Re: How to bootstrap a set of packages?

2019-04-14 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le dimanche 14 avril 2019 à 19:52 +0200, Robert-André Mauchin a écrit : > Hello, > > I'd like to bootstrap all Golang packages to be able to detect > whatever cyclic > dependencies we have introduced over the years. > Basically what I need is to be able to build from the base rawhide > (or Koji

Re: Can we use SCLs for building for EPEL 6?

2019-04-14 Thread Dmitry Butskoy
Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Sat, 13 Apr 2019 at 21:06, Todd Zullinger > wrote: Neal Gompa wrote: > If devtoolset is available for EPEL6 (which I think it is?) I don't believe devtoolset was enabled for el6 in koji. When it was added to the mock

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F29 to F30

2019-04-14 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 14. 04. 19 20:21, Raphael Groner wrote: $ sudo dnf --releasever=30 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f30 --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync [...] Problem 2: package python2-testify-0.11.0-12.fc29.noarch requires python2-flake8, but none of the providers can be installed -

package built but not tagged into Rawhide in Koji

2019-04-14 Thread Robin Lee
Hi, I have a package built on 10 Mar. Build is deepin-qt-dbus-factory-1.1.0-1.fc31[1]. The package is already available in public repo. But I just found it is not tagged into rawhide, queried with 'koji latest-build rawhide deepin-qt-dbus-factory'. I never met this case. What should I do? [1]

Re: package built but not tagged into Rawhide in Koji

2019-04-14 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 4/14/19 8:22 PM, Robin Lee wrote: > Hi, > > I have a package built on 10 Mar. Build is > deepin-qt-dbus-factory-1.1.0-1.fc31[1]. > The package is already available in public repo. But I just found it > is not tagged > into rawhide, queried with 'koji latest-build rawhide

Re: Can we use SCLs for building for EPEL 6?

2019-04-14 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Sat, 13 Apr 2019 at 21:06, Todd Zullinger wrote: > Neal Gompa wrote: > > If devtoolset is available for EPEL6 (which I think it is?) > > I don't believe devtoolset was enabled for el6 in koji. > When it was added to the mock configs for el6/el7, the > consensus on the epel list was that it

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F29 to F30

2019-04-14 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 9:11 PM Garry T. Williams wrote: > > On Thursday, February 28, 2019 4:22:51 AM EDT Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Do you want to make Fedora 30 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time > > and try to run: > > > > sudo dnf --releasever=30

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F29 to F30

2019-04-14 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 15. 04. 19 3:27, Neal Gompa wrote: On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 9:11 PM Garry T. Williams wrote: On Thursday, February 28, 2019 4:22:51 AM EDT Miroslav Suchý wrote: Do you want to make Fedora 30 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: sudo dnf --releasever=30

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F29 to F30

2019-04-14 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 15. 04. 19 3:10, Garry T. Williams wrote: Error: Problem 1: package python2-cinderclient-3.5.0-1.fc29.noarch requires python2-oslo-i18n >= 3.15.3, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-oslo-i18n-3.19.0-1.fc29.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository -

Re: How to bootstrap a set of packages?

2019-04-14 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Sun, 14 Apr 2019 at 15:10, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le dimanche 14 avril 2019 à 19:52 +0200, Robert-André Mauchin a écrit : > > Hello, > > > > I'd like to bootstrap all Golang packages to be able to detect > > whatever cyclic > > dependencies we have introduced over the years. > > Basically

Re: Can we use SCLs for building for EPEL 6?

2019-04-14 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 4:04 PM Jonathan Dieter wrote: > > So, the background is that I'd like to build zchunk for EPEL 6 (it's > already built for EPEL 7). Unfortunately, the gcc in EL6 is too old to > build zchunk, so I'd prefer to use a newer version from an SCL, rather > than rewrite zchunk

Re: How to bootstrap a set of packages?

2019-04-14 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le dimanche 14 avril 2019 à 16:06 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen a écrit : > You will need to look also in each of the packages if they have any > specific bootstrap configs in their src spec files. Thanks, I forgot my awful bootstrap-aware chain building script also did that. It would be nice if

Re: Can we use SCLs for building for EPEL 6?

2019-04-14 Thread Kevin Kofler
Jonathan Dieter wrote: > For reference, you can find zck.h.in (which gets processed into zck.h > with the version added) at: > https://github.com/zchunk/zchunk/blob/master/include/zck.h.in > > and zck_private.h at: > https://github.com/zchunk/zchunk/blob/master/src/lib/zck_private.h > > As far

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F29 to F30

2019-04-14 Thread Garry T. Williams
On Thursday, February 28, 2019 4:22:51 AM EDT Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 30 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run: > > sudo dnf --releasever=30 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f30 > --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync garry@ifr$ sudo

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F29 to F30

2019-04-14 Thread Hirotaka Wakabayashi
Hello I tested upgrades from F29 to F30. I use the following images: https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/29/Cloud/x86_64/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-Vagrant-29-1.2.x86_64.vagrant-virtualbox.box

Re: Orphaning elasticsearch

2019-04-14 Thread Luis Enrique Bazán De León
Hi Emanuel I can work on it Fas lbazan Cheers, El dom., 14 de abril de 2019 2:00 a. m., Emmanuel Seyman escribió: > > Hi, folks. > > A while back, I realized that I was the main admin for the elasticsearch > package. Given that I'm not using elasticsearch these days (I signed up for >

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F29 to F30

2019-04-14 Thread Wells, Roger K.
On 4/13/19 10:42 PM, Phil Wyett wrote: On Fri, 2019-03-01 at 13:52 +0800, Robin Lee wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 5:23 PM Miroslav Suchý > wrote: >> >> Do you want to make Fedora 30 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and >> try to run: >> >> sudo dnf

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F29 to F30

2019-04-14 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 14. 04. 19 8:55, Hirotaka Wakabayashi wrote: Hello I tested upgrades from F29 to F30. I use the following images: https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/29/Cloud/x86_64/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-Vagrant-29-1.2.x86_64.vagrant-virtualbox.box

Orphaning elasticsearch

2019-04-14 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
Hi, folks. A while back, I realized that I was the main admin for the elasticsearch package. Given that I'm not using elasticsearch these days (I signed up for co-maintainership because I maintain the perl bindings for ES) and with the upcoming retiring of most of the Java stack in Fedora, I

Re: urw-base35-fonts package missing from f30 and rawhide composes

2019-04-14 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 5:58 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > This was due to a releng PR I merged yesterday to the script that blocks > retired packages. ;( > > It blocked a bunch of things that are in a weird state (which we should > totally fix), including that fonts package and all our images. :)

urw-base35-fonts package missing from f30 and rawhide composes

2019-04-14 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, I've noticed today that several of my packages are starting to fail to build in koschei due to missing dependencies - on urw-base35-fonts. Attempting fedpkg scratch builds in koji confirmed the issue. For example: Problem: package doxygen-1:1.8.15-9.fc31.x86_64 requires graphviz,

Re: urw-base35-fonts package missing from f30 and rawhide composes

2019-04-14 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 4:03 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > I've noticed today that several of my packages are starting to fail to > build in koschei due to missing dependencies - on urw-base35-fonts. > Attempting fedpkg scratch builds in koji confirmed the issue. > > For

Re: Orphaning elasticsearch

2019-04-14 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
* Luis Enrique Bazán De León [14/04/2019 08:22] : > > I can work on it I've transferred the package to you, Luis. Good luck with it! Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: urw-base35-fonts package missing from f30 and rawhide composes

2019-04-14 Thread Steven A. Falco
On 4/14/19 10:42 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 4:03 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: >> >> Hi everybody, >> >> I've noticed today that several of my packages are starting to fail to >> build in koschei due to missing dependencies - on urw-base35-fonts. >> Attempting fedpkg scratch

Re: urw-base35-fonts package missing from f30 and rawhide composes

2019-04-14 Thread Kevin Fenzi
This was due to a releng PR I merged yesterday to the script that blocks retired packages. ;( It blocked a bunch of things that are in a weird state (which we should totally fix), including that fonts package and all our images. :) I've reverted the PR merge and unblocked all the packages.

How to bootstrap a set of packages?

2019-04-14 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
Hello, I'd like to bootstrap all Golang packages to be able to detect whatever cyclic dependencies we have introduced over the years. Basically what I need is to be able to build from the base rawhide (or Koji latest) without any preexisting Go package, and slowly build the packages

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F29 to F30

2019-04-14 Thread Raphael Groner
$ sudo dnf --releasever=30 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f30 --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync [...] Problem 1: package lxqt-l10n-0.13.0-1.fc29.noarch requires libfm-qt-l10n = 0.13.0-1.fc29, but none of the providers can be installed - libfm-qt-l10n-0.13.0-1.fc29.noarch does not

[Bug 1697630] perl-App-a2p-1.011 is available

2019-04-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697630 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1699090] RPM package description out of date

2019-04-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699090 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-DNS-SEC-1.11-3.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-77c2e4f650 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1699090] RPM package description out of date

2019-04-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699090 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2019-04-15 - 91% PASS

2019-04-14 Thread vashirov
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/04/15/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.22-1.fc29.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code