Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (~400 during this week)

2019-09-09 Thread Kevin Kofler
Miro Hrončok wrote: > openvswitch aconole, chrisw, orphan, 0 weeks ago > tgraf, tredaell This one is a dependency of NetworkManager, so surely it should not go away. (Or is the plan to drop support for it from NM?) So can either one of the ex

Re: Fedora-Rawhide-20190909.n.1 compose check report

2019-09-09 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2019-09-09 at 14:14 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > No missing expected images. > > Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! > 21 of 45 required tests failed, 19 results missing > openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** > below > Unsatisfied

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (~400 during this week)

2019-09-09 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2019-09-10 at 02:41 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Miro Hrončok wrote: > > openvswitch aconole, chrisw, orphan, 0 weeks ago > > tgraf, tredaell > > This one is a dependency of NetworkManager, so surely it should not go away. > (Or is the

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (~400 during this week)

2019-09-09 Thread Gwyn Ciesla via devel
I filed an issue offering to take this and a few others. Sent from ProtonMail mobile \ Original Message On Sep 9, 2019, 7:31 PM, < mcatanz...@gnome.org> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 4:49 PM, Miro Hrončok > <[mhron...@redhat.com][mhroncok_redhat.com]> > wrote: > > li

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Team (weekly)

2019-09-09 Thread nils
Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Modularity Team (weekly) on 2019-09-10 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Meeting of the Modularity Team. More information available at: [Modularity Team Docs](https://docs.pagure.o

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (~400 during this week)

2019-09-09 Thread Tony Breeds
On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 11:49:17PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: > https://fed

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

2019-09-09 Thread John M. Harris Jr.
On Monday, September 9, 2019 6:42:35 AM MST Solomon Peachy wrote: > On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 06:22:46AM -0700, John M. Harris Jr. wrote: > > The system I'm sending this email from only has 4 GiB of memory in > > total. Does that mean that this system makes ASLR completely > > ineffective? Should thi

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

2019-09-09 Thread John M. Harris Jr.
On Monday, September 9, 2019 10:29:23 AM MST Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 14:52:07 -, > vvs vvs wrote: > > >May be there are more interested people that we know, but they are not > >reading that list. There will just be just every man for himself and > >Fedora has failed

Re: translucent gnome top bar gone in F31?

2019-09-09 Thread John M. Harris Jr.
On Monday, September 9, 2019 8:51:48 AM MST Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 04:39:47AM -0700, John M. Harris Jr. wrote: > > > > > > > > > This is precisely the issue with GNOME entirely. It assumes the user > > > > shouldn't > > > > have a choice, that some designers know best. > >

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

2019-09-09 Thread John M. Harris Jr.
On Monday, September 9, 2019 8:36:45 AM MST vvs vvs wrote: > There is no either right or wrong stance here. We are discussing possible > alternatives to "just drop it" attitude. > What work should be done? Please, be more specific. Right now I'm running a > i686 userland and it works. If I would

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

2019-09-09 Thread John M. Harris Jr.
On Monday, September 9, 2019 11:58:08 AM MST vvs vvs wrote: > I would argue that it might be difficult to distinguish work needed to find > out if it was i686 specific when there already is similar bug on x86_64. > Also, it's difficult to rate bug importance for most users. As I've already > said t

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

2019-09-09 Thread John M. Harris Jr.
On Monday, September 9, 2019 12:09:49 PM MST vvs vvs wrote: > Ok, now I see that Fedora is just for activists. If I'm not one of them then > I don't deserve any possibility to use it and should blame myself. Thanks > for explaining it to me. Please don't let the hostilities of this list get to you

Re: [EXT] Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

2019-09-09 Thread John M. Harris Jr.
On Monday, September 9, 2019 1:00:51 PM MST Anderson, Charles R wrote: > On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 07:57:20PM -, vvs vvs wrote: > > > Well, thanks for sharing. > > > > I'm not complaining that nobody wants to fix things for me. I'm > > complaining because there is no possibility to fix things m

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

2019-09-09 Thread John M. Harris Jr.
On Monday, September 9, 2019 12:44:42 PM MST DJ Delorie wrote: > "vvs vvs" writes: > > > Ok, now I see that Fedora is just for activists. If I'm not one of > > them then I don't deserve any possibility to use it and should blame > > myself. Thanks for explaining it to me. > > > I think you're o

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (~400 during this week)

2019-09-09 Thread Raphael Groner
Hi, > My package requires libxslt. You're obviously not alone with this issue. The better question is *why* the package as a commonly used library got orphaned, propably silently without warning (at least I can not find any announcement, officially). Regards Raphael ___

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (~400 during this week)

2019-09-09 Thread Julian Sikorski
W dniu 10.09.2019 o 06:47, Raphael Groner pisze: > Hi, > >> My package requires libxslt. > > You're obviously not alone with this issue. The better question is *why* the > package as a commonly used library got orphaned, propably silently without > warning (at least I can not find any announcem

is this update stuck? Ceph-14.2.3-1.fc32

2019-09-09 Thread Kaleb Keithley
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-6f5be50fd9 Two other ceph updatest submitted around the same time moved to testing okay. If it is stuck, can someone with appropriate privs please kick it. Thanks, -- Kaleb ___ devel mailing list --

<    1   2