On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 6:36 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 04:23:46PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > I'm trying to log into COPR but when I press submit it just stays at the
> > login page and doesn't forward me back to COPR.
>
> This email looks a few hours old? What exact
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 04:23:46PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I'm trying to log into COPR but when I press submit it just stays at the
> login page and doesn't forward me back to COPR.
This email looks a few hours old? What exact time were you seeing the
problems?
It's very likely it was
On Wed, 2021-10-13 at 18:53 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> I can pick this up as a provenpackager tomorrow if this has been
> requested and accepted as an FE for F35 and the maintainers haven't
> done anything yet.
Thanks, I have proposed this as a Freeze Exception:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 6:29 PM Davide Cavalca via devel
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> the jq package currently has an unfortunate issue with handling large
> integers:
>
> $ echo '{"a":9011153322235679}' | jq '.a'
> 9011153322235680
>
> I reported this in
Hello,
the jq package currently has an unfortunate issue with handling large
integers:
$ echo '{"a":9011153322235679}' | jq '.a'
9011153322235680
I reported this in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2008979
a while ago and put up a PR at
I'm trying to log into COPR but when I press submit it just stays at the
login page and doesn't forward me back to COPR.
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2008958
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|rt-4.4.5-4.fc33 |rt-4.4.5-4.fc33
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2008957
Bug 2008957 depends on bug 2008958, which changed state.
Bug 2008958 Summary: CVE-2021-38562 rt: User enumeration through a timing
side-channel attack [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2008958
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2008958
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||rt-4.4.5-4.fc33
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980682
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-418ea72cb3 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917521
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-2ff97582b0 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829902
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-afa95e1cc4 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021, at 1:52 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I'm working on extending quickemu[1] to be able to easily spin up
> Fedora VMs, but our lack of a static URL formula for fetching ISOs
> makes this a bit difficult.
>
> Do we have some kind of API endpoint that has the necessary
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20211012.0):
ID: 1027076 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1027076
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests
Hello Maxwell,
Thanks for the welcome. Here is the bugzilla link:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013796
Cheers!
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, October 13th, 2021 at 14:31, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) via devel
wrote:
> Oct 13, 2021 2:29:10 PM Robby Callicotte
Oct 13, 2021 2:29:10 PM Robby Callicotte via devel
:
> Hello all,
>
> I am a long time Linux user (Mandrake 7.0, Fedora Core) and I want to
> contribute to the project. As part of my dayjob, I build rpm packages with a
> private koji instance as part of our internal deliverables pipeline.
Hello all,
I am a long time Linux user (Mandrake 7.0, Fedora Core) and I want to
contribute to the project. As part of my dayjob, I build rpm packages with a
private koji instance as part of our internal deliverables pipeline. I have
created a package for salt-lint, an ansible-lint like
On 13/10/2021 15:44, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
Why rawhide and F35 and not F34?
Random issue due to the different builders.
Anything I can do in the SPEC to fix this?
Try this:
%ifarch %{arm}
%global _smp_build_ncpus 1
%endif
If it will not help, you can also try this:
%ifarch %{arm}
%global
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980682
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829902
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917521
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
On Wed, 2021-10-13 at 14:45 -0400, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 2:21 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> > Unfortunately, we lack a usable equivalent for releases, though that's
> > good to know for Rawhide.
>
> For that I use the following URL format string:
>
>
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 2:21 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> Unfortunately, we lack a usable equivalent for releases, though that's
> good to know for Rawhide.
For that I use the following URL format string:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 2:14 PM Ken Dreyer wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 3:26 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> > Hanging over all of this is the threat that PDC might go away at some
> > point, which would be a bit of an inconvenience. In A World Where there
> > is no PDC, you have to grab the
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 3:26 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Hanging over all of this is the threat that PDC might go away at some
> point, which would be a bit of an inconvenience. In A World Where there
> is no PDC, you have to grab the metadata files for composes that still
> exist from kojipkgs;
On Wed, 2021-10-13 at 08:11 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 2:42 PM Frantisek Zatloukal
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > in testcloud (
> > https://pagure.io/testcloud/blob/master/f/testcloud/util.py#_100 ), I am
> > using adam's openqa nightlies.json for
Hi,
Workstation working group was tracking this:
#241 Re-revisit Fedora Workstation minimums
https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/241
But to answer the questions, I think we need to broaden the
conversation, hence this email.
Only Fedora Workstation edition explicitly states minimum
On Wed, Oct 13 2021 at 06:06:50 PM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser
wrote:
What you describe as lto requires a lot of memory is caused by
building
lto along with non-lto in the same object file requires significantly
more memory. For that reason one can disable building non-lto along
with lto
Thanks, Björn, Dan and Fabio for your comments.
On Wed, 13 Oct 2021 at 18:20, Björn 'besser82' Esser
wrote:
>
> Am Mittwoch, dem 13.10.2021 um 16:51 +0200 schrieb Björn 'besser82'
> Esser:
> > Am Mittwoch, dem 13.10.2021 um 15:44 +0200 schrieb Iñaki Ucar:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > RStudio is failing
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 7/204 (x86_64), 8/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20211012.n.0):
ID: 1026602 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_master
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1026602
ID: 1026615 Test:
Due to outstanding blocker bugs[1], we do not have an F35 Final RC. As
a result, F35 Final is NO-GO by default and tomorrow's Go/No-Go
meeting is cancelled.
The next Fedora Linux 35 Final Go/No-Go meeting[2] will be held at
1700 UTC on Thursday 21 October in #fedora-meeting. We will aim for
the
Due to outstanding blocker bugs[1], we do not have an F35 Final RC. As
a result, F35 Final is NO-GO by default and tomorrow's Go/No-Go
meeting is cancelled.
The next Fedora Linux 35 Final Go/No-Go meeting[2] will be held at
1700 UTC on Thursday 21 October in #fedora-meeting. We will aim for
the
Building with lto disabled is a bad idea, as Fedora intentionally
enabled lto by default.
What you describe as lto requires a lot of memory is caused by building
lto along with non-lto in the same object file requires significantly
more memory. For that reason one can disable building non-lto
Am Mittwoch, dem 13.10.2021 um 16:51 +0200 schrieb Björn 'besser82'
Esser:
> Am Mittwoch, dem 13.10.2021 um 15:44 +0200 schrieb Iñaki Ucar:
> > Hi,
> >
> > RStudio is failing consistently on armv7l on F35 [1, 2] and rawhide
> > [3, 4] with this message (memory exhausted). The same build on the
>
Hi Iñaki,
Iñaki Ucar writes:
> Hi,
>
> RStudio is failing consistently on armv7l on F35 [1, 2] and rawhide
> [3, 4] with this message (memory exhausted). The same build on the
> same machine (CPU and RAM) succeeds on F34 [5]. Any clue what's going
> on? Why rawhide and F35 and not F34? Anything
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 3:45 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> RStudio is failing consistently on armv7l on F35 [1, 2] and rawhide
> [3, 4] with this message (memory exhausted). The same build on the
> same machine (CPU and RAM) succeeds on F34 [5]. Any clue what's going
> on? Why rawhide and F35
Am Mittwoch, dem 13.10.2021 um 15:44 +0200 schrieb Iñaki Ucar:
> Hi,
>
> RStudio is failing consistently on armv7l on F35 [1, 2] and rawhide
> [3, 4] with this message (memory exhausted). The same build on the
> same machine (CPU and RAM) succeeds on F34 [5]. Any clue what's going
> on? Why
On 2021-10-13 05:13, Troy Curtis Jr wrote:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021, 10:14 PM Luya Tshimbalanga
wrote:
On 2021-10-12 15:37, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to put out a public call for a new primary owner for
> ImageMagick[1].
>
> I only
Hi,
RStudio is failing consistently on armv7l on F35 [1, 2] and rawhide
[3, 4] with this message (memory exhausted). The same build on the
same machine (CPU and RAM) succeeds on F34 [5]. Any clue what's going
on? Why rawhide and F35 and not F34? Anything I can do in the SPEC to
fix this?
[1]
On Wed, Oct 13 2021 at 10:22:14 AM +0200, Hans de Goede
wrote:
Making what IMHO is a poor default of always using sssd everywhere
hardcoded even deeper into Fedora seems like a bad idea to me.
I think we can fix this at the same time. Make authselect default to
its minimal profile rather
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 35 Branched 20211013.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Wednesday, 13 October 2021 at 14:39, Stephen Snow wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-10-13 at 14:33 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
[...]
> I got the email with tracking info two days prior to arrival of swag.
> but in between reg and ship, no communication.
Alright, I'll remain patient
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 02:33:19PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Wednesday, 13 October 2021 at 13:08, Luna Jernberg wrote:
> > You had to register at a website during the event,
>
> That I did. On August 7th, I received an e-mail with a promo code to
> enter at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013643
Bug ID: 2013643
Summary: perl-Net-STOMP-Client-2.4 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Net-STOMP-Client
Keywords: FutureFeature,
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20211012.0):
ID: 1026546 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1026546
ID: 1026561
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013637
Bug ID: 2013637
Summary: perl-Directory-Queue-2.1 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Directory-Queue
Keywords: FutureFeature,
On Wed, 2021-10-13 at 14:33 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 13 October 2021 at 13:08, Luna Jernberg wrote:
> > You had to register at a website during the event,
>
> That I did. On August 7th, I received an e-mail with a promo code to
> enter at
On Wednesday, 13 October 2021 at 13:08, Luna Jernberg wrote:
> You had to register at a website during the event,
That I did. On August 7th, I received an e-mail with a promo code to
enter at https://coolstuff.redhat.com/promo/fedora which I did, but I
haven't heard from them since.
> got an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013631
Bug ID: 2013631
Summary: perl-Messaging-Message-1.7 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Messaging-Message
Keywords: FutureFeature,
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021, 10:14 PM Luya Tshimbalanga
wrote:
>
> On 2021-10-12 15:37, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I would like to put out a public call for a new primary owner for
> > ImageMagick[1].
> >
> > I only picked it up a few years ago to prevent it from being orphaned,
> >
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 2:42 PM Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> in testcloud (
> https://pagure.io/testcloud/blob/master/f/testcloud/util.py#_100 ), I am
> using adam's openqa nightlies.json for rawhide/branched:
> https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/nightlies.json (this isn't a "stable
On 10/12/21 4:13 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 7:54 AM Michal Ruprich wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am planning to start a retirement process for quagga in Fedora. The
>> package is very outdated since the upstream is dead for a couple of
>> years. There is a replacement in the form of
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211012.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211013.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 98
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 141.80 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 9:05 PM Reon Beon via devel
wrote:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OapTyDo2hk4
>
> GNOME GTK4 PortInitiative (ISSUE26)
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/Initiatives/-/issues/26
I just want to say: cool video! I like this method of demoing the work
that the team has
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007254
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-POE-Component-SSLify-1
You had to register at a website during the event, got an email with
tracking information from both Fedex and Red Hat
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 1:06 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 12 October 2021 at 16:03, Luna Jernberg wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 12,
On Tuesday, 12 October 2021 at 16:03, Luna Jernberg wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 3:29 PM Michael J Gruber
> wrote:
>
> > Today that special package for Nest participants arrived here.
> > Back then I thought: "Nice, a few stickers." Today, after opening the
> > package, I thought: "Woah!". [
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005844
--- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth ---
Koschei builds of perl-GD are working again:
https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-GD?collection=f36
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005844
Bug 2005844 depends on bug 2005916, which changed state.
Bug 2005916 Summary: Version 2.3.3 disables gd/gd2 support by default, breaking
perl-GD and perl-GDGraph test suites
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005916
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013579
Bug ID: 2013579
Summary: perl-Encode-3.16 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Encode
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211012.0):
ID: 1026108 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 10:59 AM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki <
s...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > In the docs there is a section about Claiming Ownership of an Orphaned
> Package
> You were looking almost in the right place. There's a separate section
> about claiming retired packages. [1]
>
I missed
> In the docs there is a section about Claiming Ownership of an Orphaned Package
You were looking almost in the right place. There's a separate section about
claiming retired packages. [1]
tl;dr: If it was retired for more than 8 weeks, it needs to go through the
Package Review process again.
Hello folks!
I would like to become a maintainer/packager of package scrot [1] that was
dropped [2] last year. (Disclaimer: I have experience with maintaining some
packages in COPR but not with actually maintaining packages in the official
Fedora repos. I'm completely new to this.)
In the docs
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 10:49 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 12. 10. 21 10:35, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > There seems to be some inconsistency with how our update workflow
> > currently works. When an update gets enough positive karma "pre-push"
> > (still in "pending →
Hi,
On 10/12/21 5:32 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Make_Authselect_Mandatory
>
> == Summary ==
> This change wants to make authselect required to configure
> authentication and identity sources and forcefully update
> non-authselect configuration to the sssd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007254
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||CPAN 139684
--
You are receiving this
Dne 12. 10. 21 v 17:45 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 11:33 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
=== 1. It is difficult to deliver updates to configurations ===
FIles /etc/nsswitch.conf and /etc/pam.d/* are distributed as
%config(noreplace) which means that they are configuration files and
are
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211012.0):
ID: 1025863 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On Tue, 2021-10-12 at 19:12 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 3:25 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> >
> > So to answer Neal's question: you can use PDC directly, or you can use
> > fedfind which will talk to PDC for you, plus do a bunch of other stuff,
> > like the above, and also
70 matches
Mail list logo
