[Modularity] WG Meeting in 2 hours at 15h UTC in #fedora-meeting

Please join us in #fedora-meeting in about 2 hours (15h UTC). Please feel free to propose any agenda items here or during the roll call of the meeting. Agenda: * Governance * What & when Langdon PS: the proposed governance wiki page should be updated by then[1] PPS: you can find the

How to fix broken dependency in orphaned package that FTBFS in F24

Hi all. We pushed an update for log4cplus in F24+ [1]. It is a rebase and one of the dependent packages is "pion-net". The problem is that pion-net does not build on F24+, which stops us from pushing update on F24 which would not break dependencies. There is an older build of pion-net in F24

Re: How to fix broken dependency in orphaned package that FTBFS in F24

On 7 April 2016 at 14:26, Tomas Hozza wrote: > Hi all. > > We pushed an update for log4cplus in F24+ [1]. It is a rebase and one of > the dependent packages is "pion-net". The problem is that pion-net does not > build on F24+, which stops us from pushing update on F24 which

perl-Lucy-0.5.0-1.fc25 changed license

perl-Lucy-0.5.0-1.fc25 changed license from (ASL 2.0) to (ASL 2.0 and MIT). -- Petr -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: iproute package split

On 04/07/2016 04:07 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Thu, 2016-04-07 at 12:55 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: If you have: (main package) Obsoletes: %{name} < the-new-version-release %package tc Obsoletes: %{name} < the-new-version-release Both subpackages should get installed on

Re: How to fix broken dependency in orphaned package that FTBFS in F24

On 04/07/2016 02:26 PM, Tomas Hozza wrote: Hi all. We pushed an update for log4cplus in F24+ [1]. It is a rebase and one of the dependent packages is "pion-net". The problem is that pion-net does not build on F24+, which stops us from pushing update on F24 which would not break dependencies.

ppisar uploaded Lucy-0.5.0.tar.gz for perl-Lucy

c5f27bea81bc60625c07fb3e6622c4d4 Lucy-0.5.0.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Lucy/Lucy-0.5.0.tar.gz/md5/c5f27bea81bc60625c07fb3e6622c4d4/Lucy-0.5.0.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

Re: No Rich boolean deps in Requires/Recommends for f24

On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 07:54:36 -0400 Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Stephen Gallagher > wrote: > > On 04/06/2016 04:49 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>> "PP" == Petr Pisar writes: > >> > >> PP> This

Re: Error while retiring breathe

On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 21:09:11 -0700 Dave Johansen wrote: > I'm renaming breathe [1] to python-breathe [2]. I just tried to retire > breathe in f22 using the instructions on the wiki [3] and got the > following error: > Could not retire package: Error while decoding JSON:

Re: How to fix broken dependency in orphaned package that FTBFS in F24

On 7 Apr 2016 15:58, "Kalev Lember" wrote: > > On 04/07/2016 02:26 PM, Tomas Hozza wrote: >> >> Hi all. >> >> We pushed an update for log4cplus in F24+ [1]. It is a rebase and one of the dependent packages is "pion-net". The problem is that pion-net does not build on F24+,

Re: iproute package split

On 7 Apr 2016 16:07, "Phil Sutter" wrote: > > Hi, > > On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 12:55:40PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > If you have: > > > > Maybe you already thought about this, but I'd add > > Recommends: iproute-tc to the main package, and > > I guess

Re: python F23 update testing needed

On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:28:37 +0200 Jan Pokorný wrote: ...snip... > Does bodhi allow to specify several builds as a means of an atomic > (non-racy) override? Should I file a RFE for that if not? Seems to already be filed: https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/777

Re: NUnit test in Monodevelop

Do you try this? NUnit TestAdapter including NUnit 2.6.4 framework Ref: http://blog.wildsky.cc/posts/nunit-3-0-1-not-working/ Ilia Gradina 於 2016年4月7日 週四 下午7:59寫道： > ok, > bug:

Re: iproute package split

Hi, On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 12:55:40PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > If you have: > > (main package) > Obsoletes: %{name} < the-new-version-release > > %package tc > Obsoletes: %{name} < the-new-version-release > > Both subpackages should get installed on upgrade. Oh, this is

Re: python F23 update testing needed

On 04/07/2016 07:28 AM, Jan Pokorný wrote: On 02/04/16 13:58 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote: On 02/04/16 12:26 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote: On 31/03/16 21:28 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: I've just submitted https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-dcddcc1f06 This update does two things:

Re: iproute package split

On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 01:09:11PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 06:01:14PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote: > > I am in the process of splitting the 'tc' utility off from iproute > > package. The motivation for this comes from two things: > > After considering your

Re: No Rich boolean deps in Requires/Recommends for f24

On 04/06/2016 04:49 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >> "PP" == Petr Pisar writes: > > PP> This changes meaning regarding to F25. Previous text banned rich > PP> strong dependencies in F24 only. This current text extends the ban > PP> to all Fedoras. > > PP> Is that

Re: NUnit test in Monodevelop

ok, bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com//show_bug.cgi?id=1324824 On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 2:24 PM Timotheus Pokorra < timotheus.poko...@solidcharity.com> wrote: > Hello Ilia, > > >> > in monodevelop (f24,f25) don't work NUnit test. I can not create NUnit > >> > test > >> > from IDE. > > I am one of

Re: No Rich boolean deps in Requires/Recommends for f24

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 04/06/2016 04:49 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >>> "PP" == Petr Pisar writes: >> >> PP> This changes meaning regarding to F25. Previous text banned rich >> PP> strong dependencies in F24

Re: iproute package split

On Thu, 2016-04-07 at 12:55 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > If you have: > > (main package) > Obsoletes: %{name} < the-new-version-release > > %package tc > Obsoletes: %{name} < the-new-version-release > > Both subpackages should get installed on upgrade. This is a good trick; I've

Re: python F23 update testing needed

On 02/04/16 13:58 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote: > On 02/04/16 12:26 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote: >> On 31/03/16 21:28 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: >>> I've just submitted >>> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-dcddcc1f06 >>> >>> This update does two things: >>> >>> - Updates python to

Re: iproute package split

On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 08:07:01AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Thu, 2016-04-07 at 12:55 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > If you have: > > > > (main package) > > Obsoletes: %{name} < the-new-version-release > > > > %package tc > > Obsoletes: %{name} < the-new-version-release

Re: NUnit test in Monodevelop

it function (create NUnit test from IDE) work on monodevelop(v.5.9.7) in f23. On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:55 PM Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > From: "Ilia Gradina" > > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" < > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> > >

Re: pushed package to stable four days ago, is it stuck?

On 04/07/2016 06:45 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: I pushed glusterfs-3.7.9-1.fc23 to stable four days ago. It has +4 karma. It's still pending. Is it stuck? Can someone please give it a kick? >>> >>> All the updates are already in process of being kicked by me, should >>> hopefully be

Re: NUnit test in Monodevelop

Hello Ilia, >> > in monodevelop (f24,f25) don't work NUnit test. I can not create NUnit >> > test >> > from IDE. I am one of the maintainers of the Fedora monodevelop package. Please create a bug for it at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ Product: Fedora, Component: monodevelop I will try to have

Re: pushed package to stable four days ago, is it stuck?

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Kaleb KEITHLEY wrote: > On 04/07/2016 06:45 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > I pushed glusterfs-3.7.9-1.fc23 to stable four days ago. It has +4 karma. > > It's still pending. Is it stuck? Can someone please give it a kick?

Fedora 24-20160407.n.1 compose check report

Missing expected images: Kde live i386 Workstation live i386 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Workstation live x86_64 No images in this compose but not 24-20160406.n.0 Images in 24-20160406.n.0 but not this: Lxde live x86_64 Mate live i386

Re: changing project homepage in apps and pkgdb

On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 07:44:21PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 05:12:19PM +0100, Dave Love wrote: > > How do you change the homepage listed in a project's apps page and > > "upstream" in pkgdb (e.g. in > > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/powerman and the

Re: iproute package split

On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 05:35:00PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 04:35:49PM +0100, James Hogarth wrote: > > On 7 Apr 2016 16:07, "Phil Sutter" wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 12:55:40PM +, Zbigniew

weakdeps and the buildroot

Hi All, Following the decision of FPC that weak deps must not be installed into the buildroot[1] koji has been changed to set install_weak_deps to 0. What this means is that some builds may fail due to missing things. if you encounter this the correct fix is to add BuildRequires to you

Re: changing project homepage in apps and pkgdb

On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 05:12:19PM +0100, Dave Love wrote: > How do you change the homepage listed in a project's apps page and > "upstream" in pkgdb (e.g. in > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/powerman and the different one > in

Re: python F23 update testing needed

On 07/04/16 09:41 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:28:37 +0200 > Jan Pokorný wrote: > > ...snip... > >> Does bodhi allow to specify several builds as a means of an atomic >> (non-racy) override? Should I file a RFE for that if not? > > Seems to already

Re: iproute package split

On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 04:35:49PM +0100, James Hogarth wrote: > On 7 Apr 2016 16:07, "Phil Sutter" wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 12:55:40PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > If you have: > > > > > > > > > Maybe you already thought about

changing project homepage in apps and pkgdb

How do you change the homepage listed in a project's apps page and "upstream" in pkgdb (e.g. in https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/powerman and the different one in https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/powerman/)? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Can't request commit access after requesting an EPEL 7 branch

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/pg_top/ I requested that an EPEL 7 branch be created for pg_top and it was granted, but now I can't request commit access for the other branches. Is this a known issue? Is there a workaround? Thanks, Dave -- devel mailing list

Re: weakdeps and the buildroot

On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 11:40:18AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Hi All, > > Following the decision of FPC that weak deps must not be installed into the > buildroot[1] koji has been changed to set install_weak_deps to 0. What this > means is that some builds may fail due to missing things.

Re: weakdeps and the buildroot

On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 10:04:58PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > In this case the package doesn't depend explicitly on rubygem-rdoc (a > bug, I think). I'll try to add that and see if it makes a difference. FWIW adding `BuildRequires: rubygem(rdoc)' fixed this. Is it strange that dnf

Re: weakdeps and the buildroot

On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 11:39:18PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote: > Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 10:04:58PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > In this case the package doesn't depend explicitly on rubygem-rdoc > > > (a bug, I think). I'll try to add that and see if it

Fedora 24 compose report: 20160407.n.1 changes

OLD: Fedora-24-20160406.n.0 NEW: Fedora-24-20160407.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added packages: 5 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 79 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 1.40 MiB Size of dropped packages:0.00 B Size of upgraded packages: 1.43 GiB Size

Re: Fedora 24-20160407.n.1 compose check report

On Thu, 2016-04-07 at 22:32 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > Missing expected images: > > Kde live i386 > Workstation live i386 > Kde live x86_64 > Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 > Cloud_base raw-xz i386 > Atomic raw-xz x86_64 > Workstation live x86_64 So all the live image builds for this

Re: Announce: OpenCV 3.1 in Rawhide

There were issues with mock while building. Some packages failed even if they should not. About OpenImageIO - it's strange, but I did not investigate it. I will look into it. Pavel. On Wed, 2016-04-06 at 09:05 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > It's interesting that OpenImageIO failed for f24 but

Re: weakdeps and the buildroot

Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 10:04:58PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > In this case the package doesn't depend explicitly on rubygem-rdoc > > (a bug, I think). I'll try to add that and see if it makes a > > difference. > > FWIW adding `BuildRequires: rubygem(rdoc)'

Re: iproute package split

On 04/07/2016 09:12 PM, Phil Sutter wrote: On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 05:35:00PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 04:35:49PM +0100, James Hogarth wrote: On 7 Apr 2016 16:07, "Phil Sutter" wrote: Hi, On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 12:55:40PM +,

Fedora 24-20160407.n.2 compose check report

Missing expected images: Kde live i386 Workstation live i386 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Workstation live x86_64 No images in this compose but not 24-20160407.n.1 No images in 24-20160407.n.1 but not this. Failed openQA tests: 4/53

Fedora 24 compose report: 20160407.n.2 changes

OLD: Fedora-24-20160407.n.1 NEW: Fedora-24-20160407.n.2 = SUMMARY = Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:0.00 B Size of upgraded packages: 0.00 B Size of downgraded

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-04-08)

Hi, Please note that I feel only one ticket is there in this week that need discussion. If any other existing open ticket need to be discussed then we can discuss that in the meeting but I am adding only one new ticket on the Agenda of this meeting. Following is the list of topics that will

Re: weakdeps and the buildroot

On 04/07/2016 06:40 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: Hi All, Following the decision of FPC that weak deps must not be installed into the buildroot[1] koji has been changed to set install_weak_deps to 0. What this means is that some builds may fail due to missing things. if you encounter this the

[Test-Announce] Fedora 24 Branched 20160407.n.2 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 24 Branched 20160407.n.2. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: iproute package split

On Thu, 2016-04-07 at 17:46 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: > It might seem better but it doesn't work. > > Obsoletes are matched on package names only, and %{name}%{isa} in  > packages is in the package provides so the ends never meet and > nothing  > gets obsoleted. Thanks for pointing this

Re: pushed package to stable four days ago, is it stuck?

On 04/05/2016 08:55 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Kaleb KEITHLEY wrote: >> >> I pushed glusterfs-3.7.9-1.fc23 to stable four days ago. It has +4 karma. >> >> It's still pending. Is it stuck? Can someone please give it a kick? > > All the

Re: pushed package to stable four days ago, is it stuck?

>>> I pushed glusterfs-3.7.9-1.fc23 to stable four days ago. It has +4 karma. >>> >>> It's still pending. Is it stuck? Can someone please give it a kick? >> >> All the updates are already in process of being kicked by me, should >> hopefully be moving again shortly. >> > > Thanks, > > I have

NUnit test in Monodevelop

Hi all, in monodevelop (f24,f25) don't work NUnit test. I can not create NUnit test from IDE. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: NUnit test in Monodevelop

> From: "Ilia Gradina" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2016 12:47:15 PM > Subject: NUnit test in Monodevelop > > Hi all, Hi, > in monodevelop (f24,f25) don't work NUnit test. I can not create

Re: iproute package split

Hi, On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 06:01:14PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote: > I am in the process of splitting the 'tc' utility off from iproute > package. The motivation for this comes from two things: After considering your feedback (thanks!) and just going for it (thereby messing up Rawhide a bit), I am

[EPEL-devel] Re: python_provide macro in EPEL 7?

On 04/06/2016 10:00 PM, Dave Johansen wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 8:39 PM, Orion Poplawski > wrote: On 04/06/2016 09:31 PM, Dave Johansen wrote: I'm trying to build python-breathe in EPEL 7 (

[EPEL-devel] Upgrading QGIS to 2.14 in EL 7?

https://www.qgis.org/en/site/forusers/visualchangelog214/index.html QGIS has adopted a LTR model similar to Firefox and 2.14 is the new LTR. I've considered doing what RedHat does with Firefox and updating the version of QGIS in EPEL with LTR releases. What is everyone's thoughts on that? Thanks,

[Bug 1322446] perl-Params-Validate-1.23 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322446 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Params-Validate-1.23-1

[Bug 1319683] Please upgrade to upstream version

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319683 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

ppisar pushed to perl-Lucy (master). "0.5.0 bump"

From 188e161abc24d0d29989f6515854e2f3f1e93a56 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 17:04:47 +0200 Subject: 0.5.0 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Lucy.spec | 21 +++-- sources| 2 +- 3 files

[Bug 1322446] perl-Params-Validate-1.23 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322446 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Params-Validate-1.23-1

[Bug 1324892] perl-Lucy-0.4.4-1.fc25 FTBFS: Invalid parameter: 'initializer' at buildlib/Lucy/Build/Binding/Index.pm

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324892 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- This is fixed in a new upstream Lucy-0.5.0 release. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[Bug 1319683] Please upgrade to upstream version

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319683 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Config-General-2.60-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1322446] perl-Params-Validate-1.23 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322446 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Params-Validate-1.23-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1319683] Please upgrade to upstream version

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319683 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Config-General-2.60-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1319683] Please upgrade to upstream version

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319683 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Config-General-2.60-1.

[Bug 1322446] perl-Params-Validate-1.23 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322446 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Params-Validate-1.23-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1320354] perl-Socket6-0.27 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320354 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1318839] perl-Socket6-0.26 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318839 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Socket6-0.27-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving

[Bug 1320354] perl-Socket6-0.27 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320354 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Socket6-0.27-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving

[Bug 1318839] perl-Socket6-0.26 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318839 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1239778] perl-MooseX-Workers: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239778 --- Comment #6 from Petr Pisar --- Few days ago, I got similar failure with perl-MooseX-Workers-0.24-5.fc25. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[Bug 1324887] New: perl-Starlet-0.29-1.fc25 FTBFS: t/11multi-sockets.t fails

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324887 Bug ID: 1324887 Summary: perl-Starlet-0.29-1.fc25 FTBFS: t/11multi-sockets.t fails Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Starlet Assignee:

[Bug 1324892] New: perl-Lucy-0.4.4-1.fc25 FTBFS: Invalid parameter: 'initializer' at buildlib/Lucy/Build/Binding/Index.pm

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324892 Bug ID: 1324892 Summary: perl-Lucy-0.4.4-1.fc25 FTBFS: Invalid parameter: 'initializer' at buildlib/Lucy/Build/Binding/Index.pm Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component:

Re: Removing perl from build root

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 03:10:26PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > This change will go through a Fedora system wide change process and Perl > packaging guidelines update. I'd like to implement it in Fedora 25. > Here are the proposed documents: Fedora Change:

berrange uploaded Sys-Virt-1.3.3.tar.gz for perl-Sys-Virt

f8d85acfd44c53607d87737c57bb72f7 Sys-Virt-1.3.3.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Sys-Virt/Sys-Virt-1.3.3.tar.gz/md5/f8d85acfd44c53607d87737c57bb72f7/Sys-Virt-1.3.3.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel

[Bug 1324047] perl-Lingua-Translit-0.25 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324047 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Lingua-Translit-0.25-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

berrange pushed to perl-Sys-Virt (f24). "Update to 1.3.3 release"

From 2524410143d2c1ec2183ce7c59d444b0ee14ed0e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Daniel P. Berrange" Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 18:00:51 +0100 Subject: Update to 1.3.3 release --- perl-Sys-Virt.spec | 5 - sources| 2 +- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2

berrange pushed to perl-Sys-Virt (master). "Update to 1.3.3 release"

From 15c2d7cdcf4158d0407e5db23f7a04d2d30e87af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Daniel P. Berrange" Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 18:00:51 +0100 Subject: Update to 1.3.3 release --- perl-Sys-Virt.spec | 5 - sources| 2 +- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2

[Bug 1315905] perl-MongoDB-v1.2.3 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315905 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1322572] Version bump to 1.055 causes warnings on el6

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322572 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-SSLGlue-1.057-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 395 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 158 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 24

[Bug 1305061] perl-Encode-2.80 breaks sending email by bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305061 --- Comment #5 from Sjoerd Mullender --- Created attachment 1144849 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1144849=edit possible patch to fix the problem Here is a patch that I hope fixes the problem. I haven't

[Bug 1324047] perl-Lingua-Translit-0.25 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324047 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Lingua-Translit-0.25-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 291 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6828 chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el6 274 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 268

[Bug 1324639] perl-Net-SSLGlue: update to 1.057 in epel

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324639 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-SSLGlue-1.057-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1324047] perl-Lingua-Translit-0.25 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324047 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Lingua-Translit-0.25-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1319683] Please upgrade to upstream version

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319683 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Config-General-2.60-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1319683] Please upgrade to upstream version

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319683 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Config-General-2.60-1.

[Bug 1324639] perl-Net-SSLGlue: update to 1.057 in epel

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324639 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1322572] Version bump to 1.055 causes warnings on el6

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322572 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ON_QA

[Bug 1324047] perl-Lingua-Translit-0.25 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324047 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Lingua-Translit-0.25-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

Broken dependencies: perl-Dumbbench

perl-Dumbbench has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On armhfp: perl-Dumbbench-BoxPlot-0.10-2.fc24.noarch requires perl(SOOT) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[EPEL-devel] Re: Upgrading QGIS to 2.14 in EL 7?

On 04/07/2016 10:33 AM, Dave Johansen wrote: > https://www.qgis.org/en/site/forusers/visualchangelog214/index.html > QGIS has adopted a LTR model similar to Firefox and 2.14 is the new LTR. > I've considered doing what RedHat does with Firefox and updating the > version of QGIS in EPEL with LTR

[Bug 1315905] perl-MongoDB-v1.2.3 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315905 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-MongoDB-1.2.3-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-572f48c74c -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1293113] perl-EV-4.22 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293113 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1293113] perl-EV-4.22 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293113 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

Broken dependencies: perl-Dumbbench

perl-Dumbbench has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On armhfp: perl-Dumbbench-BoxPlot-0.10-2.fc24.noarch requires perl(SOOT) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

Broken dependencies: perl-Dumbbench

perl-Dumbbench has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On armhfp: perl-Dumbbench-BoxPlot-0.10-2.fc24.noarch requires perl(SOOT) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[Bug 1158860] Please drop dependency on perl-generators from rpm-build

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158860 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added URL|