F24 broken dependencies

Currently, it's not possible to update from F23 to F24 because of broken dependencies. # dnf update --releasever=24 --best --allowerasing Error: package firebird-libfbembed-2.5.5.26952.0-2.fc23.x86_64 requires libicuuc.so.54()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed. package

Re: [HEADS UP] libgit2 bump to 0.24.0

On 03/21/2016 07:28 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: This time it was easy. They didn't break anything. Should I build it in f24-gnome? Because libgit2-glib requires it and itself it required by some other gnome packages. I think it's easier if we can do the gnome and libgit2 updates separately. Can

Re: F24 broken dependencies

On Tuesday, March 22, 2016 12:13:47 PM WET Jan Synacek wrote: > Currently, it's not possible to update from F23 to F24 because of > broken dependencies. > > # dnf update --releasever=24 --best --allowerasing Does it helps if instead of update/upgrade you use distro-sync? I have updated last

Re: Major owncloud updates incoming

On 9 March 2016 at 15:42, James Hogarth wrote: > > > On 24 February 2016 at 17:30, James Hogarth > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> We're at the last stages of preparing the first major owncloud update in >> a while. >> >> The current version of

Re: F24 broken dependencies

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:46 PM, José Matos wrote: > On Tuesday, March 22, 2016 12:13:47 PM WET Jan Synacek wrote: >> Currently, it's not possible to update from F23 to F24 because of >> broken dependencies. >> >> # dnf update --releasever=24 --best --allowerasing > > Does it

Re: F24 broken dependencies

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:46:18AM +, José Matos wrote: > This is an example of where dfn swap would be nice to have. :-) I've reopened https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110780 -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader -- devel mailing list

Re: [HEADS UP] libgit2 bump to 0.24.0

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:46:58PM +0100, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 03/21/2016 07:28 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > >This time it was easy. They didn't break anything. Should I build it in > >f24-gnome? Because libgit2-glib requires it and itself it required by > >some other gnome packages. > > I

Re: Checking signatures on package source tarballs

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 9:02 AM, David Woodhouse wrote: > The original draft does raise an interesting question — do we need to > put the upstream PGP key directly into the package git tree instead of > the lookaside cache? > > I suppose while the lookaside cache is still

Re: Checking signatures on package source tarballs

On Mon, 2016-03-21 at 18:02 +0100, Till Maas wrote: > > It is a simple one-liner if you use gpgv2: > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/youtube-dl.git/tree/youtube-dl.spec#n35 That's better than my version; thanks. It also means there's probably not a lot of point in trying to simplify it

Re: F24 broken dependencies

On 03/22/2016 08:16 AM, Jan Synacek wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:46 PM, José Matos wrote: >> On Tuesday, March 22, 2016 12:13:47 PM WET Jan Synacek wrote: >>> Currently, it's not possible to update from F23 to F24 because of >>> broken dependencies. >>> >>> # dnf update

Re: Checking signatures on package source tarballs

On Tue, 2016-03-22 at 09:12 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 9:02 AM, David Woodhouse > wrote: > > > > The original draft does raise an interesting question — do we need > > to put the upstream PGP key directly into the package git tree > > instead of the

Fedora 24 compose report: 20160322.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-24-20160321.n.0 NEW: Fedora-24-20160322.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:0.00 B Size of upgraded packages: 0.00 B Size of downgraded

Re: Checking signatures on package source tarballs

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 01:02:40PM +, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Mon, 2016-03-21 at 18:02 +0100, Till Maas wrote: > > > > It is a simple one-liner if you use gpgv2: > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/youtube-dl.git/tree/youtube-dl.spec#n35 > > That's better than my version; thanks.

Re: Checking signatures on package source tarballs

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 06:01:28PM +0100, Björn Persson wrote: > David Woodhouse wrote: > > Our packaging guidelines really ought to mandate that *if* upstream > > publishes GPG or PKCS#7/CMS signatures of source tarballs, then the > > package *must* verify those signatures as part of %prep. > >

Re: F24 broken dependencies

On Tue, 2016-03-22 at 08:27 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > I'd also point out that the supported mechanism for upgrading from > F23 to F24 is: > > # dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=24 > # dnf system-upgrade reboot Just a small note to add: for Workstation, the expected way to upgrade

Re: Checking signatures on package source tarballs

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Till Maas wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 09:12:15AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > >> As an aside, I think Till has code written to make the lookaside use >> sha256. I'm not sure what the next steps are to get that rolled out >> though. > >

Re: Checking signatures on package source tarballs

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 09:12:15AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > As an aside, I think Till has code written to make the lookaside use > sha256. I'm not sure what the next steps are to get that rolled out > though. Just for the record: Mathieu wrote the code/did the work for this. -- devel mailing

Re: Package review swap: libfilezilla

Hi. took ... can you take this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286467 for me? regards .g Il 22/03/2016 17:09, Jon Ciesla ha scritto: If someone would be so kind as to take this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317956 so that FileZilla may be brought current, I'll

Re: Checking signatures on package source tarballs

On Tue, 2016-03-22 at 18:01 +0100, Björn Persson wrote: > Because technically, verifying a tarball that the packager uploaded, > with a signature that the packager uploaded, against a key that the > packager uploaded, that doesn't really add anything compared to the > packager verifying the

Re: F24 broken dependencies

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016, at 08:27 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > I'd also point out that the supported mechanism for upgrading from F23 to F24 > is: That's one of them - there are two. I have extended: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading to also cover rpm-ostree managed systems such as the

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : The second Fedora 24 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: The second Fedora 24 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting on 2016-03-23 from 17:00:00 to 18:00:00 UTC At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting for this important meeting, wherein we

iproute package split

Hi, I am in the process of splitting the 'tc' utility off from iproute package. The motivation for this comes from two things: 1) Due to it's xt/ipt action, tc depends on iptables. 2) iproute is part of the 'Core' group. These two in combination lead to iptables being pulled into Core as a

Fedora 24-20160322.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Kde live i386 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Images in this compose but not 24-20160321.n.0: Security live x86_64 Security live i386 Images in 24-20160321.n.0 but not this: Kde live i386 Kde live x86_64 Jam_kde

Package review swap: libfilezilla

If someone would be so kind as to take this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317956 so that FileZilla may be brought current, I'll take one of theirs. Thanks! -j -- http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/ in your fear, seek

Re: F24 broken dependencies

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016, 9:32 AM Colin Walters wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016, at 08:27 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > I'd also point out that the supported mechanism for upgrading from F23 > to F24 is: > > That's one of them - there are two. I have extended: >

Re: Checking signatures on package source tarballs

David Woodhouse wrote: > Our packaging guidelines really ought to mandate that *if* upstream > publishes GPG or PKCS#7/CMS signatures of source tarballs, then the > package *must* verify those signatures as part of %prep. I suppose the point of this would be that others can see that the

Re: Checking signatures on package source tarballs

David Woodhouse wrote: > On Mon, 2016-03-21 at 18:02 +0100, Till Maas wrote: > > > > It is a simple one-liner if you use gpgv2: > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/youtube-dl.git/tree/youtube-dl.spec#n35 > > > > That's better than my version; thanks. It also

Re: iproute package split

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 06:01:14PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote: > Hi, > > I am in the process of splitting the 'tc' utility off from iproute > package. The motivation for this comes from two things: > > 1) Due to it's xt/ipt action, tc depends on iptables. > 2) iproute is part of the 'Core' group.

osgaudio packaging (bundles/provides openalpp)

Hi, I'd like to package osgaudio, which is an OpenSceneGraph-like frontend to OpenAL. It is currently maintained by OpenSceneGraph's main author at: https://github.com/robertosfield/osgaudio/ It requires and contains openalpp, a C++ frontend for OpenAL. We haven't shipped openalpp since Fedora

Re: Checking signatures on package source tarballs

Till Maas wrote: > I guess it might even make the new hotness do scratch builds with > verified tarballs, since iirc it updates both the tarball and the > signature and then %prep makes sure that they are verified. I suppose so, at least if the key is specified as only a filename. What will it do

Re: Checking signatures on package source tarballs

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Björn Persson wrote: > > Till Maas wrote: > > I guess it might even make the new hotness do scratch builds with > > verified tarballs, since iirc it updates both the tarball and the > > signature and then %prep makes sure that they are

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 24 Alpha status is NO-GO

Jan, I've been testing all recent alpha versions.I believe the following is a blocker Bugzill«a 1318473 Fedora kernel kernel-ma...@redhat.com NEW Can't add parttitions to fstab Mon 16:52 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 24 Alpha 1.7 compose check report

Missing expected images: Kde live i386 Workstation live i386 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Images in this compose but not 24 Alpha 1.6: Jam_kde live x86_64 Astronomy_kde live x86_64 Robotics live x86_64 Images in 24 Alpha 1.6 but not this: Security live x86_64 Cloud_base

Should breathe package be called python-breathe?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1313796 This request to include a Python 3 subpackage for breathe made me realize that I probably should have named the package python-breathe instead of breathe. Is that correct? If so, what's the right way to fix this? Thanks, Dave -- devel mailing

Re: Should breathe package be called python-breathe?

On Tue, 2016-03-22 at 21:23 -0700, Dave Johansen wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1313796 > This request to include a Python 3 subpackage for breathe made me realize > that I probably should have named the package python-breathe instead of > breathe. Is that correct? If so,

[Test-Announce] Fedora 24 Candidate Alpha-1.7 Available Now!

According to the schedule [1], Fedora 24 Candidate Alpha-1.7 is now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation testing! For more information on release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan Test coverage information for the

Re: F24 broken dependencies

On Tue, 2016-03-22 at 13:16 +0100, Jan Synacek wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:46 PM, José Matos wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, March 22, 2016 12:13:47 PM WET Jan Synacek wrote: > > > > > > Currently, it's not possible to update from F23 to F24 because of > > > broken

pghmcfc uploaded DateTime-1.26.tar.gz for perl-DateTime

44999f88e58b6e40762e49b93b3de9a0 DateTime-1.26.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-DateTime/DateTime-1.26.tar.gz/md5/44999f88e58b6e40762e49b93b3de9a0/DateTime-1.26.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing

jplesnik pushed to perl-Shell (master). "0.73 bump"

From d7601a377cf820842b6b4ba261ae64bceeddb655 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 11:54:09 +0100 Subject: 0.73 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Shell.spec | 25 ++--- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 16

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Package-DeprecationManager (f24). "Update to 0.16 (..more)"

From 23fd7548801bc936fe803c90bd86b23bf8ef5728 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 11:29:05 + Subject: Update to 0.16 - New upstream release 0.16 - The subs installed into the caller are now named with Sub::Name; this makes these subs

[Bug 1319956] perl-DateTime-1.26 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319956 --- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- pghmcfc's perl-DateTime-1.26-1.fc25 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=747756 -- You are receiving this mail

pghmcfc pushed to perl-DateTime (f24). "Update to 1.26 (..more)"

From 1d8cf864e8441275257c045caba8fb52cd03eb6f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 10:42:37 + Subject: Update to 1.26 - New upstream release 1.26 - Switched from Module::Build to ExtUtils::MakeMaker (GH#13) --- perl-DateTime.spec | 36

[Bug 1297775] perl-Regexp-Grammars-1.045 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297775 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Package-DeprecationManager (master). "Update to 0.16 (..more)"

From 23fd7548801bc936fe803c90bd86b23bf8ef5728 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 11:29:05 + Subject: Update to 0.16 - New upstream release 0.16 - The subs installed into the caller are now named with Sub::Name; this makes these subs

pghmcfc pushed to perl-DateTime (master). "Update to 1.26 (..more)"

From 1d8cf864e8441275257c045caba8fb52cd03eb6f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 10:42:37 + Subject: Update to 1.26 - New upstream release 1.26 - Switched from Module::Build to ExtUtils::MakeMaker (GH#13) --- perl-DateTime.spec | 36

jplesnik uploaded Shell-0.73.tar.gz for perl-Shell

35ee2912920a6be47d981e33f0540767 Shell-0.73.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Shell/Shell-0.73.tar.gz/md5/35ee2912920a6be47d981e33f0540767/Shell-0.73.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[Bug 1296164] Upgrade perl-Shell to 0.73

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296164 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

pghmcfc uploaded Package-DeprecationManager-0.16.tar.gz for perl-Package-DeprecationManager

6d457e26f23daeff18ae74b57ab57274 Package-DeprecationManager-0.16.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Package-DeprecationManager/Package-DeprecationManager-0.16.tar.gz/md5/6d457e26f23daeff18ae74b57ab57274/Package-DeprecationManager-0.16.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl

pghmcfc pushed to perl-DateTime (perl-DateTime-1.26-1.fc24). "Update to 1.26 (..more)"

From 1d8cf864e8441275257c045caba8fb52cd03eb6f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 10:42:37 + Subject: Update to 1.26 - New upstream release 1.26 - Switched from Module::Build to ExtUtils::MakeMaker (GH#13) --- perl-DateTime.spec | 36

pghmcfc pushed to perl-DateTime (perl-DateTime-1.26-1.fc25). "Update to 1.26 (..more)"

This commit already existed in another branch. http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-DateTime.git/commit/?h=perl-DateTime-1.26-1.fc25=1d8cf864e8441275257c045caba8fb52cd03eb6f -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[Bug 1319956] perl-DateTime-1.26 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319956 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DateTime-1.26-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-a0eac1ce95 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1316317] perl-Digest-MD5-2.55 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316317 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Digest-MD5-2.55-1.fc25

[Bug 1316317] perl-Digest-MD5-2.55 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316317 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Digest-MD5-2.55-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

ppisar pushed to perl-Prima (f24). "Fix bars on big endian indeed"

From 85ed9860d82555a209dc49ae02284f62078bc99d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 08:21:27 +0100 Subject: Fix bars on big endian indeed --- perl-Prima.spec | 6 +- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff

[Bug 1315521] perl-File-Edit-Portable-1.24 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315521 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System --- perl-File-Edit-Portable-1.24-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1318734] perl-Prima-1.45 tests fail on big-endian platforms

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318734 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Prima-1.45-4.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-79616dd821 -- You are receiving this mail

jplesnik uploaded SNMP-Info-3.31.tar.gz for perl-SNMP-Info

0721edf70db203ac5e1b014733404fd8 SNMP-Info-3.31.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-SNMP-Info/SNMP-Info-3.31.tar.gz/md5/0721edf70db203ac5e1b014733404fd8/SNMP-Info-3.31.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel

jplesnik uploaded Term-Shell-0.07.tar.gz for perl-Term-Shell

56631200034b5519f3c4ccee183c268d Term-Shell-0.07.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Term-Shell/Term-Shell-0.07.tar.gz/md5/56631200034b5519f3c4ccee183c268d/Term-Shell-0.07.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel

[Bug 1299525] Upgrade perl-Term-Shell to 0.07

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299525 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

Broken dependencies: perl-Dumbbench

perl-Dumbbench has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On armhfp: perl-Dumbbench-BoxPlot-0.10-2.fc24.noarch requires perl(SOOT) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Package-DeprecationManager (perl-Package-DeprecationManager-0.16-1.fc24). "Update to 0.16 (..more)"

From 23fd7548801bc936fe803c90bd86b23bf8ef5728 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 11:29:05 + Subject: Update to 0.16 - New upstream release 0.16 - The subs installed into the caller are now named with Sub::Name; this makes these subs

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Package-DeprecationManager (perl-Package-DeprecationManager-0.16-1.fc25). "Update to 0.16 (..more)"

This commit already existed in another branch. http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Package-DeprecationManager.git/commit/?h=perl-Package-DeprecationManager-0.16-1.fc25=23fd7548801bc936fe803c90bd86b23bf8ef5728 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl

[Bug 1315029] perl-Digest-Bcrypt-1.204 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315029 --- Comment #7 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patching or scratch build for perl-Digest-Bcrypt and version 1.0.1 FAILED. See for details -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 1315029] perl-Digest-Bcrypt-1.204 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315029 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1315029] perl-Digest-Bcrypt-1.204 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315029 --- Comment #9 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patches were not touched. All were applied properly -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora

[Bug 1315029] perl-Digest-Bcrypt-1.204 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315029 --- Comment #8 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1139020 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1139020=edit Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.

jplesnik pushed to perl-Term-Shell (master). "0.07 bump"

From 518f21b08a562d57e66a4fd57e9ba3305b9c5767 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 13:29:41 +0100 Subject: 0.07 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Term-Shell.spec | 44 +--- sources

jplesnik pushed to perl-SNMP-Info (master). "3.31 bump"

From 3e46a92b698ccd3f6a587186d23dc4a30812e3ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 14:24:09 +0100 Subject: 3.31 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-SNMP-Info.spec | 7 +-- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 7

jplesnik pushed to perl-SNMP-Info (f24). "3.31 bump"

From 2cc9ffcd27c75972ffc5a306771b28b92640940a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 14:24:09 +0100 Subject: 3.31 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-SNMP-Info.spec | 7 +-- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 7

[Bug 1118240] puic4 is broken: fix provided

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1118240 --- Comment #9 from Petr Pisar --- I will apply the "Fixes partially 'puic4 -x' generated code" patch. I cannot apply "Fixes puic4 code generator" because it requires many changes from upstream after the 0.69.0 release and

ppisar pushed to perl-Qt (master). "Disable perlqt_networkgooglesuggest test (..more)"

From abb2e79e339af50772571359f02578ebf43ba4d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 18:15:12 +0100 Subject: Disable perlqt_networkgooglesuggest test Also does not work without network. --- perl-Qt.spec | 3 ++- 1 file

[Bug 1319956] perl-DateTime-1.26 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319956 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1301246] perl-SNMP-Info-3.31 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301246 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

ppisar pushed to perl-Qt (master). "Modernize spec file"

From e1b1d244289d1389cb7e5a3178fa698db680ea2b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 09:31:34 +0100 Subject: Modernize spec file --- perl-Qt.spec | 53 ++--- 1 file changed, 34

ppisar pushed to perl-Qt (master). "Fix code generation with "puic4 -x""

From 0cb05ee05116fb65f48da7cd73db03da57e5b009 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 15:38:37 +0100 Subject: Fix code generation with "puic4 -x" --- ...Fix-problems-with-puic4-x-code-generation.patch | 129

ppisar pushed to perl-Qt (master). "Run X11 tests"

From 6a86bb1b9235dfac0605f704c81fb1e692409496 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 12:42:48 +0100 Subject: Run X11 tests --- Qt-0.96.0-Fix-uchar-test.patch | 37 + perl-Qt.spec

ppisar pushed to perl-Qt (master). "Disable a broadcast network test (..more)"

From 5e8ba5f5850639b783460a158fafe2c403f46091 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 17:57:58 +0100 Subject: Disable a broadcast network test It fails on build server because there is no network. --- perl-Qt.spec | 5 + 1

[Bug 1318734] perl-Prima-1.45 tests fail on big-endian platforms

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318734 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[EPEL-devel] Xfce 4.12 coming to EPEL-7 (official repo) in the next few days

It has been almost a month since I sent an email[1] about testing Xfce 4.12 packages on EL-7. I have seen a few emails with requests for packages but no emails about issues that folks had in using the same on EL-7. Given this scenario, I am encouraged to do the official builds. Towards that, I

[Bug 1320354] New: perl-Socket6-0.27 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320354 Bug ID: 1320354 Summary: perl-Socket6-0.27 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Socket6 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1320354] perl-Socket6-0.27 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320354 --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patches were not touched. All were applied properly -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora

[Bug 1320354] perl-Socket6-0.27 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320354 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1139291 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1139291=edit Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.

[Bug 1320354] perl-Socket6-0.27 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320354 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patching or scratch build for perl-Socket6 and version 0.26 FAILED. See for details -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 1301246] perl-SNMP-Info-3.31 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301246 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1301246] perl-SNMP-Info-3.31 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301246 --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- jplesnik's perl-SNMP-Info-3.31-1.fc25 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=747818 -- You are receiving this mail

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-XML-CommonNS (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-XML-CommonNS (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-XML-CommonNS/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'commit' permission on perl-XML-CommonNS (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'commit' permission on perl-XML-CommonNS (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-XML-CommonNS/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[Bug 1301246] perl-SNMP-Info-3.31 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301246 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-SNMP-Info-3.31-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-54dd065e70 -- You are receiving this mail

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'approveacls' permission on perl-XML-CommonNS (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'approveacls' permission on perl-XML-CommonNS (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-XML-CommonNS/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-XML-CommonNS (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-XML-CommonNS (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-XML-CommonNS/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 380 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 142 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 18

jplesnik uploaded WWW-Search-2.515.tar.gz for perl-WWW-Search

a7bbb66df60ffa13f2e4315d4a3b598d WWW-Search-2.515.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-WWW-Search/WWW-Search-2.515.tar.gz/md5/a7bbb66df60ffa13f2e4315d4a3b598d/WWW-Search-2.515.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl

jplesnik pushed to perl-WWW-Search (master). "2.515 bump"

From 3891b6c9d21c2b7d17656cd8cbb874acf4b52619 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 15:46:30 +0100 Subject: 2.515 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-WWW-Search.spec | 7 +-- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 7

[Bug 1291682] perl-WWW-Search-2.515 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291682 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Bug 1319683] Please upgrade to upstream version

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319683 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Config-General-2.60-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1318457] perl-DBIx-Connector-0.56 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318457 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DBIx-Connector-0.56-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1315521] perl-File-Edit-Portable-1.24 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315521 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System --- perl-File-Edit-Portable-1.24-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1319536] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20160320 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319536 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-CoreList-5.20160320-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See