On 22 May 2016 14:08, "Martin Gansser" wrote:
>
> thanks, for your feedback,
>
> I already piushed the buttom + Ask Retirement, but this fails with the
message
> "You must provide a valid review URL to un-retire master"
>
> i gave as review_url this link to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 01:07:33PM -, Martin Gansser wrote:
> I already piushed the buttom + Ask Retirement, but this fails with the message
> "You must provide a valid review URL to un-retire master"
>
> i gave as review_url this link to
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338140
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Failed openQA tests: 6/72 (x86_64), 3/17 (i386)
ID: 18716 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/18716
ID: 18717 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fe
Hi all,
Doing the obligatory introduction :)
I am a member of the Apache Software Foundation, and on the PMCs of the httpd
and apr projects where amongst other things I maintain the out-of-the-box RPM
packaging for both projects. I would like to see more of the Apache module
ecosystem easily a
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Doing the obligatory introduction :)
>
> I am a member of the Apache Software Foundation, and on the PMCs of the httpd
> and apr projects where amongst other things I maintain the out-of-the-box RPM
> packaging for both projec
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2016-05-23
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's meeting time again on Monday! We haven't met for a while, and I
think it'd be good to check in o
# F24 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2016-05-23
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Hi folks! We have 7 proposed Final blockers to review. There are also 6
accepted blockers to check in on, and 5 proposed freeze exception
issues we could look at if we have time
I plan to update assimp[1] to version 3.2.0 in rawhide and f24 in the
next day or two. The update involves a soname bump, so dependent
packages will need to be rebuilt:
$ dnf repoquery --alldeps --source --whatrequires assimp
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:01 ago on Sun May 22 18:04:05 2
psabata changed psabata's 'commit' permission on perl-Module-CPANfile (f22) to
'Obsolete'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Module-CPANfile/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160521.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160522.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 40
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 62.54 KiB
Size of dropped packages
Missing expected images:
Kde live i386
Workstation live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Workstation live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 13/60 (x86_64), 6/15 (i386)
ID: 18634 Test: x86_64 Atomic-boot-iso install_default
U
i filled already a new review request on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338140
The package was retired at 2014-05-14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/guayadeque/
Can a admin give me access to f24 and rawhide to update the package again.
--
devel mailing list
devel
You probably need someone to complete the review and then request the
branches from the PackageDB.
Given the time frame, perhaps you could file an unretirement request
through the PackageDB interface without going through the review process,
but I'm not sure about that.
--
devel mailing list
devel@
On 22 May 2016 13:45, "Alexander Ploumistos"
wrote:
>
> You probably need someone to complete the review and then request the
branches from the PackageDB.
> Given the time frame, perhaps you could file an unretirement request
through the PackageDB interface without going through the review process
psabata changed psabata's 'commit' permission on perl-Convert-ASN1 (f22) to
'Obsolete'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Convert-ASN1/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
ht
thanks, for your feedback,
I already piushed the buttom + Ask Retirement, but this fails with the message
"You must provide a valid review URL to un-retire master"
i gave as review_url this link to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338140, but this fails also with
"You must provide a
thanks for your feedback, will try this.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
psabata changed psabata's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Config-Any (f23)
to 'Obsolete'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Config-Any/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
psabata changed psabata's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Config-Any (f22)
to 'Obsolete'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Config-Any/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
psabata changed psabata's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Config-Any (f24)
to 'Obsolete'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Config-Any/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
OLD: Fedora-24-20160521.n.0
NEW: Fedora-24-20160522.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 8
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 108
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 95.81 MiB
Size of dropped packages:7.70 MiB
21 matches
Mail list logo
