Re: correct combination (arch & abi) for rebulding gcc SRPM for RV64IMAFD on top of RISC-V Fedora image
Hi everyone, Can anyone explain what is the difference between the following two approaches for rebuilding GCC SRPM on RISC-V Fedora image. Here I have changed the gcc.spec file. *Method-1:* %ifarch riscv64 --with-arch=rv64g --enable-multilib --with-multilib-list=lp64 %endif *Result:* #error "rv32i-based targets are not supported" *Method-2:* %ifarch riscv64 --with-arch=rv64g --disable-multilib %endif *Result:* Here all library packages are going to /usr/lib folder path, but in-between rebuilding process move commands are there, that are trying to move files from /usr/lib64 path. But no file is there in /usr/lib64 path. all failed move commands files are there in /usr/lib path. If anyone understands my problem, Please explain why I am not able to rebuild GCC SRPM with method-1. Is it compulsory for rebuilding gcc srpm --enable-multilib --with-multilib-list=lp64 or method-1 also correct process for rebuilding. Thanks in advance Billa ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1940699] New: perl-Net-HTTP-6.21 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1940699 Bug ID: 1940699 Summary: perl-Net-HTTP-6.21 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Net-HTTP Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 6.21 Current version/release in rawhide: 6.20-2.fc34 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-HTTP/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/3152/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1939683] perl-MooseX-Getopt-0.75 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939683 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-f353272e48 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-f353272e48` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-f353272e48 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1939044] perl-DateTime-Format-Pg-0.16014 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939044 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-c56daf4eea has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-c56daf4eea` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-c56daf4eea See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1939759] perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive-0.109 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939759 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-3526704f0d has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-3526704f0d` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-3526704f0d See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1938597] perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive-0.107 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938597 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-3526704f0d has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-3526704f0d` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-3526704f0d See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1938396] perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive-0.106 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938396 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-3526704f0d has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-3526704f0d` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-3526704f0d See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Orphaning pasystray, clipit, python-i3ipc, rnv
I took python-i3ipc; I have a package with dependency on it. Thanks for maintaining it all these years! On 3/18/21 12:44 PM, Michael Šimáček wrote: Hi, Due to lack of time and motivation I've just orphaned the following packages which are now free to take: pasystray clipit python-i3ipc rnv Regards, Michael Simacek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure -- With best regards, Aleksei Bavshin ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Orphaning pasystray, clipit, python-i3ipc, rnv
Hi, Due to lack of time and motivation I've just orphaned the following packages which are now free to take: pasystray clipit python-i3ipc rnv Regards, Michael Simacek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora Linux 34 Beta is GO
The Fedora Linux 34 Beta RC1.3 compose[1] is GO and will be shipped live on Tuesday, 23 March 2021. For more information please check the Go/No-Go meeting minutes[2] or log [3]. Thank you to everyone who has and still is working on this release! The Final Freeze begins on 6 April. [1] https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/34_Beta-1.3/ [2] https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2021-03-18/f34-beta-go_no_go-meeting.2021-03-18-17.02.html [3] https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2021-03-18/f34-beta-go_no_go-meeting.2021-03-18-17.02.log.html -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Test-Announce] Fedora Linux 34 Beta is GO
The Fedora Linux 34 Beta RC1.3 compose[1] is GO and will be shipped live on Tuesday, 23 March 2021. For more information please check the Go/No-Go meeting minutes[2] or log [3]. Thank you to everyone who has and still is working on this release! The Final Freeze begins on 6 April. [1] https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/34_Beta-1.3/ [2] https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2021-03-18/f34-beta-go_no_go-meeting.2021-03-18-17.02.html [3] https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2021-03-18/f34-beta-go_no_go-meeting.2021-03-18-17.02.log.html -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Review swaps
Il 17/03/21 16:51, Robert-André Mauchin ha scritto: > Hello! > > I have a dozen or more packages waiting to be reviewed and I'm looking for > someone to > help in exchange of some of yours. > I'll try to work on some of them in the weekend, I already own you a couple of reviews, at least. BTW, I approved golang-github-gl some days ago. Mattia ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-IoT-35-20210318.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Iot dvd x86_64 Iot dvd aarch64 Failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210317.0): ID: 820578 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820578 ID: 820579 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820579 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210317.0): ID: 820574 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820574 ID: 820583 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820583 ID: 820590 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820590 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210317.0): ID: 820568 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820568 Passed openQA tests: 13/15 (aarch64), 12/16 (x86_64) New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210317.0): ID: 820587 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820587 ID: 820593 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820593 ID: 820594 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820594 ID: 820596 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_ignition@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820596 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Permissions vs. Impact mismatch: Orphaning and Retiring
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 5:33 PM Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > > Il 17/03/21 11:41, Vít Ondruch ha scritto: > > > > I think the problem is that the groups can be removed from package only > > by the main admin. If the main admin is non-responsive, then the whole > > group is kind of hostage. Every group member should be able to remove > > the group from the package IMHO. But this can be solved via tickets. > > > > Vít > > > > > Yeah, if the group (or a user) was added with "commit" privileges only > (not "admin"), they cannot remove themselves. I wonder if this not > something that can be addressed upstream on Pagure. That's even worse! Group members can not even open "Settings" if the group is only at "commit" level, and can't remove the group from packages. But they can *retire* the package no questions asked ... Fabio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-34-20210318.n.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 4/126 (aarch64), 3/187 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210317.n.0): ID: 820151 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820151 ID: 820220 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_browser@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820220 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-34-20210317.n.0): ID: 820118 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820118 ID: 820129 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820129 ID: 820236 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820236 ID: 820313 Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820313 ID: 820342 Test: aarch64 universal install_simple_encrypted@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820342 Soft failed openQA tests: 6/126 (aarch64), 4/187 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-34-20210317.n.0): ID: 820172 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820172 ID: 820347 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820347 Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-34-20210317.n.0): ID: 820062 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820062 ID: 820087 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820087 ID: 820150 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820150 ID: 820198 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820198 ID: 820203 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820203 ID: 820208 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820208 ID: 820230 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820230 ID: 820296 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820296 Passed openQA tests: 180/187 (x86_64), 108/126 (aarch64) New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-34-20210317.n.0): ID: 820064 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_hd_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820064 ID: 820127 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820127 ID: 820169 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_lvm_ext4@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820169 ID: 820173 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820173 ID: 820192 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_resize_lvm@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820192 ID: 820223 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_update_graphical@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820223 ID: 820320 Test: aarch64 universal install_cyrillic_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820320 ID: 820332 Test: aarch64 universal install_with_swap@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820332 ID: 820334 Test: aarch64 universal install_package_set_minimal@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820334 ID: 820345 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820345 ID: 820348 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820348 ID: 820352 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820352 Skipped non-gating openQA tests: 8 of 313 Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi: System load changed from 0.03 to 0.24 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/818388#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820041#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default: System load changed from 0.16 to 0.28 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/818389#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820042#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload: System load changed from 0.26 to 0.09 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/818402#downloads Current test data:
Re: libravatar ported to Fedora's AWS
Great News! Much appreciated! David Duncan http://about.me/davdunc On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 9:37 PM Christoph Karl wrote: > > Am 14.03.21 um 23:32 schrieb clime: > > Hello, > > > > I have just finished port of libravatar.org service to server provided > > by Fedora. Big thanks to the Fedora project for sponsoring libravatar. > > Avatars in pagure.io, src.fp.o, Bodhi should now load much faster. > > +1 > > Christoph > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora 34 compose report: 20210318.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-34-20210317.n.0 NEW: Fedora-34-20210318.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 0 B Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 0 B Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES = ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Cyrus-imapd orphaned for unknown reason
The real issue is not orphaning itself but the possibility to take the package right away and get full access access for any package in the distribution. On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 2:46 PM Kalev Lember wrote: > > On 3/18/21 11:29, Pavel Zhukov wrote: > > Even worse. Every packager (not a member of package) is able to orphan > > *any* package and drop the main admin there. Just verified it. > > I went ahead and filed this as > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9745 > > -- > Kalev > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure -- Pavel Zhukov Software Engineer IRC: landgraf ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Cyrus-imapd orphaned for unknown reason
On 3/18/21 11:29, Pavel Zhukov wrote: Even worse. Every packager (not a member of package) is able to orphan *any* package and drop the main admin there. Just verified it. I went ahead and filed this as https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9745 -- Kalev ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Packages hijacking configuration files
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 9:11 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 9:04 AM Matthew Miller > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 01:24:29PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > If we want to have this now in the remix, I would say we could take > > > generic-release and modify it for our needs and ship that instead of > > > fedora-release. > > > > > > I'm not sure that it's up to date tho... :( > > > > > > At one point it was nicely setup to allow just swapping generic-release > > > in and modifying it. > > > > That *should* still be the case and is a bug if not. > > > > The presets need to be synced from fedora-release to generic-release > again, then it should be fine. We should probably consider splitting them out as a new package like we did with fedora-repos. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Rawhide-20210318.n.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check! All required tests passed Failed openQA tests: 15/126 (aarch64), 10/187 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210317.n.0): ID: 819845 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso support_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/819845 ID: 819850 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_standard_partition_ext4@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/819850 ID: 819856 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/819856 ID: 819862 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_updates_nfs@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/819862 ID: 819882 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/819882 ID: 819994 Test: aarch64 universal support_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/819994 ID: 820013 Test: aarch64 universal install_kickstart_nfs@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820013 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210317.n.0): ID: 819768 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/819768 ID: 819785 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/819785 ID: 819798 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/819798 ID: 819803 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/819803 ID: 819812 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/819812 ID: 819814 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/819814 ID: 819878 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/819878 ID: 819920 Test: x86_64 universal install_arabic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/819920 ID: 819921 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/819921 ID: 819934 Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/819934 ID: 819943 Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/819943 ID: 819997 Test: aarch64 universal install_arabic_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/819997 ID: 819998 Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/819998 ID: 820005 Test: aarch64 universal install_cyrillic_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820005 ID: 820009 Test: aarch64 universal install_european_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820009 ID: 820032 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820032 ID: 820033 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820033 ID: 820037 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820037 Soft failed openQA tests: 71/187 (x86_64), 44/126 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210317.n.0): ID: 819944 Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/819944 ID: 820027 Test: aarch64 universal install_simple_encrypted@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/820027 Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210317.n.0): ID: 819726 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/819726 ID: 819727 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/819727 ID: 819729 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/819729 ID: 819739 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/819739 ID: 819740 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/819740 ID: 819745 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_updates_nfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/819745 ID: 819746 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/819746 ID: 819747 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/819747 ID: 819748 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/819748 ID: 819749 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_hd_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/819749 ID: 819750 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso
Re: Packages hijacking configuration files
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 9:04 AM Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 01:24:29PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > If we want to have this now in the remix, I would say we could take > > generic-release and modify it for our needs and ship that instead of > > fedora-release. > > > > I'm not sure that it's up to date tho... :( > > > > At one point it was nicely setup to allow just swapping generic-release > > in and modifying it. > > That *should* still be the case and is a bug if not. > The presets need to be synced from fedora-release to generic-release again, then it should be fine. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Packages hijacking configuration files
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 01:24:29PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > If we want to have this now in the remix, I would say we could take > generic-release and modify it for our needs and ship that instead of > fedora-release. > > I'm not sure that it's up to date tho... :( > > At one point it was nicely setup to allow just swapping generic-release > in and modifying it. That *should* still be the case and is a bug if not. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Packages hijacking configuration files
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 08:47:00AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I don't see anything explicit. There's: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_file_and_directory_ownership > which talks about a package owning all it's files, but it doesn't > explicitly say no to this. Also this https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/DefaultServices/#_must_not_alter_other_services although that's in the section about daemons and unit files. > That said, IMHO this should be forbidden. I agree generally as well -- we generally don't do configuration-via-packageset (except for the fedora-release presets). -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[rpms/slic3r] PR #8: Security fix for CVE-2020-28591
churchyard opened a new pull-request against the project: `slic3r` that you are following: `` Security fix for CVE-2020-28591 `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/slic3r/pull-request/8 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[rpms/slic3r] PR #7: Security fix for CVE-2020-28591
churchyard opened a new pull-request against the project: `slic3r` that you are following: `` Security fix for CVE-2020-28591 `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/slic3r/pull-request/7 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[rpms/slic3r] PR #6: Security fix for CVE-2020-28591
churchyard opened a new pull-request against the project: `slic3r` that you are following: `` Security fix for CVE-2020-28591 `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/slic3r/pull-request/6 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: How to apply a patch to the kernel 5.11.x
> is to add the contents of the patch to the existing (empty) > linux-kernel-test.patch > file. Thanks! It looks like this method works. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210318.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210317.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210318.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:3 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 21 Dropped packages:4 Upgraded packages: 83 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 73.09 MiB Size of dropped packages:48.52 MiB Size of upgraded packages: 7.24 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 159.41 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree ppc64le Path: Silverblue/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-ppc64le-Rawhide-20210318.n.0.iso Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree x86_64 Path: Silverblue/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-x86_64-Rawhide-20210318.n.0.iso Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree aarch64 Path: Silverblue/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-aarch64-Rawhide-20210318.n.0.iso = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: R-arules-1.6.6-2.fc35 Summary: Mining Association Rules and Frequent Itemsets RPMs:R-arules Size:12.47 MiB Package: fx-20.0.2-2.fc35 Summary: Command-line JSON processing tool RPMs:fx Size:277.38 KiB Package: gn-1893-3.20210314git64b3b940.fc35 Summary: Meta-build system that generates build files for Ninja RPMs:gn gn-doc Size:3.58 MiB Package: golang-github-msprev-fzf-bibtex-1.1-1.20210317git53c49fa.fc35 Summary: A BibTeX source for fzf RPMs:golang-github-msprev-fzf-bibtex Size:5.79 MiB Package: golang-github-sophaskins-efs2tar-0-0.1.20210317git4db1b0f.fc35 Summary: A tool to convert SGI efs filesystems to tarballs RPMs:efs2tar golang-github-sophaskins-efs2tar-devel Size:3.33 MiB Package: google-cpu_features-0.6.0-2.fc35 Summary: A cross-platform C library to retrieve CPU features at runtime RPMs:google-cpu_features google-cpu_features-devel Size:229.38 KiB Package: google-guest-agent-20201217.02-1.fc35 Summary: Google Compute Engine guest environment RPMs:google-guest-agent Size:35.98 MiB Package: libv3270-5.3-5.fc35 Summary: 3270 Virtual Terminal for GTK+3 RPMs:libv3270 libv3270-devel libv3270-doc Size:1.27 MiB Package: manafirewall-0.0.2-1.fc35 Summary: ManaTools FirewallD configuration tool RPMs:manafirewall Size:144.40 KiB Package: netcat-1.217-3.fc35 Summary: OpenBSD netcat to read and write data across connections using TCP or UDP RPMs:netcat Size:169.05 KiB Package: npm-name-cli-3.0.0-3.fc35 Summary: Check whether a package or organization name is available on npm RPMs:npm-name-cli Size:1.01 MiB Package: poke-1.0-3.fc35 Summary: Extensible editor for structured binary data RPMs:poke poke-data poke-devel poke-libs Size:3.20 MiB Package: python-cffsubr-0.2.8-2.fc35 Summary: Standalone CFF subroutinizer based on the AFDKO tx tool RPMs:python3-cffsubr Size:22.15 KiB Package: python-pcicrawler-1.0.0-1.fc35 Summary: Display/filter/export information about PCI or PCI Express devices RPMs:pcicrawler Size:37.83 KiB Package: sdorfehs-1.1-2.fc35 Summary: A tiling window manager RPMs:sdorfehs Size:579.39 KiB Package: sleef-3.5.1-3.fc35 Summary: Vectorized math library RPMs:sleef sleef-devel sleef-doc sleef-gnuabi sleef-gnuabi-devel Size:4.37 MiB Package: topojson-client-3.1.0-2.fc35 Summary: Manipulate TopoJSON and convert it to GeoJSON RPMs:topojson-client Size:49.24 KiB Package: topojson-server-3.0.1-2.fc35 Summary: Convert GeoJSON to TopoJSON RPMs:topojson-server Size:47.49 KiB Package: topojson-simplify-3.0.3-2.fc35 Summary: Topology-preserving simplification and filtering for TopoJSON RPMs:topojson-simplify Size:64.84 KiB Package: ultimarc-1.1.0-2.20210317git540d403.fc35 Summary: Library and command line utility to configure Ultimarc boards RPMs:ultimarc ultimarc-devel ultimarc-libs Size:441.76 KiB Package: xbanish-1.7-2.fc35 Summary: Banish the mouse cursor when typing, show it again when the mouse moves RPMs:xbanish Size:84.29 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = Package: geronimo-jcdi-1.1-api-1.0-10.fc33 Summary: Apache Geronimo JCDI Spec 1.1 RPMs:geronimo-jcdi-1.1-api geronimo-jcdi-1.1-api-javadoc Size:414.36 KiB Package: geronimo-validation-1.1-24.fc33 Summary: Geronimo implementation of JSR 303 RPMs:geronimo-validation geronimo-validation-javadoc Size:364.56 KiB Package: simple-jndi-0.11.4.1-19.fc33 Summary: A JNDI implementation RPMs:simple-jndi simple-jndi-javadoc Size:347.00 KiB Package: tmw-music-0.3.0.1-0.10.20151005git0fe3e21.fc34 Summary: Music files for The Mana World RPMs:tmw-music Size:47.42 MiB = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: CGAL-5.2.1-1.fc35 Old package: CGAL-5.2-2.fc34 Summary: Computational Geometry Algorithms Library RPMs: CGAL-demos-source CGAL-devel CGAL-qt5-devel Size: 119.85 MiB Size change: -60.05 KiB Changelog: * Wed Mar 17 2021 Laurent Rineau - 5.2.1-1 - New upstream release Package: adwaita-icon
Re: How to apply a patch to the kernel 5.11.x
Hi,
On 3/18/21 12:42 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> In kernel 5.10.x, it was enough to add the line for example "Patch 990:
>> example.patch" to apply the patch.
>> Now in 5.11.x it looks like this method doesn't work.
>
> You can still do that for a local build, you also need to have an
> ApplyOptionalPatch line, see the "ApplyOptionalPatch
> patch-%{stableversion}-redhat.patch" example around line 1260 in the
> spec.
I guess that might work, but AFAIK the preferred way of doing this starting
with 5.11
is to add the contents of the patch to the existing (empty)
linux-kernel-test.patch
file.
You can add multiple patches there by just concatenating them, e.g.:
cat 00*.patch > linux-kernel-test.patch
or:
cat patch1.patch > linux-kernel-test.patch
cat patch2.patch >> linux-kernel-test.patch
cat patch3.patch >> linux-kernel-test.patch
etc.
Likewise with 5.11 and later Kconfig options can be overriden for local builds
by adding them to the kernel-local file, e.g.
echo "CONFIG_AMD_SFH_HID=m" > kernel-local
Regards,
Hans
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: How to apply a patch to the kernel 5.11.x
> In kernel 5.10.x, it was enough to add the line for example "Patch 990:
> example.patch" to apply the patch.
> Now in 5.11.x it looks like this method doesn't work.
You can still do that for a local build, you also need to have an
ApplyOptionalPatch line, see the "ApplyOptionalPatch
patch-%{stableversion}-redhat.patch" example around line 1260 in the
spec.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1939683] perl-MooseX-Getopt-0.75 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939683 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-f353272e48 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-f353272e48 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1890795] EPEL8 Request: perl-PDL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890795 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1940400 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1940400 [Bug 1940400] EPEL8 Request: fftw2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1939683] perl-MooseX-Getopt-0.75 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939683 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||perl-MooseX-Getopt-0.75-1.f ||c35 --- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth --- Rawhide build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=64041156 Fedora 34 build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=64041283 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1939683] perl-MooseX-Getopt-0.75 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939683 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|emman...@seyman.fr |p...@city-fan.org Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
How to apply a patch to the kernel 5.11.x
In kernel 5.10.x, it was enough to add the line for example "Patch 990: example.patch" to apply the patch. Now in 5.11.x it looks like this method doesn't work. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Cyrus-imapd orphaned for unknown reason
Even worse. Every packager (not a member of package) is able to orphan *any* package and drop the main admin there. Just verified it. On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 11:25 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 18. 03. 21 11:14, Pavel Zhukov wrote: > > So... Looks like the ex-admin of the package was able to orphan one > > somehow and by doing this drop the current admin from the member > > list. Looks like a bug if not a security hole for me. > > An "admin" can remove admins. I don't think that is necessarily an unexpected > permission of an admin. > > I'd argue that the security hole lies in keeping users you don't trust as > admins. > > -- > Miro Hrončok > -- > Phone: +420777974800 > IRC: mhroncok > -- Pavel Zhukov Software Engineer IRC: landgraf ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Cyrus-imapd orphaned for unknown reason
On 18. 03. 21 11:14, Pavel Zhukov wrote: So... Looks like the ex-admin of the package was able to orphan one somehow and by doing this drop the current admin from the member list. Looks like a bug if not a security hole for me. An "admin" can remove admins. I don't think that is necessarily an unexpected permission of an admin. I'd argue that the security hole lies in keeping users you don't trust as admins. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Cyrus-imapd orphaned for unknown reason
So... Looks like the ex-admin of the package was able to orphan one somehow and by doing this drop the current admin from the member list. Looks like a bug if not a security hole for me. On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 11:07 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 18. 03. 21 11:03, Pavel Zhukov wrote: > > landgraf (it's me) have not done this :) and pavlix transferred the > > package to me ~3 years ago. > > I've been the default bug assignee for this component since then. > > In that case, no idea. The pagure admins might have some kind of information > about who made this change somewhere in the db and/or logs, but I'm sure. > > -- > Miro Hrončok > -- > Phone: +420777974800 > IRC: mhroncok > -- Pavel Zhukov Software Engineer IRC: landgraf ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Cyrus-imapd orphaned for unknown reason
On 18. 03. 21 11:03, Pavel Zhukov wrote: landgraf (it's me) have not done this :) and pavlix transferred the package to me ~3 years ago. I've been the default bug assignee for this component since then. In that case, no idea. The pagure admins might have some kind of information about who made this change somewhere in the db and/or logs, but I'm sure. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Cyrus-imapd orphaned for unknown reason
landgraf (it's me) have not done this :) and pavlix transferred the package to me ~3 years ago. I've been the default bug assignee for this component since then. On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 10:59 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 18. 03. 21 10:48, Pavel Zhukov wrote: > > I've got an email from bugzilla and noticed that the cyrus-imapd > > package was orphaned and pagure confirmed that. > > The package was built in rawhide, upgraded to the newest version and > > there are not fail to install bugs opened. So the reason for this > > action is not unclear for me. > > Can somebody (Miro?) explain the reason? > > To see the reason we first need to know who orphaned it. > > I happen to have a backup of pagure_owner_alias.json from couple days ago, the > maintainers were: > > "cyrus-imapd": [ > "kanarip", > "tibbs", > "landgraf", > "pavlix", > "zdohnal" > ], > > Unfortunately I don't see who was the main admin. > > Today, landgraf and pavlix are missing. Is it possible that one of them was > the > main admin and orphaned the package? > > -- > Miro Hrončok > -- > Phone: +420777974800 > IRC: mhroncok > -- Pavel Zhukov Software Engineer IRC: landgraf ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Cyrus-imapd orphaned for unknown reason
On 18. 03. 21 10:48, Pavel Zhukov wrote: I've got an email from bugzilla and noticed that the cyrus-imapd package was orphaned and pagure confirmed that. The package was built in rawhide, upgraded to the newest version and there are not fail to install bugs opened. So the reason for this action is not unclear for me. Can somebody (Miro?) explain the reason? To see the reason we first need to know who orphaned it. I happen to have a backup of pagure_owner_alias.json from couple days ago, the maintainers were: "cyrus-imapd": [ "kanarip", "tibbs", "landgraf", "pavlix", "zdohnal" ], Unfortunately I don't see who was the main admin. Today, landgraf and pavlix are missing. Is it possible that one of them was the main admin and orphaned the package? -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Cyrus-imapd orphaned for unknown reason
I've got an email from bugzilla and noticed that the cyrus-imapd package was orphaned and pagure confirmed that. The package was built in rawhide, upgraded to the newest version and there are not fail to install bugs opened. So the reason for this action is not unclear for me. Can somebody (Miro?) explain the reason? -- Pavel Zhukov Software Engineer IRC: landgraf ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1890595] EPEL8 Request: perl-OpenGL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890595 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-f2a00d88c2 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-f2a00d88c2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[rpms/slic3r] PR #5: Security fix for CVE-2020-28591
churchyard opened a new pull-request against the project: `slic3r` that you are following: `` Security fix for CVE-2020-28591 `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/slic3r/pull-request/5 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-32-20210318.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210317.0): ID: 819714 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/819714 ID: 819721 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/819721 Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64), 6/7 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-33-20210318.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210317.0): ID: 819647 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/819647 ID: 819654 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/819654 Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (aarch64), 6/7 (x86_64) New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210317.0): ID: 819652 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_selinux@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/819652 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1890595] EPEL8 Request: perl-OpenGL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890595 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|lkund...@v3.sk |jples...@redhat.com Flags|needinfo?(lkund...@v3.sk) | --- Comment #3 from Jitka Plesnikova --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33029 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2021-03-18 - 95% PASS
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/03/18/report-389-ds-base-2.0.3-20210318git06db4a85e.fc33.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
