On Sun, 06 Dec 2015 03:52:56 +
Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12011291
>
> I've tried to resubmit build many times, but it stuck on one of
> tests. How I can debug this problem? It works perfectly on my laptop
> in mock.
On 12/04/2015 09:46 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-12-04 at 16:09 +0100, Timotheus Pokorra wrote:
>>> is deployed in probably half of the homes in Germany... Also I am
>>> pretty sure other routers form other manufacturers do the same
>>> thing. Now, if we default to DNSSEC validation
On Fri, 4 Dec 2015 20:11:00 +
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 10:06:45AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > You all may also be interested in:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/
> I'm a big fan of this web page :)
>
> > which
On Sat, 5 Dec 2015 07:44:26 +
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 09:20:24AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 10:56:24 +
> > "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> >
> > > I wonder if someone can remove the "Fedora
As I'm not sure what are the steps to get this done I prefer to ask to the
devel list.
Currently, we have Fritzing [1] package in our repos which a software
related to electronics and I think that should be part of the electronic
lab group.
Is there a posibility to include it into the comps.xml
On 11/30/2015 05:14 PM, Jan Kurik wrote:
> We want to have Unbound server installed and running on localhost by
> default on Fedora systems. Where necessary, have also dnssec-trigger
> installed and running by default
Would someone please clarify the proposal if Unbound would run as a
forwarder,
In the series of interviews with candidates to FAmSCo several candidates
mentioned that ambassadors do not always know what changes were
implemented and what changes are planned for the future in Fedora.
I think this is understandable to a large extent, 'cause Fedora is a
large project, and the
Missing expected images:
Cloud disk raw i386
Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64
Kde disk raw armhfp
Kde live i386
Cloud disk raw x86_64
Kde live x86_64
Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151204:
Lxde disk raw armhfp
Lxde live i386
Games live i386
Images in Rawhide 20151204 but not this:
Kde
Compose started at Sat Dec 5 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
Reindl Harald wrote:
> to make that clear
>
> Version:
> Release: MMDD.1%{?dist}
>
> where the .1 is the typical usage of Release
This should actually be:
Release: 1.MMDD%{?dist}
as per the guidelines.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Panu Matilainen wrote:
> We're all so conditioned to the yum behavior that anything else seems
> suspicious even if it (removing unused cruft) is actually a sane thing
> to do.
autoremoving stuff that does not HAVE to be removed due to dependencies is
NEVER a sane thing to do.
Kevin
Panu Matilainen wrote:
> So the answer is no, dnf does not consider "install" of an already
> installed packages to be equivalent of "mark install". I think it should
> - user asking for a package to be installed does not get any more
> explicit than "install ".
Ouch, this is totally broken!
Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> 2 .If I want to edit boot options, grubby makes it unnecessarily
> painful, and the directions are simply wrong. For example, my
> /etc/grub2-efi.cfg says:
>
> #
> # DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE
> #
> # It is automatically generated by grub2-mkconfig using templates
> # from
Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> Note that packages installed by PackageKit are not marked as installed,
> so dnf always thinks it can remove them.
This makes "autoremove" completely unsuitable for end users and totally
inappropriate as a default (and the only suggestion we can give them is to
NEVER use
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12011291
I've tried to resubmit build many times, but it stuck on one of tests. How
I can debug this problem? It works perfectly on my laptop in mock.
--
-Igor Gnatenko
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282917
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test-mysqld-0.17-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282917
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test-mysqld-0.17-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238804
--- Comment #5 from Harald Reindl ---
PIE is one thing
Full RELRO is another one
http://tk-blog.blogspot.co.at/2009/02/relro-not-so-well-known-memory.html
[root@localhost:~]$ hardening-check /usr/bin/perl
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 11:42:14AM -0700, Kim Ebert wrote:
> Is there a reason python-cherrypy has been retired in EPEL 7?
It is now part of RHEL.
Regards
Till
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Is there a reason python-cherrypy has been retired in EPEL 7?
Thanks,
Kim
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 11:42:14AM -0700, Kim Ebert wrote:
> Is there a reason python-cherrypy has been retired in EPEL 7?
I forgot to mention that you can find retirement reasons in the
package's GIT repo:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/python-cherrypy.git/tree/dead.package?h=epel7
Regards
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288707
Bug ID: 1288707
Summary: perl-libwww-perl-6.15 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-libwww-perl
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288707
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1102518
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1102518=edit
[patch] Update to 6.15 (#1288707)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285423
--- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12068014
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285423
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288709
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12068019
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288709
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1102521
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1102521=edit
[patch] Update to 2.424 (#1288709)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288709
Bug ID: 1288709
Summary: perl-ParseUtil-Domain-2.424 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-ParseUtil-Domain
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285423
--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1102520
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1102520=edit
[patch] Update to 0.20 (#1285423)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288710
Bug ID: 1288710
Summary: perl-XML-Simple-2.22 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-XML-Simple
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288707
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12067997
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
3e199a0c05ba4452060fe563e558045b ParseUtil-Domain-2.424.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-ParseUtil-Domain/ParseUtil-Domain-2.424.tar.gz/md5/3e199a0c05ba4452060fe563e558045b/ParseUtil-Domain-2.424.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288784
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1102650
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1102650=edit
[patch] Update to 1.23 (#1288784)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288784
Bug ID: 1288784
Summary: perl-PDF-Create-1.23 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-PDF-Create
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
>From 3342a04143e87b8db09d768acff9bbfd7a2695b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Emmanuel Seyman
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2015 02:18:13 +0100
Subject: Update to 2.424
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-ParseUtil-Domain.spec | 9 -
sources| 2 +-
3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282914
--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Lingua-Translit-0.23-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282914
Bug 1282914 depends on bug 1284461, which changed state.
Bug 1284461 Summary: perl-Lingua-Translit-0.23 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284461
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288774
Bug ID: 1288774
Summary: New upstream release 0.57_03 fixes bug that broke
pubkey authentication
Product: Fedora
Version: 23
Component: perl-Net-SSH2
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288784
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12076539
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287915
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Unicode-Normalize-1.24-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287915
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282914
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285407
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-File-Touch-0.10-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want to
So, I ran some repoclosures today... I think something is still not
quite right as I was seeing some broken deps in base rhel repos, which
I would think would not be the case. ;(
Anyhow, attached it 'epel' which is just rhel + epel and 'epel-testing'
which is rhel + epel + epel-testing.
kevin
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
167 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6828
chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el6
150 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031
python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6
144
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285407
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-File-Touch-0.10-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282914
--- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Lingua-Translit-0.23-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288709
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
eseyman's perl-ParseUtil-Domain-2.424-1.fc24 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=703550
--
You are receiving this
48 matches
Mail list logo