Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> Users that want to reproduce Ant 1.10.2 build would need to repeat
> series of builds and rely on information stored in Koji to know what
> builds should be ran in what order. Trying to build packages only from
> content released to users would be even more difficult.
I want to address a few comments in particular:
> Kevin Fenzi:
> I'm prefer to add a new milestone of 'day before release' and put it
> there.
The current schedule starts the "create the release announcement" on
the day of the Go/No-Go meeting. I don't think that makes much sense:
the
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018, at 2:42 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> There's a request for the nvme-cli package to generate a unique name
> to use when connecting to NVMe-over-fabrics targets:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1633814
>
> I'm wondering what the right approach is. For the
I wouldn't use the word useless. Having the packages is just a quality of life
thing. Just like for me as mainly C++ developer; not having Basel or abseil
does not make Fedora useless for me or C++ developers. It doesn't take much
effort to get your environment up and running script the
On 9/28/18 8:03 AM, Brian Clark wrote:
[02:04:21.928] Loading module '/usr/lib64/libweston-5/x11-backend.so'
[02:04:22.373] fatal: failed to create compositor backend
[root@d4895acb1694 /]#
Are programs in the container allowed to contact the X server? Check
for audit messages or try running
Le jeudi 27 septembre 2018 à 19:14 -0400, Gerald Henriksen a écrit :
>
> Or, short version, the Java ecosystem is either indifferent or hostile
> to distribution packages.
Any language ecosystem is initially hostile to distribution packages.
Languages ecosystems are created by devs, that care
Le vendredi 28 septembre 2018 à 10:09 +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski a écrit :
>
> This is already not met for Fedora. Lets look at ant package which you
> mentioned earlier.
>
That just shows it is urgent for Fedora to improve its handling of
bootstrapping operations, because major languages depend
On 09/28/2018 02:50 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
>> Modules with their API specifications at least make it more clear what
>> are expectations about packages. Something user may consider essential
>> is only a build dependency for a packager and the packages won't receive
>>
Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> Fedora (rightly)
> as a rule doesn't want multiple versions of libraries.
what rule is that?
-- Rex
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 10:15:46 +0200, you wrote:
>Le jeudi 27 septembre 2018 à 19:14 -0400, Gerald Henriksen a écrit :
>>
>> Or, short version, the Java ecosystem is either indifferent or hostile
>> to distribution packages.
>
>Any language ecosystem is initially hostile to distribution packages.
Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 28/09/2018 19:42, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>
>> Debian has "purge" for things like this, but I don't think Fedora has
>> any equivalent.
>
> Doesn't generating in %post and owning it as %ghost in the
> files list achieve much the same result of removing it when
> the
On vendredi 28 septembre 2018 21:15:14 CEST Gwyn Ciesla wrote:
I'd like a swap with:
android-file-transfer - Reliable MTP client with minimalistic UI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1633317
Best regards,
Robert-André
___
devel mailing
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/133 (x86_64), 1/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 286561 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso
desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/286561
ID: 286581 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso
I concur the landing page font is large.
I recommend that the link emoji icon utilized in "Fedora Budget" and "Fedora's
Otreachy Docs" is replaces with an image. It differs from platform to platform.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, September 28, 2018 4:00 PM, Richard Shaw
wrote:
>
Le vendredi 28 septembre 2018 à 10:26 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen a
écrit :
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 at 04:21, Nicolas Mailhot
> wrote:
> > Le vendredi 28 septembre 2018 à 10:09 +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski a
> > écrit :
> > > This is already not met for Fedora. Lets look at ant package which
> > > you
>
OLD: Fedora-29-20180926.n.0
NEW: Fedora-29-20180927.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 83
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 125.29 MiB
Size of dropped packages:47.81 KiB
On 28/09/2018 19:42, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
Debian has "purge" for things like this, but I don't think Fedora has
any equivalent.
Doesn't generating in %post and owning it as %ghost in the
files list achieve much the same result of removing it when
the package is removed?
Tom
--
Tom
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1634087
I'll take one of yours, if you like.
Thank you!
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
There's a request for the nvme-cli package to generate a unique name
to use when connecting to NVMe-over-fabrics targets:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1633814
I'm wondering what the right approach is. For the various Atomic
variants, ISTM it's not very nice for the package to
* Andrew Lutomirski:
> There's a request for the nvme-cli package to generate a unique name
> to use when connecting to NVMe-over-fabrics targets:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1633814
How many bits can the NQN have? Is it long enough that random
generation of IDs is feasible?
Looks a touch on the big side fonts wise but looks really nice overall.
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Due to the incompatibly with bpy (Blender as Python module) and Python
3.7, the interface failed to render as seen on this report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631922
Normal solution would be using Python36. Unfortunately, there is no
python36-devel or modules to properly rebuild
On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 at 04:21, Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
>
> Le vendredi 28 septembre 2018 à 10:09 +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski a écrit :
> >
> > This is already not met for Fedora. Lets look at ant package which you
> > mentioned earlier.
> >
>
> That just shows it is urgent for Fedora to improve its
Hello,
I am trying to put weston in a docker container. I have run into some
issues and have been able to solve them with some trial and error and
research. But, I have hit an error when trying to start weston that there
are no other warning that I can see and I am not sure what else to do.
Hello everyone,
We have moved packaging guidelines onto docs.fedoraproject.org[0].
If you find any error or would like to change something, don't hesitate to
open ticket or submit pull request for packaging committee repo[1].
Thanks for attention!
[0]
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 02:02:37PM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> We have moved packaging guidelines onto docs.fedoraproject.org[0].
> If you find any error or would like to change something, don't hesitate to
> open ticket or submit pull request for packaging committee repo[1].
This is amazing!
Hello everyone,
We have moved packaging guidelines onto docs.fedoraproject.org[0].
If you find any error or would like to change something, don't hesitate to
open ticket or submit pull request for packaging committee repo[1].
Thanks for attention!
[0]
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
110 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b6c663378c
unrtf-0.21.9-8.el6
49 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-f21474267b
condor-8.6.11-1.el6
10
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/09/29/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.16-20180928gitc73cd26.fc28.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
110 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3835d39d1a
unrtf-0.21.9-8.el7
61 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-f9d6ff695a
bibutils-6.6-1.el7 ghc-hs-bibutils-6.6.0.0-1.el7
30 matches
Mail list logo
