Fix for GRUB_SAVEDEFAULT=true

Hi, GRUB_SAVEDEFAULT=true with EFI doesn't work correctly in Fedora 21, 22, 23, 24 and 25. Can someone have a look at this bug report? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1335533 There's a working patch available which is pretty simple. Thanks :) Regards, Jan

New Release: rpkg-1.49 and fedpkg-1.27

Hello Fedora Devs, I just made new release of rpkg-1.49 and fedpkg-1.27. Both of them are in Bodhi update now. Changelog: fedpkg - Python 3.6 invalid escape sequence deprecation fixes (ville.skytta) - Disable tag inheritance check - #98 (cqi) - Enable the fix to allow anonymous clone via

Fedora Rawhide-20170221.n.1 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64 Atomic qcow2 x86_64 Server dvd i386 Workstation live i386 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Xfce raw-xz armhfp Server boot i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Workstation live x86_64 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 60/85 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) ID:

Re: gcc7 issue with efl + aarch64

On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 04:51:47PM -0500, Tom Callaway wrote: > I'm stumped here. efl builds against all rawhide arches except aarch64, > where it has started failing like this (since gcc 7): > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2376/17972376/build.log [...] > Any gcc gurus have any

Re: Headsup: Xserver update switching Intel GPUs from xorg-x11-drv-intel to -modesetting by default coming to rawhide

Hi, On 22-02-17 03:42, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Ter, 2017-01-10 at 15:22 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, A while back Debian has switched to using the modesetting Xorg driver rather then the intel Xorg driver for Intel GPUs. There are several good reasons for this, rather then repeating them

Re: time to retire some kde4/smoke-based language bindings?

On 2017-02-22, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Anyway perl-Qt is not in the list of packages to be retired , can we > build perl-Qt without smokeqt ? I don't think so. It looks like smokeqt provides some kind of introspection for Qt library and perl-Qt is built on top of this

thunderbird 45.7.1 and packer account

Hi! I have build local thunderbird-45.7.1 for F25 and want upload it to koji but have no credentials. The error i become is "kinit kinit: Client '' not found in Kerberos database while getting initial credentials" - can you fix it? --

jplesnik pushed to perl-Net-SMTPS (master). "0.05 bump"

From 888a01d3dd923c8ea7ca814fc44f8aff36720c44 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 13:08:25 +0100 Subject: 0.05 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Net-SMTPS.spec | 23 ++- sources | 2 +- 3 files

Re: Semi-automated (and automated) testing of laptops for Fedora

> Hi, > > we are currently looking into enabling us to test laptops more > effectively. There are two main parts to the issue, which is to >    1. have a system to run semi-automated tests on a standalone machine >   and submit the results to an online server ("Fedora Tested Laptops") >   

Re: thunderbird 45.7.1 and packer account

On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 13:08 +0100, tech...@dk-software.org wrote: > The error i become is "kinit dksoftw...@fedoraproject.org > kinit: Client 'dksoftw...@fedoraproject.org' not found in Kerberos > database while getting initial credentials" - can you fix it? Hi, I'm not the service/server

Re: thunderbird 45.7.1 and packer account

tech...@dk-software.org píše v St 22. 02. 2017 v 13:08 +0100: > Hi! > > I have build local thunderbird-45.7.1 for F25 and want upload it to > koji > but have no credentials. The error i become is "kinit > > kinit: Client '' not found in

Re: thunderbird 45.7.1 and packer account

Have you tried with the domain in caps, i.e. @FEDORAPROJECT.ORG? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Plan to orphan cups-pdf

Hi, https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/cups-pdf/ Some bugs still exists, and a new version is released (3.0.0) I don't use this package anymore, and don't have really time anymore to take care of it. Feel to ask if you want to take ownership, Remi.

Re: thunderbird 45.7.1 and packer account

El 22/2/2017 6:47 a. m., escribió: Hi! I have build local thunderbird-45.7.1 for F25 and want upload it to koji but have no credentials. The error i become is "kinitdksoftw...@fedoraproject.org kinit: Client 'dksoftw...@fedoraproject.org' not found in Kerberos database

Re: fedorahosted.org sunset is next week!

Kevin Fenzi wrote: > fedorahosted is getting retired soon (next week!). > > A quick grep of spec files shows a lot of packages still using > fedorahosted.org in their URL and/or Source file lines. That tells me that the Fedora community is NOT ready for fedorahosted.org getting shut down and

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Anaconda LVM RAID

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:12 AM, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > On 02/22/2017 09:37 AM, Vratislav Podzimek wrote: > > On Tue, 2017-02-21 at 14:29 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > > Tested Fedora 24 and Fedora 23, there's no notification with either > one of those. I have no

Re: F27 System Wide Change: No More Alphas

On 02/21/2017 03:33 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > El mar, 21-02-2017 a las 01:56 +0100, Ralf Corsepius escribió: >> On 02/21/2017 01:48 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>> On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 00:14:56 + >>> "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" wrote: >>> ...snip... >>> Rawhide as it

Fedora Rawhide-20170222.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64 Atomic qcow2 x86_64 Server dvd i386 Workstation live i386 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Xfce raw-xz armhfp Server boot i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Workstation live x86_64 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 60/85 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) ID:

Re: F27 System Wide Change: No More Alphas

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >> Let's not overreact, even though I agree Ralf was out of line. >> >> https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Community_working_group > > Well, what exactly are you suggesting with those links? The first of > those links

Re: time to retire some kde4/smoke-based language bindings?

Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Seg, 2017-02-20 at 11:50 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: >> Sérgio Basto wrote: >> >> > >> > On Seg, 2017-02-20 at 10:39 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: >> > > >> > > Per old thread, >> > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedorap >> > > roje >> > >

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Anaconda LVM RAID

On Tue, 2017-02-21 at 14:29 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > Tested Fedora 24 and Fedora 23, there's no notification with either > one of those. I have no idea if this is a VM thing. Or if it's a > regression. > > Maybe the notification was depending on smartd rather than mdadm. > Kinda need someone

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Anaconda LVM RAID

On 02/22/2017 09:37 AM, Vratislav Podzimek wrote: On Tue, 2017-02-21 at 14:29 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: Tested Fedora 24 and Fedora 23, there's no notification with either one of those. I have no idea if this is a VM thing. Or if it's a regression. Maybe the notification was depending on

Re: F27 System Wide Change: No More Alphas

Rex Dieter wrote: > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >>> Let's not overreact, even though I agree Ralf was out of line. >>> >>> https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Community_working_group >> >> Well, what exactly are you suggesting with those links? The

Re: ActionNotAllowed: policy violation (build_from_srpm)

On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 18:52:35 +0100 Sandro Mani wrote: > Hi > > Anyone an idea what's going on here? > > $ fedpkg build > Building mingw-eigen3-3.3.3-1.fc26 for rawhide > Created task: 17994713 > Task info: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17994713

Re: F27 System Wide Change: No More Alphas

On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 09:36 -0800, Brian C. Lane wrote: > > > Because the entire installer environment is loaded into RAM during > > install, we try quite hard to keep the installer environment *small*. > > Not anymore (that was a F17 experiment that didn't go well). We run from > the boot media

Re: F27 System Wide Change: No More Alphas

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 09:05:14AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 17:30 +0100, Petr Lautrbach wrote: > > > > > Rawhide has been broken since the 15th, First due to nss, then rdma- > > > core, followed by policycoreutils and setools breakages. > > > > Could you please

Re: Headsup: Xserver update switching Intel GPUs from xorg-x11-drv-intel to -modesetting by default coming to rawhide

On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 02:42 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > The default of modesetting is enable glamor Correct. > and glamor doesn't run on 32-bit archs Incorrect. Glamor works fine on 32-bit CPUs, and on 64-bit CPUs if you force them to run 32-bit binaries. What it doesn't work on is some of

Fedora 25 Respin 20170221 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 22/22 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Any voluteers for maintaining xml-security-c?

https://github.com/metsma/libdigidocpp/blob/openssl11/xml-security-c-1.7.3_openssl1.1.patch There is even some opensslv1.1 patch. Still hoping that someone will take over :) On E, veebr 20, 2017 at 8:58 , mih...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Hey. I'm looking volunteers for maintaining

Re: SSH Key and FAS Account

Am 22. Februar 2017 um 20:27:34 +01:00, hat Kevin Fenzi geschrieben: > On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 19:59:09 +0100 > <> wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > I have genarte few hours a SSH Key and i can't connect to my > > pkgs.fedoraproject.org-account > > > > Error

Re: SSH Key and FAS Account

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:06 PM, wrote: > Thank you, but i can with "fedpkg scratch-build --srpm filename.src.rpm" it > upload to dksoftw...@pks.fedoraproject.org and here is a build -> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17995140 Scratch builds are

Re: Headsup: Xserver update switching Intel GPUs from xorg-x11-drv-intel to -modesetting by default coming to rawhide

On Qua, 2017-02-22 at 15:20 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 02:42 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > > The default of modesetting is enable glamor > > Correct. > > > > > and glamor doesn't run on 32-bit archs > > Incorrect. Glamor works fine on 32-bit CPUs, and on 64-bit

Re: Headsup: Xserver update switching Intel GPUs from xorg-x11-drv-intel to -modesetting by default coming to rawhide

> ... is trying to say. The "gen3" family of Intel GPUs (i915, i945, G33) > are (to put it politely) garbage. Though they claim to support fragment > shaders, the instruction limit of those shaders is far less than what > glamor requires. These GPUs will stop claiming fragment shaders support

policy on changes in or introduction of new dependencies

Dear Fedora developers, there have been a number of examples where an update in a stable branch brought in new dependencies and in significant numbers. The most recent case was discussed on this list even today:

Re: gcc7 issue with efl + aarch64

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 09:44:32AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 04:51:47PM -0500, Tom Callaway wrote: > > I don't have an aarch64 setup, but even > > if I did, this isn't much to go on. > > It's a real shame that none of the cheap 64 bit boards work with > Fedora. I

ActionNotAllowed: policy violation (build_from_srpm)

Hi Anyone an idea what's going on here? $ fedpkg build Building mingw-eigen3-3.3.3-1.fc26 for rawhide Created task: 17994713 Task info: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17994713 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 17994713 build (rawhide,

Re: fedorahosted.org sunset is next week!

On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 17:22:05 +0100 Kevin Kofler wrote: > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > fedorahosted is getting retired soon (next week!). > > > > A quick grep of spec files shows a lot of packages still using > > fedorahosted.org in their URL and/or Source file lines. > >

Re: SSH Key and FAS Account

On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 19:59:09 +0100 wrote: > Hi! > > I have genarte few hours a SSH Key and i can't connect to my > pkgs.fedoraproject.org-account > > Error i become is: Perimiision denied (puplickey). > ssh -i /path/to/key/id_rsa is

Re: F27 System Wide Change: No More Alphas

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 09:05:14AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 17:30 +0100, Petr Lautrbach wrote: > > > > > Rawhide has been broken since the 15th, First due to nss, then rdma- > > > core, followed by policycoreutils and setools breakages. > > > > Could you please

SSH Key and FAS Account

Hi! I have genarte few hours a SSH Key and i can't connect to my pkgs.fedoraproject.org-account Error i become is: Perimiision denied (puplickey). ssh -i /path/to/key/id_rsa is the same error. I have upload the id_rsa.pub key to FAS Account. -- Dominik

Kernel 4.10 rebase plans and Fedora 26 kernel

The 4.10 kernel was released on Sunday, and built into rawhide on Monday. We plan to rebase Fedora 25 once we feel that 4.10 has stabilized enough. With history as an indicator, that should be the 4.10.2 stable release, but this is not set in stone. We will be monitoring closely. Fedora 24 will

Re: F27 System Wide Change: No More Alphas

On 02/22/2017 07:14 PM, Petr Lautrbach wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 09:05:14AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 17:30 +0100, Petr Lautrbach wrote: >>> Rawhide has been broken since the 15th, First due to nss, then rdma- core, followed by policycoreutils and

Re: fedorahosted.org sunset is next week!

Kevin Fenzi wrote: > By that logic: > > % egrep -i "Source|URL" * | grep googlecode | wc -l > 372 > > The Fedora community is NOT ready for googlecode to be shut down? > Things go away, it's part of the great internet cycle of life. It is well known that Google does not give a darn about its

Re: fedorahosted.org sunset is next week!

Is there a facility to redirect URLs to new sites? e.g. I'd like https://fedorahosted.org/publican/ to redirect to https://sourceware.org/publican/ Cheers, Jeff. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list --

Re: ActionNotAllowed: policy violation (build_from_srpm)

On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 21:19:52 +0100 Sandro Mani wrote: > On 22.02.2017 19:36, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 18:52:35 +0100 > > Sandro Mani wrote: > > > >> Hi > >> > >> Anyone an idea what's going on here? > >> > >> $ fedpkg build > >>

Re: F27 System Wide Change: No More Alphas

On Thu, 2017-02-23 at 00:22 +0100, Petr Lautrbach wrote: > > I have a fix for it in setools-4.1.0-1.fc26.6 - > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/516358/ > > > python3-networkx is only required by setools-gui (/usr/bin/apol) and > setools-console-analyses (/usr/bin/sedta and

Re: fedorahosted.org sunset is next week!

On Thu, 2017-02-23 at 00:28 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > By that logic: > > > > % egrep -i "Source|URL" * | grep googlecode | wc -l > > 372 > > > > The Fedora community is NOT ready for googlecode to be shut down? > > Things go away, it's part of the great internet cycle

Re: fedorahosted.org sunset is next week!

On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 10:10:27 +1000 Jeff Fearn wrote: > Is there a facility to redirect URLs to new sites? > > e.g. I'd like https://fedorahosted.org/publican/ to redirect to > https://sourceware.org/publican/ Yep. Just file an infrastructure ticket with what you want and we

Re: F27 System Wide Change: No More Alphas

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > What you are doing is filing a bug report with no way for anyone else to > reproduce it or resolve it and refusing to provide more info when asked. > > CLOSED CANTFIX > Unfortunately, this is an ongoing, extremely

Re: policy on changes in or introduction of new dependencies

On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 22:53 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Dear Fedora developers, > there have been a number of examples where an update in a stable branch > brought in new dependencies and in significant numbers. The most recent > case was discussed on this list even today: >

Re: fedorahosted.org sunset is next week!

On 23/02/2017 10:35 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 10:10:27 +1000 > Jeff Fearn wrote: > >> Is there a facility to redirect URLs to new sites? >> >> e.g. I'd like https://fedorahosted.org/publican/ to redirect to >> https://sourceware.org/publican/ > Yep. Just file

Re: policy on changes in or introduction of new dependencies

On Thursday, 23 February 2017 at 00:08, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 22:53 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: > > Dear Fedora developers, > > there have been a number of examples where an update in a stable branch > > brought in new dependencies and in significant

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Anaconda LVM RAID

On Tue, 2017-02-21 at 12:32 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 6:34 AM, Vratislav Podzimek > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2017-02-01 at 12:25 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > > > Actually, I've got a concern about this feature. > > > > > > I'm not sure what

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Anaconda LVM RAID

On Tue, 2017-02-21 at 07:52 -0600, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Vratislav Podzimek said: > > > > On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 14:50 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > > > My opinion of the change is limited to whether gnome-shell will still > > > notify the user of

Re: F27 System Wide Change: No More Alphas

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 09:29:33AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 07:48:27 +0100 >> Tomasz Torcz wrote: >> >> > I have: >> > page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(1 &&

cpio: Digest mismatch

Hi Guys, I have a source file of 6 GB and i try to create an RPM using the spec file. After creating the RPMS , i installed on the machines. But i am not able to do the command : "rpm -ivh LINSEE_xilinx-sdk_v20164-2016.4-1.src.rpm" It throws an error as below : [root@euca-10-254-169-180 SRPMS]#

Re: F27 System Wide Change: No More Alphas

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:55 PM Gerald B. Cox wrote: > It gets a bit tedious to read all the feigned outrage and the continuous > aggrandisement of the Fedora Code of Conduct; it shouldn't be used as a > construct to silence debate. > Vague accusations are not a debate. Rahul

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2017-02-23 17:00 UTC)

 Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2017-02-23 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net.  Local time information (via. rktime): 2017-02-23 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PST 2017-02-23 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EST 2017-02-23

Re: F27 System Wide Change: No More Alphas

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 5:00 AM Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 02/21/2017 01:02 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 6:42 PM Ralf Corsepius > > > > > > No. Mr. Williamson's attitude towards the Fedora community makes it > > impossible to answer > > > > > > Without

Re: F27 System Wide Change: No More Alphas

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 01:17:02AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >No. Mr. Williamson's attitude towards the Fedora community makes it > >impossible to answer > >Without details, a vague discussion adds nothing meaningful to the > >conversation. > Yes, and? It's Mr. Williamson's

Re: F27 System Wide Change: No More Alphas

On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 06:24:21PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > I for one don't actually want Rawhide to be gated because it makes > things much harder in terms of properly developing new features. We're > simply not capable of being as good as OpenSUSE in terms of automation > to be able to pull

Re: F27 System Wide Change: No More Alphas

On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 17:30 +0100, Petr Lautrbach wrote: > > > Rawhide has been broken since the 15th, First due to nss, then rdma- > > core, followed by policycoreutils and setools breakages. > > Could you please share more information about policycoreutils and > setools breakages? I haven't

Re: F27 System Wide Change: No More Alphas

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 09:28:51AM -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > Rex Dieter wrote: > > > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > >>> Let's not overreact, even though I agree Ralf was out of line. > >>> > >>> https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct > >>>

Re: F27 System Wide Change: No More Alphas

On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 4:14 PM M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: > I'm glad someone brought up Tumbleweed because every so often I build a VM > of Tumbleweed, a VM of Rawhide and a VM of Debian "sid" just to see if I > could use any of them as a workstation day-to-day. What I'm

Package 'xdelta' was relicensed from GPLv2 to ASL 2.0

SSIA, per release notes on http://xdelta.org/ Pavel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: policy on changes in or introduction of new dependencies

On 02/23/2017 02:23 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: On Thursday, 23 February 2017 at 00:08, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 22:53 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: Dear Fedora developers, there have been a number of examples where an update in a stable branch

Re: COPR and new chroot naming

Kevin Fenzi wrote: > If we move back to having a rawhide/devel/master repo the problem > becomes "which rawhide" ? if you build something in that branch a year > ago, what are the chances it will still work? I have packages built in 2007 that still work (in the CalcForge repository).

Re: ActionNotAllowed: policy violation (build_from_srpm)

On 22.02.2017 19:36, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 18:52:35 +0100 Sandro Mani wrote: Hi Anyone an idea what's going on here? $ fedpkg build Building mingw-eigen3-3.3.3-1.fc26 for rawhide Created task: 17994713 Task info:

Broken dependencies: perl-ZeroMQ

perl-ZeroMQ has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-ZeroMQ-0.23-13.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit) On armhfp: perl-ZeroMQ-0.23-13.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.1 On ppc64le: perl-ZeroMQ-0.23-13.fc25.ppc64le requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit) On

Broken dependencies: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3

perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.3()(64bit) On armhfp: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.3 On ppc64le: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.ppc64le requires

Broken dependencies: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2

perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit) On armhfp: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.1 On ppc64le: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.ppc64le requires

Broken dependencies: perl-Alien-ROOT

perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On ppc64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-4.fc26.noarch requires root-core On ppc64le: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-4.fc26.noarch requires root-core Please resolve this as soon as possible.

ppisar pushed to perl-libwww-perl (master). "6.21 bump"

From dc4f98d799b8e2d92e33ad323b03cdefa4558cdd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 08:57:34 +0100 Subject: 6.21 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-libwww-perl.spec | 42 ++

jplesnik uploaded Test-Expect-0.34.tar.gz for perl-Test-Expect

2bac870775b0da492f0f97817f4a45a88ed299fa110b0963067b94457a1935689cde23b896be67ce1c08b3a3d80f422162bb433475e281da6bb971b94580c592 Test-Expect-0.34.tar.gz

jplesnik pushed to perl-Test-Expect (master). "0.34 bump"

From e0ba36af0024a24c74f393f766a20b9aea8b0189 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 09:41:19 +0100 Subject: 0.34 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Test-Expect.spec | 7 +-- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 7

[Bug 1425015] Cwd.c: loadable library and perl binaries are mismatched ( got handshake key 0xdb00080, needed 0xdb80080)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1425015 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Bug 1425641] perl-libwww-perl-6.21 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1425641 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1422859] perl-Net-POP3S-0.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422859 --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- jplesnik's perl-Net-POP3S-0.06-1.fc26 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=860940 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1425650] perl-Test-Expect-0.34 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1425650 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1425129] perl-Log-Any-Adapter-Dispatch-0.06-16.fc26 FTBFS: Exception: :Class::Base::throw("Params::ValidationCompiler::Exception::Named::Extra", "message", "found extra parameters: [category]"

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1425129 --- Comment #7 from Paul Howarth --- (In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #6) > (In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #5) > Anyway, back to this bug. Upon closer inspection, I think, this package can > be removed

pghmcfc uploaded Mouse-v2.4.9.tar.gz for perl-Mouse

194471dc7121692dc4dcd384c4e3ecd3936457bf34fa3088b25abc9d6d5faa76fc7ca08ee2c1bc23c3ab9c2d91a6b414b065796aea1371d46a31cbf248621b10 Mouse-v2.4.9.tar.gz

jplesnik pushed to perl-Net-POP3S (f24). "0.06 bump"

From 1f2d6d16ff9afc6aeb65143593f701cec1260e5d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 12:34:35 +0100 Subject: 0.06 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Net-POP3S.spec | 15 ++- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 12

[Bug 1422859] perl-Net-POP3S-0.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422859 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-POP3S-0.06-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-d2f5b07ab1 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1421444] perl-Digest-Bcrypt-1.207 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421444 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

jplesnik pushed to perl-Digest-Bcrypt (master). "1.207 bump"

From 1ae580413fb9526589b32048672c0f18681e58fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 11:02:43 +0100 Subject: 1.207 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Digest-Bcrypt.spec | 9 ++--- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed,

[Bug 1422859] perl-Net-POP3S-0.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422859 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-POP3S-0.06-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-01849033fb -- You are receiving this mail

jplesnik uploaded Digest-Bcrypt-1.207.tar.gz for perl-Digest-Bcrypt

a3d283fe45916ea1f0ec110ed45ced2bd1c677005160d57e2bace1e6e840992ebc2c2acb9a77558ddc384ee3be3411b09d41f9e8d66a1b314c5dd0bf6152a9b5 Digest-Bcrypt-1.207.tar.gz

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Mouse (master). "Update to 2.4.9 (..more)"

From cbbccedb038e13cb3f9fbea9a8716c0af8e1ce10 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 11:04:44 + Subject: Update to 2.4.9 - New upstream release 2.4.9 - Fix build issue on newer Perl without '.' in @INC --- perl-Mouse.spec | 6 +- sources

jplesnik pushed to perl-Net-POP3S (master). "0.06 bump"

From f077615ef2a14f35db13a99f62921b2b3f1af68f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 12:15:40 +0100 Subject: 0.06 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Net-POP3S.spec | 15 ++- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 12

[Bug 1422859] perl-Net-POP3S-0.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422859 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED

jplesnik pushed to perl-Net-POP3S (f25). "0.06 bump"

From af7a3b0a65e9bede02a2bd70c84b60b190b98fa7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 12:28:12 +0100 Subject: 0.06 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Net-POP3S.spec | 15 ++- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 12

Re: Warning before sudo pip'ing?

Hi! The warning when sudo pip installing is deployed in rawhide! Package version: python-pip-9.0.1-6.fc26. Cheers, Tomas On 02/10/2017 06:35 PM, Tomas Orsava wrote: Hi! On the last FESCo meeting while discussing the sudo pip Fedora [Change], maxamillion proposed that it might be useful to

jplesnik uploaded Net-POP3S-0.06.tar.gz for perl-Net-POP3S

ebb5a47e1bcf2ad226223af6d56ff5dc5fd060d03cbd3c01761baced9fda957530f05c2f98dbb3b9cead586de3d3fcacfe18931a0eaf6911f906aef039d4c483 Net-POP3S-0.06.tar.gz

jplesnik uploaded Net-SMTPS-0.05.tar.gz for perl-Net-SMTPS

8c5a49820997eec65566d86a6eb69ba36800772ab1a400a4a005ce771895264de7b38d037c5e5ebcfb18b39e91f71d78aa251f721882a448a565da5038e49273 Net-SMTPS-0.05.tar.gz

[Bug 1422860] perl-Net-SMTPS-0.05 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422860 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED

[Bug 1422860] perl-Net-SMTPS-0.05 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422860 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-SMTPS-0.05-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ea6f8cfe89 -- You are receiving this mail

jplesnik pushed to perl-Net-SMTPS (f25). "0.05 bump"

From 8dab7077f5bdc692f74f0137a2d11148da6747e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 13:16:39 +0100 Subject: 0.05 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Net-SMTPS.spec | 23 ++- sources | 2 +- 3 files

jplesnik pushed to perl-Net-SMTPS (f24). "0.05 bump"

From 2e9597aa30bff51eaae3122c6d3d1721a534fe10 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 13:27:49 +0100 Subject: 0.05 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Net-SMTPS.spec | 24 +++- sources | 2 +- 3 files

[Bug 1422860] perl-Net-SMTPS-0.05 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422860 --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- jplesnik's perl-Net-SMTPS-0.05-1.fc26 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=860975 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1422860] perl-Net-SMTPS-0.05 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422860 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-SMTPS-0.05-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-b3b261f1dd -- You are receiving this mail

  1   2   >