https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OapTyDo2hk4
GNOME GTK4 PortInitiative (ISSUE26)
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/Initiatives/-/issues/26
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 2021-10-12 15:37, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to put out a public call for a new primary owner for
ImageMagick[1].
I only picked it up a few years ago to prevent it from being orphaned,
but I no longer have the desire or time to maintain it.
Thanks,
Michael
[1]
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 3:25 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> So to answer Neal's question: you can use PDC directly, or you can use
> fedfind which will talk to PDC for you, plus do a bunch of other stuff,
> like the above, and also synthesizing metadata for pre-Pungi 4 stable
> releases so you can
As reported on last week, an updated Zstd implementation for the Linux kernel
is being re-attempted by Zstd developer Nick Terrell at Facebook. Today he sent
out the latest Zstd kernel patches to provide a much newer version of the code
compared to what is currently mainlined and will provide
Hi,
in testcloud (
https://pagure.io/testcloud/blob/master/f/testcloud/util.py#_100 ), I am
using adam's openqa nightlies.json for rawhide/branched:
https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/nightlies.json (this isn't a "stable api")
and https://getfedora.org/releases.json for stable releases.
For
estion, there more or less *is* an API
for this, yes: PDC - https://pdc.fedoraproject.org/
Specifically, you want the compose-images endpoint:
https://pdc.fedoraproject.org/rest_api/v1/compose-images/
you pass it a compose ID, like this:
https://pdc.fedoraproject.org/rest_api/v1/compose-images/Fed
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20211011.0):
ID: 1025771 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1025771
ID: 1025786
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 09:10:44AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 11. 10. 21 v 20:14 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> >>Nothing is broken **now**. But it very often broke N+1 or N+2
> >>upgrade. I remember some package broken N+5 upgrade. And then you
> >>(or some co-maintainer)
Hi everybody,
There seems to be some inconsistency with how our update workflow
currently works. When an update gets enough positive karma "pre-push"
(still in "pending → testing" state) so that it can be pushed to
stable, bodhi changes its state to ("pending → stable"), making it
skip the
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 09:55:05PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 11. 10. 21 21:41, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 08:17:36PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>On 11. 10. 21 20:14, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >>>On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 08:21:51AM +0200,
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211011.0):
ID: 1024366 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On 12/10/21 00:37, Bojan Smojver via devel wrote:
> Could someone with sufficient permissions please get httpd package unstuck in
> bodhi?
>
> It's been sitting there for a few days, waiting to get to stable, but it
> keeps getting kicked out, because some automated tests did not pass. The
>
Dne 11. 10. 21 v 20:14 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
Nothing is broken **now**. But it very often broke N+1 or N+2
upgrade. I remember some package broken N+5 upgrade. And then you
(or some co-maintainer) hesitated to add it to
fedora-obsolete-packages because "it is too old".:)
That's
Correct, it will effect all dnf operations
Jaroslav
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 9:57 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 11. 10. 21 21:10, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 2:49 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 3:03 PM Miro Hrončok
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I've checked the
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 9:12 AM Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
>
> Correct, it will effect all dnf operations
>
So then drop the "_on_upgrade" part? "weakexclude_unsatisfied_weakdeps"
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list --
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 09:14:21AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 9:12 AM Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
> >
> > Correct, it will effect all dnf operations
> >
>
> So then drop the "_on_upgrade" part? "weakexclude_unsatisfied_weakdeps"
Or maybe "exclude_old_unsatisfied_weak_deps" ?
My colleague told me a very nice argument when we discussed the name of the
option. There is no way to name it by the way that everyone will understand
it, therefore let's make it simple. Anyway I will discuss it in the team
Jaroslav
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 3:15 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue,
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211011.0):
ID: 1024966 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 7:54 AM Michal Ruprich wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am planning to start a retirement process for quagga in Fedora. The
> package is very outdated since the upstream is dead for a couple of
> years. There is a replacement in the form of FRR that can be used in a
> very similar
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Make_Authselect_Mandatory
== Summary ==
This change wants to make authselect required to configure
authentication and identity sources and forcefully update
non-authselect configuration to the sssd authselect profile to
eliminate any existing non-authselect
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 9:48 AM Artem Tim wrote:
>
> Noticed this a long time ago when in freeze stage and this could a serious
> issue sometimes. BTW please push flatpak 1.12.1 update to Stable manually
> since people still complain and stuck with 1.12.0.
This is not a place to request random
Hi Dimitry,
Just came across a situation where I can't limit SFTP max connections on a
per user (not per IP) basis without resorting to using wrappers. Not sure
if the old SCP actually logs in (sorry haven't checked) but the SFTP that I
use (latest RHEL7) doesn't honour limits.conf (maxlogins or
Hi,
I am planning to start a retirement process for quagga in Fedora. The
package is very outdated since the upstream is dead for a couple of
years. There is a replacement in the form of FRR that can be used in a
very similar fashion and it has active upstream with a lot of
development going on.
Yes it is correct. Supplements that are not installed during the first
install, cannot be installed anymore with enabled autodetection. There is
no way to calculate it correctly without storing all provides at the time
of installation for each package.
Jaroslav
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 8:52 AM
Getting mine on Thursday or Friday this week
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 3:29 PM Michael J Gruber
wrote:
> Today that special package for Nest participants arrived here.
> Back then I thought: "Nice, a few stickers." Today, after opening the
> package, I thought: "Woah!". [ No spoilers here ;) ]
>
On 10/1/21 12:57 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 9:43 AM Richard W.M. Jones mailto:rjo...@redhat.com>> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 08:03:07PM -0700, Tom Stellard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm going to start packaging LLVM 13.0.0-final for rawhide and f35. The
>
Got mine the other day. It is really a lot of cool things Fedora.
Thanks to the Sponsors of this years Nest.
Looking forward to the release party in November!
Stephen
On Tue, 2021-10-12 at 13:29 +, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> Today that special package for Nest participants arrived here.
>
You are right. I'm supper wondering it did as great job :)
On 10/11/21 15:32, Ian McInerney via devel wrote:
I think if you jump more than 2 versions at a time the packages obsoleted by fedora-obsolete-packages might not be picked up properly because it only holds packages for about 2 versions
Today that special package for Nest participants arrived here.
Back then I thought: "Nice, a few stickers." Today, after opening the package,
I thought: "Woah!". [ No spoilers here ;) ]
So, thanks to anyone who made possible Nest as well as this form of community
appreciation!
[posting it here
OLD: Fedora-35-20211011.n.0
NEW: Fedora-35-20211012.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 8
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Fedora Source-git SIG on 2021-10-13 from 14:30:00 to 15:30:00 GMT
At meet.google.com/mic-otnv-kse
The meeting will be about:
Bi-weekly meeting of the Fedora source-git SIG
Agenda:
Understood. Filed a bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013168#c1.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On 12. 10. 21 10:35, Fabio Valentini wrote:
Hi everybody,
There seems to be some inconsistency with how our update workflow
currently works. When an update gets enough positive karma "pre-push"
(still in "pending → testing" state) so that it can be pushed to
stable, bodhi changes its state to
Noticed this a long time ago when in freeze stage and this could a serious
issue sometimes. BTW please push flatpak 1.12.1 update to Stable manually since
people still complain and stuck with 1.12.0.
___
devel mailing list --
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 5:54 PM Jerry James wrote:
>
> The ELN package builds for the recent OCaml 4.13 update have mostly
> been failing, over and over. I finally took a look at some today;
> they're going to keep failing until a human intervenes. Rebuilding
> against Rawhide packages was
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 11:33 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> === 1. It is difficult to deliver updates to configurations ===
> FIles /etc/nsswitch.conf and /etc/pam.d/* are distributed as
> %config(noreplace) which means that they are configuration files and
> are only installed if they are not yet
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 9/204 (x86_64), 6/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20211011.n.0):
ID: 1024569 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_master
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1024569
ID: 1024578 Test:
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20211010.0):
ID: 1025442 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1025442
ID: 1025456 Test: x86_64
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 1:13 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
>
> This change is well-considered and includes detailed reasoning to
> support it. Looks good to me.
>
> I think the change proposal should be renamed, though, since authselect
> would clearly not *actually* be mandatory. Of course
Hey all,
I'm working on extending quickemu[1] to be able to easily spin up
Fedora VMs, but our lack of a static URL formula for fetching ISOs
makes this a bit difficult.
Do we have some kind of API endpoint that has the necessary
information for this? It'd be nice to be able to fetch some kind
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211011.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211012.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 92
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 2.86 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
On Tue, Oct 12 2021 at 01:44:12 PM -0400, Neal Gompa
wrote:
Why hasn't the nsswitch.conf situation been fixed to work in
/usr/share like it does in /etc?
Guess: probably nobody proposed it to the glibc developers yet.
Michael
___
devel mailing
This change is well-considered and includes detailed reasoning to
support it. Looks good to me.
I think the change proposal should be renamed, though, since authselect
would clearly not *actually* be mandatory. Of course you'll risk severe
breakage if you turn it off and edit these
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 6/206 (x86_64), 7/132 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211011.n.0):
ID: 1025071 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso
Hi all,
I would like to put out a public call for a new primary owner for
ImageMagick[1].
I only picked it up a few years ago to prevent it from being orphaned, but I no
longer have the desire or time to maintain it.
Thanks,
Michael
[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ImageMagick
I'm doing a review of a MinGW build of a Qt 6 package:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009214
During the license check portion of the review, I have become
increasingly convinced that our qt5-* and qt6-* packages have
incorrect License fields. Currently they have "LGPLv2 with
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 10:44:14PM -0500, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am Maxwell G or @gotmax23 on FAS and Github. I am relatively new to
> Linux but after trying different distros, I settled on Fedora. I don't
> have a lot of time between school and having chronic pain, but
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 6:09 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> OK, for the short term, I'm just going to tag the Rawhide builds of
> ocaml packages into ELN. If you want me to do a mini-mass-rebuild for
> ELN after that, let me know.
I do not have any particular need for a mini-mass-rebuild. If
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917521
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917521
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980682
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980682
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2012875
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-ec1a9e7532 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2012875
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-3b8d7416ae has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829902
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829902
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-d640ea3bbe has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-d640ea3bbe
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-dd446b153c
libopenmpt-0.5.12-1.el8
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
libtraceevent-1.2.1-1.el8
Details about builds:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2012875
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Graphics-TIFF-17-1.fc3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013055
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2012875
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|ppi...@redhat.com |
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2012875
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-ad9e7cff8b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-ad9e7cff8b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2012875
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-ec1a9e7532 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-ec1a9e7532
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2012875
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-3b8d7416ae has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-3b8d7416ae
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Make_Authselect_Mandatory
== Summary ==
This change wants to make authselect required to configure
authentication and identity sources and forcefully update
non-authselect configuration to the sssd authselect profile to
eliminate any existing non-authselect
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2021-10-13 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
A general agenda is the following:
#meetingname
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2012875
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
66 matches
Mail list logo
