No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Sure!
TYVM!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
See
https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/affected-by/gcc?epoch1=0=10.0.1=0.12.fc33=0=10.0.1=0.13.fc33=f33
https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/affected-by/cpp?epoch1=0=10.0.1=0.12.fc33=0=10.0.1=0.13.fc33=f33
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 12:03 PM Jerry James wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 7:55 AM Christopher wrote:
> > Can anybody tell me why the grub package seems to want to label files
> > on the EFI partition during updates?
> > I had thought that, by definition, EFI partitions were basically FAT,
>
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
ID: 591295 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/591295
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
Yes
On Sat, 2 May 2020 at 01:21, Alessio wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-12-31 at 10:09 +0300, Silvia Sánchez wrote:
> >
> > I'm perfectly fine with Fedora's policy regarding Python2. When
> > upstream updates to 3, I'll be happy to comaintain together with
> > Alessio.
>
> For the record,
On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 12:36:29PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm stuck on the following build failure of the aarch64 build here [1]
>
> /usr/bin/ld: .libs/geod: hidden symbol `__aarch64_ldadd4_acq_rel' in
> /usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-redhat-linux/10/libgcc.a(ldadd_4_4.o) is referenced by
>
> Seems like a lot of things just started to fail to build on aarch64.
I also get the following only for aarch64:
/usr/bin/ld: index.lib.o: in function `IndexBase::clear(void (*)(void*, int))':
/builddir/build/BUILD/audacious-4.0.3/src/libaudcore/index.cc:48: undefined
reference to
On Sat, 2 May 2020 12:36:29 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm stuck on the following build failure of the aarch64 build here [1]
>
> /usr/bin/ld: .libs/geod: hidden symbol `__aarch64_ldadd4_acq_rel' in
> /usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-redhat-linux/10/libgcc.a(ldadd_4_4.o) is referenced
> by DSO
>
Hi
I'm stuck on the following build failure of the aarch64 build here [1]
/usr/bin/ld: .libs/geod: hidden symbol `__aarch64_ldadd4_acq_rel' in
/usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-redhat-linux/10/libgcc.a(ldadd_4_4.o) is referenced
by DSO
/usr/bin/ld: final link failed: bad value
collect2: error: ld
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2020-05-04 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 33 Rawhide 20200502.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
Silvia, read this
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers
, also make some reviews to others packagers, after that, I or any
sponsor can help you to join to the package maintainer group
On Sat, May 2, 2020 at 11:46 AM Silvia Sánchez wrote:
>
>
> For the records,
Greetings.
There's a ticket https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/issue/492 (formerly a
bug) that the games group in comps has nothing in it.
Thats not quite the case, it has a ton of games in it, but they are all
optional. ;(
I have no much horse in this race, but I thought I would see if folks
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200430.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200502.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 80
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 4.07 MiB
Size of dropped packages
> Does anyone know why they are all optional there?
Don't know why they are optional but most packages from this list will not run
or retired already.
I want to suggest add game launchers here which already packaged in Fedora:
- minigalaxy
- gamehub
- legendary
- lutris
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 12:36:29PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I'm stuck on the following build failure of the aarch64 build here [1]
>>
>> /usr/bin/ld: .libs/geod: hidden symbol `__aarch64_ldadd4_acq_rel' in
>>
For the records, I'm still interested in co-maintaining this package.
Please, let me know which are the next steps.
On Sat, 2 May 2020 at 01:21, Alessio wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-12-31 at 10:09 +0300, Silvia Sánchez wrote:
> >
> > I'm perfectly fine with Fedora's policy regarding Python2. When
On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 11:51:57AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 12:36:29PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> I'm stuck on the following build failure of the aarch64 build here [1]
> >>
> >> /usr/bin/ld: .libs/geod: hidden symbol
On Sat, May 2, 2020 at 4:33 AM Christopher wrote:
> Those are bugs filed against RPM. Is the RPM package responsible for
> executing lsetfilecon, or is it the grub2 package? If the grub2
> package, it seems to me that they should know that EFI partitions will
> never support lsetfilecon and they
On 01. 05. 20 22:21, Ben Cotton wrote:
* Proposal owners:
The packages are already built for Fedora 33 in a non-default module
stream. On June 14th, 2020, the nodejs-14.x packages will become the
default in Fedora 33 (either by making the 14.x module stream be the
default stream or by rebuilding
Hello,
I have been trying to package franz from here:
https://github.com/meetfranz/franz/archive/v5.5.0.tar.gz
and I have the following spec file at:
UNTITLED - Pastebin Service
|
|
| |
UNTITLED - Pastebin Service
|
|
|
However, I get a bunch of warnings and errors and I am not sure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824316
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
626 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d
condor-8.6.11-1.el7
368 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-c499781e80
python-gnupg-0.4.4-1.el7
366
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-7f0ce51dbd
python-bleach-3.1.4-2.el8
7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-72116e7775
chromium-81.0.4044.122-1.el8
7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829983
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830579
Bug ID: 1830579
Summary: perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.82 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-YAML-LibYAML
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On 5/1/20 12:39 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
There was no 'rule' but the intent was everyone would keep the
package.cfg and build for both. If they were not making any playground
changes, they didn't need to commit anything, and fedpkg build would
just build for both epel8 and epel8-playground.
The
On 01. 05. 20 20:32, Troy Dawson wrote:
I've never un-updated anything, and I'm not sure if it will make it
possible for your packages to be pushed to stable.
It wont. Just please make sure my commit eventually gets pushed in some update
and that there is a buildroot override until that
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/05/03/report-389-ds-base-1.4.4.1-20200502git8895fc4.fc31.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796214
Bug 1796214 depends on bug 1826270, which changed state.
Bug 1826270 Summary: Review Request: perl-B-COW - Additional B helpers to check
Copy On Write status
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826270
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824317
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On 5/1/20 8:39 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 08:39:48PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Anyone willing to take over ngircd for EPEL?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830182
Sure. I can do that. Will add it to my list.
kevin
34 matches
Mail list logo
