biniSox9c99xT.bin
Description: PGP/MIME version identification
encrypted.asc
Description: OpenPGP encrypted message
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora
On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 09:44, Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
> If someone wants to do this the font powerline uses should be fixed to
> used correct unicode point values (and PUA when it include things not
> standardised by unicode).
>
> Otherwise powerline display is just broken on many terminals
Is
On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 14:55, Randy Barlow wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2018-10-31 at 17:13 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> > Since powerline does
> > not
> > impact the performance, it will be great to set for Fedora 30.
>
> I experienced a performance problem with powerline on Fedora on a
> Raspberry Pi
Le 2018-11-05 11:31, Jonathan Underwood a écrit :
On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 09:44, Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
If someone wants to do this the font powerline uses should be fixed to
used correct unicode point values (and PUA when it include things not
standardised by unicode).
Otherwise powerline
This is related to an open ticket to Release Engineering
(https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7840) which was brought to FESCo
(https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2003). We understand the need to
enable this, but there is an impact to workflow for local builds. It
is possible that some of this could be
Meeting started by zbyszek at 15:02:05 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-11-05/fesco.2018-11-05-15.02.log.html
.
Meeting summary
---
* init process (zbyszek, 15:02:08)
* follow-ups (zbyszek, 15:03:40)
* 2003 Ursa Major
Hello all,
While I have an interesting bug in Dnfdragora, I don't think it's super
urgent, so if you want, we can skip this week and have a meeting the other
week?
I have one or two other little issues I'd like to discuss, but again
nothing to die for.
Kind regards,
Silvia
FAS: Lailah
On
On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 11:14, Justin Forbes wrote:
>
> This is related to an open ticket to Release Engineering
> (https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7840) which was brought to FESCo
> (https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2003). We understand the need to
> enable this, but there is an impact to workflow
On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 5:13 PM Justin Forbes wrote:
>
> This is related to an open ticket to Release Engineering
> (https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7840) which was brought to FESCo
> (https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2003).
Until now, I've been mostly keeping quiet about the whole modularity
thing -
On 11/1/18 8:03 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> this koji build [1] is in state bunding since , 17 Sep 2018 16:12:27
> UTC !???
>
> [1]
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1145294
Cleaned up. Thanks for the heads up.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hello Fedora developers and maintainers,
Apache Cassandra is a free and open-source distributed NoSQL database written
in Java, we have a package since Fedora 27, I am a maintainer for about a year
with a help of Augusto Caringi, but currently we dont have enought capacity to
keep it
On Sun, 2018-11-04 at 16:42 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 11/4/18 11:47 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > Quoting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1538352#c1
> >
> > > Yes, recordmydesktop was intentionally retired due to the project being
> > > abandoned (no new release in 10 years), it contained many
I can help you with it. Do I need to request approval to get
maintainer role to this package? I already created packages before.
On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 2:58 PM Jakub Janco wrote:
>
> Hello Fedora developers and maintainers,
>
> Apache Cassandra is a free and open-source distributed NoSQL database
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity Office Hours on 2018-11-06 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-modular...@chat.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
This is where you ask the Fedora Modularity Team questions (and we try to
answer them)!
Join us on
On 11/5/18 12:47 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2018-11-04 at 16:42 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
I don't know about the other bugs, but not working on Wayland can't be
held against it. Nothing works to record the desktop on Wayland since
that isn't supported yet.
GNOME's inbuilt screen
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> I have to say, making core, non-leaf packages available as modules
> only sounds like a *terrible* idea to me.
> I don't want to have to deal with this uncooked mess if I just want to
> do standard packaging.
+1. And, for that matter, that goes even for standard USING, as
On Mon, 2018-11-05 at 17:07 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 11/5/18 12:47 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Sun, 2018-11-04 at 16:42 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > > I don't know about the other bugs, but not working on Wayland can't be
> > > held against it. Nothing works to record the desktop on
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 30 Rawhide 20181105.n.1. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
Dear maintainers,
I'm working again on implementing
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_glibc-langpacks-all_from_buildroot.
The first step is to replace LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8 with LC_ALL=C.UTF-8
(and similarly for LANG=, LC_CTYPE=, etc.) in all spec files. This
will be backwards and
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> The first step is to replace LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8 with LC_ALL=C.UTF-8
> (and similarly for LANG=, LC_CTYPE=, etc.) in all spec files.
But there are probably many more packages where the setting is hidden in
upstream build scripts.
> This will be backwards and
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 33/142 (x86_64), 7/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20181030.n.0):
ID: 305344 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305344
ID: 305423 Test: x86_64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646135
Bug ID: 1646135
Summary: Upgrade perl-DB_File to 1.843
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-DB_File
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
Reporter: jples...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646141
Bug ID: 1646141
Summary: Upgrade perl-HTML-Selector-XPath to 0.25
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-HTML-Selector-XPath
Assignee: rc040...@freenet.de
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646142
Bug ID: 1646142
Summary: Upgrade perl-libintl-perl to 1.30
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-libintl-perl
Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646133
Bug ID: 1646133
Summary: Upgrade perl-Catalyst-Runtime to 5.90122
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Catalyst-Runtime
Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646134
Bug ID: 1646134
Summary: Upgrade perl-Cpanel-JSON-XS to 4.07
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Cpanel-JSON-XS
Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646137
Bug ID: 1646137
Summary: Upgrade perl-File-NFSLock to 1.29
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-File-NFSLock
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646144
Bug ID: 1646144
Summary: Upgrade perl-RDF-NS to 20181102
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-RDF-NS
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
Reporter: jples...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646137
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646135
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643855
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646135
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DB_File-1.843-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-5b86f97c2a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646135
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DB_File-1.843-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-5372a4cd42
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646141
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646141
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-HTML-Selector-XPath-0.25-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-586030188d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646134
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On 05. 11. 18 1:12, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I'd like to update python3-setuptools from 19.6.2 to something newer (at
least 20.8.1 but hopefully much later) without breaking the world.
However, I don't have much experience with possible setuptools breakage.
Any suggestions would be greatly
On 05. 11. 18 1:12, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I'd like to update python3-setuptools from 19.6.2 to something newer (at
least 20.8.1 but hopefully much later) without breaking the world.
However, I don't have much experience with possible setuptools breakage.
Any suggestions would be greatly
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646135
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DB_File-1.843-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-029aac9f38
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646144
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646144
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-RDF-NS-20181102-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-eaddee1bb5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646144
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-RDF-NS-20181102-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c1c9f7af64
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646144
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-RDF-NS-20181102-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-bb5e3a8dba
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
Hello Stephen,
We mirror the EPEL5 and EPEL7 repositories, but I really don’t know if there
are other issues with those or EPEL6. The only reason I stumbled upon this one
was due to the fact that the munin update in Sept 2018 now requires
conntrack-tools. There may be others, and this also
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646572
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|perl-devel@lists.fedoraproj |kh...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646572
Bug ID: 1646572
Summary: Bugzilla still lists Fedora 29 as unreleased
Product: Fedora
Version: 29
Component: bugzilla
Assignee: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br
Reporter:
46 matches
Mail list logo
