> > It has been a pleasure for me to be a part of and help lead the
> > EPEL steering committee for the last couple of years. It has not
> > always been smooth sailing but I have found it an enjoyable experience.
> >
> > However, as you may know the Fedora project will be moving to a
> > different
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 19/02/2020 07:05, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 18.02.2020 22:29, David Sommerseth wrote:
We released the OpenVPN 3 Linux v8 beta release early last week [0], with the
Fedora Copr repository [1] updated as well. Now things are working so well it
is about time to get this package into
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 1:12 PM Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 9:36 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > It has been a pleasure for me to be a part of and help lead the
> > EPEL steering committee for the last couple of years. It has not
> > always been smooth
This is the time of the year again and I must say that the situation
improved. The process was:
~~~
$ sudo dnf update fedora-gpg-keys
$ sudo dnf update fedora-repos --release 33
~~~
Where for the second command, you have to confirm the GPG key import.
Please note that the `--release 33`
- Original Message -
> From: "Stephen John Smoogen"
> To: "EPEL Development List" ,
> "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2020 6:35:26 PM
> Subject: Announcement: EPEL Steering Committee Changes
>
> Hi,
>
> It has been a pleasure for me to be
On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 at 01:01, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, February 18, 2020 10:35:26 AM MST Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It has been a pleasure for me to be a part of and help lead the
> > EPEL steering committee for the last couple of years. It has not
> > always been
Hi,
can you try to run with QT_DEBUG_PLUGINS=1 and attach here the output? Does
uninstalling QGnomePlatform package make any difference? Can you be more
specific about where exactly you are trying to change the font which doesn't
apply? I opened the "Style" option and there is tons of
There will be an outage starting at 2020-02-23 06:00 UTC, which will last
approximately 7 hours (but can take more if something goes wrong).
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2020-02-23 06:00 UTC'
Reason for outage:
> Am 19.02.2020 um 06:59 schrieb John M. Harris Jr :
>
> Based on this, I'm not so sure that Troy is the best person to take that
> place
> within EPEL's Steering Committee. ..., as he is a member of the
> Modularity team, this is not a good sign for what's to come.
Whether modularity is
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 12:09 AM Jerry James wrote:
>
> I am trying to track down a font problem with MuseScore:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1790829
>
> The problem is that everything is displayed in Cantarell, no matter
> which font the user actually selects. In the style
On 19.02.2020 09:32, Tom Hughes wrote:
> In this case I believe that although the client is intended to be
> protocol compatible with openvpn 2 it's basically an entirely new
> program with a totally different architecture and user interface
> so parallel packaging seems reasonable.
I think it
Just a minor FYI announcement:
As most of the original Modularity Team is moving on to face new
challenges, Red Hat's effort will now be primarily represented by the
software management group, with Daniel Mach coming up with an updated
Modularity Objective in the following weeks.
In essence,
Hey,
I would really appreciate if someone would be kind enough to review my
first package .It is the elementary-tweaks tool built for pantheon de.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802177
I have no experience in reviewing a package but if someone has a simple
review, maybe I can do that
I managed to solve the issue with the Java stack size for the s390x
builder. The new koji scratch build succeeded, and now the review
should be quick and easy:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803528
Iñaki
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 20:23, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 01:05:59PM -0500, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>
> The original issue seemed to clear itself up. Or at least by random chance
> I got a builder that wasn't full.
Its not got anything to do will full as far as we can tell.
It seems sporadic. The best kind of bugs to try and
Hi,
Would someone mind swapping reviews?
I am building puppet 6 for EPEL 8 and this one[1] is a dependency.
1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803276
Thank you!!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 01:17:29PM -0500, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Feb 2020, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>
> long ago
> diskcheck
> was in Centos 2, and early Fedora
> /var/ftp/pub/nfs/mirror/redhat/fedora/1/SRPMS/diskcheck-1.4-5.src.rpm
>
> Why not build and install it so the
On Wed, 19 Feb 2020, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
long ago
diskcheck
was in Centos 2, and early Fedora
/var/ftp/pub/nfs/mirror/redhat/fedora/1/SRPMS/diskcheck-1.4-5.src.rpm
Why not build and install it so the admins would get warnings
?
Also, when a build fails for:
error:
OLD: Fedora-32-20200218.n.0
NEW: Fedora-32-20200219.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 10
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 188
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 12.50 MiB
Size of dropped packages:271.60 KiB
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2020-02-20 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2020-02-20 09:00 PST US/Pacific
2020-02-20
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 1:17 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> I managed to solve the issue with the Java stack size for the s390x
> builder. The new koji scratch build succeeded, and now the review
> should be quick and easy:
That's great! I will take the review. If an OCaml review is okay,
would you
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 36/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-32-20200218.n.0):
ID: 523757 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/523757
ID: 523762 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso
Good day,
I've been working mostly with python at Sugar Labs for some time now, I'm
yet to file a review request but I'm currently helping co-maintain the
sugar* packages;
I'm from Nigeria.
I'm glad to be part of the fedora project maintainers community.
--
Ibiam Chihurumnaya
oject.org/tests/overview?distri=fedora=Rawhide=Fedora-Rawhide-20200219.n.0=1
. Some of the remaining failures (mostly the Server-dvd-iso tests) are
due to the fedora-repos issue; I'm not doing a hacky workaround for
those for this compose, because we've just fixed the problem (I hope)
in fedora-repo
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020, at 2:20 AM, Chihurumnaya Ibiam wrote:
> Good day,
>
> I've been working mostly with python at Sugar Labs for some time now, I'm yet
> to file a review request but I'm currently helping co-maintain the sugar*
> packages;
> I'm from Nigeria.
>
> I'm glad to be part of
Also note that since the next Monday we will have to shut-down all our
ppc64le builders in Fedora Copr. Fedra infrastructure is going to move
them to (some) new datacenter - assemple, and make them available for copr
builds again. But we don't yet have ETA.
We will disable the ppc64le chroots
Hello, Leo.
On Tuesday, 18 February 2020 at 19:06, Leonardo Rossetti wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> My name Leonardo (commonly called Leo), I am a software engineer from São
> Paulo, Brazil.
>
> I've recently joined the community platform engineering team in Red Hat and
> I wanted to go through
Hello!
On Thursday, 20 February 2020 at 00:20, Chihurumnaya Ibiam wrote:
> Good day,
>
> I've been working mostly with python at Sugar Labs for some time now,
> I'm yet to file a review request but I'm currently helping co-maintain
> the sugar* packages;
> I'm from Nigeria.
>
> I'm glad to be
Great, thanks, I'll take yours!
El jue., 20 feb. 2020 4:01, Jerry James escribió:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 1:17 PM Iñaki Ucar
> wrote:
> > I managed to solve the issue with the Java stack size for the s390x
> > builder. The new koji scratch build succeeded, and now the review
> > should be
Dne 19. 02. 20 v 9:32 Tom Hughes napsal(a):
> On 19/02/2020 07:05, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
>> On 18.02.2020 22:29, David Sommerseth wrote:
>>> We released the OpenVPN 3 Linux v8 beta release early last week [0],
>>> with the
>>> Fedora Copr repository [1] updated as well. Now things are
Hi everybody,
The Stewardship SIG has decided to orphan netty. None of our packages
still depend on it.
We were also unable to update the package to newer versions, and the
currently available version has some open security issues associated
with it:
- CVE-2019-20444:
On Wed, 2020-02-19 at 10:38 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 4:08 AM Richard Shaw wrote:
> > This isn't the first time that this has happened but I have pushed multiple
> > builds in one bodhi update through the web interface and:
> >
> > 1. It takes forever
> > 2. Only
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 9:59 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 04:41:42PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 02:05:07PM -0500, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> > > several of my `koji --scratch --arch-overide=s390x ...` builds have
> failed
> > > with error; reading
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
24 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 88/158 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
Old failures (same test failed in
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 5:36 PM Stephen John Smoogen
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It has been a pleasure for me to be a part of and help lead the
> EPEL steering committee for the last couple of years. It has not
> always been smooth sailing but I have found it an enjoyable experience.
>
Thank you for your
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 4:08 AM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> This isn't the first time that this has happened but I have pushed multiple
> builds in one bodhi update through the web interface and:
>
> 1. It takes forever
> 2. Only one (or some) updates are created, others are dropped
>
> What gives?
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 10:38:16 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 4:08 AM Richard Shaw wrote:
> >
> > This isn't the first time that this has happened but I have pushed multiple
> > builds in one bodhi update through the web interface and:
> >
> > 1. It takes forever
> > 2.
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 1:12 PM Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 9:36 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > It has been a pleasure for me to be a part of and help lead the
> > EPEL steering committee for the last couple of years. It has not
> > always been smooth
tstellar commented on the pull-request: `Spec file cleanups: Use make_build and
make_install macros` that you are following:
``
Ok, I've fixed the comment now.
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-SSLeay/pull-request/1
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 4:17 AM Pablo Sebastián Greco
wrote:
>
>
> On 18/2/20 21:06, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 05:17:01PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 03:04:17PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >>> This is what I was trying to get to in the thread
On 18/2/20 21:06, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 05:17:01PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 03:04:17PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
This is what I was trying to get to in the thread recently about
libssh2. However it's still not entirely clear to me.
Does this
pghmcfc merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-SSLeay` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Spec file cleanups: Use make_build and make_install macros
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-SSLeay/pull-request/1
___
tstellar commented on the pull-request: `Spec file cleanups: Use make_build and
make_install macros` that you are following:
``
Thanks, were you planning to submit a new build with this change or would you
like me to do it?
``
To reply, visit the link below
adelton commented on the pull-request: `Spec file cleanups: Use make_build and
make_install macros` that you are following:
``
I did not plan to do a rebuild just for this change.
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Scalar-List-Utils/pull-request/1
eseyman merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-libintl-perl` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Spec file cleanups: Use make_build and make_install macros
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-libintl-perl/pull-request/1
The pull-request: `Spec file cleanups: Use make_build and make_install macros`
of project: `perl-libintl-perl` has been assigned to `eseyman` by eseyman.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-libintl-perl/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797859
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797858
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797860
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--- Comment #6 from
ppisar merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-FCGI` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Spec file cleanups: Use make_build and make_install macros
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-FCGI/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/02/20/report-389-ds-base-1.4.3.3-20200220git031c0b9.fc31.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797859
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797860
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797858
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1805029
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1805029
Bug ID: 1805029
Summary: perl-IRI-0.011 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-IRI
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
pghmcfc commented on the pull-request: `Spec file cleanups: Use make_build and
make_install macros` that you are following:
``
If you fix the comment I'll merge the PR.
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-SSLeay/pull-request/1
58 matches
Mail list logo
