ABI change announce svt-vp9

ABI changed in svt-vp9 0.1.1 release. All changes https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/artifacts/all/6720382c-ebf1-11e9-904f-52540077ca13/tests.yml/svt-vp9-0.1.1-1.fc32.log ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path

On 10/7/19 8:55 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: I have to ask, given containers are so popular and can deal with any dependency without conflicting with system installed binaries, should we really continue with this very complicated modular design ? There are only few people who fully understand how

Re: koji web interface is very slow

On Friday, 11 October 2019 at 04:36, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 10/10/19 4:57 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > On 10/10/19 9:23 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: [...] > > > Pretty please can you all indicate approximately when (UTC) you were > > > seeing the slowness? I suspect it may be the nightly database

Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora

On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 at 20:33, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 12:28:37AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > >> The problem does not only happen if the module is a non-leaf at module > >> level, but there can also be conflicts at package level, if the modules >

Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path

Chris Murphy writes: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 6:57 AM Simo Sorce wrote: >> On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 09:56 +0200, Daniel Mach wrote: >>> On 10/7/19 8:55 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: I have to ask, given containers are so popular and can deal with any dependency without conflicting with system

Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path

- Original Message - > From: "Neal Gompa" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Friday, October 11, 2019 2:36:58 PM > Subject: Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 8:50 AM Stephen Gallagher > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct

Re: koji web interface is very slow

On 10/11/19 12:20 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > So to update this thread some: > > * Load is fine/responsiveness is fine as long as we aren't doing a > database dump. > * When we do, things slow down and load goes way up. > > We did find one very odd/bad thing on the virthost the server is on (one

[Test-Announce] 2019-10-14 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 31 Blocker Review Meeting

# F31 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2019-10-14 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Hi folks! We have 6 proposed Final blockers and 11 proposed Final freeze exception to review, so let's have a Fedora 31 blocker review meeting on Monday! If you have time

Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path

On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 at 14:29, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > My main gripe is the current situation where users are thrown under the > > bus and then we give them a business card and say: read these > > instruction to figure out how to save yourself. > > I think this is unacceptable. > > Ordinary

Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 6:57 AM Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 09:56 +0200, Daniel Mach wrote: > > On 10/7/19 8:55 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > > > I have to ask, > > > given containers are so popular and can deal with any dependency > > > without conflicting with system installed

Way to visualize where Fedora contributors are around the world?

Just a random thought I had but I actually have no idea which contributors/packagers are closest to me here in Mississippi, USA. That got me thinking it would be pretty neat if a map could be automagically creating showing where everyone is. Wouldn't need exact addresses for privacy reasons but

Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path

On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 14:42 -0400, Robbie Harwood wrote: > > I believe the point most of us are struggling with is: there's no > definition of what advantages of modularity are. There may or may not > be some idea of what the advantages could be, which is a different > thing. This makes it

Re: Way to visualize where Fedora contributors are around the world?

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 1:51 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 2:48 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > > > > Just a random thought I had but I actually have no idea which > contributors/packagers are closest to me here in Mississippi, USA. > > > > That got me thinking it would be pretty neat

Re: Way to visualize where Fedora contributors are around the world?

On 10/11/19 12:47 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > Just a random thought I had but I actually have no idea which > contributors/packagers are closest to me here in Mississippi, USA. > > That got me thinking it would be pretty neat if a map could be automagically > creating showing where everyone is.

CPE Weekly: 2019-10-11

Hi everyone, Welcome to the CPE team weekly project update mail! Background: The Community Platform Engineering group is the Red Hat team combining IT and release engineering from Fedora and CentOS. Our goal is to keep core servers and services running and maintained, build releases, and other

Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 8:50 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 10:41 AM Lukas Ruzicka wrote: >> >> Seeing the reaction of the Modularity WG ... I do not understand how it is >> possible that such important decisions are taken by 4 people without any >> Fedora wide

Re: Way to visualize where Fedora contributors are around the world?

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019, 8:48 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > > That got me thinking it would be pretty neat if a map could be > automagically creating showing where everyone is. Wouldn't need exact > addresses for privacy reasons but something that gets you close like a zip > code (or equivalent). > >

Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora

On Sat, 2019-10-05 at 02:38 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > No. Resolving conflicts implies that you need to do an actual merge, > NOT a > fast forward. Fast-forwarding means that I am shipping the SAME > commit on > all branches, so the changelog must be identical (unless I play games > with >

Re: koji web interface is very slow

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 09:22:11AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 at 09:19, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 10:13 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > > wrote: > > > > > > On Friday, 11 October 2019 at 04:36, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > > > On

Re: Way to visualize where Fedora contributors are around the world?

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 2:48 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > > Just a random thought I had but I actually have no idea which > contributors/packagers are closest to me here in Mississippi, USA. > > That got me thinking it would be pretty neat if a map could be automagically > creating showing where

coreos-assembler v0.6.0

As part of creating Fedora CoreOS (and derivatives like Red Hat Enterprise Linux CoreOS), we are making some fairly fundamental changes to how the operating system works - while OSTree isn't new to Fedora, Ignition is - and more broadly than that, using Ignition implies something much more

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2019-10-14 Fedora QA Meeting

Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting for Monday. Once again I don't think there's anything urgent right now (the Xen criterion probably isn't urgent again as it looks like we have a fix for the bug there) and we're focused on F31 release testing right now. There will be a blocker

Re: Way to visualize where Fedora contributors are around the world?

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 3:02 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 1:51 PM Neal Gompa wrote: >> >> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 2:48 PM Richard Shaw wrote: >> > >> > Just a random thought I had but I actually have no idea which >> > contributors/packagers are closest to me here in

Fedora 31 Final blocker status email #5

Next week is the Go/No-Go meeting. Wouldn't it be great if this was the last blocker status email? Action summary Accepted blockers - 1. mutter — can't turn zoom off once enabled — POST ACTION: upstream to merge fixes 2. distribution — Cannot upgrade to

Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora

On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 17:10 -0400, Randy Barlow wrote: > On Sat, 2019-10-05 at 02:38 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > No. Resolving conflicts implies that you need to do an actual merge, > > NOT a > > fast forward. Fast-forwarding means that I am shipping the SAME > > commit on > > all branches,

Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path

On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 04:34:21PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 08:13:17PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > To quote you from the other ongoing thread: "The default stream for a > > package shouldn't be updated in disruptive ways in shipped releases" > > If that's the

Re: libdav1d SONAME bump

Le ven. 11 oct. 2019 à 16:33, Xavier Bachelot a écrit : > > Le 11/10/2019 à 16:10, Robert-André Mauchin a écrit : > > Hello, > > > > Dav1d 0.5.0 was published today and brings a SONAME bump from libdav1d.so. > > 2.0.0 to libdav1d.so.3.0.0. > > I will be updating it next week on F31/32, consumers

Re: Let's revisit the FTBFS policy

On 14. 08. 19 14:23, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello. Recently, a couple hundred packages were retired from rawhide (Fedora 31 at that time) based on the Fedora Failed to Build From Source Policy [1]. From various reactions over several threads it seems this policy is not ideal. This is an attempt

how to list all module repos in Fedora?

Hi, https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/ returns 404, and https://src.fedoraproject.org/browse/projects/ seems to list rpms/ (though there's 622 pages of output, so I'm not sure). Is there a way to browse through module repos? Zbyszek ___ devel

Fedora-31-20191011.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 5/153 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-31-20191010.n.0): ID: 467475 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_remote_logging_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/467475 ID: 467476 Test: x86_64

Non-responsive maintainer: jamielinux

Hello, In accordance with Fedora's non-responsive maintainer policy, I'm sending this message in attempt to contact Jamie Nguyen (jamielinux). Required non-responsive maintainer bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760898 Open unaddressed bugs (219 in total):

Re: how to list all module repos in Fedora?

If you go to any modular repo: https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/eclipse And click on "modules" in the path at the top, it takes you to: https://src.fedoraproject.org/projects/modules/%2A Which lists them all. - Original Message - > From: "Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek" >

Re: module package exclusion behavior on EL8

On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 at 19:28, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > I continue to run into strange (at least to me) issues with modules on > EL8. RHEL8 ships a 'rhn-tools' module that ships only the "koan" > package from the cobbler srpm [1]. When this module is enabled, I > cannot install cobbler from my

Re: Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Free Pascal Compiler 3.2.0

> "AI" == Artur Iwicki writes: AI> I imagine the reason is that this allows us to add new AI> architectures to FPC and do some trial-and-error builds of FPC AI> without affecting dependent packages - if FPC itself used AI> %{fpc_arches}, then adding new architectures to FPC would require AI>

Re: libdav1d SONAME bump

Le 11/10/2019 à 16:10, Robert-André Mauchin a écrit : Hello, Dav1d 0.5.0 was published today and brings a SONAME bump from libdav1d.so. 2.0.0 to libdav1d.so.3.0.0. I will be updating it next week on F31/32, consumers of these libraries (ffmpeg, xine-lib, vlc) will need to rebuild their

RE: Question regarding systemd service unit cleanup

> systemctl daemon-reload? Thanks Dridi. I had forgotten to mention that I had tried daemon-reload and that did not help. > Isn't this handled automatically by the %systemd scriptlets? %systemd_post macro is a no-op for upgrade case -

Re: Way to visualize where Fedora contributors are around the world?

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 02:59:19PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 10/11/19 12:47 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > > Just a random thought I had but I actually have no idea which > > contributors/packagers are closest to me here in Mississippi, USA. > > > > That got me thinking it would be pretty

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20191011.n.1 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20191010.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20191011.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 9 Dropped packages:63 Upgraded packages: 245 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 15.61 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora

On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 14:34 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > That seems like a personal call, really. I very much like being able > to > keep branches in sync without merge commits as it means I can do > stuff > like: > > for i in el6 epel7 f29 f30 f31 master; do fedpkg switch-branch $i; > git >

Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora

On Thu, 2019-10-03 at 19:02 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > As pointed out elsewhere, we would have fewer conflicts if we could > > get > > the version, release, and changelog out of the spec file, and then > > I > > think maintaining different spec in different release branches > >

Fedora-Rawhide-20191011.n.1 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 3 of 45 required tests failed, 2 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests: FAILED:

Re: libdav1d SONAME bump

> Hello, > > Dav1d 0.5.0 was published today and brings a SONAME bump from libdav1d.so. > 2.0.0 to libdav1d.so.3.0.0. > I will be updating it next week on F31/32, consumers of these libraries > (ffmpeg, xine-lib, vlc) will need to rebuild their packages. > > Best regards, > > Robert-André I'm

Re: koji web interface is very slow

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 03:02:20PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 10/11/19 12:20 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > So to update this thread some: > > > > * Load is fine/responsiveness is fine as long as we aren't doing a > > database dump. > > * When we do, things slow down and load goes way up. >

Re: Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Free Pascal Compiler 3.2.0

Yes, dependent packages should use %{fpc_arches}. FPC itself doesn't do that. I imagine the reason is that this allows us to add new architectures to FPC and do some trial-and-error builds of FPC without affecting dependent packages - if FPC itself used %{fpc_arches}, then adding new

Unretiring the tolua++ package

Hi All, Per the https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Retired_Package procedure here is a mail to let people know I have filed a request to unretire tolua++: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8895 tolua++ was retired as part of the

Unretiring the tolua++ package

Hi All, Per the https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Retired_Package procedure here is a mail to let people know I have filed a request to unretire tolua++: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8895 tolua++ was retired as part of the

Re: Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Free Pascal Compiler 3.2.0

Il 11/10/19 11:39, Artur Iwicki ha scritto: > Yes, dependent packages should use %{fpc_arches}. FPC itself doesn't do that. > Ah, I misunderstood the phrase `Add AArch64 and ppc64le to the `ExclusiveArch:` tag in the package spec.`. I thought you were saying to add those ExclusiveArch to all

Re: koji web interface is very slow

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 10:13 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > On Friday, 11 October 2019 at 04:36, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > On 10/10/19 4:57 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > > On 10/10/19 9:23 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > [...] > > > > Pretty please can you all indicate approximately

Re: Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Free Pascal Compiler 3.2.0

On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 10:35:23AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Free_Pascal_Compiler_3.2.0 > > == Summary == > Update the Free Pascal Compiler used within Fedora to version 3.2.0, > once it is published, and enable building (previously unsupported) > AArch64

Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path

On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 10:41 AM Lukas Ruzicka wrote: > Seeing the reaction of the Modularity WG ... I do not understand how it is > possible that such important decisions are taken by 4 people without any > Fedora wide discussions like this. And yet, it seems a little bit that even > opinions

Re: koji web interface is very slow

On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 at 09:19, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 10:13 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: > > > > On Friday, 11 October 2019 at 04:36, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > > On 10/10/19 4:57 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > > > On 10/10/19 9:23 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >

Re: Unretiring the tolua++ package

Hi, On 10/11/19 1:20 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 11. 10. 19 12:11, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi All, Per the https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Retired_Package procedure here is a mail to let people know I have filed a request to

Re: module package exclusion behavior on EL8

Dne 11. 10. 19 v 1:27 Orion Poplawski napsal(a): I continue to run into strange (at least to me) issues with modules on EL8.  RHEL8 ships a 'rhn-tools' module that ships only the "koan" package from the cobbler srpm [1].  When this module is enabled, I cannot install cobbler from my copr - dnf

Re: Heads-up: openQA scheduling outage over last 2 days

On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 08:21:37AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hey folks! Just to let folks know that the openQA job scheduling robot > (for the production instance) had a bad day and needed to go lie down > for a bit, so it didn't schedule any tests for any new composes or > critpath updates

Re: s390x: glibc32 and gcc

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 5:08 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > And did not bump soname at the same time? I suspected as much once I > stared at the problem some more. Yes, that's exactly right. > Oh, if mpfr and mpc had bumped soname at the same time, the > BuildRequires: change would not have been

libdav1d SONAME bump

Hello, Dav1d 0.5.0 was published today and brings a SONAME bump from libdav1d.so. 2.0.0 to libdav1d.so.3.0.0. I will be updating it next week on F31/32, consumers of these libraries (ffmpeg, xine-lib, vlc) will need to rebuild their packages. Best regards, Robert-André

Re: Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Free Pascal Compiler 3.2.0

FPC 3.2.0 hasn't been released yet - this Change Proposal is a bit of a early heads-up. The FPC website says it should be out before the end of the year. Once it's released, after updating rawhide, a COPR repo can be prepared. ___ devel mailing list --

Re: s390x: glibc32 and gcc

* Jerry James: > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 12:39 AM Florian Weimer wrote: >> Sorry, I wasn't aware that you were trying to rebuild gcc this week. I >> spoke to Jakub about the glibc32 change, and he had no objections. >> >> It's not clear how you are handling the transition. Why do you need to

Re: Unretiring the tolua++ package

On 11. 10. 19 12:11, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi All, Per the https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Retired_Package procedure here is a mail to let people know I have filed a request to unretire tolua++: 

Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path

On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 09:56 +0200, Daniel Mach wrote: > On 10/7/19 8:55 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > > I have to ask, > > given containers are so popular and can deal with any dependency > > without conflicting with system installed binaries, should we really > > continue with this very complicated

Fedora 31 compose report: 20191011.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-31-20191010.n.0 NEW: Fedora-31-20191011.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 50 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 7.63 MiB Size of dropped packages:834.47 KiB

Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path

I don't think containers can replace modularity. They need to coexist. > If we want to create containers built on top of a distribution (no > randomly picked bits from the internet, reproducible builds, security, > ...), we need a way to distribute multiple versions of the software > (module

[Bug 1758719] Plans for EPEL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758719 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from

[Bug 1756029] [RFE] perl-LWP-UserAgent-Determined build for epel8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756029 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings (epel8). "We provide Test2::Event::Warning so we don't need to build-require it"

Notification time stamped 2019-10-11 18:09:59 UTC From 97acaba71a36ff87d3536c514e622caecbf3d17d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Oct 27 2016 10:57:15 + Subject: We provide Test2::Event::Warning so we don't need to build-require it --- diff --git

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings (epel8). "Update to 0.04 (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2019-10-11 18:09:59 UTC From 0758fd7c03096d870405dac0b551e723a1fcbbfb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Oct 24 2016 08:51:13 + Subject: Update to 0.04 - New upstream release 0.04 - Load Test2::Event::Warning in the plugin instead of relying on

[Bug 1760944] New: perl-Math-BigInt-1.999817 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760944 Bug ID: 1760944 Summary: perl-Math-BigInt-1.999817 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Math-BigInt Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1760943] New: perl-Math-BigInt-FastCalc-0.5009 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760943 Bug ID: 1760943 Summary: perl-Math-BigInt-FastCalc-0.5009 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Math-BigInt-FastCalc Keywords:

[Bug 1760942] New: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP-1.6007 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760942 Bug ID: 1760942 Summary: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP-1.6007 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP Keywords: FutureFeature,

[Bug 1756029] [RFE] perl-LWP-UserAgent-Determined build for epel8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756029 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Bauer --- Huh, don't know how I missed this. Epel8 branch has been requested: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/18180 I'll build it as soon as this goes through. -- You are receiving this mail

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings (epel8). "Perl 5.30 rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2019-10-11 18:09:59 UTC From 74997f22e5320541c22b4f624a4a3eb7228551ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Oct 11 2019 18:09:09 + Subject: Perl 5.30 rebuild --- diff --git a/perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings.spec b/perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings.spec

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings (epel8). "Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/f28' into epel8"

Notification time stamped 2019-10-11 18:09:59 UTC From 147648083fe38430881ca93bbf8bd3250c2c4b7c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Oct 11 2019 18:08:49 + Subject: Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/f28' into epel8 --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings (epel8). "Perl 5.26 rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2019-10-11 18:09:59 UTC From 22eea02aab9a0f1d8db5e3627b0be2face9edf2b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Jun 05 2017 19:59:09 + Subject: Perl 5.26 rebuild --- diff --git a/perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings.spec b/perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings.spec

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings (epel8). "Update to 0.05 (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2019-10-11 18:09:59 UTC From 614d507095a4690ec845dcb3eed31c51c8f040c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Nov 08 2016 09:35:39 + Subject: Update to 0.05 - New upstream release 0.05 - Skip compile.t on Windows; this test uses IPC::Run3, which

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings (epel8). "Initial import (perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings-0.02-3) (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2019-10-11 18:09:59 UTC From de8e111344105006d0653f93a6884d5a8f8da332 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Sep 19 2016 13:16:18 + Subject: Initial import (perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings-0.02-3) Loading this plugin causes your tests to fail if there are

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings (epel8). "cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN "

Notification time stamped 2019-10-11 18:09:59 UTC From 4a17e7ee409a3f11693c01d082f2cd0ed9d3baf1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Oct 11 2019 18:09:09 + Subject: cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN --- diff

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings (epel8). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Mass_Rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2019-10-11 18:09:59 UTC From d87ebfa3218d3dfa18c6e46dc2f9fbb363f5e7a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Feb 11 2017 05:40:17 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Mass_Rebuild --- diff --git

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings (epel8). "perl dependency renamed to perl-interpreter "

Notification time stamped 2019-10-11 18:09:59 UTC From 35811b744a24adb1db2d3d6310ed953d74ec0c18 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jul 12 2017 12:28:40 + Subject: perl dependency renamed to perl-interpreter

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings (epel8). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2019-10-11 18:09:59 UTC From e4867736025164a981bcaab53619d2f1c076feb5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Feb 09 2018 01:40:11 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings (epel8). "Update to 0.06 (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2019-10-11 18:09:59 UTC From d53f4dcf0c902ebdf9a8b72f4d447ea3b065dcfc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Jun 19 2017 08:36:36 + Subject: Update to 0.06 - New upstream release 0.06 - Warnings inside a subtest were not emitted as TAP events,

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings (epel8). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2019-10-11 18:09:59 UTC From 17eb18c1c04113c57dc04a547fef6993ab80e3a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Oct 11 2019 18:09:09 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings (epel8). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2019-10-11 18:09:59 UTC From 0e07951d3578f513d9e7c63e3e94f397cfa86e02 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jul 27 2017 06:38:49 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild --- diff --git

limb pushed to perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings (epel8). ""Adding package.cfg file""

Notification time stamped 2019-10-11 18:01:14 UTC From 0f18f4043d0bfe9838c4e8bc26a35d6c7ec3f053 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gwyn Ciesla Date: Oct 11 2019 18:01:07 + Subject: "Adding package.cfg file" --- diff --git a/package.cfg b/package.cfg new file mode 100644 index 000..66ea79d

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings (epel8). "Update to 0.03 (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2019-10-11 18:09:59 UTC From 6ceee59fb92b2634b5e9a072f86956ca43f61c3b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Oct 18 2016 12:48:06 + Subject: Update to 0.03 - New upstream release 0.03 - Add the $SIG{__WARN__} hook in an INIT block; we really don't

[Bug 1760112] [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Test-Number-Delta

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760112 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings (epel8). "Update to 0.08 (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2019-10-11 18:09:59 UTC From 092205a65c9da7cbddadcec8393eadab2154dfb3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Oct 11 2019 18:09:09 + Subject: Update to 0.08 - New upstream release 0.08 - Use IPC::Run3 instead of Capture::Tiny for all tests, which fixes

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings (epel8). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2019-10-11 18:09:59 UTC From b7ab4b4f06337cfc4f61e0a8b21b47ca3d19c320 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Oct 11 2019 18:09:09 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings (epel8). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2019-10-11 18:09:59 UTC From f1ee14fafbd072a2b514d223ce90524fa853656d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Oct 11 2019 18:09:09 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings (epel8). "Update to 0.07 (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2019-10-11 18:09:59 UTC From 78c378b33714bba4883041b193ffbc4582765358 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Oct 11 2019 18:09:09 + Subject: Update to 0.07 - New upstream release 0.07 - Reverted back to using the Warning event type, since the bug in

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings (epel8). "Perl 5.28 rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2019-10-11 18:09:59 UTC From 7d4c0fd90330a704bad74446cbe8a6b5852312c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Oct 11 2019 18:09:09 + Subject: Perl 5.28 rebuild --- diff --git a/perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings.spec b/perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings.spec

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings (master). "Update to 0.08 (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2019-10-11 17:58:43 UTC From f7660e89060a174b00d0ab30e9be566794a228e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Oct 11 2019 17:57:35 + Subject: Update to 0.08 - New upstream release 0.08 - Use IPC::Run3 instead of Capture::Tiny for all tests, which fixes

[Bug 1760112] [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Test-Number-Delta

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760112 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug 1758719] Plans for EPEL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758719 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 1760111] [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Params-Coerce

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760111 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 1760112] [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Test-Number-Delta

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760112 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 1756029] [RFE] perl-LWP-UserAgent-Determined build for epel8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756029 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 1756027] [RFE] perl-PerlIO-gzip build for epel8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756027 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1752411] perl-Date-Holidays-DE-2.03 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752411 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Date-Holidays-DE-2.03- |perl-Date-Holidays-DE-2.03-

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2019-10-12 - 95% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/10/12/report-389-ds-base-1.4.2.2-20191011gitc95f6cf.fc30.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 1755810] [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-DateTime-Format-SQLite

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1755810 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

  1   2   >