Diagreement with pkgconfig removal

On Friday, January 13, 2017 1:18:34 PM CET Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > On Friday, January 13, 2017 5:54:41 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote: > >> Doh I missed this. This is now approved due to "bootstrapping issue". So > >> the

Re: Diagreement with pkgconfig removal

On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 7:10 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On Friday, January 13, 2017 1:18:34 PM CET Neal Gompa wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: >> > On Friday, January 13, 2017 5:54:41 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote: >> >> Doh

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2017-01-12)

I'll take budgie. On 01/13/2017 06:56 AM, opensou...@till.name wrote: The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2017-01-12)

Ah, sorry, just saw the reason budgie orphaned is that, the upstream is deleted. On 01/14/2017 08:29 PM, Zamir SUN wrote: I'll take budgie. On 01/13/2017 06:56 AM, opensou...@till.name wrote: The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless

Re: Diagreement with pkgconfig removal

On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 09:51 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > And being afraid of > switching to a different and fully compatible implementation of > pkg-config just because it's not the implementation we've used for > over a decade is contrary to those values. But...you just said yourself it's not

Re: Diagreement with pkgconfig removal

On Saturday, January 14, 2017 7:45:05 AM CET Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 7:10 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > On Friday, January 13, 2017 1:18:34 PM CET Neal Gompa wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Pavel Raiskup > >> wrote: > >>

Re: Attempt at building YafaRay

On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 12:20 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > Here is an attempt at building YafaRay using scratch build: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17274673 > > > An issue is somehow OpenCV will not meet a requirement due to this error > below:

Re: Diagreement with pkgconfig removal

On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On Saturday, January 14, 2017 7:45:05 AM CET Neal Gompa wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 7:10 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: >> > On Friday, January 13, 2017 1:18:34 PM CET Neal Gompa wrote: >> >> On

becoming a co-maintainer of elementary-icon-theme

Hello Johannes, I am working on getting all the elementary apps and pantheon desktop components into fedora and wondered if you could approve my ACL Requests for becoming a co-maintaner of elementary-icon-theme (since that package obviously ties in with the other packages I am now maintaining,

becoming a co-maintainer of plank

Hello Wesley, I am working on getting all the elementary apps and pantheon desktop components into fedora and wondered if you could approve my ACL Requests for becoming a co-maintaner of plank (since that package is obviously also part of a Pantheon DE and ties in with the other packages I am

Re: Diagreement with pkgconfig removal

On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 10:45:48AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Adam Williamson > wrote: > > On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 09:51 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > >> And being afraid of > >> switching to a different and fully compatible implementation

Re: becoming a co-maintainer of elementary-icon-theme

Fabio, sorry for do not star a new thread, but there is a way to help you with the packaging of pantheon in Fedora? Some package than new review or than need to be packaged? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Re: debuginfo updates: RFE for dnf?

On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:16:18PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 01/13/2017 12:03 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > > On 01/13/2017 11:30 AM, Michael Mraka wrote: > >> Przemek Klosowski: > >>> Easy access to debug information is very well done in Fedora, and is > >>> one of its most empowering

Re: Diagreement with pkgconfig removal

On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 19:35 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > You argue that the change should be mostly painless, but without > providing any details: why not rebuild a 10 or 100 or 1000 packages > in a mock root with pkgconf-pkg-config? Even if there are some minor > hiccups, at least

Re: Diagreement with pkgconfig removal

Hi, On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 09:51 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: >> And being afraid of >> switching to a different and fully compatible implementation of >> pkg-config just because it's not the implementation we've

Re: Diagreement with pkgconfig removal

Hello, On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 19:35 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >> You argue that the change should be mostly painless, but without >> providing any details: why not rebuild a 10 or 100 or 1000

Re: Diagreement with pkgconfig removal

On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 09:51 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: >> And being afraid of >> switching to a different and fully compatible implementation of >> pkg-config just because it's not the implementation we've used

Re: HEADS UP: Rebasing to Readline-7.0 in rawhide

On Friday, January 13, 2017 6:33:49 PM CET Igor Gnatenko wrote: > On Fri, 2017-01-13 at 10:30 -0500, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Readline-7.0 was released few months ago and I have rebased it in > > rawhide to version 7.0. I have created a compatibility package > >

Re: HEADS UP: Rebasing to Readline-7.0 in rawhide

On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 17:17 +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On Friday, January 13, 2017 6:33:49 PM CET Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > On Fri, 2017-01-13 at 10:30 -0500, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > Readline-7.0 was released few months ago and I have rebased it in > > > rawhide to

Re: Diagreement with pkgconfig removal

On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > Hi Neal! > > On Saturday, January 14, 2017 9:51:39 AM CET Neal Gompa wrote: >> > I hope no. Can you be precise here? I'm all for protecting Fedora's >> > interests.; >> >> I strongly believe in Fedora's

Re: Diagreement with pkgconfig removal

Hello, On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > Hi Neal! > > On Saturday, January 14, 2017 9:51:39 AM CET Neal Gompa wrote: >> > I hope no. Can you be precise here? I'm all for protecting Fedora's >> > interests.; >> >> I strongly believe in Fedora's

Re: Diagreement with pkgconfig removal

Hello, On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Björn Persson wrote: > Neal Gompa wrote: >> Because pkgconf supports the full specification, including Provides >> rules. pkgconfig does not. It's been *years* and they never added >> support for it. It's even documented to be a stub

Re: Diagreement with pkgconfig removal

Hi Neal! On Saturday, January 14, 2017 9:51:39 AM CET Neal Gompa wrote: > > I hope no. Can you be precise here? I'm all for protecting Fedora's > > interests.; > > I strongly believe in Fedora's Foundations[0], which include a commitment to > "excellence" and "innovation". I hope it all is

Re: RFC: static builds for user emulators in Fedora QEMU RPMs

Daniel, thanks for presenting this so clearly; I think you're spot-on. Has there been any progress on this? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: RFC: static builds for user emulators in Fedora QEMU RPMs

On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Jonathon Reinhart wrote: > Daniel, thanks for presenting this so clearly; I think you're spot-on. Has > there been any progress on this? qemu-user-static has been shipping in Fedora qemu builds since qemu 2.6.0-5 in Fedora 24. :)

Re: Diagreement with pkgconfig removal

Neal Gompa wrote: > Because pkgconf supports the full specification, including Provides > rules. pkgconfig does not. It's been *years* and they never added > support for it. It's even documented to be a stub implementation in > pkgconfig. As a result of pkgconf fully implementing the Provides >

Rebuilt SWIG with support for Octave 4.2

I just backported the upstream patch for adding support for Octave 4.2 to SWIG in Rawhide. Build is running [1]. Cheers Björn [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17285610 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Diagreement with pkgconfig removal

On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Björn Persson wrote: > Neal Gompa wrote: >> Because pkgconf supports the full specification, including Provides >> rules. pkgconfig does not. It's been *years* and they never added >> support for it. It's even documented to be a stub

Re: drop obsolete static uid/gid allocations

On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 7:20 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 01:17:52AM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> >> Am 15.01.2017 um 01:13 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: >> >== No need for static allocation, afaict >> >games, man, slocate, squid,

Re: Attempt at building YafaRay

On 14/01/17 06:45 AM, Rich Mattes wrote: > On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 12:20 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga > wrote: >> Here is an attempt at building YafaRay using scratch build: >> >> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17274673 >> >> >> An issue is somehow OpenCV

Heads up: lua-lpeg 1.0.1 in Rawhide; lua no longer in mock root by default?

Hi all, Just a heads-up: I just built lua-lpeg 1.0.1 for Rawhide. The release notes does not seem to suggest any significant API change, but just to be sure we should probably let it sit in Rawhide for a while. On the packaging side, turns out Lua is not available by default in the mock root,

[Test-Announce] Fedora 26 Rawhide 20170114.n.1 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 26 Rawhide 20170114.n.1. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: drop obsolete static uid/gid allocations

On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 01:17:52AM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 15.01.2017 um 01:13 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: > >== No need for static allocation, afaict > >games, man, slocate, squid, named, postgres, mysql, nscd, > >rpcuser, rpc, rpm, ntp, mailman, gdm, utempter, apache,

Re: Diagreement with pkgconfig removal

Pavel Raiskup wrote: > Cool. Let's provide 'pkgconf' so we can be also three, too! But at the > same time please consider not dropping 'pkgconfig' for no reason. It's not "no reason". The reason is to provide a drop-in replacement, which necessarily requires using the same binary name. At that

Fedora Rawhide-20170114.n.1 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64 Atomic qcow2 x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 24/103 (x86_64), 17/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170111.n.0): ID: 54791 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso

Re: drop obsolete static uid/gid allocations

On Sunday, January 15, 2017 8:13:42 AM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote: > (which users are often a bit to setup .. s/a bit/a bit lazy/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

drop obsolete static uid/gid allocations

https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/setup.git/tree/uidgid has a list of "soft static" uids and gids. Currently FPC has a process for allocating new numbers on this list, but here's a number of static uid/gid allocations from old times, which are not necessary. Dropping them will allow those numbers

Re: Diagreement with pkgconfig removal

On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 10:45:48AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Adam Williamson >> wrote: >> > On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 09:51 -0500, Neal Gompa

Re: drop obsolete static uid/gid allocations

On Sunday, January 15, 2017 12:30:51 AM CET Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 7:20 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 01:17:52AM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > >> > >> > >> Am 15.01.2017 um 01:13 schrieb Zbigniew

Re: Proposal: Migrating More Git Projects to Pagure

On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2017-01-13 at 14:16 +0100, Josef Skladanka wrote: > > > I am personaly against issues/pull requests on Pagure - logging into > Phab > > is about as difficult as logging into Pagure, and I don't see the

kni requested branch epel7 for package perl-Class-Std

kni requested branch epel7 for package perl-Class-Std https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Class-Std/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL-ANNOUNCE ansible1.9 retirement

On 13 Jan 2017 11:59 pm, "Kevin Fenzi" wrote: On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 00:18:09 + Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 8:44 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Greetings. > > > > When ansible 2.0 was released there were some changes in

[Bug 1413323] New: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1413323 Bug ID: 1413323 Summary: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.06 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1413329] New: perl-Mouse-2.4.7 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1413329 Bug ID: 1413329 Summary: perl-Mouse-2.4.7 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Mouse Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr

[Bug 1413331] New: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20170115 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1413331 Bug ID: 1413331 Summary: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20170115 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Module-CoreList Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Broken dependencies: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2

perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit) On armhfp: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.1 On ppc64le: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.ppc64le requires

Broken dependencies: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3

perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.3()(64bit) On armhfp: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.3 On ppc64le: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.ppc64le requires

Broken dependencies: perl-Alien-ROOT

perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On aarch64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-2.fc26.noarch requires root-core On ppc64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-2.fc26.noarch requires root-core On ppc64le: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-2.fc26.noarch requires root-core

Broken dependencies: perl-ZeroMQ

perl-ZeroMQ has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-ZeroMQ-0.23-13.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit) On armhfp: perl-ZeroMQ-0.23-13.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.1 On ppc64le: perl-ZeroMQ-0.23-13.fc25.ppc64le requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit) On

Broken dependencies: perl-OpenOffice-UNO

perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On armhfp: perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-20.fc25.armv7hl requires libuno_cppu.so.3 perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-20.fc25.armv7hl requires libuno_cppu.so.3(LIBO_UDK_4.4) perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-20.fc25.armv7hl