Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
-
Some PHP scriptlets are now unnecessary in F24 due to the use of file
triggers.
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:PHP#PECL_Modules
* https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/597
-
A page describing the implementation of L
> From: "Josh Boyer"
> Could you please elaborate (perhaps in a separate thread) the full
> desire and requirements behind rewriting DNF into C? The first link
> in your email says the initiative is started, but it doesn't really
> explain why aside from the libhif step.
Having DNF in C is desir
Hello Adam!
Sorry for this - I've just rebuild tracker.
2016-02-25 1:56 GMT+01:00 Adam Williamson :
> On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 13:23 +0100, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
>> Hello All!
>> I'm going to upgrade libcue. Unfortunately this requires a soname
>> bump. Fortunately only recompilation is necessary.
>
Hi,
I am Ramesh working in Red Hat for Gluster. I have contributed to oVrit
project for Gluster and Ovirt Integration and Gluster Nagios monitoring
project. I was actively involved in packaging the nagios addons for RHEL. I
would like to provide the gluster nagios addons in Fedora.
Regards,
Hi,
today i noticed that sqlite and sqlite-devel have both broken
dependencies as reported by dnf.
Reported at:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312014
Cheers.
[...TRUNCATED...]
qca x86_64
2.1.1-4.fc23
Reartes Guillermo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> today i noticed that sqlite and sqlite-devel have both broken
> dependencies as reported by dnf.
>
> Reported at:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312014
Known, yes, see:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-850f410498
--
devel mai
On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 11:10:39AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Dec 2015 07:44:26 +
> "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 09:20:24AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 10:56:24 +
> > > "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> > >
> > > > I wonder if
From ee75e45d695692643dbe58f7ca8557ad267aa8e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 15:12:54 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild
---
perl-POE-Component-Server-SimpleHTTP.spec | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 ins
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 15:35:55 +
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> Kevin, do you have a reference to this ticket? This still hasn't been
> resolved and at this rate I'm going to have to clone the bug to get
> rid of the unwanted group.
I'll mail you privately. They closed my ticket wontfix. ;(
I'd like to update to latest mercurial. I built 3.7.1 in rawhide, and
AFAICT there's no problem using it with tortoisehg-3.7.1-fc24.
I'd like to update mercurial in F24 - AFAIK there should not be any
compatibility issues.
Any objections?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http
On Thu 25 Feb 2016 04:42:34 PM CET Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 15:35:55 +
> "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
>> Kevin, do you have a reference to this ticket? This still hasn't been
>> resolved and at this rate I'm going to have to clone the bug to get
>> rid of the unwanted group.
On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 05:42 -0500, Honza Šilhan wrote:
> > From: "Josh Boyer"
> > Could you please elaborate (perhaps in a separate thread) the full
> > desire and requirements behind rewriting DNF into C? The first
> > link
> > in your email says the initiative is started, but it doesn't really
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 18:00:09 +0100
Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> On Thu 25 Feb 2016 04:42:34 PM CET Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 15:35:55 +
> > "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> >
> >> Kevin, do you have a reference to this ticket? This still hasn't
> >> been resolved and at thi
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:03:52PM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> "rewrite DNF in a language that can be compiled to efficient machine
> code, which doesn't require a large runtime support library, and which
> can interoperate with C".
> I think I'm only semi-serious here [1], but have you conside
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:03:52PM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
>> "rewrite DNF in a language that can be compiled to efficient machine
>> code, which doesn't require a large runtime support library, and which
>> can interoperate with C".
On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 12:27 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:03:52PM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > "rewrite DNF in a language that can be compiled to efficient
> > > machine
> > > code, which doesn't require a
Hoping to raise the profile of BZ#1311814 ; seems to break anything
that requires graphviz. That's a good chunk of the distro.
It initially broke Elixir builds, I just got notification about ejabberd.
cheers,
m
--
martin.langh...@gmail.com
- ask interesting questions
- don't get distracte
-20160225.n.0/work/i386/repo
--variant=Workstation --nomacboot --noupgrade --buildarch=athlon --volidþdora-
WS-boot-i386-24 --installpkgsþdora-productimg-workstation
/mnt/koji/compose/branched/Fedora-24-20160225.n.0/work/i386/buildinstall/Workst
ation
2016-02-25 16:46:06,909: Added 'lorax-r
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:46:55 -0500
Martin Langhoff wrote:
> Hoping to raise the profile of BZ#1311814 ; seems to break anything
> that requires graphviz. That's a good chunk of the distro.
>
> It initially broke Elixir builds, I just got notification about
> ejabberd.
This is not librsvg2's fau
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 18:03:52 +0100, David Malcolm wrote:
> I think I'm only semi-serious here [1], but have you considered Rust?
> [1] e.g. it's not yet in Fedora.
or proven C++11(/14/17)?
(it is already in Fedora)
Jan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraprojec
On Tuesday, February 23, 2016 10:18:49 PM Ralf Senderek wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Feb 2016, Till Maas wrote:
> > I used my access to the signing server to verify the key before signing
> > it. But why is confirming the fingerprint here a step forward? Why would
> > someone search in this mailing list for
On Thu 25 Feb 2016 06:22:26 PM CET Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 18:00:09 +0100
> Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
>
>> On Thu 25 Feb 2016 04:42:34 PM CET Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> > On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 15:35:55 +
>> > "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>> >
>> >> Kevin, do you have a reference t
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 07:54:57PM +0100, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> On Thu 25 Feb 2016 06:22:26 PM CET Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 18:00:09 +0100
> > Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu 25 Feb 2016 04:42:34 PM CET Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >> > On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 15:35:55 +
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
No one has access to the private key. It lives on a server that has no
services running that listen for connections. There is a service that runs
on
it that talks to the signing bridge. That brokers all requests. Users with
access do not know the p
On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 18:58 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 18:03:52 +0100, David Malcolm wrote:
> > I think I'm only semi-serious here [1], but have you considered
> > Rust?
> > [1] e.g. it's not yet in Fedora.
>
> or proven C++11(/14/17)?
> (it is already in Fedora)
C++ is so
On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 08:31 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Reartes Guillermo wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > today i noticed that sqlite and sqlite-devel have both broken
> > dependencies as reported by dnf.
> >
> > Reported at:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312014
> Known, yes, se
On Thursday, February 25, 2016 08:05:59 PM Ralf Senderek wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > No one has access to the private key. It lives on a server that has no
> > services running that listen for connections. There is a service that
> > runs
> > on
> > it that talks to
Sending direct to devel@ due to an issue with forwarding from devel-announce@
Hi All,
Fedora 24 has been branched, please be sure to do a git pull --rebase to
pick up the new branch, as an additional reminder rawhide/f25 has been
completely isolated from previous releases, so this means that an
Just out of curiosity... Shouldn't this have been caught by mock build,
rpmlint?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 11:50 -0800, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> Just out of curiosity... Shouldn't this have been caught by mock build,
> rpmlint?
rpmlint doesn't tell you anything about dependencies. Ideally a
taskotron test should have caught this, but none of the current tests
happens to catch this p
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
Which fingerprint? There is a number of keys
Dennis
The one you were referring to in your posting and which
an ordinary user would verify with:
gpg --list-keys --fingerprint 81B46521
Ralf
PS: if you had a long-term signing key it would be its f
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> We are working on a fix for pkgdb now.
Thank you!
m
--
martin.langh...@gmail.com
- ask interesting questions
- don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first
~ http://docs.moodle.org/en/User:Martin_Langhoff
--
devel mail
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 03:38:59PM -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > We are working on a fix for pkgdb now.
>
> Thank you!
Note that it will take some time, before fixing pkgdb itself I'm trying to
assess the size of the issue which is basic
I plan to orphan oggvideotools, I don't have the time to really give
it the proper attention it needs anymore. It is currently failing to
build in rawhide.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/oggvideotools/
-AdamM
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fed
Thanks , i have started preparing for the material
Irenge B. Jules
MSC student @ Liverpool University
email : jbi.oct...@gmail.com
Tel No 07405834974
U.K.
2016-02-23 14:29 GMT+00:00 John M. Harris, Jr. :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> I would start by separating the idea
2016-02-25 16:58 GMT+01:00 Neal Becker :
> I'd like to update to latest mercurial. I built 3.7.1 in rawhide, and
> AFAICT there's no problem using it with tortoisehg-3.7.1-fc24.
>
> I'd like to update mercurial in F24 - AFAIK there should not be any
> compatibility issues.
>
> Any objections?
I'd
erlang-p1_zlib-1.0.1 has changed the license from GPLv2 to ASL 2.0. I'm
making the change in the spec file as needed, but thought I'd mention
here just in case there's something more I should do.
--
Randy Barlow
xmpp: bowlofe...@electronsweatshop.com
irc: bowlofeggs on Freenode
signature.asc
I have three outstanding reviews that I'd like to push through so I
can work out the next layer of my dependency tree. I'd be happy to
swap reviews with someone. Links below:
rubygem-async_sinatra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310873
rubygem-benchmark-ips https://bugzilla.redhat.com
On Qui, 2016-02-25 at 10:56 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:46:55 -0500
> Martin Langhoff wrote:
>
> >
> > Hoping to raise the profile of BZ#1311814 ; seems to break anything
> > that requires graphviz. That's a good chunk of the distro.
> >
> > It initially broke Elixir buil
On 02/25/2016 08:11 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 18:58 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 18:03:52 +0100, David Malcolm wrote:
I think I'm only semi-serious here [1], but have you considered
Rust?
[1] e.g. it's not yet in Fedora.
or proven C++11(/14/17)?
(it is
40 matches
Mail list logo
