Re: Disable PulseAudio flat volumes to prevent it from pushing volume level to max

On Mon, 2015-09-21 at 17:46 -0700, Thomas Daede wrote: > In the case of Youtube, you shouldn't be having any issues because > Mozilla switched to using a soft mixer internal to Firefox: > > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1046814 > > If you still have issues, you should report them

Re: Disable PulseAudio flat volumes to prevent it from pushing volume level to max

Thomas Daede wrote: > Um, that bug looks totally unrelated to the problems reported here. It was referenced in the first post of this thread. :) -- Rex > On 09/21/2015 06:51 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: >> Rex Dieter wrote: >> >>> Germano Massullo wrote: >>> Il 21/09/2015 21:45, Thomas Daede ha

Re: Disable PulseAudio flat volumes to prevent it from pushing volume level to max

hi I don't know, but if there's not, I'll go file one and post the link here. Thanks Kendell clark On 09/21/2015 02:45 PM, Thomas Daede wrote: > Is there currently a bug open for this? I'd rather it not get lost. > > On 09/17/2015 11:59 AM, Germano Massullo wrote: >> === >> Definition of

Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2015-09-21)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Re: Disable PulseAudio flat volumes to prevent it from pushing volume level to max

hi Yup, I've seen all these use cases. TBH, this really should be handled in pulse audio. IE this isn't so much a problem of gnome, although I do agree taht they should make app volumes easier to set, as it is a pulse audio problem. Pulse audio should be smart enough to handle such use cases and

Orphaned Packages in branched (2015-09-21)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Re: llvm 3.7 for rawhide and then f23

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 6:00 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: > > Given that we are now post-Beta for F23, it seems a little late in the > > cycle to be introducing a new llvm runtime. Is it guaranteed to be > > backwards-compatible? > > OTOH, having OpenGL 4 support in Fedora 23 (at

Re: Disable PulseAudio flat volumes to prevent it from pushing volume level to max

> Today I had a scary experience with the audio of my computer. > I was listening to music with Amarok, using my headphones... The KMix volume > level was ~ 35%. When I logged into a video conference application, the > volume suddenly reached the 100%. I was shocked, having the maximum audio >

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

Florian Weimer writes: > I think it is important to keep the LD_PRELOAD case separate from > implicit interposition between the main program (if linked with -E) and > DSOs or between different DSOs. LD_PRELOAD is quite explicit in what it > wants to do. OK. (I probably

Re: Trying to contact package maintainer for boinc-client

The actual BOINC working mantainer is Mattia Verga -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

rawhide report: 20150921 changes

Compose started at Mon Sep 21 05:15:04 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [IQmol] IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0 [Macaulay2]

Re: DNF's CI moved to Copr

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Radek Holy wrote: > Hello, > > thanks to the Copr's new ability to upload SRPMs directly, we have improved > DNF's continuous integration process a lot. If you are interested in how we > do that or if you would like to use/test our nightly

Re: Self Introduction: Marco Driusso

hi welcome regards gil Il 20/09/2015 20:45, Marco Driusso ha scritto: Hi all, I'm Marco Driusso. I'm a PhD student in communications engineering in University of Trieste, north east of Italy. I've just sent a review request for a package of IT++, a nice C++ library widely used in research

Re: Self Introduction: David Muse

hi welcome regards gil Il 10/09/2015 20:03, David Muse ha scritto: Hello all, My name is David Muse. I'm the lead developer of the SQL Relay database connection management system (http://sqlrelay.sourceforge.net) as well as several other software projects (http://www.firstworks.com). I've

Re: Self Introduction: Marco Driusso

On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Marco Driusso wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm Marco Driusso. I'm a PhD student in communications engineering in > University of Trieste, north east of Italy. > Welcome! > > I've just sent a review request for a package of IT++, a nice C++

GNOME 3.18.0 megaupdate

Hi all, GNOME 3.18.0 is going to be released this week and I'll be wrangling the builds for Fedora. Same as with the pre-releases we've built so far, we are still using the f23-gnome side tag in koji for preparing everything. If you are helping with builds, please use: $ fedpkg build --target

Re: redhat bugzilla probs

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Hi, > > When trying to file a BZ, bugzilla just greeter me with this: > > > Proxy Error > > The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server. > The proxy server could not handle the request POST

Trying to contact package maintainer for boinc-client

Hi, As stated in the policy for non-responsive package maintainers, I am emailing this list to find out if anyone knows how to contact the package maintainer (Miloš Jakubíček) for the boinc-client? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1140826 Various people have tired but so far not

F-23 Branched report: 20150921 changes

Compose started at Mon Sep 21 07:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for armhfp -- [apache-scout] apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:uddi-ws) apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires

DNF's CI moved to Copr

Hello, thanks to the Copr's new ability to upload SRPMs directly, we have improved DNF's continuous integration process a lot. If you are interested in how we do that or if you would like to use/test our nightly builds [1], take a look at http://dnf.baseurl.org/2015/09/21/ci-moved-to-copr/ or

redhat bugzilla probs

Hi, When trying to file a BZ, bugzilla just greeter me with this: Proxy Error The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server. The proxy server could not handle the request POST /post_bug.cgi. Reason: Error reading from remote server Apache Server at

Re: Disable PulseAudio flat volumes to prevent it from pushing volume level to max

On Mon, 21 Sep 2015, Owen Taylor wrote: Experimenting with GNOME, the model presented to the user seems to be:  - Each application's volume control separate goes from 0-100% of the    maximum system volume.   - Adjusting each application is independent  - Modifying the system global volume

OpenMesh soname bump in rawhide

Hi, I'm updating OpenMesh in rawhide to version 4.1, which bumps the soname. Only IQmol seems to use OpenMesh, which I'm rebuilding soon after. -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

grub2 wiki page

Can someone double check this before I make the change? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GRUB_2 1. Under "Install the bootloader files" grub2-efi-modules shouldn't be listed. An unsuspecting user who then uses grub2-install as they once did on BIOS systems will blow away the signed grubx64.efi

Re: Disable PulseAudio flat volumes to prevent it from pushing volume level to max

Germano Massullo wrote: > Il 21/09/2015 21:45, Thomas Daede ha scritto: >> Is there currently a bug open for this? I'd rather it not get lost. > I think that a FESCo ticket would be more appropriate. I think it would be premature to appeal to FESCo without giving pulseaudio maintainers a chance

Re: Disable PulseAudio flat volumes to prevent it from pushing volume level to max

Um, that bug looks totally unrelated to the problems reported here. On 09/21/2015 06:51 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: > Rex Dieter wrote: > >> Germano Massullo wrote: >> >>> Il 21/09/2015 21:45, Thomas Daede ha scritto: Is there currently a bug open for this? I'd rather it not get lost. >>> I think

Re: Disable PulseAudio flat volumes to prevent it from pushing volume level to max

hi Not to go off topic, but I keep hearing comparisons between linux and windows in this regard. I haven't used windows in ages, but how does windows avoid this problem, or does it? Maybe we could do something similar to what they do? I still say pulse audio needs to fix this, and keep it fixed.

Re: Disable PulseAudio flat volumes to prevent it from pushing volume level to max

On Mon, 2015-09-21 at 18:00 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote: > There is danger to the ears if an application assumes that 100% > volume > is a safe volume and blindly sets its volume to 100% without user > input. But that only affects that application - one application's > misbehavior never affects

Re: Disable PulseAudio flat volumes to prevent it from pushing volume level to max

In the case of Youtube, you shouldn't be having any issues because Mozilla switched to using a soft mixer internal to Firefox: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1046814 If you still have issues, you should report them upstream. (note that this means all website volume sliders are

Re: Fedora 23 cloud image (and, for that matter, minimal anything) bloat

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 03:39:46PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: >> It's worth pointing out that your griping about grub2 "growth" seems >> misleading. The sizes of the grub2 packages did not change between >> F22 and

Re: Disable PulseAudio flat volumes to prevent it from pushing volume level to max

On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 23:26 +0200, Germano Massullo wrote: > Il 17/09/2015 21:13, Andrew Lutomirski ha scritto: > > > > To clarify: did you get blasted by music or by video conference > > sounds?  If the music volume got louder, then it sounds like either > > a > > straight-up bug in PulseAudio

Re: Disable PulseAudio flat volumes to prevent it from pushing volume level to max

OK, here's a couple of counterexamples, still using default apps: - I start chatting on Firefox with WebRTC and I can't hear the person talking over my music. So I open the GNOME control center and make Firefox louder. Pulseaudio is awesome. But now, the volume of all of my other applications is

Re: grub2 wiki page

On Mon, 2015-09-21 at 19:20 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > 2. Also under "install the bootloader files" it lists the shim > package, but this should be shim-signed in order to include the > shim.efi that's been signed by the Microsoft signing service. The shim > package only contains an unsigned

Re: [Test-Announce] Cloud Atomic Test Day: 2015-09-22 - CORRECTION: #atomic not #fedora-test-day

On Sun, 2015-09-20 at 22:18 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! Just to let everyone know, we have another Test Day coming > up on Tuesday 2015-09-22, Cloud Atomic Test Day [1]. The wiki page > isn't up yet but should be soon. This will be a combined event with > the fine folks over at

Re: Fedora 23 cloud image (and, for that matter, minimal anything) bloat

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 05:11:24PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > >5423400 xkeyboard-config # really looks like a systemd dep chain > >involving plymouth > plymouth luckily is no hard dependency for anything "Involving plymouth" might have been wrong. libxkbcommon.so.0 looks like a direct

Re: Fedora 23 cloud image (and, for that matter, minimal anything) bloat

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:07:40AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > Okay, let's look on disk: > > > [f21]$ sudo du -sh * 2>/dev/null|sort -h > [...] > 36K home > 40K root > 228Krun > 21M boot > 22M etc > 34M var > 276Musr I find that KDE filelight (also GNOME

[POC-change] Fedora packages point of contact updates

Change in package status over the last 168 hours 5 packages were orphaned prototype [f23, f22, f21, master, el6, epel7, el5] was orphaned by remi JavaScript framework

Re: Kernel model convert to loadable module

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 01:16:10PM +0200, Anteja Vuk Macek wrote: > Hi, > I work with Timesys Fedora 18 Remix and I want to convent kernel module in > loadable module ( i2c-gpio.o in i2c-gpio.ko ). What I need to do ? Hi, you generally come to wrong place with this question. First of all,

Re: Fedora 23 cloud image (and, for that matter, minimal anything) bloat

Am 21.09.2015 um 17:07 schrieb Matthew Miller: 5423400 xkeyboard-config # really looks like a systemd dep chain involving plymouth plymouth luckily is no hard dependency for anything [root@rawhide ~]# rpm -qa | grep keyboard xkeyboard-config-2.15-2.fc23.noarch [root@rawhide ~]# rpm -qa

Re: Fedora 23 cloud image (and, for that matter, minimal anything) bloat

On 21/09/15 16:07, Matthew Miller wrote: > Fedora-Cloud-Base-20141203-21.x86_64.qcow2: 151M > Fedora-Cloud-Base-23_Beta-20150915.x86_64.qcow2: 275M > > In just one year — 82% more awesome? > > I'd really like this to stay below 200MB as a competitive threshold. > Or, if we're going to

[Test-Announce] 2015-09-21 @ 1600 UTC ** [Moved] F23 Blocker Review

Well, it appears that Bugzilla is currently experiencing some issues, so we had to move today's blocker review to tomorrow. Providing that Bugzilla is up and working by 1600 UTC tomorrow (2015-09-22), we'll be having the blocker review then. Thanks! -- // Mike -- Fedora QA freenode: roshi

Re: redhat bugzilla probs

People are already looking into it. Standby On Mon 21 Sep 2015 03:49:03 PM CEST Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> When trying to file a BZ, bugzilla just greeter me with this: >> >> >> Proxy Error >> >> The

Fedora 23 cloud image (and, for that matter, minimal anything) bloat

Fedora-Cloud-Base-20141203-21.x86_64.qcow2: 151M Fedora-Cloud-Base-23_Beta-20150915.x86_64.qcow2: 275M In just one year — 82% more awesome? I'd really like this to stay below 200MB as a competitive threshold. Or, if we're going to be bigger than that, be bigger for REASONS, not just

jplesnik uploaded Devel-Cover-1.21.tar.gz for perl-Devel-Cover

c747fe984f7e945a4cbe11ad727ebc52 Devel-Cover-1.21.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Devel-Cover/Devel-Cover-1.21.tar.gz/md5/c747fe984f7e945a4cbe11ad727ebc52/Devel-Cover-1.21.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl

Re: llvm 3.7 for rawhide and then f23

> Given that we are now post-Beta for F23, it seems a little late in the > cycle to be introducing a new llvm runtime. Is it guaranteed to be > backwards-compatible? OTOH, having OpenGL 4 support in Fedora 23 (at least for certain cards) is a strong marketing point. Personally I'm very much

Re: Fedora 23 cloud image (and, for that matter, minimal anything) bloat

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 03:39:46PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > It's worth pointing out that your griping about grub2 "growth" seems > misleading. The sizes of the grub2 packages did not change between > F22 and F23. What seems to have happened is that the cloud images > added the grub2 packages,

Fedora Rawhide 20150921 compose check report

No missing expected images. Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20150920: Cloud_atomic vagrant virtualbox x86_64 Cloud_atomic vagrant libvirt x86_64 No images in Rawhide 20150920 but not this. Failed openQA tests: 49 of 52 ID: 3225Test: x86_64 universal server_btrfs ID: 3223

Re: Disable PulseAudio flat volumes to prevent it from pushing volume level to max

Is there currently a bug open for this? I'd rather it not get lost. On 09/17/2015 11:59 AM, Germano Massullo wrote: > === > Definition of flat-volumes from [1] : it scales the device-volume with > the volume of the "loudest" application. For example, raising the VoIP > call volume will raise

Re: Disable PulseAudio flat volumes to prevent it from pushing volume level to max

Il 21/09/2015 21:45, Thomas Daede ha scritto: > Is there currently a bug open for this? I'd rather it not get lost. I think that a FESCo ticket would be more appropriate. I will open it during next days. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Kernel model convert to loadable module

Hi, I work with Timesys Fedora 18 Remix and I want to convent kernel module in loadable module ( i2c-gpio.o in i2c-gpio.ko ). What I need to do ? Best regards, Teja -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of

Re: llvm 3.7 for rawhide and then f23

On Sun, 2015-09-20 at 21:00 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > On 9/20/15, David Airlie wrote: > > It's llvm, there is never a good time to upgrade it and no llvm release is > > backwards compatible. > > Yes, so unless someone is pretty familiar with LLVM upstream, keep >

Re: Fedora 23 cloud image (and, for that matter, minimal anything) bloat

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > Fedora-Cloud-Base-20141203-21.x86_64.qcow2: 151M > Fedora-Cloud-Base-23_Beta-20150915.x86_64.qcow2: 275M > > In just one year — 82% more awesome? > > I'd really like this to stay below 200MB as a

Fedora 23 Branched 20150921 compose check report

No missing expected images. No images in this compose but not 23 Branched 20150920 No images in 23 Branched 20150920 but not this. Failed openQA tests: 8 of 52 ID: 3219Test: x86_64 kde_live default_install ID: 3218Test: i386 kde_live default_install ID: 3208Test: i386

Re: Fedora Rawhide glibc-2.22.90-6.fc24 shipping C.UTF-8 locale.

Hello Carlos, Thank you very much for such an advancement. This feature will allow any software to fallback on a fully internationalized locale. -- Clément David A non ASCII user Le 18 sept. 2015 07:06, "Carlos O'Donell" a écrit : > Thanks to some great work by Mike FABIAN

[Bug 1264745] New: perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom-1.15-6.fc24 FTBFS: t/main.t tests fail

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264745 Bug ID: 1264745 Summary: perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom-1.15-6.fc24 FTBFS: t/main.t tests fail Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom Assignee:

[Bug 1264752] New: perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-25.1.fc24 FTBFS: Statgrab.xs:85:14: error: too few arguments to function 'sg_get_host_info'

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264752 Bug ID: 1264752 Summary: perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-25.1.fc24 FTBFS: Statgrab.xs:85:14: error: too few arguments to function 'sg_get_host_info' Product: Fedora

ppisar uploaded Clownfish-CFC-0.4.2.tar.gz for perl-Clownfish-CFC

c1ece23ba907ee29e6ece0a0e6fdd86a Clownfish-CFC-0.4.2.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Clownfish-CFC/Clownfish-CFC-0.4.2.tar.gz/md5/c1ece23ba907ee29e6ece0a0e6fdd86a/Clownfish-CFC-0.4.2.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[Bug 1264741] New: perl-CSS-DOM-0.15-8.fc24 FTBFS: Can't call method "cssText" on an undefined value at t/charset.t line 144

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264741 Bug ID: 1264741 Summary: perl-CSS-DOM-0.15-8.fc24 FTBFS: Can't call method "cssText" on an undefined value at t/charset.t line 144 Product: Fedora Version:

[Bug 1264742] New: perl-Debug-Client-0.29-5.fc24 FTBFS: tests hang

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264742 Bug ID: 1264742 Summary: perl-Debug-Client-0.29-5.fc24 FTBFS: tests hang Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Debug-Client Assignee: jples...@redhat.com

ppisar pushed to perl-Clownfish-CFC (master). "Import"

From db1060fe05fd5806cf6535d8b75e81c510c46232 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 08:24:05 +0200 Subject: Import diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index e69de29..e8dd9fb 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -0,0

[Bug 1264744] New: perl-Git-Repository-1.315-1.fc24 FTBFS: t/24-errors.t fails at line 205: doesn't match '(?^:^fatal: bad default revision 'HEAD' )'

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264744 Bug ID: 1264744 Summary: perl-Git-Repository-1.315-1.fc24 FTBFS: t/24-errors.t fails at line 205: doesn't match '(?^:^fatal: bad default revision 'HEAD' )' Product: Fedora

[Bug 1264751] New: perl-Net-DNS-1.01-2.fc24 FTBFS in mock: sign_sig0: unexpected Net::DNS::RR argument at t/04-packet.t line 198.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264751 Bug ID: 1264751 Summary: perl-Net-DNS-1.01-2.fc24 FTBFS in mock: sign_sig0: unexpected Net::DNS::RR argument at t/04-packet.t line 198. Product: Fedora Version:

[Bug 1180496] perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.109 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180496 Petr Šabata changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

[Bug 1264752] perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-25.1.fc24 FTBFS: Statgrab.xs:85:14: error: too few arguments to function 'sg_get_host_info'

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264752 Petr Šabata changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1264882] perl-Event-RPC-1.07 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264882 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Event-RPC-1.06-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-16386 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1264882] perl-Event-RPC-1.07 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264882 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Event-RPC-1.06-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 21. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-16387 -- You are receiving this mail

corsepiu pushed to perl-Log-Dispatch (f21). "Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/f22' into f21"

From 303ab34f6c6bc9b41a864401bd2aac0b2a4d5502 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ralf=20Cors=C3=A9pius?= Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 17:21:52 +0200 Subject: Update to 2.51. - Add BR: perl(CPAN::Meta). diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index d2ee304..33e1ccb

corsepiu pushed to perl-Log-Dispatch (f21). "Update to 2.51. (..more)"

From 303ab34f6c6bc9b41a864401bd2aac0b2a4d5502 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ralf=20Cors=C3=A9pius?= Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 17:21:52 +0200 Subject: Update to 2.51. - Add BR: perl(CPAN::Meta). diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index d2ee304..33e1ccb

[Bug 1264885] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20150920 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264885 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-CoreList-5.20150920-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-16388 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1262578] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20150912 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262578 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-CoreList-5.20150920-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-16389 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1256166] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20150820 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256166 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-CoreList-5.20150920-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-16389 -- You are receiving

[Bug 1264885] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20150920 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264885 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-CoreList-5.20150920-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-16389 -- You are receiving this

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-Socket-SSL (perl-IO-Socket-SSL-2.020-1.fc24). "Update to 2.020 (..more)"

From 1b76ff56a26e24bad6b34ce5f39850f727c38bdb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 10:56:58 +0100 Subject: Update to 2.020 - New upstream release 2.020 - Support multiple directories in SSL_ca_path (CPAN RT#106711); directories can be given

[Bug 1259716] perl-WebService-Rajce-1.152450 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259716 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-WebService-Rajce-1.15.2450-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You

[Bug 1259340] perl-Iterator-Simple-Lookahead missing on fc23

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259340 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Iterator-Simple-0.06-1.fc23, perl-Iterator-Simple-Lookahead-0.07-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make

[Bug 1259340] perl-Iterator-Simple-Lookahead missing on fc23

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259340 Bug 1259340 depends on bug 1259338, which changed state. Bug 1259338 Summary: perl-Iterator-Simple missing on fc23 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259338 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1259338] perl-Iterator-Simple missing on fc23

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259338 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1261677] perl-HTTP-Message-6.11 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261677 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- perl-HTTP-Message-6.11-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1261677] perl-HTTP-Message-6.11 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261677 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1259338] perl-Iterator-Simple missing on fc23

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259338 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Iterator-Simple-0.06-1.fc23, perl-Iterator-Simple-Lookahead-0.07-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make

[Bug 1258289] perl-WebService-Rajce-1.152420 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258289 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1259716] perl-WebService-Rajce-1.152450 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259716 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1230790] Upgrade perl-Proc-ProcessTable to 0.51

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230790 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Proc-ProcessTable-0.53-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1258289] perl-WebService-Rajce-1.152420 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258289 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- perl-WebService-Rajce-1.15.2450-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You

[Bug 1230790] Upgrade perl-Proc-ProcessTable to 0.51

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230790 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[EPEL-devel] Orphaned Packages in epel5 (2015-09-21)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

[EPEL-devel] Orphaned Packages in epel6 (2015-09-21)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Orphaned Packages in branched (2015-09-21)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

[Bug 1264751] perl-Net-DNS-1.01-2.fc24 FTBFS in mock: sign_sig0: unexpected Net::DNS::RR argument at t/04-packet.t line 198.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264751 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1264874] perl-DateTime-Format-Duration-1.04 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264874 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DateTime-Format-Duration-1.04-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-16328 -- You are receiving

Broken dependencies: polymake

polymake has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree: On x86_64: polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2) polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires perl = 4:5.20.2 polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires

Broken dependencies: perl-Devel-BeginLift

perl-Devel-BeginLift has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree: On x86_64: perl-Devel-BeginLift-0.001003-9.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-Devel-BeginLift-0.001003-9.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit) On i386:

Broken dependencies: perl-POE-API-Peek

perl-POE-API-Peek has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree: On x86_64: 1:perl-POE-API-Peek-2.20-8.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) On i386: 1:perl-POE-API-Peek-2.20-8.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) On armhfp:

[Bug 1263486] perl-Encode-2.77 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263486 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Encode-2.77-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving

[EPEL-devel] Orphaned Packages in epel7 (2015-09-21)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

[Bug 1264751] perl-Net-DNS-1.01-2.fc24 FTBFS in mock: sign_sig0: unexpected Net::DNS::RR argument at t/04-packet.t line 198.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264751 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar --- The difference in build root is caused by wrong dependency list on perl.spec's perl-Pod-Perldoc subpackage. I will correct it in perl.spec. Yet I need to figure out why the test fails

ppisar uploaded DateTime-Format-Duration-1.04.tar.gz for perl-DateTime-Format-Duration

34298bc24aee006aaae862809e0e8224 DateTime-Format-Duration-1.04.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-DateTime-Format-Duration/DateTime-Format-Duration-1.04.tar.gz/md5/34298bc24aee006aaae862809e0e8224/DateTime-Format-Duration-1.04.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[Bug 1264874] perl-DateTime-Format-Duration-1.04 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264874 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

[Bug 1264878] New: perl-Email-Address-1.908 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264878 Bug ID: 1264878 Summary: perl-Email-Address-1.908 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Email-Address Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1264878] perl-Email-Address-1.908 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264878 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Failed to kick off scratch build. cmd: sha256sum /var/tmp/thn-BnjWg0/100.0% return code: 1 stdout: stderr: sha256sum:

  1   2   >