On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 7:28 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
...
> As said in the modularity docs PR (but I cannot find it now, because pagure.io
> is down), I am not sure what is the outcome wrt default streams. Default
> streams
> are not allowed now. If this change proposal and the policy is approved,
On 22. 07. 20 13:07, Igor Raits wrote:
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Wednesday at 14:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d
Hi!
I am writing today to share a proposal for how we can make it
easier to enable tests in Fedora CI.
We've heard the user story mentioned in the subject many times.
Fedora developers have frequently mentioned the difficulties which
they face with enabling tests in Fedora CI. Some people don't
- Original Message -
> From: "Ben Cotton"
> To: devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Cc: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 1:21:20 AM
> Subject: F33 Change proposal: Ruby on Rails 6.0 (Self-Contained Change)
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Wednesday at 14:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date
Hi Tom,
On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 13:53 +0100, Tom Hughes via devel wrote:
> On 21/07/2020 13:12, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > > I normally just edit .git/config and add to the origin remote
> > > an extra fetch:
> > >
> > > fetch = +refs/pull/*/head:refs/remotes/origin/pull/*
> > >
> > > then after
I'd like to use NFLOG to log firewall drops (so that the kernel message
log isn't spammed by them), but it doesn't appear there's anything
currently in Fedora that can read that other than "tcpdump -i nflog".
It looks like ulogd was retired a while back because it only had a SysV
init script and
On 7/22/20 9:31 AM, Nurmukhamed Artykaly wrote:
I am an IT engineer, sysadmin, programmer, DevOps, SRE. I study new
technologies. My Blog is dedicated to IT technologies and (or) events
related to IT in Kazakhstan, the CIS and the world.
Hi Nurmukhamed,
Welcome to Fedora. We look forward to
On 2020-07-22 12:24 a.m., Martin Gansser wrote:
Hi,
cant't built guayadeque on rawhide [1] but on f32 [2] it works.
[1] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4781/47574781/build.log
[2]
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 12:14 AM Steven Munroe wrote:
>
> Dave Love; writes:
> ...
> > I'm pretty sure I said to do that a while ago, like I did when
> > testing the trivial patch that I didn't expect to cause such trouble.
>
> You probably did say so ;)
>
> I come from a different culture and
I am an IT engineer, sysadmin, programmer, DevOps, SRE. I study new
technologies. My Blog is dedicated to IT technologies and (or) events
related to IT in Kazakhstan, the CIS and the world.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
Hi,
cant't built guayadeque on rawhide [1] but on f32 [2] it works.
[1] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4781/47574781/build.log
[2]
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/guayadeque/0.4.7/0.16.20200717git3c54f64.fc32/data/logs/x86_64/build.log
how can i solve this ?
"Martin Gansser" writes:
> Hi,
>
> cant't built guayadeque on rawhide [1] but on f32 [2] it works.
>
> [1] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4781/47574781/build.log
This looks related to the recent cmake changes wrt to out of source
builds. See here for migration steps:
Many Thanks, that solves my problems.
Regards
Martin
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Wed, 2020-07-22 at 07:24 +, Martin Gansser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> cant't built guayadeque on rawhide [1] but on f32 [2] it works.
>
> [1]
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4781/47574781/build.log
> [2]
>
On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 at 19:59, Dave Love wrote:
>
> Iñaki Ucar writes:
>
> >> The licence seems to me to
> >> rule it out a priori.
> >
> > The authors are going to add an exception, so the license won't be a
> > problem. What problems do you think it produces?
>
> Obviously GPLv3 is incompatible
On 21/07/20 17:12 -0500, Steven Munroe wrote:
Dave Love; writes:
...
I'm pretty sure I said to do that a while ago, like I did when
testing the trivial patch that I didn't expect to cause such trouble.
You probably did say so ;)
I come from a different culture and experience. I am not as
Hi,
On Wed, 2020-07-22 at 09:32 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 9:19 AM Tom Hughes via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > On 22/07/2020 13:19, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> >
> > > As you say, the web api is even more resourceful and we can integrate
> > > some of those requests into the
On 22/07/2020 13:19, Mark Wielaard wrote:
As you say, the web api is even more resourceful and we can integrate
some of those requests into the library: https://pagure.io/api/
The only thing that is not very nice are those pagure_tokens. I was
hoping you could get a temporary one through
Hi,
unfortunately I have to orphan my packages psi+ (incl. psi as a base where
co-maintainer) and trojita as well.
psi+ - XMPP client
trojita - e-mail client for IMAP
Please feel free to pick them if you still think there's any usefulness in
Fedora. Both packages didn't get updates since
On 2020-07-19 11:12 a.m., Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Hello team,
when doing a scratch build [1], I noticed some changes like these
lines on %build:
'/builddir/build/BUILD/partio-1.10.1/build/Linux-5.6.15-x86_64-optimize'
and on %install i.e.
-- Installing:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 1:06 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Is this just about the specific URL or also about the "Naming Policy"?
The Naming Policy is not currently under discussion in this proposal.
Only the URL provided in the Change Proposal is applicable right now.
If you want to submit a
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 9:19 AM Tom Hughes via devel
wrote:
>
> On 22/07/2020 13:19, Mark Wielaard wrote:
>
> > As you say, the web api is even more resourceful and we can integrate
> > some of those requests into the library: https://pagure.io/api/
> >
> > The only thing that is not very nice
On 22.07.2020 15:16, Raphael Groner wrote:
> psi+ - XMPP client
I can take it. FAS: xvitaly.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
> On 22.07.2020 15:16, Raphael Groner wrote:
>
> I can take it. FAS: xvitaly.
done, thanks
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Hi all,
The mass rebuild is postponed to next Monday 27th July 2020 since a
couple of changes haven't landed yet.
For more information, please look at https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2451
We will keep you posted if anything changes.
Thanks.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 5:38 PM Mohan Boddu wrote:
>
Neal Gompa wrote:
> So my understanding is that the option shouldn't work at all on CMake
> 3.11 in EPEL 8, as it does not exist in the man page:
> https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.11/manual/cmake.1.html
Older CMake versions had undocumented -H and -B options, which were supposed
to be always
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2020-07-23 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2020-07-23 09:00 PDT US/Pacific
2020-07-23
Raphael Groner wrote:
> trojita - e-mail client for IMAP
I have taken this package. (I was already a comaintainer. I use Trojitá all
the time.) However, I am still looking for somebody interested in EPEL to
take care of the EPEL branches, in which I am not interested. Anybody
interested (no
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 10:18:39PM +0200, Andy Mender wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jul 2020 at 22:14, Mohamed El Morabity
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm the maintainer of the nicotine+ package. This package was retired
> > before F32 branching last year (no Python 3 support at this time) and
> > I
Hi,
On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 15:21 -0700, Josh Stone wrote:
> On 7/21/20 3:12 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > > > Is there a procedure to follow for dropping these sub-packages, or can
> > > > I simply remove them from the spec file?
> > >
> > > Maybe add Obsoletes to the devel subpackages, but not
El jue., 16 jul. 2020 a las 15:14, John Florian ()
escribió:
> On 2020-07-16 13:59, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>
>
>
> El jue., 16 jul. 2020 a las 12:22, John Florian ()
> escribió:
>
>> In any case, the few hassles I encounter are so much less time demanding
>> than all the window management I
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 12:51 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 12:24:07PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > I may have missed it but I don't remember seeing any infra updates for a
> > while but I was out of town last week with limited connectivity...
> >
> > What's the current
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 04:31:20PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> I can't remember the name, but the tool that would let you see dependency
> differences between releases. I have a package that's failing one of it's
> tests but neither the package version (or even the spec file) have changed.
>
Dne 22. 07. 20 v 14:55 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 1:06 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Is this just about the specific URL or also about the "Naming Policy"?
> The Naming Policy is not currently under discussion in this proposal.
> Only the URL provided in the Change
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 12:07:38AM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm working on updating the mingw toolchain [1], and am hitting the
> situation [2] where I build with -fstack-protector in the ldflags, can
> confirm that -lssp and -lssp_nonshared are automatically added to the
> ldflags
On 22/07/2020 15:59, Mark Wielaard wrote:
That is not how I understand the current situation. CPE has a proposal
to provide a forge for use by the fedora project possibly based on
gitlab, but pagure wouldn't go away.
I think you may be behind the times. The pretend consultation is over
and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
=
#fedora-meeting-2: FESCO (2020-07-22)
=
Meeting started by ignatenkobrain at 14:01:00 UTC. The full logs are
available at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Re-sending with the proper subject..
=
#fedora-meeting-2: FESCO (2020-07-22)
=
Meeting started by ignatenkobrain at 14:01:00 UTC. The full logs are
available at
Vitaly, please also consider to take a look into psi-im-decrypt project. Maybe
it can be included. Requested and fixed upstream to add license file.
https://github.com/jose1711/psi-im-decrypt
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
I may have missed it but I don't remember seeing any infra updates for a
while but I was out of town last week with limited connectivity...
What's the current status?
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
rust-crossbeam-channel-0.4.3-1.fc33 has changed its license from a
combined "(MIT or ASL 2.0) and BSD" to just "MIT or ASL 2.0".
See also: https://github.com/crossbeam-rs/crossbeam/issues/536
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 12:24:07PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I may have missed it but I don't remember seeing any infra updates for a
> while but I was out of town last week with limited connectivity...
>
> What's the current status?
Are you meaning the Datacenter move? or ?
Most all the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Wed, 2020-07-22 at 11:41 -0700, Josh Stone wrote:
> rust-crossbeam-channel-0.4.3-1.fc33 has changed its license from a
> combined "(MIT or ASL 2.0) and BSD" to just "MIT or ASL 2.0".
> See also:
Hello,
I'm the maintainer of the nicotine+ package. This package was retired
before F32 branching last year (no Python 3 support at this time) and
I unretired it after a review request and a unretirement request
ticket to releng.
I requested a branch creation for f32 using "fedpkg
On Wed, 22 Jul 2020 at 22:14, Mohamed El Morabity
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm the maintainer of the nicotine+ package. This package was retired
> before F32 branching last year (no Python 3 support at this time) and
> I unretired it after a review request and a unretirement request
> ticket to
On Wed, 2020-07-22 at 07:51 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2020-07-19 11:12 a.m., Luya
> Tshimbalanga wrote:
>
>
>
> >
> > Hello team,
> > when doing a scratch build [1], I noticed some changes like
> > these lines on %build:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859367
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859415
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-60737de4d0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-60737de4d0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859415
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-8bca15ae7d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-8bca15ae7d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859367
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859415
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-ac5d34630b has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-ac5d34630b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859506
Bug ID: 1859506
Summary: perl-Mail-Transport-3.005 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Mail-Transport
Keywords: FutureFeature,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859506
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1702044
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1702044=edit
[patch] Update to 3.005 (#1859506)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859506
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-Mail-Transport-3.005-1.fc32.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=47621523
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859415
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859415
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Hi all,
The mass rebuild is postponed to next Monday 27th July 2020 since a
couple of changes haven't landed yet.
For more information, please look at https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2451
We will keep you posted if anything changes.
Thanks.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 5:38 PM Mohan Boddu wrote:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859415
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-12d0e14fab
cacti-1.2.13-1.el8 cacti-spine-1.2.13-1.el8
8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-1c906e59bb
mbedtls-2.16.7-1.el8
8
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-e44380bc7a
php-horde-kronolith-4.2.29-1.el6
7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-e54cfb4880
singularity-3.6.0-1.el6
7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859415
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-8bca15ae7d has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
robert merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Razor-Agent` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Use make macros
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Razor-Agent/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854141
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Socket-2.030-1.fc33|perl-Socket-2.030-1.fc33
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859415
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-60737de4d0 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859623
Bug ID: 1859623
Summary: perl-Catalyst-View-TT-0.45 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Catalyst-View-TT
Keywords: FutureFeature,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859622
Bug ID: 1859622
Summary: perl-Catalyst-Manual-5.9011 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Catalyst-Manual
Keywords: FutureFeature,
Hello,
I want to make qjackctl (and some other packages) available in the EPEL
8 repo.
I succeeded with a scratch build for EPEL:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=47379008
But now I am not sure what to do next.
I want to learn this and become a fedora packager.
Is someone
On 22/07/20 19:17, Christoph Karl wrote:
> Hello,
>
Hi Christoph.
> I want to make qjackctl (and some other packages) available in the EPEL
> 8 repo.
>
> I succeeded with a scratch build for EPEL:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=47379008
`qjackctl` is already on Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859707
Bug ID: 1859707
Summary: perl-Text-CSV_XS-1.44 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Text-CSV_XS
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
70 matches
Mail list logo
