Re: Variable expansion in COPR external URL?

Dne 17.10.2015 v 23:55 Dave Johansen napsal(a): > How can I do a variable expansion that doesn't have - before and after? I > tried "slc${releasever}X" [1] and > "slc$releaseverX" [2] but neither worked. > Thanks, > Dave > > [1]: >

Re: New package request

Dne 19.10.2015 v 12:53 Marek Skalický napsal(a): > Hello everyone, > does someone know how the "Request new package" in pkgdb works? > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageDB_admin_requests )- for 6 days I > have status of this request "Approved", but I can't do fedpkg clone... > What is wrong?

Re: Unresponsive maintainer and unupdated package

You have to go through this process: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers I just filed a ticket to FESCo: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1492 - Original Message - > From: "Chaoyi Zha" > To: "Development

Re: Unresponsive maintainer and unupdated package

Hi Chaoyi, On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Chaoyi Zha wrote: > Node.js v0.12 has since become outdated. The page about updating it to 0.12 > for F23 is likely outdated as well by now. We may want to create a new page > if it is needed. > > Here is the latest "LTS"

Re: New package request

On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:53:39 +0200 Marek Skalický wrote: > Hello everyone, > does someone know how the "Request new package" in pkgdb works? > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageDB_admin_requests )- for 6 > days I have status of this request "Approved", but I can't do

New package request

Hello everyone, does someone know how the "Request new package" in pkgdb works? (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageDB_admin_requests )- for 6 days I have status of this request "Approved", but I can't do fedpkg clone... What is wrong? What next step I should do? Thanks, Marek -- devel

Re: Recommended way of proposing changes in someone else Fedora packages configuration

On 2015-10-19, Kevin Kofler wrote: > 1. git clone … > 2. commit your changes > 3. git format-patch > 4. attach to Bugzilla > The 3rd and 4th step can be simplified to "git send-bugzilla" command. Although I think it can attach a patch only to already existing bug report.

Fedora 23 Go/No-Go Meeting on Thursday, October 22nd, 4PM (UTC)

Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this important meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 23. The meeting is scheduled at 4PM (UTC). Please follow the [FedoCal] link to find the time of the meeting in your time-zone. [FedoCal]

Unresponsive maintainer: patches <tchollingswo...@gmail.com>

Hi, As per the Policy for nonresponsive package maintainers: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers I am writing here to ask you, if any of you know how to get in contact with T.C. Hollingsworth? It appears he has been inactive for +6 months and I to

Re: Unresponsive maintainer and unupdated package

On 19/10/15 12:22, Chaoyi Zha wrote: I think someone else has also recently e-mailed about this unresponsive maintainer, "patches". I am looking to update one of his packages, "nodejs" It is currently at version 0.10 in our PkgDB but the current version is 4.2.1 I would be happy to update

Re: Unresponsive maintainer and unupdated package

Ah, there is a Node.js list? I'll look into it and see if anything is going on over there. On Mon, Oct 19, 2015, 7:32 AM Tom Hughes wrote: > On 19/10/15 12:22, Chaoyi Zha wrote: > > > I think someone else has also recently e-mailed about this unresponsive > > maintainer,

rawhide report: 20151019 changes

Compose started at Mon Oct 19 05:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [IQmol] IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0

Unresponsive maintainer and unupdated package

Hi, I think someone else has also recently e-mailed about this unresponsive maintainer, "patches". I am looking to update one of his packages, "nodejs" It is currently at version 0.10 in our PkgDB but the current version is 4.2.1 I would be happy to update and maintain this package, but I do

Re: Unresponsive maintainer and unupdated package

Node.js v0.12 has since become outdated. The page about updating it to 0.12 for F23 is likely outdated as well by now. We may want to create a new page if it is needed. Here is the latest "LTS" release: https://nodejs.org/en/blog/release/v4.2.1/ On Mon, Oct 19, 2015, 7:32 AM Chaoyi Zha

F-23 Branched report: 20151019 changes

Compose started at Mon Oct 19 07:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for armhfp -- [openstack-swift] openstack-swift-2.3.0-2.fc23.noarch requires python-pyeclib Broken deps for i386 --

Re: Unresponsive maintainer and unupdated package

On 19/10/15 12:33, Chaoyi Zha wrote: Ah, there is a Node.js list? I'll look into it and see if anything is going on over there. There is, yes: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/nodejs Tom -- Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) http://compton.nu/ -- devel mailing list

Re: Ownership of /usr/lib/rpm/fileattrs

On 2015-10-16, Orion Poplawski wrote: > only rpm-mpi-hooks requires rpm-build for directory ownership, while > javapackages-tools takes the route of owning the directory. However, I'd > rather rpm-mpi-hooks not require rpm-build as it's not really necessary other > than for

Re: Ownership of /usr/lib/rpm/fileattrs

On 2015-10-19, Petr Pisar wrote: > One can perceive the package packages as rpm-build plugins. Having the > dependency on rpm-build does not look wrong in the end. > One must perceive the scripts as rpm-build plugins because they are installed into rpm-build's package

Re: Recommended way of proposing changes in someone else Fedora packages configuration

On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 21:12:42 -0400 Neal Gompa wrote: > ​Perhaps GitLab might be more appealing, since it is a FOSS service > and it could be brought in-house relatively easily?​ Not really. There was an effort started I think in 2012 or 2013 to package it...

Re: ansible in Fedora 23+ (python3)

On Mon, 19 Oct 2015, at 01:33, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Dusty Mabe wrote: > > Does anyone have a good solution for this? Obviously it would be nice > > if ansible went to python3 but I think they have stated clearly that > > they are sticking with python2 for backwards compat with systems that > >

Re: ansible in Fedora 23+ (python3)

2015-10-19 2:33 GMT+02:00 Kevin Kofler : > Dusty Mabe wrote: >> Does anyone have a good solution for this? Obviously it would be nice >> if ansible went to python3 but I think they have stated clearly that >> they are sticking with python2 for backwards compat with systems

Re: ansible in Fedora 23+ (python3)

On 10/19/2015 11:37 AM, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: > 2015-10-19 2:33 GMT+02:00 Kevin Kofler : >> Dusty Mabe wrote: >>> Does anyone have a good solution for this? Obviously it would be nice >>> if ansible went to python3 but I think they have stated clearly that >>> they

Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 22:03:43 +0200, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 21:14:25 +0200 Jan Kratochvil > wrote: > > > That is a Bug of Bodhi, the URLs should be more descriptive. > > (I have not filed it.) > > I thought it was filed, but I can't seem to find it

Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 15:33:38 +0200 Jan Kratochvil wrote: > There were filed and "fixed" exactly the opposite Bugs, to switch > from NVRA to the FEDORA-2015-7113eaf84e style: > RFE: use update alias/updateid instead of update title in > methods

Fedora 23 Release Readiness Meeting on Thursday, October 22nd, 6PM (UTC)

This Thursday, we will meet on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 to make sure we are coordinated and ready for the release of Fedora 23 on Tuesday, October 27, 2015. Please note that this meeting will occur even if the release is delayed at the Go/No-Go meeting on the same day two hours

[POC-change] Fedora packages point of contact updates

Change in package status over the last 168 hours 8 packages were orphaned bouncycastle-pkix [epel7] was orphaned by gil Bouncy Castle PKIX, CMS, EAC, TSP, PKCS, OCSP, CMP, and CRMF APIs

Review Request: vtable-dumper

If someone has time for a quick review I have submitted vtable-dumper: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273065 It is a new requirement from the same upstream for an existing package, abi-dumper: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/abi-dumper/ Thanks, Richard -- devel

Re: New package request

On Mon, 2015-10-19 at 06:51 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:53:39 +0200 > Marek Skalický wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > does someone know how the "Request new package" in pkgdb works? > > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageDB_admin_requests )- for 6

Re: Recommended way of proposing changes in someone else Fedora packages configuration

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Marcin Zajączkowski wrote: > I like the idea with mirroring Fedora Git to GitHub. Read only mirror > just to be a dedicated place for that kind of contributions (via pull > requests). > While I like the idea of making it easier for people to submit

Re: Review Request: vtable-dumper

On 10/19/2015 08:04 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: If someone has time for a quick review I have submitted vtable-dumper: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273065 It is a new requirement from the same upstream for an existing package, abi-dumper:

Re: Recommended way of proposing changes in someone else Fedora packages configuration

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I'd think a pagure.io like frontend would but at somewhat of a > different level than this. You would: > > * Go to the interface and create a fork of the package you want to > change. > * Clone that fork and work on it

Re: [389-devel] DSAdmin tests and basic functionality in the lib389

On 10/19/2015 10:02 AM, Simon Pichugin wrote: Hi team, I am working now on the fixing lib389 broken tests: https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48303 And it's time for dsadmin_* tests. Can anybody, please, tell me more about it? As I see, Mark and Thierry worked on it, but any other team

Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 02:45:14AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Well, we don't know for sure that those updates lost autokarma > > (Although it seems likely). It might be the maintainers pushed them > > with autokarma disabled. > > And they should have, in any case, because

Re: Ansible 2.0 in Fedora: review request for python-shade (and a copr)

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 08:35:49PM +0200, Haïkel wrote: > Under review, thanks for preparing ansible 2.0 landing :) Haïkel, I think I fixed the spec file w/r/t to your initial review comments. Cheers, -- Lars Kellogg-Stedman | larsks @ {freenode,twitter,github} Cloud

Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2015-10-19)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Re: Recommended way of proposing changes in someone else Fedora packages configuration

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:18:15AM -0400, Jeff Peeler wrote: > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > I'd think a pagure.io like frontend would but at somewhat of a > > different level than this. You would: > > > > * Go to the interface and create a fork of the

Re: Review Request: vtable-dumper

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > Taken. Perhaps you could take > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262965 ? > Got it. Thanks, Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Kernel 4.2.3-200 stability problems and mouse cursor defects...

Fedora Devel, Just wanted to get more information on a bug that bit me over the weekend. Running Fedora 22 and updated to 'kernel.x86_64 4.2.3-200.fc22'. There's no mouse cursor on the login screen at all. When logging in either on X11 or the Wayland session I repeatedly get Kernel Oops

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2015-10-19)

On 19.10.2015 17:04, opensou...@till.name wrote: [...] thinkfan orphan, madsa0 weeks ago Taken. [...] -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: ansible in Fedora 23+ (python3)

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 4:37 AM, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: > 2015-10-19 2:33 GMT+02:00 Kevin Kofler : >> Dusty Mabe wrote: >>> Does anyone have a good solution for this? Obviously it would be nice >>> if ansible went to python3 but I think they

Re: [Fedora-legal-list] tktable license clarification

> "AT" == Antonio Trande writes: AT> Probably i taken too much seriously this "type of joke", so much AT> that this issue does not deserve any answer. Well, if the license text says "you must buy me a beer of you see me" or whatever then that would render the software

Re: Announcing the release of Fedora 23 Beta!

On 10/18/2015 06:49 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote: > 2015-10-02 21:20 GMT+02:00 Gerard Ryan : >> On 10/02/2015 07:11 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote: >>> 2015-09-26 0:10 GMT+02:00 Thomas Daede : On 09/25/2015 02:18 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote: > Removed

Re: Announcing the release of Fedora 23 Beta!

2015-10-19 20:47 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald : > > > Am 19.10.2015 um 20:35 schrieb Gerard Ryan: >> >> On 10/18/2015 06:49 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote: >>> >>> I still can't upgrade, I get: >>> >>> dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=23 --distro-sync >>> dnf system-upgrade

Re: Heads Up: New pugixml coming to rawhide

2015-10-19 20:46 GMT+02:00 Richard Shaw : > In the next couple of days I'll be doing an update of pugixml in rawhide. > The affected packages seem to be: > > # repoquery --qf=%{name} --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires --source > "libpugixml.so.1()(64bit)" >

Re: Heads Up: New pugixml coming to rawhide

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > Thx for the update. > Can you verify that "long long" is enabled by default in the fedora build > (as it should per this https://github.com/zeux/pugixml/issues/53 report) > > This will help me to switch filezilla to

Re: Heads Up: New pugixml coming to rawhide

Hi! On Monday, 19 October 2015 at 20:46, Richard Shaw wrote: > In the next couple of days I'll be doing an update of pugixml in rawhide. Thanks for the heads-up. > The affected packages seem to be: > > # repoquery --qf=%{name} --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires --source >

Re: Heads Up: New pugixml coming to rawhide

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski < domi...@greysector.net> wrote: > Feel free to bump mkvtoolnix. I'm planning an update to 8.5.0, > but I don't know if I'll be able to do it in time. Is there a new > pugixml build I can test against? I probably need to go ahead

Re: Announcing the release of Fedora 23 Beta!

On 10/19/2015 07:47 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 19.10.2015 um 20:35 schrieb Gerard Ryan: >> On 10/18/2015 06:49 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote: >>> I still can't upgrade, I get: >>> >>> dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=23 --distro-sync >>> dnf system-upgrade reboot >> >> Yes, I'm in the

Re: Announcing the release of Fedora 23 Beta!

Am 19.10.2015 um 20:35 schrieb Gerard Ryan: On 10/18/2015 06:49 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote: I still can't upgrade, I get: dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=23 --distro-sync dnf system-upgrade reboot Yes, I'm in the same situation. Would you mind adding the info of what you get to the

Heads Up: New pugixml coming to rawhide

In the next couple of days I'll be doing an update of pugixml in rawhide. The affected packages seem to be: # repoquery --qf=%{name} --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires --source "libpugixml.so.1()(64bit)" OpenImageIO-1.5.20-1.fc24.src.rpm OpenImageIO-1.5.20-1.fc24.src.rpm

Fedora 23 Branched 20151019 compose check report

No missing expected images. Images in this compose but not 23 Branched 20151018: Cloud docker x86_64 Design_suite live x86_64 Design_suite live i386 No images in 23 Branched 20151018 but not this. Failed openQA tests: 9 of 52 ID: 6642Test: i386 kde_live default_install ID: 6640

Re: Recommended way of proposing changes in someone else Fedora packages configuration

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 9:42 AM Jared K. Smith wrote: > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Marcin Zajączkowski wrote: > >> I like the idea with mirroring Fedora Git to GitHub. Read only mirror >> just to be a dedicated place for that kind of contributions

Re: Unresponsive maintainer: patches <tchollingswo...@gmail.com>

2015-10-19 13:00 GMT+02:00 Viktor Jancik : > Hi, > > As per the Policy for nonresponsive package maintainers: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers > > I am writing here to ask you, if any of you know how to get in contact with > T.C.

Re: Fedora 23 Final blocker status #1

On Mon, 2015-10-19 at 17:03 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! Time for a blocker status mail - well, past time, but I > hadn't found time to do one till now. Small addendum - I've added one more proposed blocker: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273214 - spin-kickstarts

Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Seriously? When I push out an update to testing, I already have done the > tests on it in my system, and it *think* it is correct. What would be > the point of pushing out something that is known to be broken? > > The time in testing is for others to others to

Fedora 23 Final blocker status #1

Hi folks! Time for a blocker status mail - well, past time, but I hadn't found time to do one till now. Status is that Go/No-Go is on Thursday: we really need an RC1 by tomorrow in order to have sufficient testing time. Action summary: Blocker reviewers - Review: * 

Re: ansible in Fedora 23+ (python3)

Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: > Also, the problem is that RedHat still supports RHEL5 systems which > for today standards are totally legacy and therefore it has to run on > Python 2.4. The point of forking would be that the fork wouldn't have to care. Let the upstream project deal with ancient

Re: tktable license clarification

On 10/18/2015 12:55 PM, Antonio Trande wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi all, > > tktable package is newly under review; can someone clarify to me how > to identify its license? (license file attached) > > In particular, i have a doubt about these "special notes": >

Re: Un-retiring tktable package

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 10/17/2015 12:13 PM, Antonio Trande wrote: > On 10/17/2015 11:57 AM, Antonio Trande wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 >> >> Hi all, >> >> I wish take care of tktable package currently retired by Fedora. >> This package

jplesnik pushed to perl-CGI (master). "4.22 bump"

From 5528fe319902254fa8683bcdddf43b73ba007cc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 09:34:13 +0200 Subject: 4.22 bump --- perl-CGI.spec | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/perl-CGI.spec b/perl-CGI.spec

jplesnik uploaded CGI-4.22.tar.gz for perl-CGI

8289aa6f2cba9589134d517f4a25da9e CGI-4.22.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-CGI/CGI-4.22.tar.gz/md5/8289aa6f2cba9589134d517f4a25da9e/CGI-4.22.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

jplesnik pushed to perl-CGI (master). "4.22 bump"

From 3b814d5e55ee2c7cd20a2ae12a62cd84f4b3ef9b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 09:57:03 +0200 Subject: 4.22 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + sources| 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/.gitignore

jplesnik pushed to perl-HTML-Toc (f23). "Specify all dependencies"

From 957928c514eaa511d09779423caf8d9443c4e750 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 16:47:18 +0200 Subject: Specify all dependencies --- perl-HTML-Toc.spec | 30 -- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 10

[Bug 1272440] perl-CGI-4.22 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272440 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed

ppisar uploaded Coro-6.49.tar.gz for perl-Coro

0e62bcaf27e00c5ceaa4c0dbb1606fb5 Coro-6.49.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Coro/Coro-6.49.tar.gz/md5/0e62bcaf27e00c5ceaa4c0dbb1606fb5/Coro-6.49.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[Bug 1272659] perl-Coro-6.49 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272659 --- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar --- A bug-fix release suitable for Fedora >= 23. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[Bug 1272905] New: perl-DBIx-Class-0.082820-2.fc24 FTBFS: Failed test 'Deploying the bad schema produces a warning: aba_name_artists was not created.'

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272905 Bug ID: 1272905 Summary: perl-DBIx-Class-0.082820-2.fc24 FTBFS: Failed test 'Deploying the bad schema produces a warning: aba_name_artists was not created.' Product:

pghmcfc uploaded Class-C3-0.30.tar.gz for perl-Class-C3

730b4007b292190c24096ba1ef312995 Class-C3-0.30.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Class-C3/Class-C3-0.30.tar.gz/md5/730b4007b292190c24096ba1ef312995/Class-C3-0.30.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 224 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 120 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6813 chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el7 28

[Bug 1272713] perl-Config-Model-Tester-2.052 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272713 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed

Fedora 23 Go/No-Go Meeting on Thursday, October 22nd, 4PM (UTC)

Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this important meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 23. The meeting is scheduled at 4PM (UTC). Please follow the [FedoCal] link to find the time of the meeting in your time-zone. [FedoCal]

Fedora 23 Release Readiness Meeting on Thursday, October 22nd, 6PM (UTC)

This Thursday, we will meet on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 to make sure we are coordinated and ready for the release of Fedora 23 on Tuesday, October 27, 2015. Please note that this meeting will occur even if the release is delayed at the Go/No-Go meeting on the same day two hours

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Class-C3 (master). "Update to 0.30 (..more)"

From a2af758a6e0b2ebb4d40215c7bfdbb952da06731 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:26:50 +0100 Subject: Update to 0.30 - New upstream release 0.30 - Update compiler detection to use ExtUtils::HasCompiler --- perl-Class-C3.spec | 28

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Class-C3 (perl-Class-C3-0.30-1.fc24). "Update to 0.30 (..more)"

From a2af758a6e0b2ebb4d40215c7bfdbb952da06731 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:26:50 +0100 Subject: Update to 0.30 - New upstream release 0.30 - Update compiler detection to use ExtUtils::HasCompiler --- perl-Class-C3.spec | 28

jplesnik pushed to perl-v6 (master). "Filter requirements from file Perlito/Python/Prelude.pm"

From 815fdadd015aab7cb8c1ad20f70e86b18ab0a400 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 14:35:33 +0200 Subject: Filter requirements from file Perlito/Python/Prelude.pm --- perl-v6.spec | 22 +++--- 1 file changed, 19

ppisar changed ppisar's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Config-Model-Tester (f23) to 'Obsolete'

ppisar changed ppisar's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Config-Model-Tester (f23) to 'Obsolete' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Config-Model-Tester/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

ppisar created the branch 'f22' for the package 'perl-Config-Model-Tester'

ppisar created the branch 'f22' for the package 'perl-Config-Model-Tester' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Config-Model-Tester/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ppisar changed ppisar's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Config-Model-Tester (master) to 'Obsolete'

ppisar changed ppisar's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Config-Model-Tester (master) to 'Obsolete' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Config-Model-Tester/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

ppisar changed ppisar's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Config-Model-Tester (f23) to 'Obsolete'

ppisar changed ppisar's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Config-Model-Tester (f23) to 'Obsolete' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Config-Model-Tester/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

ppisar changed ppisar's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Config-Model-Tester (master) to 'Obsolete'

ppisar changed ppisar's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Config-Model-Tester (master) to 'Obsolete' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Config-Model-Tester/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

ppisar pushed to ctstream (f21). "Version 24 bump"

From cead58396cb0877903d13767a91fb7081654ab9c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:33:31 +0200 Subject: Version 24 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + ctstream.spec | 6 +- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 7

ppisar pushed to ctstream (f22). "Version 24 bump"

From cead58396cb0877903d13767a91fb7081654ab9c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:33:31 +0200 Subject: Version 24 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + ctstream.spec | 6 +- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 7

[Bug 1272796] ctstream-24 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272796 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- ctstream-24-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5aae57af0b -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 1272905] perl-DBIx-Class-0.082820-2.fc24 FTBFS: Failed test 'Deploying the bad schema produces a warning: aba_name_artists was not created.'

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272905 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||CPAN 107852 -- You

[Bug 1272659] perl-Coro-6.49 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272659 --- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- ppisar's perl-Coro-6.49-1.fc24 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=692776 -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 1272659] perl-Coro-6.49 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272659 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

ppisar set the monitor flag of perl-CGI-Compile to nobuild

ppisar set the monitor flag of perl-CGI-Compile to nobuild -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

ppisar uploaded ctstream-24 for ctstream

a86368a7c474feb4ca9d5799d0b35c17 ctstream-24 http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/ctstream/ctstream-24/md5/a86368a7c474feb4ca9d5799d0b35c17/ctstream-24 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[Bug 1272796] ctstream-24 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272796 --- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar --- Bug fix release suitable for all distributions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[Bug 1272796] ctstream-24 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272796 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

[Bug 1272796] ctstream-24 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272796 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- ctstream-24-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-143e8437eb -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1272796] ctstream-24 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272796 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- ctstream-24-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-ed16d78bda -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 1272796] ctstream-24 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272796 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- ctstream-24-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 21. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-8a511d69ca -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 1272905] perl-DBIx-Class-0.082820-2.fc24 FTBFS: Failed test 'Deploying the bad schema produces a warning: aba_name_artists was not created.'

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272905 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment

ppisar pushed to perl-Coro (master). "6.49 bump"

From 14a2142e34ce5026db4b843f8de66e9a6c7c07e8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:09:42 +0200 Subject: 6.49 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Coro.spec | 6 +- sources| 2 +- 3 files changed, 7

ppisar pushed to perl-Coro (f23). "6.49 bump"

From 14a2142e34ce5026db4b843f8de66e9a6c7c07e8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:09:42 +0200 Subject: 6.49 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Coro.spec | 6 +- sources| 2 +- 3 files changed, 7

ppisar pushed to ctstream (epel7). "Version 24 bump"

From 3525e741be7d4dc0eb816b396fe491cf5ffd5a3c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:33:31 +0200 Subject: Version 24 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + ctstream.spec | 6 +- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 7

[Bug 1272796] ctstream-24 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272796 --- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- ppisar's ctstream-24-1.fc24 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=692781 -- You are receiving this mail because:

jplesnik pushed to perl-Config-Model-Tester (master). "2.052 bump"

From edbe7462b2aa5639f4c6be71eba32a2670dc88a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:08:45 +0200 Subject: 2.052 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Config-Model-Tester.spec | 7 +-- sources | 2 +-

ppisar pushed to ctstream (master). "Version 24 bump"

From 2f1561a66e9b4f645f1848cc8c7037b3db90eced Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:33:31 +0200 Subject: Version 24 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + ctstream.spec | 8 ++-- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 8

  1   2   >