[Test-Announce] Fedora 29 Beta status is No-Go

2018-09-14 Thread Ben Cotton
Due to in-progress RC2 for the F29 Beta release and presence of blocker bugs, the decision is “No Go”. The Beta release slips for one week to “Target #1” date (September 25th)[1]. We are not going to slip the Final GA yet. For more information please check the minutes from the F29 Beta Go/No-Go

Re: Testing / feedback request: DNF 3 crashes

2018-09-14 Thread Samuel Rakitničan
The following bug have not been updated since report. I would say it is a big issue since an upgrade will break dnf, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1598590 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Retiring pgtune

2018-09-14 Thread Miroslav Suchý
I want to retire pgtune https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pgtune The original upstream is dead and python2 only: https://github.com/gregs1104/pgtune There is a new upstream based on the original version: https://github.com/le0pard/pgtune But it is far of being simple. It is made in ruby

Re: Proposal to modify release criteria for fwraid

2018-09-14 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 10:22:12AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > At yesterday's F29 Go/No-Go meeting, we discussed the blocker status > of BZ #1628192 - Fedora 29 installation cannot see a firmware RAID > device. While the blocker criteria clearly states that this should be > a blocker for

Proposal to modify release criteria for fwraid

2018-09-14 Thread Stephen Gallagher
At yesterday's F29 Go/No-Go meeting, we discussed the blocker status of BZ #1628192 - Fedora 29 installation cannot see a firmware RAID device. While the blocker criteria clearly states that this should be a blocker for Beta, many of the people present at the meeting disagreed, for a variety of

Re: [modularity] Recommended platform: [] and version 2 format

2018-09-14 Thread Jun Aruga
Thanks for explaining about it! I found the part of "platform: []" in the document you shared. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/modularity/making-modules/defining-modules/#_modular_dependencies Jun On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 11:07 AM, Adam Samalik wrote: > That's right! > > This and more is

Re: Am I allowed to package this?

2018-09-14 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 09/13/2018 07:59 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 16:07 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 10-09-18 14:40, Abhiram Kuchibhotla wrote: According to the LICENSE file in their git repo, the code in the repo seems to be gplv2. Not sure if that proves anything. I'll do the

Re: Am I allowed to package this?

2018-09-14 Thread Simo Sorce
On Fri, 2018-09-14 at 19:37 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 09/13/2018 07:59 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 16:07 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 10-09-18 14:40, Abhiram Kuchibhotla wrote: > > > > According to the LICENSE file in their git repo, the

Re: Proposal to modify release criteria for fwraid

2018-09-14 Thread Randy Barlow
On 09/14/2018 10:22 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > I'd like to propose that we make the following change to > the criteria going forward: > > "The blocking criterion for successful installation atop a firmware > RAID array is moved to the GA release criteria." +1 signature.asc Description:

Fedora 29 compose report: 20180912.n.0 changes

2018-09-14 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-29-20180911.n.0 NEW: Fedora-29-20180912.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 3 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 103 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 90.43 MiB Size of dropped packages:134.08 KiB

Fedora 29-20180912.n.0 compose check report

2018-09-14 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Atomichost qcow2 x86_64 Atomichost raw-xz x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 3/132 (x86_64), 1/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 279984 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279984 ID: 279991 Test:

Re: Testing / feedback request: DNF 3 crashes

2018-09-14 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2018-09-14 at 14:41 +, Samuel Rakitničan wrote: > The following bug have not been updated since report. I would say it is a big > issue since an upgrade will break dnf, > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1598590 I've closed it as a dupe of the bug we're using as the

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180914.n.0 changes

2018-09-14 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180913.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180914.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 5 Dropped packages:6 Upgraded packages: 121 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 2.20 MiB Size of dropped packages

[Test-Announce] 2018-09-17 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 29 Blocker Review Meeting

2018-09-14 Thread Adam Williamson
# F29 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2018-09-17 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Hi folks! We have 2 proposed Beta blockers, 6 proposed Beta freeze exceptions and 8 proposed Final blockers to review, so let's have a review meeting on Monday (those numbers

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2018-09-17 Fedora QA Meeting

2018-09-14 Thread Adam Williamson
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting tomorrow. We're still focused on F29 Beta at the moment, though please do take a minute to look at the firmware RAID criterion proposal. There will be a blocker review meeting at 16:00 UTC, please come to that if you can. If you're aware of

Re: Testing / feedback request: DNF 3 crashes

2018-09-14 Thread Alessio Ciregia
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 9:26 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > Can anyone who is still struggling with DNF crashes on *basic* > operations on F29 or Rawhide please reply, and provide a few details on > what you're seeing and any workarounds or fixes you've found? FWIW, I never hit such problem. The

Re: F29 DNF can't find gnome 3.30 packages

2018-09-14 Thread Kalev Lember
On 09/14/2018 01:02 PM, Vascom wrote: I and some other users just upgraded from F28 to F29 see that dnf can't find Gnome 3.30 packages. That's because there hasn't been a successful F29 compose since GNOME 3.30.0 got pushed to stable. Just have to wait for releng to sort this out. -- Kalev

F29 DNF can't find gnome 3.30 packages

2018-09-14 Thread Vascom
Hi all. I and some other users just upgraded from F28 to F29 see that dnf can't find Gnome 3.30 packages. For example nautilus: LANG=C sudo dnf list all nautilus --refresh Available Packages nautilus.i6863.28.1-2.fc29 fedora nautilus.x86_64 3.28.1-2.fc29 fedora

Re: Call for participation: Fedora Flatpaks

2018-09-14 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - > Hi Bastien, > > Here are some of the benefits I see of this effort as compared to simply > telling users to consume Flatpaks from Flathub or independent repositories: Sorry it took a couple of days to get back to you. If the end-goal is shipping Flatpaks, and

Re: Call for participation: Fedora Flatpaks

2018-09-14 Thread Bastien Nocera
Urgh, unfinished trains of thought. - Original Message - > > * Benefit to Fedora contributors: they can make their packaging work > > available across distributions and distribution versions. > > Most likely duplicating upstream work on getting that same ...on getting that same

[389-devel] please review: PR 49952 - PassSync not setting pwdLastSet attribute in Active Directory after Pw update from LDAP sync for normal user

2018-09-14 Thread Mark Reynolds
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49952 ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html

[Bug 1628413] ctstream-29 is available

2018-09-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1628413 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- ctstream-29-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing

[Bug 1624362] perl-re-engine-PCRE2-0.14-5.fc30 FTBFS: t/perl/ regexp.t fails with pcre2-10.32

2018-09-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624362 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

[Bug 1628550] perl-BSON-v1.8.0 is available

2018-09-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1628550 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

[Bug 1624362] perl-re-engine-PCRE2-0.14-5.fc30 FTBFS: t/perl/ regexp.t fails with pcre2-10.32

2018-09-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624362 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- pcre2-10.32-1.fc28, perl-re-engine-PCRE2-0.14-4.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1628550] perl-BSON-v1.8.0 is available

2018-09-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1628550 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-BSON-1.8.0-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2018-09-15 - 90% PASS

2018-09-14 Thread vashirov
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/09/15/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.16-20180914git4881826.fc28.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 1628550] perl-BSON-v1.8.0 is available

2018-09-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1628550 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-BSON-1.8.0-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-ea062d971d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1628550] perl-BSON-v1.8.0 is available

2018-09-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1628550 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1628550] perl-BSON-v1.8.0 is available

2018-09-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1628550 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-BSON-1.8.0-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-1dd17c8f0a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1624362] perl-re-engine-PCRE2-0.14-5.fc30 FTBFS: t/perl/ regexp.t fails with pcre2-10.32

2018-09-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624362 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- pcre2-10.32-1.fc29 perl-re-engine-PCRE2-0.14-6.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-4fb5569365 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1624362] perl-re-engine-PCRE2-0.14-5.fc30 FTBFS: t/perl/ regexp.t fails with pcre2-10.32

2018-09-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624362 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1624362] perl-re-engine-PCRE2-0.14-5.fc30 FTBFS: t/perl/ regexp.t fails with pcre2-10.32

2018-09-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624362 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- pcre2-10.32-1.fc28 perl-re-engine-PCRE2-0.14-4.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-8217a06c3a -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1624362] perl-re-engine-PCRE2-0.14-5.fc30 FTBFS: t/perl/ regexp.t fails with pcre2-10.32

2018-09-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624362 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- Two of the failures were fixed in 10.32. Another two failures are not bug in PCRE2. re-engine-PCRE2 upstream adjusted tests. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1262772] perl-SOAP-Lite-1.10-1.el7.noarch requires perl(Class:: Inspector)

2018-09-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262772 Jaskaran Singh Narula changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janar...@redhat.com -- You