Re: f32-backgrounds look like crap

2020-04-18 Thread Markus Larsson
On 18 April 2020 07:49:18 CEST, Leigh Scott wrote: >> Well then please don't express your opinion then and keep it to yourself. > >It's a free country with free speech. >If you don't like it don't read it! You do realise that asking someone nicely is not the same as trying to take away their

Accounts disabled in Bugzilla (ex-redhaters)

2020-04-18 Thread Miro Hrončok
Hello Marek, Martin. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1799462 "You can't ask Marek Mahut because that account is disabled." https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1799322 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1799644 "You can't ask Martin Preisler because that

Unannounced SONAME bump: libxc.so.5 → libxc.so.9

2020-04-18 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, The latest rawhide update of libxc (5.0.0) bumped the SONAME as mentioned in $SUBJECT. None of the depending packages have been rebuilt against this version: - cp2k - elk - gpaw - psi4 - python-pyscf - votca-xtp Affected maintainers added to CC. Fabio

Re: Unannounced SONAME bump: libxc.so.5 → libxc.so.9

2020-04-18 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 3:22 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > The latest rawhide update of libxc (5.0.0) bumped the SONAME as > mentioned in $SUBJECT. > > None of the depending packages have been rebuilt against this version: > > - cp2k > - elk > - gpaw > - psi4 > - python-pyscf >

Re: will disappear from rawhide glibc soon

2020-04-18 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 15. 04. 20 17:49, Florian Weimer wrote: This follows the removal of the system call from Linux 5.5. Having the header and function just confuses configure checks that assume that if the function is present, it will do something useful (it never did on aarch64, and it's been many years since

Re: f32-backgrounds look like crap

2020-04-18 Thread Peter Robinson
> My personal favorites were Fedora Core 5 and Fedora Core 6: > > FC5: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Wallpapers#Fedora_Core_5 > FC6: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Wallpapers#Fedora_Core_6 Ha, I never realised that wiki page existed, it brings back good memories :) Of the recent releases F-26

RE: will disappear from rawhide glibc soon

2020-04-18 Thread Ron Olson
Already fixed it and sending it to Rawhide now. -Original Message- From: Miro Hrončok Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2020 4:34 AM To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org; swift-lang-maintain...@fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: will disappear from rawhide glibc soon On 15. 04. 20 17:49, Florian

Re: will disappear from rawhide glibc soon

2020-04-18 Thread Florian Weimer
* Ron Olson: > Already fixed it and sending it to Rawhide now. Have you submitted the fix upstream? Thanks, Florian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code

Re: Unannounced SONAME bump: libxc.so.5 → libxc.so.9

2020-04-18 Thread Christoph Junghans
I will take care of votca-xtp shortly. Christoph On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 7:24 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 3:22 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > The latest rawhide update of libxc (5.0.0) bumped the SONAME as > > mentioned in $SUBJECT. > > > >

Fedora-IoT-33-20200418.0 compose check report

2020-04-18 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Iot dvd aarch64 Iot dvd x86_64 Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Schedule for Mondays's FESCo Meeting (2020-04-20)

2020-04-18 Thread Miro Hrončok
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2020-04-20 15:00 UTC' Links to all issues to

Re: f32-backgrounds look like crap

2020-04-18 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 18. 04. 20 7:49, Leigh Scott wrote: Well then please don't express your opinion then and keep it to yourself. It's a free country with free speech. Whatever country you are talking about, this is Fedora and not a country and in Fedora, we are nice to each other. Telling you not to express

Re: ocaml-bisect-ppx and related updates

2020-04-18 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 09:48:11PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020, 21:00 Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 10:04:52AM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > > > Sorry for the delay. In spite of being stuck in my house, life has > > > been amazingly busy

f32-backgrounds look like crap

2020-04-18 Thread Göran Uddeborg
Leigh Scott: > If there any plan to fix them? Pick another if you don't like the default. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

OCaml 4.11 prerelease in Rawhide (was: Re: ocaml-bisect-ppx and related updates)

2020-04-18 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
So several things went wrong, nothing too bad but it'll take a bit of time to fix. * We discovered two actual OCaml compiler bugs: https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/issues/9460 https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/issues/9461 The first one is more serious and means we will need to completely

CPE Weekly: 2020-04-18

2020-04-18 Thread Aoife Moloney
--- title: CPE Weekly status email tags: CPE Weekly, email --- # CPE Weekly 2020-04-18 Background: The Community Platform Engineering group is the Red Hat team combining IT and release engineering from Fedora and CentOS. Check out our team's info here https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/cpe/

Re: Getting security updates out to users sooner

2020-04-18 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 1:31 pm, John M. Harris Jr wrote: Most likely, multi-platform. There have been a few so big the NSA stepped in and started warning people they needed to update. These are both use-after-free vulnerabilities. The vulnerability is probably cross-platform, but exploits

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200418.n.0 changes

2020-04-18 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200417.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200418.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 7 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 78 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 13.63 MiB Size of dropped packages

RE: will disappear from rawhide glibc soon

2020-04-18 Thread Ron Olson
Yes: https://github.com/apple/swift-corelibs-foundation/pull/2771 -Original Message- From: Florian Weimer Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2020 8:27 AM To: Ron Olson Cc: 'Miro Hrončok' ; devel@lists.fedoraproject.org; swift-lang-maintain...@fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: will disappear from

Re: Getting security updates out to users sooner

2020-04-18 Thread Björn Persson
Demi M. Obenour wrote: > I have virtually never noticed a regression, so I consider getting a security > update out quickly to be much more important. Debian is good at pushing out important security fixes quickly – and it's fairly common to see bug fixes issued because a security fix caused a

Fedora 32 compose report: 20200418.n.0 changes

2020-04-18 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-32-20200417.n.0 NEW: Fedora-32-20200418.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Re: f32-backgrounds look like crap

2020-04-18 Thread John M. Harris Jr
On Friday, April 17, 2020 10:49:18 PM MST Leigh Scott wrote: > > Well then please don't express your opinion then and keep it to yourself. > > > It's a free country with free speech. > If you don't like it don't read it! Leigh's message wasn't targeted at any given individual, and to make this

Re: f32-backgrounds look like crap

2020-04-18 Thread Peter Robinson
> > > Well then please don't express your opinion then and keep it to yourself. > > > > > > It's a free country with free speech. > > If you don't like it don't read it! > > Leigh's message wasn't targeted at any given individual, and to make this a > CoC issue is absurd. If anything, attacking

Re: f32-backgrounds look like crap

2020-04-18 Thread John M. Harris Jr
On Saturday, April 18, 2020 2:00:27 AM MST Göran Uddeborg wrote: > Leigh Scott: > > > If there any plan to fix them? > > > Pick another if you don't like the default. It's a larger issue than that if the default wallpapers make people think they're having graphics issues.. -- John M.

Re: f32-backgrounds look like

2020-04-18 Thread Chris Murphy
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:49 PM Leigh Scott wrote: > > > Well then please don't express your opinion then and keep it to yourself. > > It's a free country with free speech. > If you don't like it don't read it! This is wrong. The U.S. first amendment is a limitation on the government inhibiting

Re: OCaml 4.11 prerelease in Rawhide (was: Re: ocaml-bisect-ppx and related updates)

2020-04-18 Thread Jerry James
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 5:16 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > * ocaml-topkg is broken for unclear reasons: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825451 > > This affects many other packages. #mod_use appears to have changed behavior, whether intentionally or unintentionally I do not

Assimp soname bump

2020-04-18 Thread Rich Mattes
Hi, I plan to update assimp from 3.3.1 to the latest release (5.0.1) in rawhide this week. The following packages will be affected: fawkes-0:1.3.0-11.fc33.src mrpt-0:1.4.0-17.fc33.src pioneer-0:20200203-1.fc33.src vkmark-0:2017.08-0.8.20180123git68b6f23.fc32.src I will take care of the

python3dist provides

2020-04-18 Thread Jerry James
What generates the python3dist(module) provides? I ask because I did a build of python-nb2plots today for which those provides were not generated: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1495361 even though they were for the previous build:

Re: Accounts disabled in Bugzilla (ex-redhaters)

2020-04-18 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 01:36:58PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello Marek, Martin. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1799462 > > "You can't ask Marek Mahut because that account is > disabled." Rught, they own the package, but thats not the address they have in fas. It seems

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2020-04-19 - 95% PASS

2020-04-18 Thread vashirov
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/04/19/report-389-ds-base-1.4.4.0-20200418git5fc54f4.fc31.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to