Help needed to get dependencies in EPEL 8 for pagure

2020-02-08 Thread Neal Gompa
Hey all, I've been trying to get Pagure into EPEL 8 for a couple of months now so that we can upgrade our Pagure instances to RHEL 8[1]. Thankfully, most of Pagure's dependencies *are* now present in EPEL 8, so there's only a few that need to be added. The list of Pagure dependencies missing

Re: Package uses Gradle (retired) to build: what to do?

2020-02-08 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 7:04 PM Gerald Henriksen wrote: > > On Sat, 8 Feb 2020 18:50:25 +0100, you wrote: > > >> and why gradle was retired ? is easy unretire it ? > > > >I am running gradle command right now as a coincidence . > > > >The upstream project is active. >

Self Introduction: Aleksei Bavshin

2020-02-08 Thread Aleksei Bavshin
Hi all, My name is Aleksei and I'm Russian living in the San Franciso Bay Area. I've been using Linux at home since 2003 and developing closed-source Linux software for my daytime jobs over the last decade. I started with Mandrake 9, tried ALT, spent a few years with Slackware and finally ended

Re: Self Introduction: Aleksei Bavshin

2020-02-08 Thread Dan Čermák
Welcome to Fedora and to the Say SIG Aleksei! Cheers, Dan Aleksei Bavshin writes: > Hi all, > > My name is Aleksei and I'm Russian living in the San Franciso Bay > Area. I've been using Linux at home since 2003 and developing > closed-source Linux software for my daytime jobs over the last

Re: Package uses Gradle (retired) to build: what to do?

2020-02-08 Thread Gerald Henriksen
On Sat, 8 Feb 2020 18:50:25 +0100, you wrote: >> and why gradle was retired ? is easy unretire it ? > >I am running gradle command right now as a coincidence . > >The upstream project is active. >https://github.com/gradle/gradle > >We also might refer other distribution's spec files if we

Re: Package uses Gradle (retired) to build: what to do?

2020-02-08 Thread Gerald Henriksen
On Sat, 8 Feb 2020 19:16:45 -0500, you wrote: >What does it tell? To me, it says that FOSS platforms don't care about >Java as much as they used to. We're clearly able to do stuff with Go >and Rust, which are just as "anti-distribution" as Java is (based on >what other people say). Go and Rust

Re: Self Introduction: Erich Eickmeyer

2020-02-08 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 6:59 PM Erich Eickmeyer wrote: > > Hello all! > > I'm Erich, the current project leader of Ubuntu Studio, the > creativity-oriented flavor of Ubuntu. I've been leading that project for the > past two years. > > In that time, my team and I have taken Ubuntu Studio strides

Re: Mock v2.0 release

2020-02-08 Thread Pavel Raiskup
On Friday, February 7, 2020 7:57:24 PM CET Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 07. 02. 20 15:44, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > Hey all, I'm pleased to announce that a new major release of mock tool, > > A 'simple' chroot build environment manager for building RPMs, is out. > > > > There are several major

Re: Change proposal discussion - Optimize SquashFS Size

2020-02-08 Thread Bohdan Khomutskyi
Hello David, As an author of this change, I'd like to comment on the options provided: 1) Reduce the ISO image size. 2) Improve installation time. 3) Improve image composition time. All three can be achieved at the same time. 1) Using the best compression with plain SquashFS will reduce the

Re: Mock v2.0 release

2020-02-08 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 08. 02. 20 15:03, Pavel Raiskup wrote: On Friday, February 7, 2020 7:57:24 PM CET Miro Hrončok wrote: On 07. 02. 20 15:44, Pavel Raiskup wrote: Hey all, I'm pleased to announce that a new major release of mock tool, A 'simple' chroot build environment manager for building RPMs, is out.

MiniDebugInfo support in tools like objdump and nm

2020-02-08 Thread Georg Sauthoff
Hello, perhaps it's just me but the Fedora switch to MiniDebugInfo [1] looks incomplete. For example, when I want to lookup the symbols of a system binary I have to remember to use eu-readelf -Ws --elf-section /usr/bin/dd instead of just being able to use `nm`. Similarly, when

Re: Package uses Gradle (retired) to build: what to do?

2020-02-08 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 11:40 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 10:44 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 6:23 AM Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > netcdf-java[1] uses the Gradle build system, and is required to update > > > hdfview[2] to the

Re: Package uses Gradle (retired) to build: what to do?

2020-02-08 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 10:44 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 6:23 AM Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > netcdf-java[1] uses the Gradle build system, and is required to update > > hdfview[2] to the latest version. Gradle, however, was retired[3] as > > "out of date, broken,

Re: Package uses Gradle (retired) to build: what to do?

2020-02-08 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sat, 2020-02-08 at 11:41 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 11:40 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia > wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 10:44 AM Neal Gompa > > wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 6:23 AM Ankur Sinha < > > > sanjay.an...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > >

Re: Package uses Gradle (retired) to build: what to do?

2020-02-08 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 6:23 AM Ankur Sinha wrote: > > Hello, > > netcdf-java[1] uses the Gradle build system, and is required to update > hdfview[2] to the latest version. Gradle, however, was retired[3] as > "out of date, broken, fails to build, basically unmaintainable". > > Now, I know that

Re: What to do with simple-koji-ci?

2020-02-08 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 3:31 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Good Morning Everyone, > > I while back I wrote a small service named simple-koji-ci, which reacts to > every pull-request opened on dist-git and fires a (scratch) build of the > package > with the proposed changes merged, and report

Package uses Gradle (retired) to build: what to do?

2020-02-08 Thread Ankur Sinha
Hello, netcdf-java[1] uses the Gradle build system, and is required to update hdfview[2] to the latest version. Gradle, however, was retired[3] as "out of date, broken, fails to build, basically unmaintainable". Now, I know that following our system, one must package Gradle first but given the

Re: Packages webapp status

2020-02-08 Thread Clement Verna
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 21:50, Richard Fearn wrote: > On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 at 17:03, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > Thats... much more harsh than I would agree with. I still use it and > > find some of its information helpfull. > > Sadly it does seem to have got a lot worse recently... I noticed last >

Fedora-Cloud-31-20200208.0 compose check report

2020-02-08 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Package uses Gradle (retired) to build: what to do?

2020-02-08 Thread Gary Buhrmaster
On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 5:08 PM Sérgio Basto wrote: > and why gradle was retired ? is easy unretire it ? Announced here (with reasons): https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/BMJXGWKXXFOOBQON3XFYPFBOWEZMAKKU/

Re: Package uses Gradle (retired) to build: what to do?

2020-02-08 Thread Jun Aruga
> and why gradle was retired ? is easy unretire it ? I am running gradle command right now as a coincidence . The upstream project is active. https://github.com/gradle/gradle We also might refer other distribution's spec files if we unretire. https://software.opensuse.org/package/gradle

Re: Orphaning owncloud and nextcloud

2020-02-08 Thread Ivan Chavero
I've finished a refactor to this package i'm on the verge of updating it right now. On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 12:39 PM Christian Glombek wrote: > Please retire the package now. > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:10 PM Michael Cronenworth > wrote: > >> On 1/17/20 11:53 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> > >> >

Re: Orphaning owncloud and nextcloud

2020-02-08 Thread Ivan Chavero
The nextcloud package updated for 18.0.0 is now on rawhide, 31 and 30 , sorry for the delay. I had to do a mayo refactor and careful testing. On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 12:40 PM Ivan Chavero wrote: > I've finished a refactor to this package i'm on the verge of updating it > right now. > > On

Re: Turning off keys.fedoraproject.org

2020-02-08 Thread Björn Persson
Josh Boyer wrote: > > We may want to replace it with a simple Web Key Directory server: > > https://wiki.gnupg.org/WKD > > > > That would make it easy to lookup keys based on @fedoraproject.org > > email addresses, and since keys can be replaced in the directory, it > > avoids the problems with

Re: Orphaning owncloud and nextcloud

2020-02-08 Thread Christian Glombek
Please retire the package now. On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:10 PM Michael Cronenworth wrote: > On 1/17/20 11:53 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > > > On 30. 11. 19 2:27, Ivan Chavero wrote: > >> Yes i'm going to update it to the newest version this weekend > >> > >> thanks for following up! > > > >

Re: Orphaning owncloud and nextcloud

2020-02-08 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 08. 02. 20 20:29, Ivan Chavero wrote: The nextcloud package updated for 18.0.0 is now on rawhide, 31 and 30 , sorry for the delay. I had to do a mayo refactor and careful testing. Thanks for the update. Is such a major overhaul applicable for already released Fedoras? Could you please

Re: Turning off keys.fedoraproject.org

2020-02-08 Thread Björn Persson
Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > We plan to turn off and decommission > keys.fedoraproject.org on 2020-02-10. FAS contains PGP key IDs, which are displayed as links to keys.fedoraproject.org. Is there a plan to look up keys through some other key server instead? It says that these key IDs are used

Re: Package uses Gradle (retired) to build: what to do?

2020-02-08 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sat, 2020-02-08 at 19:03 -0500, Gerald Henriksen wrote: > On Sat, 8 Feb 2020 18:50:25 +0100, you wrote: > > > > and why gradle was retired ? is easy unretire it ? > > > > I am running gradle command right now as a coincidence . > > > > The upstream project is active. > >

Re: swap-on-ZRAM by default

2020-02-08 Thread John M. Harris Jr
On Saturday, January 25, 2020 2:52:05 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote: > Question and (pre)proposal: > Can Fedora converge on a single swap-on-ZRAM implementation, and if > so, which one? Fedora Workstation WG wants to move to swap-on-ZRAM by > default in Fedora 33, and the working group needs to pick

Re: swap-on-ZRAM by default

2020-02-08 Thread John Reiser
John M. Harris Jr wrote: Using swap on zram disables the ability to hibernate, making it a non-starter for many users. If this is going to be thrown into anything, the user needs to be asked whether they want it or not in the installer, otherwise you're just taking away features. Why not

Re: Orphaning owncloud and nextcloud

2020-02-08 Thread Ivan Chavero
On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 1:43 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 08. 02. 20 20:29, Ivan Chavero wrote: > > The nextcloud package updated for 18.0.0 is now on rawhide, 31 and 30 , > sorry > > for the delay. I had to do a > > mayo refactor and careful testing. > > Thanks for the update. Is such a major

CPE Weekly: 2020-02-08

2020-02-08 Thread Aoife Moloney
Hi everyone, Welcome (back!) to the CPE team weekly project update mail! There was a break on this email blast of two weeks to facilitate team travel to DevConf & FosDem, but we are back in action again from this week onwards :) Background: The Community Platform Engineering group is the

Re: Turning off keys.fedoraproject.org

2020-02-08 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, Feb 08, 2020 at 08:58:11PM +0100, Björn Persson wrote: > Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > We plan to turn off and decommission > > keys.fedoraproject.org on 2020-02-10. > > FAS contains PGP key IDs, which are displayed as links to > keys.fedoraproject.org. Is there a plan to look up keys

Re: Turning off keys.fedoraproject.org

2020-02-08 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, Feb 08, 2020 at 08:59:40PM +0100, Björn Persson wrote: > Josh Boyer wrote: > > > We may want to replace it with a simple Web Key Directory server: > > > https://wiki.gnupg.org/WKD > > > > > > That would make it easy to lookup keys based on @fedoraproject.org > > > email addresses, and

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2020-02-09 - 96% PASS

2020-02-08 Thread vashirov
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/02/09/report-389-ds-base-1.4.3.2-20200209git827c97d.fc31.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Help needed to get dependencies in EPEL 8 for pagure

2020-02-08 Thread Neal Gompa
Hey all, I've been trying to get Pagure into EPEL 8 for a couple of months now so that we can upgrade our Pagure instances to RHEL 8[1]. Thankfully, most of Pagure's dependencies *are* now present in EPEL 8, so there's only a few that need to be added. The list of Pagure dependencies missing

[Bug 1800912] New: perl-MCE-1.866 is available

2020-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800912 Bug ID: 1800912 Summary: perl-MCE-1.866 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-MCE Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

2020-02-08 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 543 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d condor-8.6.11-1.el7 285 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-c499781e80 python-gnupg-0.4.4-1.el7 282