Re: F24 System Wide Change: Layered Docker Image Build Service

On 03.12.2015 15:40, Adam Miller wrote: > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 8:12 AM, Tomas Hozza wrote: > > On 03.12.2015 14:54, Jan Kurik wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Tomas Hozza wrote: > >>> On 03.12.2015 11:40, Jan Kurik wrote: > = Proposed

Re: Updating cppformat in Rawhide?

On 12/03/2015 09:57 PM, Dave Johansen wrote: > My hope was to maintain source compatibility and not binary > compatibility. For example, the header file moved from: > /usr/include/format.h > to: > /usr/include/cppformat/cppformat.h > > I was planning on updating the stable release with a symlink

Re: Let's Encrypt for F23?

On 4 December 2015 at 07:57, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 09:58:15PM +, Christopher wrote: > > I see a couple of the Let's Encrypt dependencies (like python-acme) are > > working their way in to rawhide, but not yet in F23. I also don't yet > see a > >

rawhide report: 20151204 changes

Compose started at Fri Dec 4 05:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [IQmol] IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0

[Test-Announce]Fedora 24 Rawhide 20151204 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 24 Rawhide 20151204. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: Updating cppformat in Rawhide?

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 7:24 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 03/12/15 13:57 -0700, Dave Johansen wrote: > >> My hope was to maintain source compatibility and not binary compatibility. >> For example, the header file moved from: >> /usr/include/format.h >> to: >>

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

On Tue, 01.12.15 11:15, Tomas Hozza (tho...@redhat.com) wrote: > You are not mistaken. > > This is the third time, because previously we rather moved the change to the > next Fedora to bring better user experience. Every time there was something > enhanced, since we learned a lot about user

Fedora Rawhide 20151204 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud disk raw i386 Cloud disk raw x86_64 Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64 Kde live i386 Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151203: Xfce live i386 Images in Rawhide 20151203 but not this: Kde live i386 Lxde live i386 Scientific_kde live i386 Scientific_kde live

Re: DNF could improve messages about package auto-removal

Hi, On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 04:13:56PM -0500, James Antill wrote: > That helps, but then what? The user understands (s)he now has to find > out how to fix it, and they have two options: > > 1) Some magic command to mark some/all of the unused deps. as used, > and repeat as necessary the

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

> is deployed in probably half of the homes in Germany... Also I am > pretty sure other routers form other manufacturers do the same > thing. Now, if we default to DNSSEC validation soon, does this mean Same for Vodafone Routers in Germany: I go to http://easy.box to configure my router. -- devel

Re: Let's Encrypt for F23?

On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 05:16:19AM +, James Hogarth wrote: > It might be that 3 is backwards compatible - I haven't checked the methods > and the interfaces yet. Just checked, and it's documented to be _mostly_ compatible but with a few changes. See

Re: Updating cppformat in Rawhide?

On 03/12/15 13:57 -0700, Dave Johansen wrote: My hope was to maintain source compatibility and not binary compatibility. For example, the header file moved from: /usr/include/format.h to: /usr/include/cppformat/cppformat.h I was planning on updating the stable release with a symlink at:

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Layered Docker Image Build Service

On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 09:45:11AM +0100, Tomas Hozza wrote: > Would regular Fedora contributors be able to create and build Layered > Docker images using OSBS? Or will this be usable only for the official > images produced as part of Fedora Products? > > E.g. if I think it would be beneficial to

Re: Scalability of FE-DEADREVIEW

On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 07:25:41AM +, James Hogarth wrote: > So with my little one keeping me up all night I figured I could at least be > a little productive. > > It turns out we have just under 1000 bugs against package review in the NEW > state. > > Now if even just half of these don't

Re: Let's Encrypt for F23?

On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 09:18:32AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 05:16:19AM +, James Hogarth wrote: > > It might be that 3 is backwards compatible - I haven't checked the methods > > and the interfaces yet. > > Just checked, and it's documented to be _mostly_

Re: Scalability of FE-DEADREVIEW

You all may also be interested in: https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ which is what I use at least when looking for reviews. The ones you are talking about are mostly in the 'hidden' section I would think (ie, have a whiteboard note as 'notready') kevin pgpwl2knCZJW1.pgp

Re: Can Koji handle a soname change and a self-dependency?

On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 15:46:26 +0100 Björn Persson wrote: > So the L source package shall temporarily contain two versions of the > source tarball and build them both, and then install one as usual and > extract only the binary library from the other? That would

Re: DNF could improve messages about package auto-removal

On Fri, 2015-12-04 at 15:55 +0100, David Tardon wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 04:13:56PM -0500, James Antill wrote: > > That helps, but then what? The user understands (s)he now has to find > > out how to fix it, and they have two options: > > > > 1) Some magic command to mark

Re: DNF could improve messages about package auto-removal

> If the package yumdb entry (now dnfdb) says it was installed as a > dependency This is the part I assumed was there. Is there a separate dnf command to list all installed-as-dependencies that nothing depends on any more? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora Rawhide 20151204 compose check report

On Fri, 2015-12-04 at 10:03 -0500, Fedora compose checker wrote: > > Failed openQA tests: 43 of 47 freetype 2.6.2 landed in Rawhide, and completely changed font rendering, so I got to spend another fun morning re-taking screenshots. In more exciting news, the public deployments of openqa -

Re: Scalability of FE-DEADREVIEW

On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 10:06:45AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > You all may also be interested in: > > https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ I'm a big fan of this web page :) > which is what I use at least when looking for reviews. > > The ones you are talking about are mostly in the

Re: DNF could improve messages about package auto-removal

> > 1) Some magic command to run after remove to remove the now unneeded > > cruft. > > The vast majority of users don't care about saving that $0.0001 of disk > space, so never need or want to run this and don't. One would hope (assume?) that there's something to keep dnf from thinking I no

Re: DNF could improve messages about package auto-removal

On Fri, 2015-12-04 at 15:23 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote: > > > 1) Some magic command to run after remove to remove the now unneeded > > > cruft. > > > > The vast majority of users don't care about saving that $0.0001 of disk > > space, so never need or want to run this and don't. > > One would hope

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

And some German Cable-ISP uses kabel.box across all their CPE devices. Am 04.12.2015 16:09 schrieb Timotheus Pokorra : > > > is deployed in probably half of the homes in Germany... Also I am > > pretty sure other routers form other manufacturers do the same

ntl soname bump

I'm updating Rawhide to ntl 9.6.2, which involves an soname bump. I will rebuild all affected packages in Rawhide. I have already rebuilt all of them in my local mock, so I'm confident there will be no problems on x86_64. [1] Note that multiple packages in the dependency chain take several

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

On Fri, 2015-12-04 at 16:09 +0100, Timotheus Pokorra wrote: > > is deployed in probably half of the homes in Germany... Also I am > > pretty sure other routers form other manufacturers do the same > > thing. Now, if we default to DNSSEC validation soon, does this mean > > Same for Vodafone

Re: DNF could improve messages about package auto-removal

On Fri, 2015-12-04 at 15:43 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote: > > If the package yumdb entry (now dnfdb) says it was installed as a > > dependency > > This is the part I assumed was there. > > Is there a separate dnf command to list all installed-as-dependencies > that nothing depends on any more? You

Re: DNF could improve messages about package auto-removal

On 12/04/2015 02:54 PM, James Antill wrote: > and save considerable percent of time during >subsequent updates. The things removed (correctly) are the smallest leaf nodes, I am confused here---how does dnf distinguish leaf nodes that used to be a dependency, and are no longer needed because

Re: DNF could improve messages about package auto-removal

On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 02:54:44PM -0500, James Antill wrote: > On Fri, 2015-12-04 at 15:55 +0100, David Tardon wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 04:13:56PM -0500, James Antill wrote: > > > That helps, but then what? The user understands (s)he now has to find > > > out how to fix it, and they

Fedora Rawhide 20151204 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud disk raw i386 Cloud disk raw x86_64 Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64 Kde live i386 Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151203: Xfce live i386 Images in Rawhide 20151203 but not this: Kde live i386 Lxde live i386 Scientific_kde live i386 Scientific_kde live

Re: Fedora Rawhide 20151204 compose check report

On Sat, 2015-12-05 at 03:23 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > Missing expected images: > > Cloud disk raw i386 > Cloud disk raw x86_64 > Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64 > Kde live i386 > > Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151203: > > Xfce live i386 > > Images in Rawhide 20151203 but

[Test-Announce]2015-12-07 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2015-12-07 # Time: 16:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! It's QA meeting time again! Let's try again for the meeting that got cancelled last week because of

Re: Bugzilla "Fedora Components" group

On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 09:20:24AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 10:56:24 + > "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > > > I wonder if someone can remove the "Fedora Components" group from this > > bug. (I cannot do it). > > > >

Re: F24 Self Contained Change: Koji Generates Repositories of Signed RPMs

That is out of scope as koji will not be actually performing signing as part of this feature, just utilizing rpm signatures that have already been imported. Neat idea, but bigger problem and not really related to this On Dec 1, 2015 7:37 AM, "Petr Spacek" wrote: > On

Devel archives site is awesome, but...

The devel mailing list archives has an awesome interface, but unfortunately, it only seems to work with the devel@ list, not any of the others (like java-devel@). Any plans to extend that functionality to improve all the mailing list archives? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Devel archives site is awesome, but...

On Fri, 04 Dec 2015 18:36:36 + Christopher wrote: > The devel mailing list archives has an awesome interface, but > unfortunately, it only seems to work with the devel@ list, not any of > the others (like java-devel@). > > Any plans to extend that functionality

[Bug 1285407] Upgrade perl-File-Touch to 0.10

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285407 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-File-Touch-0.10-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-de38b18414 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1285407] Upgrade perl-File-Touch to 0.10

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285407 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-File-Touch-0.10-1.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-0679fe74a2 -- You are receiving

[Bug 1285407] Upgrade perl-File-Touch to 0.10

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285407 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-File-Touch-0.10-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-de38b18414 --- Comment #2 from Fedora

[Bug 1286312] perl-Sereal-Decoder-3.008 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286312 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Sereal-Decoder-3.009-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-57573c51ba -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1285914] perl-Sereal-Decoder-3.007 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285914 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Sereal-Decoder-3.009-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-57573c51ba -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1288268] perl-Math-BigInt-GMP-1.46 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288268 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Math-BigInt-GMP (perl-Math-BigInt-GMP-1.46-1.fc24). "Update to 1.46 (..more)"

From ec10668dbcda1017c4ffbea5b959ff520eb1682b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 08:51:22 + Subject: Update to 1.46 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit - New upstream release 1.46 - Add

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Math-BigInt-GMP (master). "Update to 1.46 (..more)"

From ec10668dbcda1017c4ffbea5b959ff520eb1682b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 08:51:22 + Subject: Update to 1.46 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit - New upstream release 1.46 - Add

[Bug 1288335] perl-Sys-Syscall port for aarch64/ppc64le/s390x

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288335 Yaakov Selkowitz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST ---

[Bug 1288335] perl-Sys-Syscall port for aarch64/ppc64le/s390x

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288335 Petr Šabata changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ---

pghmcfc uploaded Math-BigInt-GMP-1.46.tar.gz for perl-Math-BigInt-GMP

d53371e59623e64368057455471f817a Math-BigInt-GMP-1.46.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Math-BigInt-GMP/Math-BigInt-GMP-1.46.tar.gz/md5/d53371e59623e64368057455471f817a/Math-BigInt-GMP-1.46.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[Bug 1288502] perl-XML-Simple-2.21 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288502 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Scratch build completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12052082 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 1288268] perl-Math-BigInt-GMP-1.46 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288268 --- Comment #3 from Petr Šabata --- (In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #1) > Whoops, just noticed you'd taken this bug after pushing a build for it... > sorry. It happens from time to time. No worries. -- You are

[Bug 1288502] perl-XML-Simple-2.21 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288502 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1102252 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1102252=edit [patch] Update to 2.21 (#1288502) -- You are

[Bug 1288502] New: perl-XML-Simple-2.21 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288502 Bug ID: 1288502 Summary: perl-XML-Simple-2.21 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-XML-Simple Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1288268] perl-Math-BigInt-GMP-1.46 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288268 --- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth --- Whoops, just noticed you'd taken this bug after pushing a build for it... sorry. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

psabata pushed to perl-XML-Simple (f23). "2.21 bump (..more)"

From 200d4138ae81af8413cb1c7febfe25bdcd47e553 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?= Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 16:54:28 +0100 Subject: 2.21 bump - Package the license text - Spec cleanup --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-XML-Simple.spec | 52

psabata pushed to perl-XML-Simple (master). "Fix a bogus date in changelog"

>From b0cc090c8b45c5e556c6a262c0d0eefbada53b9b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?= Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 16:56:05 +0100 Subject: Fix a bogus date in changelog --- perl-XML-Simple.spec | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

jplesnik uploaded PDF-Create-1.22.tar.gz for perl-PDF-Create

6b96ff47d33e732113367fe00979af72 PDF-Create-1.22.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-PDF-Create/PDF-Create-1.22.tar.gz/md5/6b96ff47d33e732113367fe00979af72/PDF-Create-1.22.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel

[Bug 1268513] perl-PDF-Create-1.22 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268513 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

psabata uploaded XML-Simple-2.21.tar.gz for perl-XML-Simple

2e8f242a21d1e0980e24d73e43c667fb XML-Simple-2.21.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-XML-Simple/XML-Simple-2.21.tar.gz/md5/2e8f242a21d1e0980e24d73e43c667fb/XML-Simple-2.21.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel

psabata pushed to perl-XML-Simple (f23). "Fix a bogus date in changelog"

>From b0cc090c8b45c5e556c6a262c0d0eefbada53b9b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?= Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 16:56:05 +0100 Subject: Fix a bogus date in changelog --- perl-XML-Simple.spec | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

psabata pushed to perl-XML-Simple (master). "2.21 bump (..more)"

From 200d4138ae81af8413cb1c7febfe25bdcd47e553 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?= Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 16:54:28 +0100 Subject: 2.21 bump - Package the license text - Spec cleanup --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-XML-Simple.spec | 52

jplesnik pushed to perl-PDF-Create (master). "1.22 bump"

>From 9f4c771b0a8d962ba1b99b227fd02c06ac4ae7ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 16:36:17 +0100 Subject: 1.22 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-PDF-Create.spec | 24 +--- sources | 2 +- 3 files

psabata set the monitor flag of perl-XML-Simple to nobuild

psabata set the monitor flag of perl-XML-Simple to nobuild -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1285407] Upgrade perl-File-Touch to 0.10

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285407 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1288502] perl-XML-Simple-2.21 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288502 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-XML-Simple-2.21-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-055663a16c -- You are receiving this mail

ppisar pushed to perl-Sys-SigAction (master). "Use macro for path in /usr/bin/pod2man"

>From 561d718a13ed27803feaa8d52053d39562109b68 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 17:19:28 +0100 Subject: Use macro for path in /usr/bin/pod2man --- perl-Sys-SigAction.spec | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1

ppisar pushed to perl-Sys-SigAction (master). "Fix converting POD to manual page with podlators >= 4"

>From 6f10ed9280d59aaa60fc557fe62fbdfb2a557c61 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 17:18:52 +0100 Subject: Fix converting POD to manual page with podlators >= 4 --- perl-Sys-SigAction.spec | 8 ++-- 1 file changed, 6

[389-devel] please review: Ticket 48369 - RFE - add config setting to always send password expiring time regardless of warning period

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48369 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48369/0001-Ticket-48369-RFE-Add-config-setting-to-always-send-t.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@%(host_name)s http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1285418] Upgrade perl-gettext to 1.07

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285418 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-gettext-1.07-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving

[Bug 1285418] Upgrade perl-gettext to 1.07

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285418 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-gettext-1.07-1.fc23

[Bug 1288673] New: perl-Archive-Zip-1.55 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288673 Bug ID: 1288673 Summary: perl-Archive-Zip-1.55 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Archive-Zip Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1288673] perl-Archive-Zip-1.55 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288673 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1102468 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1102468=edit [patch] Update to 1.55 (#1288673) -- You are

[Bug 1287361] perl-Mojolicious-6.35 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287361 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1288673] perl-Archive-Zip-1.55 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288673 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Scratch build failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12059454 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1287361] perl-Mojolicious-6.35 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287361 --- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1102473 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1102473=edit [patch] Update to 6.35 (#1287361) -- You are

[Bug 1287361] perl-Mojolicious-6.35 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287361 --- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Scratch build completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12059514 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 1285418] Upgrade perl-gettext to 1.07

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285418 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1285418] Upgrade perl-gettext to 1.07

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285418 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-gettext-1.07-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving