OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210123.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210124.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 87
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 348.88 KiB
Size of dropped packages
* Kevin Kofler via devel:
> Unfortunately, the fix is more complicated than that. It is really not
> helpful behavior from glibc to use the fstatat syscall to implement fstat.
> (What is the benefit of doing that?)
The fstat/fstat64 system call does not exist on arc and riscv/rv32.
glibc tries
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 4/15 (aarch64), 2/16 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210123.0):
ID: 761432 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification@uefi
URL:
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 34 Rawhide 20210124.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
5 of 43 required tests failed, 13 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 21/181 (x86_64), 12/123
Florian Weimer wrote:
> The fstat/fstat64 system call does not exist on arc and riscv/rv32.
> glibc tries to consolidate the implementations as far as possible, so if
> the kernel deprecates a system call and the replacement is already
> supported by all architectures, glibc uses that, rather than
On 1/24/21 5:40 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Sun, 2021-01-24 at 16:42 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 1/23/21 1:09 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Have we a FedoraRespin-32 ? we might want install a Fedora 32 .
Live respins are unofficial and only for the latest release:
Dear all,
I am trying to install RPM on riscv target (QEMU), but its throwing error.
Even Though gzip/bzip2/xz are installed in target.
Error:
*/home # uname -aLinux C-DAC 5.4.1 #1 SMP Wed Dec 30 17:01:02 IST 2020
riscv64 GNU/Linux/home # rpm -i
On Sun, 2021-01-24 at 16:42 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 1/23/21 1:09 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > Have we a FedoraRespin-32 ? we might want install a Fedora 32 .
>
> Live respins are unofficial and only for the latest release:
> https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/live-respins/
Sorry, about
Hi folks! Sorry for the late notice - I'm proposing we cancel the QA
meeting tomorrow. I don't have anything urgent this week.
If you're aware of anything important we have to discuss this week,
please do reply to this mail and we can go ahead and run the meeting.
Thanks!
--
Adam Williamson
On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 at 00:12, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> If the files are not arch-specific, just override the location to be
> always /usr/lib/voikko. Pedantically speaking, this is not exactly following
> the FHS, but it's easiest to follow upstream here. The difference between
>
On 23. 01. 21 2:18, Tom Stellard wrote:
On 1/21/21 7:28 AM, Tom Stellard wrote:
Hi,
We are going to be building clang-11.1.0 for rawhide, which changes the soname
of libclang.so and libclang-cpp.so. This is unusual for clang, since the
soname will change without bumping the major version
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> But the thing is, fstatat is not really a newer version of fstat, it
> unfortunately has very different security properties. fstat allows
> retrieving the stat metadata only of already open files (if you know or
> guess the fd). On the other hand, fstatat allows
On 1/22/21 8:19 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2021-01-22 at 09:57 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 1/21/21 8:37 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 10:53 +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Florian Weimer wrote:
With rpm-4.15.1-3.fc32.1.x86_64, I get this error:
$ rpm
On 24. 01. 21 19:43, Ville-Pekka Vainio wrote:
Hi,
This is a re-review for a rename and going from arch-specific to
noarch: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919688
The arch-noarch stuff was discussed here:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 08:38:44PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 03:21:14PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > I've been poking at it more today...
> > >
> > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=60286478
> > > > Total time 13:19:20
> > > > Task time
On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 08:21:48PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 7:54 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 08:38:44PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 03:21:14PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > > > I've been poking at it more
Hi,
This is a re-review for a rename and going from arch-specific to
noarch: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919688
The arch-noarch stuff was discussed here:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/JSEYB5XU24HEX7BR2QVJ732MR5P52YJ6/
Voikko
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 03:21:14PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > I've been poking at it more today...
> >
> > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=60286478
> > > Total time13:19:20
> > > Task time 1:11:53
> >
> > Yeah, basically kojid get OOM killed, which
On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 4:42 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 23. 01. 21 2:18, Tom Stellard wrote:
> > On 1/21/21 7:28 AM, Tom Stellard wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> We are going to be building clang-11.1.0 for rawhide, which changes the
> >> soname
> >> of libclang.so and libclang-cpp.so. This is
On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 7:54 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 08:38:44PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 03:21:14PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > > I've been poking at it more today...
> > > >
> > > > >
- Original Message -
> From: "Ankur Sinha"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, "For participants of the Documentation
> Project"
> Sent: Monday, January 18, 2021 12:31:10 PM
> Subject: Re: Migrating the Fedora Developer Portal to Fedora Docs
>
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 10:34:32 -0500,
On 1/23/21 1:09 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Have we a FedoraRespin-32 ? we might want install a Fedora 32 .
Live respins are unofficial and only for the latest release:
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/live-respins/
And about archive , shouldn't we archive 3 or 4 versions ? if last one
have
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1918151
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919051
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1918607
Robin Lee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919611
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919603
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919782
Bug ID: 1919782
Summary: Unable to install the package
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component: perl-OLE-Storage_Lite
Assignee: spo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917053
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-e976495093
coturn-4.5.2-1.el8
10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-47ea069c76
chromium-87.0.4280.141-1.el8
3
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/01/25/report-389-ds-base-2.0.2-20210125git6ea32f9f5.fc33.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917453
--- Comment #2 from Jan Pazdziora ---
Filed upstream as https://github.com/book/Git-Repository/pull/20.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel
https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/pull/4566
--
389 Directory Server Development Team
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919730
Bug ID: 1919730
Summary: Please build perl-Net-XMPP for EPEL 8
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919730
Robert Scheck changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1919598
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919731
Bug ID: 1919731
Summary: Please build perl-XML-Stream for EPEL 8
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919731
Robert Scheck changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1919730
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919730
Robert Scheck changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1919731
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919730
Robert Scheck changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1919732
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919732
Bug ID: 1919732
Summary: Please build perl-LWP-Online for EPEL 8
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component:
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
37 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-4a9fc09599
openjpeg2-2.3.1-10.el7
14 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-5843fdc72c
adplug-2.3.3-1.el7 audacious-plugins-4.0.5-3.el7
42 matches
Mail list logo
