Package prepared for review and request for sponsorship

[西木野羰基]

Hello all!

With some suggestions given, I think my package is ready for review.

Review request itself can be found here. [0]

This is my first package, so I need a sponsor for this. For potential
sponsors, you can see my pull request [1-3], all of them are prepare for a
update.

Thanks.

[0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846175

[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mkdocs/pull-request/1

[2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-lunr/pull-request/1

[3] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kcm-fcitx/pull-request/1
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Searching a new home for my packages

[Thomas Spura]

Am So., 14. Juni 2020 um 09:08 Uhr schrieb Remi Collet <
fed...@famillecollet.com>:

> Hi,
>
> Le 12/06/2020 à 21:37, Thomas Spura a écrit :
> > - php-zmq
>
> I can take this one.
>

Thanks, done!

Best
Thomas

-- 
Fedora: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Tomspur
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: RFC: Automatically generated BuildRequires for maven-based Java projects

[Markku Korkeala]

On 5/18/20 5:06 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Good $LOCAL_TIME_OF_DAY,

Hi,

> Since this is still work-in-progress (though it works for a few simple
> packages I tried it with), please feel free to report your
> experiences, and - more importantly - open issues when the tool either
> crashes (it shouldn't, since the POM parser successfully parsed all
> non-broken maven project files from all fedora packages), or when it
> generates too many (not that problematic) or too few (not so good)
> dependencies.

Sorry, took a while to find time to give this a spin. Tried
this with my packages and few mockbuilds, tool successfully
found all dependencies. Had to remove few extra plugins from
pom as previously I had just put minimal dependencies required
to build the package and mvn-genbr listed all plugins it detected.

But nice work, this should reduce packaging efforts on Java-projects.

Best wishes,
Markku


> The code for the POM parser and mvn-genbr lives in this project on pagure:
> https://pagure.io/ironthree/pommes
> 
> Go forth and break my code!
> Fabio
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Mailman3

[Neal Gompa]

On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 2:39 AM Lars Bjørndal  wrote:
>
> Hello list
>
> It seems that  is managed by Mailman 3.
> In the repo, however, only the core package are available, and not
> the other components. What's the rationale behind that?
>

It's being worked on as part of
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8455

If you'd like to help, it would be appreciated! :)



-- 
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Intent to retire python-ufolib

[Athos Ribeiro]

The upstream project has been deprecated upstream in favor of shipping
ufolib2 (available as python3-ufolib2) as part of the  fonttools project
(python-fonttools).

I will retire python-ufolib at some point during this week, unless
someone raises any concerns for not proceeding in this manner.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: It seems that gdb cannot find debuginfo on f32

[Barry Scott]

> On 14 Jun 2020, at 08:48, Jan Kratochvil  wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 07 Jun 2020 17:22:33 +0200, Barry Scott wrote:
>> python3-debuginfo.x86_64 3.8.3-1.fc32
>>
>> @updates-debuginfo
> ...
>> Reading symbols from /usr/bin/python3.8...
>> Reading symbols from .gnu_debugdata for /usr/bin/python3.8...
>> (No debugging symbols found in .gnu_debugdata for /usr/bin/python3.8)
>> Missing separate debuginfos, use: dnf debuginfo-install 
>> python3-3.8.3-1.fc32.x86_64
>> (gdb) 
>> 
>> Am I doing something wrong?
> 
> I do not see the problem, you can verify:
> 
> $ ls -l /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/python3.8-3.8.3-1.fc32.x86_64.debug
> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 17800 May 19 10:31 
> /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/python3.8-3.8.3-1.fc32.x86_64.debug
> $ rpm -qf /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/python3.8-3.8.3-1.fc32.x86_64.debug
> python3-debuginfo-3.8.3-1.fc32.x86_64
> $ rpm -V python3-debuginfo-3.8.3-1.fc32.x86_64
> $ _

I tried to reproduce and gdb asked me to install the debug info/source again.
When I did gdb worked as expected.

Thanks for the double check.

Barry


> 
> 
> Jan
> 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Packagers with no corresponding valid bugzilla accounts

[Pierre-Yves Chibon]

On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 07:09:57PM +0200, Felix Schwarz wrote:
> 
> Am 13.06.20 um 22:10 schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon:
> > bpereto
> 
> Benjamin was a previous maintainer of borgbackup. After the Python 3.9 rebuild
> I noticed that a new ticket was still assigned to him [1]. If I understood
> your email correctly this is because there is no corresponding bugzilla 
> account?
> 
> Any idea how to fix this? There was a non-responsive maintainer process a
> while ago and I did not hear from him ever since.
> 
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838161#c1
> [2] https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2242

I've just checked the logs of the sync script and that is correct. Benjamin's
lack of valid bugzilla account lead to a failure in the sync script to update
borgbackup.

Since Benjamin is considered MIA, I will remove his account from the watchers of
borgbackup and that should fix the sync.

> > @certbot-sig
> 
> What can we do here? I'm a member of the sig but I don't know if it has an
> email address.

Each group has normally a mailing list associated with them in FAS, this is the
email that is synced to bugzilla (which is why we recommend the mailing list be
private as it will be CC'ed to bugzilla reports, including private ones).
So in this case, it looks like no one created the bugzilla account for the
mailing list linked to the group.


Pierre
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: swap on zram

[John M. Harris Jr]

On Wednesday, June 10, 2020 2:50:55 AM MST Kevin Kofler wrote:
> John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> 
> > What's even more wild is that you can't easily disable it. Even though
> > it's supposed to be disabled ("vendor preset: disabled") it's actually
> > built into systemd, as a static unit.
> 
> 
> Have you tried masking the units? Disabling tends to have only limited 
> success (because it only disables the unit loading by itself, but not it 
> getting loaded by other units), masking is more effective.

I'm aware, and I have had success with masking the ones I've had issues with 
so far.

-- 
John M. Harris, Jr.

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

protobuf update coming to rawhide

[Adrian Reber]

I prepared a protobuf update for rawhide to 3.12. It requires a rebuild
of all dependencies and of the 55 dependencies currently 10 fail to
rebuild. The following packages are failing:

clementine
closure-compiler
fawkes
gazebo
hidviz
kismet
libgadu
mir
mozc
pokerth

and the failures do not seem to be protobuf related. See

https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/adrian/protobuf-3-12/

I requested a side-tag to do the rebuilds.

Adrian
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Unretire python-sqlalchemy_schemadisplay

[Mattia Verga via devel]

I'd like to unretire python-sqlalchemy_schemadisplay since it's needed 
by Bodhi to produce its documentation. I know upstream isn't very 
active, but the only alternative I see is eralchemy, which is even less 
maintained...

Any objections/alternative suggestions?

Mattia

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Mailman3

[Lars Bjørndal]

Hello list

It seems that  is managed by Mailman 3.
In the repo, however, only the core package are available, and not
the other components. What's the rationale behind that?

Thanks in advance
Lars
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Packagers with no corresponding valid bugzilla accounts

[Jan Kratochvil]

On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 22:10:36 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> jkratoch

This account is set as "inactive" in FAS. Couldn't you regenerate this list
with inactive accounts excluded?

I would like to remove this old account but FAS admin interface cannot do
that, I can only set it as "inactive".

I am using active account "jankratochvil" instead. In the past I was told it
is easier for Fedora admins to create a new account than to rename my old
account.


Jan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Searching a new home for my packages

[Remi Collet]

Hi,

Le 12/06/2020 à 21:37, Thomas Spura a écrit :
> - php-zmq

I can take this one.



Remi
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap - antimicroX

[Alexander Ploumistos]

Hello Greg,

I'll take it.
Could you please review this in return?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844643

I'll start working on it in a few hours.

Best regards
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: It seems that gdb cannot find debuginfo on f32

[Jan Kratochvil]

On Sun, 07 Jun 2020 17:22:33 +0200, Barry Scott wrote:
> python3-debuginfo.x86_64 3.8.3-1.fc32 
>   
> @updates-debuginfo
...
> Reading symbols from /usr/bin/python3.8...
> Reading symbols from .gnu_debugdata for /usr/bin/python3.8...
> (No debugging symbols found in .gnu_debugdata for /usr/bin/python3.8)
> Missing separate debuginfos, use: dnf debuginfo-install 
> python3-3.8.3-1.fc32.x86_64
> (gdb) 
> 
> Am I doing something wrong?

I do not see the problem, you can verify:

$ ls -l /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/python3.8-3.8.3-1.fc32.x86_64.debug
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 17800 May 19 10:31 
/usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/python3.8-3.8.3-1.fc32.x86_64.debug
$ rpm -qf /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/python3.8-3.8.3-1.fc32.x86_64.debug
python3-debuginfo-3.8.3-1.fc32.x86_64
$ rpm -V python3-debuginfo-3.8.3-1.fc32.x86_64
$ _


Jan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Packagers with no corresponding valid bugzilla accounts

[Pierre-Yves Chibon]

On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 08:10:11AM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 22:10:36 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > jkratoch
> 
> This account is set as "inactive" in FAS. Couldn't you regenerate this list
> with inactive accounts excluded?
> 
> I would like to remove this old account but FAS admin interface cannot do
> that, I can only set it as "inactive".
> 
> I am using active account "jankratochvil" instead. In the past I was told it
> is easier for Fedora admins to create a new account than to rename my old
> account.

So the source of information used is:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/extras/pagure_bz.json which still indicates that
jkratoch is to be CC'ed for the readline package

If you remove it from there, the question will be solved :)


Pierre
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Packagers with no corresponding valid bugzilla accounts

[Felix Schwarz]

Am 13.06.20 um 22:10 schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon:
> bpereto

Benjamin was a previous maintainer of borgbackup. After the Python 3.9 rebuild
I noticed that a new ticket was still assigned to him [1]. If I understood
your email correctly this is because there is no corresponding bugzilla account?

Any idea how to fix this? There was a non-responsive maintainer process a
while ago and I did not hear from him ever since.

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838161#c1
[2] https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2242

> @certbot-sig

What can we do here? I'm a member of the sig but I don't know if it has an
email address.

Felix
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

CPE Weekly: 2020-06-14

[Aoife Moloney]

---
title: CPE Weekly status email
tags: CPE Weekly, email
---

# CPE Weekly: 2020-06-14

Background:
The Community Platform Engineering group is the Red Hat team combining
IT and release engineering from Fedora and CentOS. Our goal is to keep
core servers and services running and maintained, build releases, and
other strategic tasks that need more dedicated time than volunteers
can give.


See our wiki page here for more
information:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/cpe/


## General Project Updates

Please check out our updated initiative timetable for briefing in new
projects to our team
here:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/cpe/time_tables/
*Note: Initiatives are large pieces of work that require a team of
people and weeks/months to complete. Please continue to open tickets
in the normal way for bugs, issues, etc.

Dont forget to view our taiga board to see the projects we are
currently working on, what we have scoped and whats in our backlog
https://tree.taiga.io/project/amoloney1-cpe-team-projects/kanban?epic=null


CPE Product Owner Office Hours
* Weekly on Thursdays @ 1300 UTC on #fedora-meeting-1
* Every second Tuesday @ 1500 UTC on #centos-meeting (next meeting 23rd June)
* Meeting Logs
* Fedora: 
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/cpe_product_owner_office_hours/cpe_product_owner_office_hours.2020-06-11-13.01.log.html
* CentOS: 
https://www.centos.org/minutes/2020/June/centos-meeting.2020-06-09-15.00.log.html









## Fedora Updates




### Data Centre Move
* The final Fedora hardware shipment is due to happen on Tuesday 16th June.
* We expect the shipment to arrive in the new data centre the week
beginning 22nd June and the team will begin bringing up services that
are affected by the move.
* A list of affected services is available here
https://hackmd.io/hpYYJQRjQy-oHxUS7IonIA?view
* Please read the below email sent by kfenzi if you have not already
done so: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastruct...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/E7HJULW2S76FZCAICURWXX223N5ZXXD7/
* Details on what this move may mean for you can be found here
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/27U6YT73556KYW2RIFJO6J2HYMYVP22U/
* If an application is not working correctly at all, please check this
list https://hackmd.io/hpYYJQRjQy-oHxUS7IonIA?view before opening a
ticket to make sure its not listed as being moved. If it is being
moved, please wait a day or two, then try again.
* Similarly, please be patient when opening tickets for service issues
in general as we have now reached the critical point in this move and
all of our sys-admins and wider teams will be assisting in the
successful bringup of the reduced Fedora service and facilitation of
the final hardware shipment and move.



### AAA Replacement
* The team are working on the changing application code bases to use
the new solution
* They are also working on the CentOS account integration and the
solution will see users be able to select the contributor agreements
that are relative to their account.
* They are also testing a script to use in data migration from the
current FAS system to Noggin to allow for very little, if any, changes
to the user
* The team are also completing user documentation that includes a
how-to migration guide for maintainers and a guide to help users
understand the differences between Noggin and the current FAS option
(issue #246 on board)
* Please feel free to check out the team kanban board for more
information on the features the team are working on and have already
completed here https://github.com/orgs/fedora-infra/projects/6





### Mbbox
* Project Dashboard here https://github.com/fedora-infra/mbbox/projects/1
* Tasks completed in the project currently
* MBS Backend CRD + documentation
* MBS Frontend CRD - configuration and certificates
* Draft of blog post about MBBox
* Tasks underway currently
* MBS Frontend CRD - deployment config and service
* Staging environment required
* MBox shared CRD




### Gitforge
With the data centre move taking most of the teams focus this week,
discussions with gitlab have been quiet. We are still discussing
technical aspects of the project and these are tracked here:
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/217350
We will keep you up to date with the developments as and when we have
information to share and thank you for your patience.



## CentOS Updates

### CentOS
* OCP4 staging cluster in progress
* CentOS Linux 8.2.2004 content is in pre-release with more artifacts to come
* There was also a recent CentOS AMA on Reddit, logs are here so check
it out if you missed it
https://www.reddit.com/r/CentOS/comments/gwnvd2/centos_ama/




### CentOS Stream
* The team have been working really hard to get package sources pushed
to keep caught up with RHEL
* We are also working on tooling for more push automation
* And tooling for RealTime and other Variants are coming in Stream soon

How to create a bodhi update from f32-kde tag?

[Robin Lee]

Hi,

I rebuilt some packages to the f32-kde tag for Qt 5.14.2. And after the new
qt package being pushed to stable, I want to create an update for my packages.

But bodhi request failed:
$ bodhi updates new --type bugfix --notes 'Deepin rebuilds for Qt
5.14.2' --request testing --autotime --autokarma --suggest logout
--user cheeselee
deepin-kwin-0.1.0-7.fc32,deepin-qt-dbus-factory-5.0.1-5.fc32,dtkwidget-2.1.1-5.fc32,deepin-qt5integration-5.0.0-5.fc32,deepin-launcher-5.0.0-5.fc32,deepin-file-manager-5.0.0-7.fc32,deepin-editor-1.2.9.1-5.fc32

Cannot find release associated with build: deepin-kwin-0.1.0-7.fc32,
tags: ['f32-kde']

So, which is the proper way to create to the update?

-robin
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1846148] perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.012 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846148



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.012-1.fc32, perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.012-1.fc32 has been
pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. If problems still persist, please
make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-61103921dc


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1846149] perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.012 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846149



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.012-1.fc32, perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.012-1.fc32 has been
pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. If problems still persist, please
make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-61103921dc


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1843195] perl-Test-Needs is wanted in EPEL7

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843195

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-586782e442 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-586782e442


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1846148] perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.012 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846148

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.012-1.fc31, perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.012-1.fc31 has been
pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please
make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-0236944568


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1842890] Add perl-MooseX-StrictConstructor to EPEL7

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842890

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-4794fda156 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-4794fda156


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1841269] please build perl-Term-ShellUI for epel8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1841269

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Term-ShellUI-0.92-18.e
   ||l8
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-06-14 17:28:09



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Term-ShellUI-0.92-18.el8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1841267] please build perl-Clipboard for epel8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1841267

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Clipboard-0.26-1.el8
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-06-14 17:28:12



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Clipboard-0.26-1.el8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1846149] perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.012 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846149

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.012-1.fc31, perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.012-1.fc31 has been
pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please
make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-0236944568


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2020-06-15 - 95% PASS

[vashirov]

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/06/15/report-389-ds-base-1.4.4.3-20200614git4cfa374.fc32.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1843185] perl-Moo is wanted in EPEL7

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843185

Emmanuel Seyman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Last Closed||2020-06-14 11:12:12



--- Comment #3 from Emmanuel Seyman  ---
Petr Pisar pointed out that Moo is only used for an optional test.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1842890] Add perl-MooseX-StrictConstructor to EPEL7

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842890
Bug 1842890 depends on bug 1843185, which changed state.

Bug 1843185 Summary: perl-Moo is wanted in EPEL7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843185

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1843195] perl-Test-Needs is wanted in EPEL7

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843195

Emmanuel Seyman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED



--- Comment #5 from Emmanuel Seyman  ---
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/25688


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1842889] Add perl-Data-Stream-Bulk to EPEL7

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842889
Bug 1842889 depends on bug 1843171, which changed state.

Bug 1843171 Summary: Add perl-DBIx-Class to EPEL7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843171

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1843171] Add perl-DBIx-Class to EPEL7

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843171

Emmanuel Seyman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Last Closed||2020-06-14 11:19:12



--- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman  ---
Petr Pisar points out that Data-Stream-Bulk only uses DBIx::Class for an
optional test.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1845214] perl-WWW-Mechanize-1.99 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1845214

Emmanuel Seyman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-WWW-Mechanize-2.00-1.f
   ||c33
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Last Closed||2020-06-14 08:21:30



--- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman  ---
Built for rawhide:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1523570


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1843662] perl-XML-Atom-SimpleFeed-0.904 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843662

Emmanuel Seyman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-XML-Atom-SimpleFeed-0.
   ||904-1.fc33
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Last Closed||2020-06-14 08:18:56



--- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman  ---
Built for rawhide:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1523572


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1843696] perl-Mojolicious-8.53 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843696

Emmanuel Seyman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Mojolicious-8.53-1.fc3
   ||3
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Last Closed||2020-06-14 08:19:55



--- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman  ---
Built for rawhide:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1523565


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1842890] Add perl-MooseX-StrictConstructor to EPEL7

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842890

Emmanuel Seyman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED



--- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman  ---
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/25687


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1842889] Add perl-Data-Stream-Bulk to EPEL7

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842889

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-bf39c9dd56 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-bf39c9dd56


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1843201] perl-Locale-Codes-3.64 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843201

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Locale-Codes-3.64-1.fc |perl-Locale-Codes-3.64-1.fc
   |33  |33
   |perl-Locale-Codes-3.64-1.fc |perl-Locale-Codes-3.64-1.fc
   |32  |32
   ||perl-Locale-Codes-3.64-1.fc
   ||31



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Locale-Codes-3.64-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1843195] perl-Test-Needs is wanted in EPEL7

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843195

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Test-Needs-0.002006-5.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-586782e442


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1842889] Add perl-Data-Stream-Bulk to EPEL7

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842889

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Data-Stream-Bulk-0.11-22.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-bf39c9dd56


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-5f91ab971e   
wordpress-5.1.6-1.el6


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing

txt2regex-0.9-1.el6

Details about builds:



 txt2regex-0.9-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2020-2d56be07fd)
 Regular expression wizard that converts human sentences to regexes

Update Information:

Update to new upstream version 0.9. Full changelog:
https://github.com/aureliojargas/txt2regex/blob/v0.9/CHANGELOG.md

ChangeLog:

* Sun Jun 14 2020 Richard Fearn  0.9-1
- Update to new upstream version 0.9 (#1838383)
* Thu Jan 28 2016 Richard Fearn  0.8-4
- Remove unnecessary %defattr

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1752253 - Errors when exiting txt2regex
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752253
  [ 2 ] Bug #1838383 - txt2regex-0.9 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838383


___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1842890] Add perl-MooseX-StrictConstructor to EPEL7

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842890

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-MooseX-StrictConstructor-0.21-11.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-4794fda156


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org