Re: Pymol is broken on Fedora 31

On 31. 12. 19 12:12, Antonio Trande wrote: The review is complete. Please, add me as maintainer. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780849 https://pagure.io/releng/new_issue?template=package_unretirement=Unretire%20pymol -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Self Introduction: Michael Hrechyn

Hi! I'm Michael Hrechyn, 17 years old school boy, who lives in Belarus. In addition to studying at school, I study programming in Rust and administration of Linux systems because I like it. I have few simple open-source projects writen in Rust and they are also available in Copr. Also I maintain

Re: Self Introduction: William Brawner

> Welcome to Fedora. Your blog is interesting. Very much enjoyed > learning > about Gitweb, have been using Gitea and it is nice to see an > alternative > lightweight git solution. You might also consider writing an article > for > the magazine ( >

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20191231.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20191230.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20191231.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:7 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 43 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 148.73 KiB Size of dropped packages:0

Self Introduction: Jacek Danecki

Hi, I've been using Linux for above 20 years. I've been involved in many Linux projects mainly closed sourced, but also open sourced: [1] isci kernel driver [2] dmraid [3] mdadm [4] KaNaPi [5] Neo I was working with some of you on adding mdadm support in Anaconda for Fedora 11. I'm preparing

List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Dear maintainers. Based on the latest fail to build from source policy, the following packages will be retired from Fedora 32 approximately one week before branching (February 2020). Policy: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ The

Re: orphaning bleachbit

Sure. But you can learn basic tasks as build using "Mock", minors changes in the macros python; or you want wait an eternity to the developer migrate to python3? Maybe when it will ready for python3, You are no longer interested in maintaining it. Good luck ;)

Re: Pymol is broken on Fedora 31

The review is complete. Please, add me as maintainer. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780849 On 07/12/19 12:51, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 07. 12. 19 12:46, Antonio Trande wrote: >> I'm interested. > > Cool. At this point, it would need a new package review (pymol was > retired more

Re: No GCC 10 for Fedora 32? Deadline is 2019/12/31

On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 02:03:23PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Hello, all: > > So I again looked at > https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-32/f-32-key-tasks.html > and proposal submission deadline for changes requiring mass rebuild is due > today > (2019/12/31). If I am correct we have

updates not getting pushed for the last several days

Hi list, it appears that the updates have not been pushed for the last several days: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-986a024b8e https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-e98d4e55e6 If I recall correctly, there have been changes made some time ago after which the

Re: updates not getting pushed for the last several days

On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 10:52:58AM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote: > Hi list, > > it appears that the updates have not been pushed for the last several days: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-986a024b8e > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-e98d4e55e6 > If I

Re: Self Introduction: Jacek Danecki

On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 11:06:11AM +0100, Jacek Danecki wrote: > Hi, > > I've been using Linux for above 20 years. I've been involved in many Linux > projects > mainly closed sourced, but also open sourced: > [1] isci kernel driver > [2] dmraid > [3] mdadm > [4] KaNaPi > [5] Neo > > I was

Re: No GCC 10 for Fedora 32? Deadline is 2019/12/31

On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 10:30:59AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 02:03:23PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > > Hello, all: > > > > So I again looked at > > https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-32/f-32-key-tasks.html > > and proposal submission deadline for changes

Fedora-Rawhide-20191231.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 5/155 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20191230.n.0): ID: 502207 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/502207 Old failures (same test

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Co

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Co on 2020-01-01 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 GMT At freenode@fedora-meeting The meeting will be about: This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. A general agenda is the following: #meetingname EPEL #topic

Self-introduction

Hi all, I don't want to repeat myself, please take a look at my wiki page [1]. Why I want to join? I have one too many Python package and I started to add the python-sig as admin. But it goes both ways, if the SIG has access to my packages I want to be part of the SIG. My name is in the member

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2020-01-01 - 96% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/01/01/report-389-ds-base-1.4.3.0-20200101git3022f46.fc31.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to