Re: Rawhide python3-devel conflict issue

Rofl, sorry. I knew I had disabled that build but I should have run osc wipebinaries. Sorry folks, but thanks for your speedy response and professionalism. On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 at 08:11, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > > On mardi 28 août 2018 22:24:09 CEST BJH2017 wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I build Vim

[HEADS UP] pythonX no longer requires setuptools and pip

Hi, python3 no longer requires python3-setuptools and python3-pip; python2 no longer requires python2-setuptools and python2-pip. Those are just recommended. If you need them at build time, BR them. + /usr/bin/python2 setup.py build '--executable=/usr/bin/python2 -s' Traceback (most

Re: nextcloud-client 2.5: help for updating qt syslibs patch

During past weeks, co-maintainer FAS nonamedotc has made some other attempts to fix the problem, but he had no success. Can anybody please provide some hints about how we could proceed? Thank you very much ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Buildroot-only modules

On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 1:23 AM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > Some modules are built in MBS/Koji but are never released to users. > Currently such modules can only be used as build dependencies of other > modules. In future, if solution like "ursa-major" [1] is implemented, > such modules could

Re: Buildroot-only modules

On 08/29/2018 11:23 AM, Adam Samalik wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 1:23 AM Mikolaj Izdebski > wrote: > >> Some modules are built in MBS/Koji but are never released to users. >> Currently such modules can only be used as build dependencies of other >> modules. In future, if solution like

Re: Rawhide python3-devel conflict issue

El mié., 29 de ago. de 2018 a la(s) 01:16, BJH2017 (brentonhorn...@gmail.com) escribió: > > Rofl, sorry. I knew I had disabled that build but I should have run > osc wipebinaries. Sorry folks, but thanks for your speedy response and > professionalism. > On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 at 08:11, Robert-André

Re: fedora-tagger sunset - week post F29 beta freeze

28.08.2018 14:28 Björn Persson wrote: > Mattia Verga wrote: > > The Group tag would not fix exactly what I mean. I wouldn't want to create > > groups of packages, but apply descriptive tags of the abilities of the > > package. > > For example, in some of the packages I maintain: > > ccdciel:

Re: Golang SIG primary goals?

Le 2018-08-28 13:27, Neal Gompa a écrit : On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 7:06 AM Nicolas Mailhot wrote: However, my initial objectives were to produce clean prometheus and grafana Fedora packages, I finished the Go part a few months ago, but they both include a javascript layer, so I'll probably

Re: [modularity] Managing module lifecycles — let's talk!

On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 6:44 PM Paul Frields wrote: > On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 7:26 AM Adam Samalik wrote: > > == Approaches > > > > Option 1: The current, yet unfinished approach > > > > We specify an EOL (end of life) date for each stream branch of > individual packages. This is done when

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 9:43 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > ghc-pretty-show (maintained by: mathstuf) > > ghc-pretty-show-1.6.16-1.fc29.i686 requires js-jquery1 = > 1.12.4-6.fc29 > I opened https://github.com/yav/pretty-show/issues/32 for this: so this will likely get fixed for

Re: nextcloud-client 2.5: help for updating qt syslibs patch

Germano Massullo wrote: > During past weeks, co-maintainer FAS nonamedotc has made some other > attempts to fix the problem, but he had no success. > Can anybody please provide some hints about how we could proceed? Consider just using the bundled versions? -- Rex

Re: Will there be one more nightly compose for Fedora 29 Beta?

On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 1:40 PM Zamir SUN wrote: > > Hi, > > I just wanna know if there will be one more compose for Fedora 29 for > Beta? To be clear, I've retired some packages in Fedora 29 before the > freeze which affect the LxQT appearance. But it did not take effect so I > filed a ticket

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27) - js-jqeury1

Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 28.8.2018 v 15:58 Christopher napsal(a): > > Given the security vulnerabilities in jQuery 1 (and 2) and the fact > > that upstream dropped them a long time ago, I strongly recommend the > > packages be retired than kept alive. Packagers depend on the newer > > js-jquery

Intent to split 'postgresql.spec' into 'libpq.spec' and 'libecpg.spec'

Hi all, ad [1] tracker - it's a good time to warn about this (rather non-intrusive, I believe) change in PostgreSQL packaging in Fedora, expected to happen in F30. We'd like to provide alternative versions of PostgreSQL servers in Fedora's modular repo, but still - it is very much desirable to

Will there be one more nightly compose for Fedora 29 Beta?

Hi, I just wanna know if there will be one more compose for Fedora 29 for Beta? To be clear, I've retired some packages in Fedora 29 before the freeze which affect the LxQT appearance. But it did not take effect so I filed a ticket for Release Engineering but it was handled yesterday. And I did

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27) - js-jqeury1

On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 at 08:16, Björn Persson wrote: > > Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 28.8.2018 v 15:58 Christopher napsal(a): > > > Given the security vulnerabilities in jQuery 1 (and 2) and the fact > > > that upstream dropped them a long time ago, I strongly recommend the > > > packages be retired

Re: [modularity] Managing module lifecycles — let's talk!

On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 4:35 AM Adam Samalik wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 6:44 PM Paul Frields wrote: >> >> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 7:26 AM Adam Samalik wrote: >> > == Approaches >> > >> > Option 1: The current, yet unfinished approach >> > >> > We specify an EOL (end of life) date for each

Re: Intent to split 'postgresql.spec' into 'libpq.spec' and 'libecpg.spec'

While the split is reasonable, this change has IMHO one big flaw and that is the change of the names, which are not really intuitive. V. Dne 29.8.2018 v 15:36 Pavel Raiskup napsal(a): > Hi all, > > ad [1] tracker - it's a good time to warn about this (rather > non-intrusive, I believe) change

Re: nextcloud-client 2.5: help for updating qt syslibs patch

On 8/29/18 1:40 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: Germano Massullo wrote: During past weeks, co-maintainer FAS nonamedotc has made some other attempts to fix the problem, but he had no success. Can anybody please provide some hints about how we could proceed? Consider just using the bundled versions?

Intent to retire or orphan keybinder - python2 version

Hi all, since keybinder won't build on any fedora version >=29 and all functionality should be provided by the newer python3 keybinder3 package. I would like to ask if it's ok to retire it, but since there are some packages depending on it, I would rather orphan it and let someone else take

Re: Will there be one more nightly compose for Fedora 29 Beta?

On Wed, 2018-08-29 at 13:41 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 1:40 PM Zamir SUN wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I just wanna know if there will be one more compose for Fedora 29 for > > Beta? To be clear, I've retired some packages in Fedora 29 before the > > freeze which affect

Re: Will there be one more nightly compose for Fedora 29 Beta?

On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 2:17 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-08-29 at 13:41 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 1:40 PM Zamir SUN wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I just wanna know if there will be one more compose for Fedora 29 for > > > Beta? To be clear, I've

Orphaning nitroshare

Hi, I'll orphan nitroshare. There are no dependencies except the subpackages. Reasons for my decision: Upstream did no release since monthes and claims instable branch for master in the documentation. There are some other good alternatives like KDE Connect or TotalCommander with WebDAV. Regards,

Orphaning speedometer

Hi, I'll orphan speedometer. Please feel free to take ownership if you think this package is still useful in Fedora. Reasons: There's an open issue [*] to implement support for python3 and nothing happened so far in favor of general python2 removal [**]. Regards, Raphael [*]

Re: Orphaned bouml

Hi Kevin, thanks for this important hint about the license change. Maybe we can ship a package for douml instead? DoUML [*] is a fork and provides official support for Qt5 with a combined license model [**]. Of course, any objection must be considered in a new request for package review. I can

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2018-08-30 16:00 UTC)

  Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2018-08-30 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net.   Local time information (via. uitime): = Day: Thursday == 2018-08-30 09:00 PDT  US/Pacific

Re: Intent to retire or orphan keybinder - python2 version

On 29.8.2018 20:05, Johannes Lips wrote: Hi all, since keybinder won't build on any fedora version >=29 and all functionality should be provided by the newer python3 keybinder3 package. I would like to ask if it's ok to retire it, but since there are some packages depending on it, I would

[Bug 1619655] Upgrade perl-Lingua-EN-Sentence to 0.31

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1619655 --- Comment #2 from Jitka Plesnikova --- Sorry, but I did not change your package. I only close BZ, because you already updated the package in August 22. I touch your packages only, if it is needed for Perl mass rebuild. -- You are

Re: Plans for Matplotlib 3.0+

On 29.8.2018 05:38, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 at 18:42, Miro Hrončok > wrote: On 17.8.2018 21:51, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 at 15:18, Miro Hrončok mailto:mhron...@redhat.com> >

[HEADS UP] pythonX no longer requires setuptools and pip

Hi, python3 no longer requires python3-setuptools and python3-pip; python2 no longer requires python2-setuptools and python2-pip. Those are just recommended. If you need them at build time, BR them. + /usr/bin/python2 setup.py build '--executable=/usr/bin/python2 -s' Traceback (most

Re: python2 doesn't require setuptools anymore

On 29.8.2018 07:43, Igor Gnatenko wrote: So finally this will force people to put proper BRs :) I've sent heads up: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ARFZB56ULRQNT3FEAC4YXXZDIUHG4M5P/ -- Forwarded message - From:

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL-7 x86_64 repoclosure failure

2018-08-28 23:30 GMT+02:00 Eli Young : > Breaking it down a bit more, the following EPEL7 packages are in the CentOS > 7.5 base and/or updates repositories: [...] > libva > libva-devel I've just retired libva in epel7 because the package was moved into RHEL 7.5 FYI, when rhel7 beta was out, I've

[Bug 1623430] New: perl-Perl-Tidy-Sweetened-1.15 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623430 Bug ID: 1623430 Summary: perl-Perl-Tidy-Sweetened-1.15 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Perl-Tidy-Sweetened Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1623267] CVE-2011-2767 mod_perl: arbitrary Perl code execution in the context of the user account via a user-owned .htaccess [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623267 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Version|28 |27 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1623268] CVE-2011-2767 mod_perl: arbitrary Perl code execution in the context of the user account via a user-owned .htaccess [epel-7]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623268 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 1623430] perl-Perl-Tidy-Sweetened-1.15 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623430 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1623427] New: perl-Lingua-EN-Tagger-0.30 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623427 Bug ID: 1623427 Summary: perl-Lingua-EN-Tagger-0.30 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Lingua-EN-Tagger Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1623428] New: perl-Net-Amazon-S3-0.85 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623428 Bug ID: 1623428 Summary: perl-Net-Amazon-S3-0.85 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Net-Amazon-S3 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1623427] perl-Lingua-EN-Tagger-0.30 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623427 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1623265] CVE-2011-2767 mod_perl: arbitrary Perl code execution in the context of the user account via a user-owned .htaccess

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623265 --- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar --- Reproducer: (1) Enable user's ~/public_html directories in httpd configuration (add "UserDir public_html" directive to /etc/httpd/conf.d/userdir.conf) and enable httpd_enable_homedirs SELinux boolean. (2)

[Bug 1623429] New: perl-Net-Whois-Raw-2.99018 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623429 Bug ID: 1623429 Summary: perl-Net-Whois-Raw-2.99018 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Net-Whois-Raw Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1623267] CVE-2011-2767 mod_perl: arbitrary Perl code execution in the context of the user account via a user-owned .htaccess [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623267 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- mod_perl-2.0.10-13.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f6a5b71464 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1623430] perl-Perl-Tidy-Sweetened-1.15 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623430 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Perl-Tidy-Sweetened-1.15-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-1ab388d8a1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 1623265] CVE-2011-2767 mod_perl: arbitrary Perl code execution in the context of the user account via a user-owned .htaccess

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623265 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||CPAN 126984 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1623267] CVE-2011-2767 mod_perl: arbitrary Perl code execution in the context of the user account via a user-owned .htaccess [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623267 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- mod_perl-2.0.10-11.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-0ddef94854 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1623267] CVE-2011-2767 mod_perl: arbitrary Perl code execution in the context of the user account via a user-owned .htaccess [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623267 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1623267] CVE-2011-2767 mod_perl: arbitrary Perl code execution in the context of the user account via a user-owned .htaccess [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623267 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- mod_perl-2.0.10-9.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-a94668408d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1622481] Upgrade perl-IO-AIO to 4.6

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622481 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-IO-AIO-4.60-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-5f72203fc8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1622999] perl-POE-Component-SSLify-1.012-13.fc30 FTBFS: t/ connect_hook_nodata.t fails with OpenSSL 1.1.1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622999 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-POE-Component-SSLify-1.012-14.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-3c95db499a -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1623267] CVE-2011-2767 mod_perl: arbitrary Perl code execution in the context of the user account via a user-owned .htaccess [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623267 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- mod_perl-2.0.10-13.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f6a5b71464 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1623430] perl-Perl-Tidy-Sweetened-1.15 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623430 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Perl-Tidy-Sweetened-1.15-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-1ab388d8a1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 1623265] CVE-2011-2767 mod_perl: arbitrary Perl code execution in the context of the user account via a user-owned .htaccess

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623265 Yasuhiro Ozone changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yoz...@redhat.com -- You are

[Bug 1622479] perl-Gearman-2.004.015 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622479 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Gearman-2.004.015-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1623267] CVE-2011-2767 mod_perl: arbitrary Perl code execution in the context of the user account via a user-owned .htaccess [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623267 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- mod_perl-2.0.10-9.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1613213] Upgrade perl-Parse-EDID to 1.0.7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613213 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Parse-EDID-1.0.7-1.fc2 |perl-Parse-EDID-1.0.7-1.fc2

[Bug 1619470] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.74 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1619470 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1623268] CVE-2011-2767 mod_perl: arbitrary Perl code execution in the context of the user account via a user-owned .htaccess [epel-7]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623268 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 1623430] perl-Perl-Tidy-Sweetened-1.15 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623430 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 1623267] CVE-2011-2767 mod_perl: arbitrary Perl code execution in the context of the user account via a user-owned .htaccess [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623267 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from

[Bug 1622481] Upgrade perl-IO-AIO to 4.6

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622481 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 1622484] Upgrade perl-MCE-Shared to 1.839

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622484 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 1622999] perl-POE-Component-SSLify-1.012-13.fc30 FTBFS: t/ connect_hook_nodata.t fails with OpenSSL 1.1.1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622999 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 1622483] perl-MCE-1.837 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622483 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-MCE-1.837-1.fc29, perl-MCE-Shared-1.839-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1622479] perl-Gearman-2.004.015 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622479 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from

[Bug 1619470] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.74 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1619470 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.7 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.7

[Bug 1622479] perl-Gearman-2.004.015 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622479 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Gearman-2.004.015-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1623267] CVE-2011-2767 mod_perl: arbitrary Perl code execution in the context of the user account via a user-owned .htaccess [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623267 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- mod_perl-2.0.10-11.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1622479] perl-Gearman-2.004.015 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622479 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Gearman-2.004.015-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-6f39f62cb5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 1622484] Upgrade perl-MCE-Shared to 1.839

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622484 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-MCE-1.837-1.fc29 perl-MCE-Shared-1.839-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-fadf157880 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1622483] perl-MCE-1.837 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622483 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-MCE-1.837-1.fc29 perl-MCE-Shared-1.839-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-fadf157880 -- You are receiving this mail