The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-b1a5eb3ef5
librabbitmq-0.5.2-2.el6
0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-22ba261c73
drupal7-ckeditor-1.19-1.el6
0
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 23:47:53 -0400
Christopher wrote:
> I actually got it working with v4l2loopback. It normally works quite
That's great!
> well. But, changing settings still crashes.
That's not.
> Literally, all I have to do is: File -> Settings -> toggle any setting
> (just to make "Apply"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987118
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
Rex Dieter wrote:
> FYI, Started work on importing Qt 5.14.2 into rawhide today, with work-in-
> progress being done in side tag f33-build-side-21031
>
> I figure it'll take at least a few days to get the core bits and all
> dependencies rebuilt. Will provide status updates as warranted.
Fist
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 1:00 PM stan via devel
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 21:44:16 -0400
> Christopher wrote:
>
> > I'm probably going to abandon the effort anyway. obs-studio in Fedora
> > crashes constantly every time I try to change the settings and save,
> > so I couldn't figure out how to
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 5:35 AM Momčilo Medić
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 04:40 -0400, Christopher wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 3:59 AM Iñaki Ucar
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 03:53, Christopher <
> > > ctubb...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > > > The previous packaging was on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820788
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-9645680d5e has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820787
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-a90b4a9d04 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/04/07/report-389-ds-base-1.4.3.5-20200406gitc868a41.fc31.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820787
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820788
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814114
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-11b578e45f has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806473
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-11b578e45f has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 16:02:34 +0100,
Leigh Griffin wrote:
Our stakeholder and engagement point as a team is Fedora Council. If you
have issues with how this was handled from a relationship perspective then
please take that up with the Council. We have engaged with fesco in the
past at the
Le 20-04-06 à 15 h 34, Adam Jackson a écrit :
On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 13:46 -0400, Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote:
I think we have a fix for that. Let me poke at things a bit.
Have read:
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item=Mesa-i915-OpenGL-2-Drop
In the link Alexei posted to Arch,
On 4/6/20 6:37 AM, Leigh Griffin wrote:
I'm sorry if you took my mail up as implying a lack of value from how
the team historically worked. As a team we are being tasked more and
more with adding what I call real value which is at a new app / service
level that has scale, quality and
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 8:08 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 23:56 +, Tom Seewald wrote:
> > Yep, I just ran "dnf info kernel" and then right after that "dnf
> > changelog kernel", in both cases dnf spent over 20 seconds syncing.
> > I haven't seen other package managers
On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 23:56 +, Tom Seewald wrote:
> Yep, I just ran "dnf info kernel" and then right after that "dnf
> changelog kernel", in both cases dnf spent over 20 seconds syncing.
> I haven't seen other package managers require this much network
> traffic, and I wonder if a lot of it
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 6:03 PM Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 16:28 -0400, Paul Dufresne via devel wrote:
> > Le 20-04-06 à 15 h 34, Adam Jackson a écrit :
> > > On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 13:46 -0400, Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote:
> > > > Xorg does not start without xorg-x11-drv-intel on
Yep, I just ran "dnf info kernel" and then right after that "dnf changelog
kernel", in both cases dnf spent over 20 seconds syncing. I haven't seen other
package managers require this much network traffic, and I wonder if a lot of it
could be avoided.
Leigh Griffin writes:
>> If you had stopped at the first
>> objections and revisited the decision making process with the rest of
>> the community involved in an open manner, you would have been forgiven,
>> because everyone here is trying to assume good faith. Alas, you haven't
>> done that.
On 07. 04. 20 0:47, Justin Forbes wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 5:24 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 06. 04. 20 23:53, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
* Clarify that the time limit on PRs is only for determining if the
maintainer is responsive. If they reply, the timer is cleared.
As a side note
Ben Rosser writes:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 9:36 AM Alex Scheel wrote:
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> > From: "Nicolas Mailhot via devel"
>> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>> >
>> > Cc: "Nicolas Mailhot"
>> > Sent: Monday, April 6, 2020 9:10:56 AM
>> > Subject: Re:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 6:22 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 6:09 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>>
>> * The DistTag should be versioned. Either .eln.elX (e.g. .eln.el9),
>> .elnX (e.g. .eln9), or just plain .elX (e.g. .el9).
>> * Likewise, I think the Koji tags should be
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 5:24 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 06. 04. 20 23:53, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > * Clarify that the time limit on PRs is only for determining if the
> > maintainer is responsive. If they reply, the timer is cleared.
>
> As a side note (probably out of scope of this
On 06. 04. 20 23:53, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
* Clarify that the time limit on PRs is only for determining if the
maintainer is responsive. If they reply, the timer is cleared.
As a side note (probably out of scope of this proposal), I think that if we have
RHEL packages in Fedora with not
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 6:09 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 5:56 PM Stephen Gallagher
> wrote:
> >
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > I've just published a fourth version[1] of the ELN proposal. With a
> > lot of input from Miro Hrončok, I think I've
On 07. 04. 20 0:08, Neal Gompa wrote:
This version of the proposal is nearly perfect, in my view.
There are a couple of things I think should change:
* The DistTag should be versioned. Either .eln.elX (e.g. .eln.el9),
.elnX (e.g. .eln9), or just plain .elX (e.g. .el9).
The good thing is that
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 5:56 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> I've just published a fourth version[1] of the ELN proposal. With a
> lot of input from Miro Hrončok, I think I've finally been able to
> clarify some of the points that we were
On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 16:28 -0400, Paul Dufresne via devel wrote:
> Le 20-04-06 à 15 h 34, Adam Jackson a écrit :
> > On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 13:46 -0400, Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote:
> > > Xorg does not start without xorg-x11-drv-intel on GMA 3150. OpenGL
> > > 2.1 used to be enabled on this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I've just published a fourth version[1] of the ELN proposal. With a
lot of input from Miro Hrončok, I think I've finally been able to
clarify some of the points that we were getting hung up on.
Changes in this version of the proposal[2]:
* Improve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I've just published a fourth version[1] of the ELN proposal. With a
lot of input from Miro Hrončok, I think I've finally been able to
clarify some of the points that we were getting hung up on.
Changes in this version of the proposal[2]:
* Improve
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NetworkTimeSecurity
== Summary ==
Support for the Network Time Security (NTS) authentication mechanism
in the NTP client/server (chrony) and installer (anaconda).
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:mlichvar| Miroslav Lichvar]], [[User:mkolman| Martin Kolman]]
*
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NetworkTimeSecurity
== Summary ==
Support for the Network Time Security (NTS) authentication mechanism
in the NTP client/server (chrony) and installer (anaconda).
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:mlichvar| Miroslav Lichvar]], [[User:mkolman| Martin Kolman]]
*
Le 20-04-06 à 15 h 34, Adam Jackson a écrit :
On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 13:46 -0400, Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote:
Xorg does not start without xorg-x11-drv-intel on GMA 3150. OpenGL
2.1 used to be enabled on this hardware, but got dropped
I think we have a fix for that. Let me poke at things a
I asked this in ask.fedoraproject
(https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/is-there-a-way-to-mockbuild-systemd),
but FranciscoD suggested this might be a better place.
I'm trying to build a slightly modified version of systemd. To start
with, I tried to do a fedpkg mockbuild of systemd without any
Richard Shaw left as an exercise for the reader:
> Yes, there's a number of examples but audacity and sox are two. What we do
> at RPM Fusion is create a new package there that depends on the package in
> Fedora and either append -freeworld (just patent issues, like ffmpeg which
> are in the free
With all of the other noise going on around this, I wanted to thank you
folks for putting this out. Even this basic update shed light on a few
things I had no idea about, communishift and rpmautospec. So thank you
it is much appreciated that you are doing these.
-Erinn
On 4/4/20 1:02 PM,
On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 13:46 -0400, Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 12:57 PM Adam Jackson wrote:
> > But the driver we default to on all the newer Intel chips should work
> > on yours too, though I'm not entirely sure whether you'll end up with
> > working 3D
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 8:03 AM Nick Black wrote:
> Richard Shaw left as an exercise for the reader:
> > Up to you which way to go... I don't see packaging it in RPM Fusion as a
> > problem. I would think most people who would be interested in this
> package
> > would likely not have a problem
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 17:52, Leigh Griffin wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 4:25 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 15:35 +0100, Leigh Griffin wrote:
>> >
>> > > Does it mean you didn't consider dist-git<->zuul integration vs. Gitlab
>> > > CI? I.e. technical
Kevin Fenzi kirjoitti 6.4.2020 21:46:
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 05:40:32PM +0300, Markku Korkeala wrote:
Hi,
I was sponsored to the packager group last year (FAS account
korkeala),
that time I had an old bugzilla account which I used. Now that I tried
to do my first review, but it seems that
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 09:03:54 -0400
Nick Black wrote:
> Now, a "notcurses-noffmpeg" version in Core and a
> "notcurses+ffmpeg" in Fusion seems reasonable. Is this kind of
> thing ever done?
I think this is still true for audacity, mplayer, and chromium so they
get patented video codec support.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821367
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 04:59:14PM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Due to the extreme time constraints that I'm forced to orphan most of my
> remaining packages.
> Namely icewm (which has an active co-maintainer), spring and springlobby.
> Following the procedure in wiki [1], I should
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 05:40:32PM +0300, Markku Korkeala wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was sponsored to the packager group last year (FAS account korkeala),
>
> that time I had an old bugzilla account which I used. Now that I tried
>
> to do my first review, but it seems that I did not have privileges to
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 09:03:54AM -0400, Nick Black wrote:
Richard Shaw left as an exercise for the reader:
Up to you which way to go... I don't see packaging it in RPM Fusion as a
problem. I would think most people who would be interested in this package
would likely not have a problem
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 08:20:47AM -0400, Nick Black wrote:
(i don't see any of these posts thus far in 2020, so perhaps
they've fallen out of vogue? i'm merely blindly complying with
the instructions at [0]).
hello there in RPM land! i'm a longtime linux user/developer.
my first Linux install
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-32-20200405.0):
ID: 568509 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/568509
Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64)
New passes (same
On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 12:13 -0400, Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote:
> > "a011" is precisely the last entry found in
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xorg-x11-server/blob/HEAD/f/06_use-intel-only-on-pre-gen4.diff
> > which explains why Xorg picks "intel" as seen in the Xorg logs:
> >
> > [
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820788
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-9645680d5e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-9645680d5e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020, at 1:48 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 13:34, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> > Aoife Moloney writes:
> >
> > > * We found a password, we do not know whose it is, but we have turned
> > > it into the lost and found.
> >
> > I'm sorry, what? Can
- Original Message -
> From: "Till Maas"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Monday, April 6, 2020 1:39:49 PM
> Subject: Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-04
>
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 08:35:28AM -0400, Alex Scheel wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > > From:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820787
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-a90b4a9d04 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-a90b4a9d04
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 13:34, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> Aoife Moloney writes:
>
> > * We found a password, we do not know whose it is, but we have turned
> > it into the lost and found.
>
> I'm sorry, what? Can you explain what this is and what it means?
>
>
This was something I slipped in to see
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 12:57 PM Adam Jackson wrote:
>
> But the driver we default to on all the newer Intel chips should work
> on yours too, though I'm not entirely sure whether you'll end up with
> working 3D acceleration. And if you uninstall xorg-x11-drv-intel,
> you'll fall back to the
On Monday, April 6, 2020 1:22:15 PM EDT Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Should I be able to see analysis for e.g. Ruby? I am asking, because I
> can't, so not sure if I am doing anything wrong.
Its likely not part of @Core package group. The analysis was run on a small
subset of Fedora 32 to see what a
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 08:35:28AM -0400, Alex Scheel wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Miro Hrončok"
> > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Sent: Monday, April 6, 2020 8:28:15 AM
> > Subject: Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-04
> >
> > On 06. 04. 20 14:19, Alex Scheel wrote:
> > > That
Aoife Moloney writes:
> * We found a password, we do not know whose it is, but we have turned
> it into the lost and found.
I'm sorry, what? Can you explain what this is and what it means?
Thanks,
--Robbie
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 2020-03-31 at 13:08 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:48:55AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > Some failure of process or communication must have occurred
> > somewhere along the lines, because open source should have been the
> > first and most important
Hi,
libxc 5.0.0 has been released. Due to the addition of several new features, it
comes with an soname bump. Also, the Fortran libraries have changed from the
earlier release: now, the old F03 wrapper employing iso_c_binding is now shipped
as the F90 wrapper, as the old F90 wrapper based on a
Should I be able to see analysis for e.g. Ruby? I am asking, because I
can't, so not sure if I am doing anything wrong.
Vít
Dne 06. 04. 20 v 18:03 Steve Grubb napsal(a):
> Hello,
>
> Just wanted to share with everyone the results of a data collection on
> various metrics of ELF files when
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821367
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-Dancer2-0.31-1.fc30.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43064526
--
You
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020, Leigh Griffin wrote:
> We cannot take the view of a singular person and make changes based on
> that, we defer to them for prioritisation and their input. That's how the
But, having reviewed the 'wishlist' of criteria quoted last
week, [in the thread with Ben Cotton's
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821367
Bug ID: 1821367
Summary: perl-Dancer2-0.31 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Dancer2
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821367
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1676658
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1676658=edit
[patch] Update to 0.31 (#1821367)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 04:02:34PM +0100, Leigh Griffin wrote:
> Ok let's scenario this out so as several people want us to restart […]
In this context of "restarting the scenario":
> How do we accommodate that when our other stakeholders' needs are now
> not being met as a whole and when the
On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 21:44:16 -0400
Christopher wrote:
> I'm probably going to abandon the effort anyway. obs-studio in Fedora
> crashes constantly every time I try to change the settings and save,
> so I couldn't figure out how to get it to work with v4l2loopback. I
You are using obs in a
On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 09:27 -0400, Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Please urgently downgrade xorg-x11-drv-intel before shipping Fedora 32 and
> spare users some pain. At least two very recent crash/segfault reports are
> fixed by downgrading to the fc31 version of xorg-x11-drv-intel.
Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 18:08, Rex Dieter wrote:
>>
>> The qt5, qt5-devel metapackages were introduced a few releases ago as
>> merely a convenience for end-users, not intended to be used in official
>> fedora packages, but seems these have seen some non-trivial adoption
>>
pghmcfc closed without merging a pull-request against the project:
`perl-String-CRC32` that you
are following.
Closed pull-request:
``
Spec file cleanups: Use make_build and make_install macros, use NO_PACKLIST=1
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-String-CRC32/pull-request/1
pghmcfc commented on the pull-request: `Spec file cleanups: Use make_build and
make_install macros, use NO_PACKLIST=1` that you are following:
``
I merged this locally and fixed the typo in the ExtUtils::MakeMaker reference.
It's now pushed and built in Fedora.
``
To reply, visit the link
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 18:08, Rex Dieter wrote:
>
> The qt5, qt5-devel metapackages were introduced a few releases ago as merely
> a convenience for end-users, not intended to be used in official fedora
> packages, but seems these have seen some non-trivial adoption anyway.
>
> Personally, I
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020, at 12:05 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 03:02:02PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 12:13:16PM +0200, Daniel Mach wrote:
[snip]
> > > Setting eol_date to the future allows informing a user about
> > > upcoming obsoleting
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200405.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200406.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 57
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 6.00 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 10:04 AM Steve Grubb wrote:
> Just wanted to share with everyone the results of a data collection on
> various metrics of ELF files when installing just @Core group.
That is really cool. Thanks for sharing this, Steve.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
>
> "a011" is precisely the last entry found in
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xorg-x11-server/blob/HEAD/f/06_use-intel-only-on-pre-gen4.diff
> which explains why Xorg picks "intel" as seen in the Xorg logs:
>
> [ 7821.917] (==) Matched intel as autoconfigured driver 0
> [ 7821.917] (==)
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 17:05, Leigh Griffin wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 2:36 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
> domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
>
>> On Monday, 06 April 2020 at 12:29, Leigh Griffin wrote:
>> [...]
>> > > Yes, this whole "decision" is in dictatorship relation to the
>> >
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 03:02:02PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 12:13:16PM +0200, Daniel Mach wrote:
> > >> # A string representing a Name of a module that is EOLed
> > >> # MANDATORY
> > >> module: nodejs
> > >>
> > >> # A string representing a
Hello,
Just wanted to share with everyone the results of a data collection on
various metrics of ELF files when installing just @Core group.
http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/analysis/f32-analysis.slides.html#/
I recommend clicking on the "pop out" link and then you have more room to see
the
pghmcfc closed without merging a pull-request against the project:
`perl-Unix-Syslog` that you
are following.
Closed pull-request:
``
Spec file cleanups: Use make_build, make_install macros, and use NO_PACKLIST=1
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Unix-Syslog/pull-request/1
pghmcfc commented on the pull-request: `Spec file cleanups: Use make_build,
make_install macros, and use NO_PACKLIST=1` that you are following:
``
I merged this locally and fixed the typo in the ExtUtils::MakeMaker reference.
It's now pushed and built in Fedora.
``
To reply, visit the link
I would like to take arduino.
I can make buildable again 1.8.5 version and may be update it to latest.
My FAS name: vascom -- Best regards, Vasiliy Glazov
вс, 29 мар. 2020 г. в 14:15, Miro Hrončok :
>
> According to the Fedora's Fails To Build From Source policy:
>
>
The qt5, qt5-devel metapackages were introduced a few releases ago as merely
a convenience for end-users, not intended to be used in official fedora
packages, but seems these have seen some non-trivial adoption anyway.
Personally, I objected to metapackage introduction at the fearing this would
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820788
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #6 from
=
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2020-04-06)
=
Meeting started by contyk at 15:00:22 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-04-06/fesco.2020-04-06-15.00.log.html
Meeting
Le lundi 06 avril 2020 à 11:42 -0400, Alex Scheel a écrit :
>
> I'm not sure why what happens outside Fedora infra has anything to do
> with the dist-git discussion. Are you suggesting that all
> contributors
> to all Fedora upstream should weigh in on this discussion as well? I
> mean, that'd be
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 4:25 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 15:35 +0100, Leigh Griffin wrote:
> >
> > > Does it mean you didn't consider dist-git<->zuul integration vs. Gitlab
> > > CI? I.e. technical differences and advantages of each? If you did, can
> you,
> > > please,
- Original Message -
> From: "Daniel P. Berrangé"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Cc: "Nicolas Mailhot"
> Sent: Monday, April 6, 2020 11:02:52 AM
> Subject: Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-04
>
> Watching the discussion in the other big thread, I feel it has become
>
> > >Are they? We stopped using intel driver around F26, we use
> > > modesetting for Intel GPUs now. The above is clearly non-default
> > > configuratiob.
> >
> > I am far from an expert on the subject, but I am pretty sure we did not stop
> > using intel driver when we use kernel mode
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 4:34 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 06. 04. 20 17:20, Leigh Griffin wrote:
> >
> > I'm reaffirming that I hear the concerns and that my team are taking
> them on
> > board. I am also reaffirming that our engagement point is with the
> Fedora
> > Council, not at the individual
- Original Message -
> From: "Nicolas Mailhot via devel"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Cc: "Nicolas Mailhot"
> Sent: Monday, April 6, 2020 10:57:40 AM
> Subject: Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-04
>
> Le lundi 06 avril 2020 à 10:09 -0400, Alex Scheel a écrit :
> >
> >
I would like to take arduino.
I can make buildable again 1.8.5 version and may be update it to latest.
My FAS name: vascom
--
Best regards,
Vasiliy Glazov
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
OLD: Fedora-32-20200405.n.0
NEW: Fedora-32-20200406.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 126
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 10.29 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
Hello,
My name is Ondrej Gajdusek. I currently work as a QE in Red Hat where I
work mainly with Foreman and Katello projects which are upstream projects
for the RH Satellite. I have some Python background so you can expect my
contributions mainly in the Python field. I look forward to
On 06. 04. 20 17:20, Leigh Griffin wrote:
I'm reaffirming that I hear the concerns and that my team are taking them on
board. I am also reaffirming that our engagement point is with the Fedora
Council, not at the individual level as the Council is responsible for listening
and collating
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 4:57 PM Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> Yes, that's the kernel side part. But in userland,
> we are NOT using xorg-x11-drv-intel for intel gen4 and up
> (if I understand
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xorg-x11-server/blob/HEAD/f/06_use-intel-only-on-pre-gen4.diff
>
Hello. Gilboa, i would like to continue maintaining IceWM. And i interesting in
'springlobby' package. Please add me as co-maintainer. FAS: atim.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 4/6/20 11:17 AM, Leigh Griffin wrote:
It's a form of engagement among others that we are partaking in day in
day out, week in week out.
Ironically, you have illustrated my point here with your response, which
isn't engagement.
I have answered every question directly, if I missed one in
On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 15:35 +0100, Leigh Griffin wrote:
>
> > Does it mean you didn't consider dist-git<->zuul integration vs. Gitlab
> > CI? I.e. technical differences and advantages of each? If you did, can you,
> > please, publish it? It would be valuable info for the community and
> >
1 - 100 of 228 matches
Mail list logo
