[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2021-06-13 - 94% PASS
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/06/13/report-389-ds-base-2.0.5-20210613gitda522d535.fc34.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1971230] New: perl-App-cpm-0.997004 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1971230 Bug ID: 1971230 Summary: perl-App-cpm-0.997004 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-App-cpm Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jples...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.997004 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.997.003-2.fc35 URL: https://metacpan.org/release/App-cpm Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/8399/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Rawhide-20210612.n.1 compose check report
No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 15 of 43 required tests failed, 9 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 88/198 (x86_64), 58/134 (aarch64) ID: 906568 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_hd_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906568 ID: 906569 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_lvm_ext4 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906569 ID: 906570 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_lvm_ext4@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906570 ID: 906571 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906571 ID: 906573 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_btrfs_preserve_home URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906573 ID: 906574 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_btrfs_preserve_home_uefi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906574 ID: 906576 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_standard_partition_ext4 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906576 ID: 906577 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_standard_partition_ext4@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906577 ID: 906578 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_standard_partition_ext4 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906578 ID: 906579 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_standard_partition_ext4@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906579 ID: 906589 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_lvm_ext4 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906589 ID: 906590 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_lvm_ext4@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906590 ID: 906592 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_btrfs_preserve_home URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906592 ID: 906593 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_btrfs_preserve_home_uefi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906593 ID: 906594 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906594 ID: 906596 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906596 ID: 906616 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_updates_nfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906616 ID: 906619 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfsiso_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906619 ID: 906642 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_printing URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906642 ID: 906643 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_update_cli **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906643 ID: 906645 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906645 ID: 906651 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906651 ID: 906652 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_browser **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906652 ID: 906654 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906654 ID: 906663 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_update_cli **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906663 ID: 906664 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906664 ID: 906665 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_terminal **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906665 ID: 906668 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso anaconda_help URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906668 ID: 906680 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_package_install_remove URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906680 ID: 906681 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_service_manipulation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906681 ID: 906682 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_reboot_unmount URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906682 ID: 906683 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906683 ID: 906684 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_selinux URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906684 ID: 906685 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906685 ID: 906686 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_system_logging URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906686 ID: 906687 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_update_cli URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906687 ID: 906696 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_update_cli@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906696 ID: 906698 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906698 ID: 906699
Re: Upcoming soname bumps
On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 7:37 PM Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > On Sat, 12 Jun 2021 at 21:14, Jerry James wrote: > > - python-jupyter-polymake: rebuild due to the polymake soname bump > > This one is noarch though; does it really need a rebuild? You're right. I think I reflexively added that one to the list due to python-jupymake being on there. Okay, strike that one. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Upcoming soname bumps
On Sat, 12 Jun 2021 at 21:14, Jerry James wrote: > > Hello all, > Hi, > It's nearly time for another round of mathematical software updates, > including some soname bumps. I am going to do the following, in this > approximate order: > > - cliquer: update to version 1.22 > - cocoalib: update to version 0.99713 > - ffcall: update to version 2.3 > - memtailor: update to git head for some minor improvements > - pari: build with pthreads support > - primecount: update to version 7.0, which entails an soname bump > - clisp: rebuild due to the ffcall and pari updates > - eclib: rebuild due to the pari update > - giac: rebuild due to the cocoalib and pari updates, and add cliquer support > - L-function: rebuild due to the pari update > - mathic: update to git head for some minor improvements > - normaliz: rebuild due to the cocoalib update > - python-cysignals: update to version 1.10.3 > - mathicgb: update to git head for some minor improvements > - python-cypari2: update to version 2.1.2 > - python-fpylll: update to version 0.5.6 > - python-pplpy: rebuild due to the python-cysignals update > - Singular: update to version 4.2.0, which entails an soname bump > - palp: update to version 2.11 > - polymake: update to version 4.4, which entails an soname bump > - pynac: update to version 0.7.27 > - python-jupymake: rebuild due to the polymake soname bump > - sagemath: update to version 9.3 > - python-jupyter-polymake: rebuild due to the polymake soname bump This one is noarch though; does it really need a rebuild? > - Macaulay2: update to version 1.18 > > I'm still working through some minor issues with Macaulay2 and some > major issues with sagemath, but I hope to have those worked out and > builds ready to go sometime next week. The builds will be done for > Rawhide initially, but the sagemath fans in the Fedora audience > *really* want version 9.3, so if all goes well, I will also update at > least F34, and F33 as well if sufficient pressure is applied to do so. > > Regards, > -- > Jerry James > http://www.jamezone.org/ > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure -- Elliott ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Upcoming soname bumps
Hello all, It's nearly time for another round of mathematical software updates, including some soname bumps. I am going to do the following, in this approximate order: - cliquer: update to version 1.22 - cocoalib: update to version 0.99713 - ffcall: update to version 2.3 - memtailor: update to git head for some minor improvements - pari: build with pthreads support - primecount: update to version 7.0, which entails an soname bump - clisp: rebuild due to the ffcall and pari updates - eclib: rebuild due to the pari update - giac: rebuild due to the cocoalib and pari updates, and add cliquer support - L-function: rebuild due to the pari update - mathic: update to git head for some minor improvements - normaliz: rebuild due to the cocoalib update - python-cysignals: update to version 1.10.3 - mathicgb: update to git head for some minor improvements - python-cypari2: update to version 2.1.2 - python-fpylll: update to version 0.5.6 - python-pplpy: rebuild due to the python-cysignals update - Singular: update to version 4.2.0, which entails an soname bump - palp: update to version 2.11 - polymake: update to version 4.4, which entails an soname bump - pynac: update to version 0.7.27 - python-jupymake: rebuild due to the polymake soname bump - sagemath: update to version 9.3 - python-jupyter-polymake: rebuild due to the polymake soname bump - Macaulay2: update to version 1.18 I'm still working through some minor issues with Macaulay2 and some major issues with sagemath, but I hope to have those worked out and builds ready to go sometime next week. The builds will be done for Rawhide initially, but the sagemath fans in the Fedora audience *really* want version 9.3, so if all goes well, I will also update at least F34, and F33 as well if sufficient pressure is applied to do so. Regards, -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 15 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-1f259a45ef openjpeg2-2.3.1-11.el7 15 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-9eaea6f65c audacious-plugins-4.0.5-4.el7 fluidsynth-2.1.8-4.el7 11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-f706ca6458 radsecproxy-1.9.0-1.el7 9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-8c50b78c57 nginx-1.20.1-2.el7 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing golang-github-cpuguy83-md2man-2.0.0-4.20210612gitaf8da76.el7 google-benchmark-1.5.5-1.el7 radare2-5.3.1-1.el7 Details about builds: golang-github-cpuguy83-md2man-2.0.0-4.20210612gitaf8da76.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-5ab799ce8c) Converts markdown into roff (man pages) Update Information: Initial package for EPEL ChangeLog: google-benchmark-1.5.5-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-97b6c5810e) A microbenchmark support library Update Information: Updated to version 1.5.5. ChangeLog: * Sat Jun 12 2021 Vitaly Zaitsev - 1.5.5-1 - Updated to version 1.5.5. * Mon May 31 2021 Vitaly Zaitsev - 1.5.4-1 - Updated to version 1.5.4. radare2-5.3.1-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-c4678a5e4b) The reverse engineering framework Update Information: bump to 5.3.1 bump to radare2 5.3.0 also fixes CVE-2021-32613 ChangeLog: * Fri Jun 11 2021 Michal Ambroz 5.3.1-1 - bump to 5.3.1 * Wed Jun 9 2021 Michal Ambroz 5.3.0-1 - re-enable build for s390x on EPEL8 (libuv should be available for 8.4) - bump to 5.3.0 - remove radare2-5.2.1-meson_rhel8.patch - accepted upstream - remove radare2-5.2.1-xxhash.patch - accepted upstream * Sat May 15 2021 Michal Ambroz 5.2.1-3 - adding the global plugins directory - for example /usr/lib64/radare2/5.2.1 * Tue May 11 2021 Michal Ambroz 5.2.1-2 - patch for older version of meson used on EPEL8 - use pkgconfig where possible for BR - use ldconfig_scriptlets only on older platforms - add ExcludeArch for s390x on EPEL8 References: [ 1 ] Bug #1959941 - CVE-2021-32613 radare2: double free in pyc parse via creafted file [epel-all] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959941 [ 2 ] Bug #1966400 - radare2-5.3.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1966400 ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-1dd57fe441 radsecproxy-1.9.0-1.el8 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing golang-github-cpuguy83-md2man-2.0.0-4.20210612gitaf8da76.el8 google-benchmark-1.5.5-1.el8 radare2-5.3.1-1.el8 vtk-9.0.1-9.el8 Details about builds: golang-github-cpuguy83-md2man-2.0.0-4.20210612gitaf8da76.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-19acd7694d) Converts markdown into roff (man pages) Update Information: Initial package for EPEL ChangeLog: google-benchmark-1.5.5-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-995b0ae7eb) A microbenchmark support library Update Information: Updated to version 1.5.5. ChangeLog: * Sat Jun 12 2021 Vitaly Zaitsev - 1.5.5-1 - Updated to version 1.5.5. * Mon May 31 2021 Vitaly Zaitsev - 1.5.4-1 - Updated to version 1.5.4. radare2-5.3.1-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-a6e2c9bc8c) The reverse engineering framework Update Information: bump to 5.3.1 re-enable build for s390x on EPEL8 (libuv should be available for 8.4) bump to radare2 5.3.0 also fixes CVE-2021-32613 ChangeLog: * Fri Jun 11 2021 Michal Ambroz 5.3.1-1 - bump to 5.3.1 * Wed Jun 9 2021 Michal Ambroz 5.3.0-1 - re-enable build for s390x on EPEL8 (libuv should be available for 8.4) - bump to 5.3.0 - remove radare2-5.2.1-meson_rhel8.patch - accepted upstream - remove radare2-5.2.1-xxhash.patch - accepted upstream * Sat May 15 2021 Michal Ambroz 5.2.1-3 - adding the global plugins directory - for example /usr/lib64/radare2/5.2.1 References: [ 1 ] Bug #1959941 - CVE-2021-32613 radare2: double free in pyc parse via creafted file [epel-all] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959941 [ 2 ] Bug #1960046 - [EPEL8] radare2 FTBFS for s390x architecture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1960046 [ 3 ] Bug #1966400 - radare2-5.3.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1966400 vtk-9.0.1-9.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-c5e2897787) The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library Update Information: Build for EPEL8 ChangeLog: References: [ 1 ] Bug #1846328 - RFE vtk: epel8 build request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846328 ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Self Introduction: Tiago d'Almeida
Hello everyone! I'm a newbie in these lists, but I have been using the Fedora OS since 2010 (more or less). I'ḿ a primarily web programmer, but I also like to help in open source projects. My presentation begins in this issue thread https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1960053#c10 , where I was asked to be co-maintainer. I hope I can help. Thanks. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Test-Announce] Fedora 35 Rawhide 20210612.n.1 nightly compose nominated for testing
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 35 Rawhide 20210612.n.1. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/testcase_stats/35 You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download locations, and enter results on the Summary page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_35_Rawhide_20210612.n.1_Summary The individual test result pages are: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_35_Rawhide_20210612.n.1_Installation https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_35_Rawhide_20210612.n.1_Base https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_35_Rawhide_20210612.n.1_Server https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_35_Rawhide_20210612.n.1_Cloud https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_35_Rawhide_20210612.n.1_Desktop https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_35_Rawhide_20210612.n.1_Security_Lab Thank you for testing! -- Mail generated by relvalconsumer: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/relvalconsumer ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
review swap: plocate
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931141 I'd be happy to do some reviews in return. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: What are https://src.fedoraproject.org/container ?
On Sat, Jun 12, 2021, 8:01 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 7:54 AM Josh Boyer > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021, 8:35 AM Stephen Gallagher > wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 5:51 AM Richard W.M. Jones > wrote: > >> > > >> > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 09:39:38AM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > >> > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 09:02:47 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > This appeared yesterday: > >> > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/container/libguestfs > >> > > > > >> > > > I'm wondering what it is? > >> > > > >> > > That should be the container image generated from the Fedora > package for > >> > > the Fedora registry: > >> > > > >> > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/containers/ > >> > > >> > So it would be a container built on top of Fedora Rawhide containing > >> > libguestfs? Do we intend to build containers like this from other > >> > Fedora packages? I'm curious what the use case is. > >> > > >> > (NB: this is not an objection to anything, people can build containers > >> > for whatever they want for all I care) > >> > > >> > >> This specific example is to address one of the FESCo concerns about > >> the cloud VM images using btrfs by default. Since RHEL VM host systems > >> cannot read the btrfs filesystem, we want to ship a containerized > >> version of libguestfs that CAN. > > > > > > That can what? As far as I know, libguestfs relies on the host to mount > the filesystem. A container still depends on the host kernel, which means > a rhel VM still isn't going to be able to mount the guest btrfs disk... > > > > At build-time, libguestfs copies the content of the kernel package > along with binaries of various filesystem tools into itself to run a > custom appliance for manipulating VMs. The Fedora-based libguestfs > package can handle Btrfs even on RHEL because it relies on the > binaries of the Fedora kernel and filesystem utilities instead of the > RHEL ones. It will run QEMU and boot up *its* VM to manipulate VM > stuff. That's even how guestfish works for mounting VM disks on the host. > Gotcha. Thanks. josh ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: What are https://src.fedoraproject.org/container ?
On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 7:54 AM Josh Boyer wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021, 8:35 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 5:51 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> > >> > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 09:39:38AM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: >> > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 09:02:47 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> > > > >> > > > This appeared yesterday: >> > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/container/libguestfs >> > > > >> > > > I'm wondering what it is? >> > > >> > > That should be the container image generated from the Fedora package for >> > > the Fedora registry: >> > > >> > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/containers/ >> > >> > So it would be a container built on top of Fedora Rawhide containing >> > libguestfs? Do we intend to build containers like this from other >> > Fedora packages? I'm curious what the use case is. >> > >> > (NB: this is not an objection to anything, people can build containers >> > for whatever they want for all I care) >> > >> >> This specific example is to address one of the FESCo concerns about >> the cloud VM images using btrfs by default. Since RHEL VM host systems >> cannot read the btrfs filesystem, we want to ship a containerized >> version of libguestfs that CAN. > > > That can what? As far as I know, libguestfs relies on the host to mount the > filesystem. A container still depends on the host kernel, which means a rhel > VM still isn't going to be able to mount the guest btrfs disk... > At build-time, libguestfs copies the content of the kernel package along with binaries of various filesystem tools into itself to run a custom appliance for manipulating VMs. The Fedora-based libguestfs package can handle Btrfs even on RHEL because it relies on the binaries of the Fedora kernel and filesystem utilities instead of the RHEL ones. It will run QEMU and boot up *its* VM to manipulate VM stuff. That's even how guestfish works for mounting VM disks on the host. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: What are https://src.fedoraproject.org/container ?
On Thu, Jun 10, 2021, 8:35 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 5:51 AM Richard W.M. Jones > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 09:39:38AM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 09:02:47 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > > > > > This appeared yesterday: > > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/container/libguestfs > > > > > > > > I'm wondering what it is? > > > > > > That should be the container image generated from the Fedora package > for > > > the Fedora registry: > > > > > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/containers/ > > > > So it would be a container built on top of Fedora Rawhide containing > > libguestfs? Do we intend to build containers like this from other > > Fedora packages? I'm curious what the use case is. > > > > (NB: this is not an objection to anything, people can build containers > > for whatever they want for all I care) > > > > This specific example is to address one of the FESCo concerns about > the cloud VM images using btrfs by default. Since RHEL VM host systems > cannot read the btrfs filesystem, we want to ship a containerized > version of libguestfs that CAN. > That can what? As far as I know, libguestfs relies on the host to mount the filesystem. A container still depends on the host kernel, which means a rhel VM still isn't going to be able to mount the guest btrfs disk... What am I missing? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: discord fedora .rpm and repo
It doesnt package discord but a script that does it for you Jun 12, 2021 12:55:32 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel : > On 11.06.2021 20:29, Jan Drögehoff wrote: >> - copr https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/duskmourn/discord > > Non-free software cannot be packaged in COPR too as it violates Fedora legal > policy: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Shareware > > -- > Sincerely, > Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: discord fedora .rpm and repo
On 11.06.2021 20:29, Jan Drögehoff wrote: - copr https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/duskmourn/discord Non-free software cannot be packaged in COPR too as it violates Fedora legal policy: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Shareware -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-34-20210612.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 8/8 (x86_64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210611.0): ID: 906550 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_package_install_remove URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906550 ID: 906551 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_service_manipulation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906551 ID: 906552 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_reboot_unmount URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906552 ID: 906553 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906553 ID: 906554 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_selinux URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906554 ID: 906555 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906555 ID: 906556 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_system_logging URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906556 ID: 906557 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_update_cli URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906557 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210611.0): ID: 906562 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906562 Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: F35FailsToInstall: cmst
Thanks for your information. Regards Martin ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Preventing supply chain attacks via rekor
Am 12.06.21 um 02:51 schrieb Kevin Fenzi: Also, not having it available has made it *very* hard to prioritize getting the issues fixed in DNF. So being able to improve this is predicated on the existence of signed metadata. This seems odd to me. I mean, it can't be hard to setup a test repo, is it? I suspect we could even ask QE folks to do some testing and map out the issues they find. I don't think it's nice/ethical to break users just as a means to make bugs we want to have fixed higher priority. Anyhow, we are pretty off topic for this thread, so I'll try and stop... kevin Does it really hurt someone, if the repos get signed and clients just do not check this by default? Of course, the signing should not break the unchecked repo in any form, which needs a small testcase ;) Best regards, Marius ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Can a package ship with JS code preminified?
Hi Robert-André, Robert-André Mauchin writes: > Hi, > > I remember the guidelines changed recently regarding js code in > packages. Should the code be minified in the spec? Even if the minifier > is not packaged in Fedora (webpack)? Wouldn't that more or less equal to shipping a upstream build binary? Especially given that we cannot verify it with tools shipped in Fedora. Cheers, Dan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-33-20210612.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210611.0): ID: 906539 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906539 ID: 906546 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906546 Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
