Dne 14. 05. 21 v 16:58 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 10:53 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
...
Maintaining a separate branch for ELN requires us to do the following things:
* Create an `eln` branch for the package
* Exclude the package from the Rawhide auto-rebuild
This is not
Dne 17. 05. 21 v 10:39 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 14. 05. 21 v 16:58 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 10:53 AM Vít Ondruch
wrote:
...
Maintaining a separate branch for ELN requires us to do the
following things:
* Create an `eln` branch for the package
* Exclude the
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210516.0):
ID: 888366 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
Dne 14. 05. 21 v 16:29 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
In nearly all cases, we want the `rawhide` branch in dist-git to
provide the sources used to build packages for ELN. This ensures that
they are kept up to date and minimizes packager effort (since they do
not have to maintain an extra branch).
On Sat, May 15, 2021 11:43:09 +0200, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
> Hello everyone.
Hi Antonio,
> python-steps-0:3.5.0-7.fc34.src
Unfortunately this currently fails to build in the side-tag:
> /builddir/build/BUILD/STEPS-3.5.0/src/steps/tetode/tetode.cpp:205:45: error:
> 'CV_FUNCTIONAL' was not
There will be an outage starting at 2021-05-18 17:00UTC,
which will last approximately 2 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2021-05-18 17:00UTC'
Reason for outage:
Host upgrade from Fedora 32 to Fedora
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 10:19:05AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> ** Package [https://github.com/libsdl-org/sdl12-compat
> libsdl12-compat] ([https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1960960
> RH#1960960])
I do have one serious question. What happens to:
SDL_Pango
SDL_gfx
SDL_image
SDL_mixer
On 17.05.2021 16:19, Ben Cotton wrote:
In order to help move SDL 1.2 games into the modern world, let's
replace SDL 1.2 with sdl12-compat, which uses SDL 2.0.
What about third-party **proprietary** games from Steam for example?
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
On 5/17/21 11:13 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Sat, May 15, 2021 11:43:09 +0200, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
Hello everyone.
Hi Antonio,
python-steps-0:3.5.0-7.fc34.src
Unfortunately this currently fails to build in the side-tag:
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 1:13 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 10:19:05AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > ** Package [https://github.com/libsdl-org/sdl12-compat
> > libsdl12-compat] ([https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1960960
> > RH#1960960])
>
> I do have one serious
I've built flatbuffers 2.0.0 in rawhide which bumps the soname to
libflatbuffers.so.2, to my knowledge nothing depends on it so no
rebuilds should be necessary but just an FYI. -ben
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 12:01 PM Matthew Miller
wrote:
>
> > 1. Swap SDL for sdl12-compat: dnf swap
> > SDL sdl12-compat
> >
> > 2. Run something that uses SDL 1.2 like {{package|quake3}} and see
> > that it works.
>
> Or, crucially, IceBreaker.
>
You didn't port to SDL 2 yet? :P
--
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 02:22:31PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SmallerContainerBase
>
> == Summary ==
> This change proposes to remove 3 packages (sssd-client, util-linux,
> shadow-utils) from the Container Base Image (including the minimal
> image). The
Dne 17. 05. 21 v 11:56 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 11:01:39AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 17. 05. 21 v 10:39 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 14. 05. 21 v 16:58 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 10:53 AM Vít Ondruch
wrote:
...
Maintaining a
As a NodeJS package under the new guidelines with bundled dependencies,
npm-name-cli has a long and complicated License field
(https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Node.js/#_bundled_licenses).
The 0BSD license now appears in its bundled dependencies, so it has been added
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210514.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210517.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:8
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 21
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 180
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 21.43 MiB
Size of dropped packages
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SDL12onSDL2
== Summary ==
This Change proposes to replace SDL 1.2 with sdl12-compat, which uses SDL 2.0.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Ngompa| Neal Gompa]]
* Email: ngomp...@gmail.com
== Detailed Description ==
SDL 1.2 development ended long ago, with SDL
Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> The container runtime in the host OS will have configured most mount
> points before the container starts. It would be relatively uncommon
> for processes inside the container image to need to mount additional
> volumes later.
That's fair, but util-linux contains
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 13/194 (x86_64), 14/133 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 12:03:48PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > Or, crucially, IceBreaker.
> You didn't port to SDL 2 yet? :P
PRs welcome. :)
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
> 1. Swap SDL for sdl12-compat: dnf swap
> SDL sdl12-compat
>
> 2. Run something that uses SDL 1.2 like {{package|quake3}} and see
> that it works.
Or, crucially, IceBreaker.
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
___
devel mailing list --
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210516.0):
ID: 888398 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/888398
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 11:01:39AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 17. 05. 21 v 10:39 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> >
> >Dne 14. 05. 21 v 16:58 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
> >>On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 10:53 AM Vít Ondruch
> >> wrote:
> >>...
> Maintaining a separate branch for ELN requires us to
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210516.0):
ID: 888382 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 12:05:25PM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 02:22:31PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SmallerContainerBase
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > This change proposes to remove 3 packages (sssd-client, util-linux,
> > shadow-utils)
Hello,
Next week I'm going to update package aqute-bnd in Fedora rawhide from
version 4.3.1 to version 5.2.0.
The proposed update contains an API change that can affect packages
depending on aqute-bnd. You may need to rebuild your packages to keep
working with updated aqute-bnd.
The update has
Hi,
On 5/17/21 2:26 PM, Martin Kolman wrote:
On Sat, 2021-05-15 at 17:53 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 5/14/21 2:50 PM, Martin Kolman wrote:
On Thu, 2021-05-13 at 20:09 +0200, Peter Boy wrote:
We discussed that in the Fedora Server Edition Working Group and
opted to leave it as is for
On 5/17/21 7:29 PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 17.05.2021 16:19, Ben Cotton wrote:
In order to help move SDL 1.2 games into the modern world, let's
replace SDL 1.2 with sdl12-compat, which uses SDL 2.0.
What about third-party **proprietary** games from Steam for example?
the Steam
On Sat, 2021-05-15 at 17:53 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 5/14/21 2:50 PM, Martin Kolman wrote:
> > On Thu, 2021-05-13 at 20:09 +0200, Peter Boy wrote:
>
> > > We discussed that in the Fedora Server Edition Working Group and
> > > opted to leave it as is for the Server installation iso. A lot
On 17.05.2021 20:50, Jan Drögehoff wrote:
the Steam runtime ships its own SDL 1.2 so I don't think anything will
change on that front
Steam was just an example. There are lots of other proprietary
applications and games without their own runtime.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev
On 5/13/21 9:45 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-05-12 at 16:35 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
>> == Benefit to Fedora ==
>> This change makes the Fedora systems installed by Anaconda more secure
>> from remote password guessing attacks targeting the root account as it
>> would no longer be possible
Hi,
On 5/14/21 1:05 AM, Juha Tuomala wrote:
On Thursday, 13 May 2021 18:50:33 EEST PGNet Dev wrote:
On 5/13/21 10:48 AM, Juha Tuomala wrote:
Virtual machine installation is hopefully a special use case and majority
of installations are bare metal end users.
hardly.
here,
Sure. But this
Hello,
Next week I'm going to update package osgi-core in Fedora rawhide from
version 7.0.0 to version 8.0.0.
The proposed update contains an API change that can affect packages
depending on osgi-core. You may need to rebuild your packages to keep
working with updated osgi-core.
The update has
Hello,
Next week I'm going to update package maven-antrun-plugin in Fedora
rawhide from version 1.8 to version 3.0.0.
The proposed update contains an API change that can affect packages
depending on maven-antrun-plugin. You may need to rebuild your
packages to keep working with updated
I am the Red Hat maintainer for this package in RHEL and CentOS, it has
been requested that I also get added to the Fedora package maintainers so
that I can handle requests like -
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tbb/pull-request/5
As well as a current issue I am working with the upstream
On Mon, 2021-05-17 at 19:29 +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 17.05.2021 16:19, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > In order to help move SDL 1.2 games into the modern world, let's
> > replace SDL 1.2 with sdl12-compat, which uses SDL 2.0.
>
> What about third-party **proprietary** games from Steam
Package rubygem-mercenary has not been updated to 0.4.0, released over a
year ago. Package rubygem-jekyll depends on it and suffers from a bug in
older versions. The maintainer, besser82 has not responded to Bugzilla
comments, nor email to any address I can find on Fedora sites. Thus, I
am
On 17.05.2021 20:53, Benjamin Lowry wrote:
Steam games default to using libraries shipped with the Steam runtime,
which includes both SDL 1.2 and SDL 2.0 and allows games to choose
which to use, so I don't think changing the system version of SDL would
have any impact on propreitary Steam games.
Hello,
Next week I'm going to update package apache-resource-bundles in
Fedora rawhide from version 2 to version 30.
The proposed update contains an API change that can affect packages
depending on apache-resource-bundles. You may need to rebuild your
packages to keep working with updated
Hello,
Next week I'm going to update package testng in Fedora rawhide from
version 6.14.3 to version 7.3.0.
The proposed update contains an API change that can affect packages
depending on testng. You may need to rebuild your packages to keep
working with updated testng.
The update has already
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1960857
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-15d912cf21 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-15d912cf21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961070
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1927309
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1960857
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961070
Bug ID: 1961070
Summary: perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-LibXML-0.26-18.fc35 FTBFS with
libxml2-2.9.12: Failed test at t/05_empty.t line 18
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1960857
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961093
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1783970
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1783970=edit
[patch] Update to 0.8001 (#1961093)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961093
Bug ID: 1961093
Summary: perl-ExtUtils-Depends-0.8001 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-ExtUtils-Depends
Keywords: FutureFeature,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1960607
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961093
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-ExtUtils-Depends-0.8001-1.fc32.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=68113966
--
roundcubemail in epel7 is very old at this point, and can never be
upgraded because epel7 has too old a php.
It's got 10 CVEs open against it.
I'm planning on retiring it later today.
I can mail epel-announce about it...
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
dwrobel commented on the pull-request: `Disable using of mod_perl` that you are
following:
``
> it will be useful have it there, if mod_perl will be broken again.
I don't think we need to bother about that in advance.
``
To reply, visit the link below
Hi team,
I've made the requested changes and improved the tests.
The tests heavily depend on the environment's performance so I won't put
them to the PR CI (it's in tier2 now and it requires to run it with
DB_LOCKS_MONITORING_ACK env. variable)
Please, review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961093
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1960347
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1960969
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
There will be an outage starting at 2021-05-18 17:00UTC,
which will last approximately 2 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2021-05-18 17:00UTC'
Reason for outage:
Host upgrade from Fedora 32 to Fedora
jplesnik commented on the pull-request: `Disable using of mod_perl` that you
are following:
``
> This looks like a small revolution.
> Is this somehow related to
> https://beta.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl5.porters/2021/04/msg259945.html
> and
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SDL12onSDL2
== Summary ==
This Change proposes to replace SDL 1.2 with sdl12-compat, which uses SDL 2.0.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Ngompa| Neal Gompa]]
* Email: ngomp...@gmail.com
== Detailed Description ==
SDL 1.2 development ended long ago, with SDL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1960396
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1960347
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961142
Bug ID: 1961142
Summary: perl-Data-Dumper-2.180 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Data-Dumper
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961142
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
dwrobel commented on the pull-request: `Disable using of mod_perl` that you are
following:
``
This looks like a small revolution.
Is this somehow related to
https://beta.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl5.porters/2021/04/msg259945.html and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961142
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-SOAP-WSDL` that
you are following:
``
Disable using mod_perl
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-SOAP-WSDL/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1960969
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1961166
Referenced Bugs:
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 08:56:06PM +0100, Nick Howitt wrote:
>
>
> On 17/05/2021 19:32, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > roundcubemail in epel7 is very old at this point, and can never be
> > upgraded because epel7 has too old a php.
> >
> > It's got 10 CVEs open against it.
> >
> > I'm planning on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1957176
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-f73776c961 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1960857
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1957176
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-b43c9fc3ec has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1960857
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-b43c9fc3ec has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1957176
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-15d912cf21 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1960857
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-15d912cf21 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/05/18/report-389-ds-base-2.0.4-20210518gitb6d8de51f.fc34.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
74 matches
Mail list logo