Re: Any interest in ROCm packaging?

Am 17.12.21 um 02:39 schrieb Jeremy Newton: Well I think OpenCL would be a good starting point since it's been around for a while and lots of applications use it. Also I'd be interested in using pytorch (installed via pip) on my AMD system. Years ago when Tom Stellard started to package

Re: When is Firefox on Wayland Going to be the Default On KDE

On 12/16/21 06:44, Reon Beon via devel wrote: I don't want to run MOZ_ENABLE_WAYLAND=1 firefox from the command line forever. It's default on Fedora 35, isn't it? Please file a bug at https://bugzilla.redhat.com if it doesn't work for you. Thanks. -- Martin Stransky Software Engineer / Red

Re: Self-introduction: Evžen Gasta

Welcome Evžen! On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 at 09:13, Benson Muite wrote: > On 12/16/21 12:01 PM, evzen...@seznam.cz wrote: > > Hello, > > > > My name is Evžen Gasta and I live in Czech Republic. > > Currently I'm studying FIT VUT in Brno. > > > > I'm developing New Generation of Fedora MediaWriter as

Fedora-Cloud-34-20211216.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211215.0): ID: 1087301 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Re: Request for sponsorship in fedora-contributor group

Hi Kevin I didn't find a link to create a new page. Could it be that I don't have edit access? At the bottom of: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Project_Wiki the page says: Note that you'll need a Fedora account and to be in at least one Fedora subproject group on that account to make

RE: Request for sponsorship in fedora-contributor group

> From: Roberto Sassu via devel [mailto:devel@lists.fedoraproject.org] > Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2021 9:25 AM > Hi Kevin > > I didn't find a link to create a new page. Could it be > that I don't have edit access? At the bottom of: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Project_Wiki > >

Re: Self-introduction: Evžen Gasta

On 12/16/21 12:01 PM, evzen...@seznam.cz wrote: Hello, My name is Evžen Gasta and I live in Czech Republic. Currently I'm studying FIT VUT in Brno. I'm developing New Generation of Fedora MediaWriter as my Bachelor's thesis.  About which am I also writing a blog. Welcome. MediaWriter is a

Re: When is Firefox on Wayland Going to be the Default On KDE

On 16/12/2021 06:44, Reon Beon via devel wrote: I don't want to run MOZ_ENABLE_WAYLAND=1 firefox from the command line forever. sudo dnf install firefox-wayland Always use Firefox Wayland shortcut. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)

Fedora-Cloud-35-20211216.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211215.0): ID: 1087117 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Self-introduction: Evžen Gasta

Hello, My name is Evžen Gasta and I live in Czech Republic. Currently I'm studying FIT VUT in Brno. I'm developing New Generation of Fedora MediaWriter as my Bachelor's thesis.   About which am I also writing a blog.  I'm using Fedora KDE for 3 years so far. I've learned about Fedora project

Re: When is Firefox on Wayland Going to be the Default On KDE

It's default on Fedora 35, isn't it? Please file a bug at https://bugzilla.redhat.com if it doesn't work for you. I'll file a ticket (if someone was not faster). Looks a similar ticket was already filed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996921

CPE Weekly Update – Week of December 13th – 17th

Hi everyone, This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering) Team. If you have any questions or feedback, please respond to this report or contact us on #redhat-cpe channel on libera.chat (https://libera.chat/). If you wish to read this in form of a discourse post (or on our

Re: When is Firefox on Wayland Going to be the Default On KDE

On 12/16/21 14:02, Jaroslav Prokop wrote: Hi, On 12/16/21 09:56, Martin Stransky wrote: On 12/16/21 06:44, Reon Beon via devel wrote: I don't want to run MOZ_ENABLE_WAYLAND=1 firefox from the command line forever. I just edit the file at `/usr/bin/firefox` on every update. Not the most

Re: The great Mailman 3 / Hyperkitty upgrade: bumping flufl-lock and mistune?

On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 at 05:51, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 14. 12. 21 23:29, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > > Hi all, > > - epel-packagers-sig (collaborator, epel* branches) for helping to > >bootstrap on new EL releases > > Fine by me, although I prefer actual maintainers to be responsible

Re: When is Firefox on Wayland Going to be the Default On KDE

Hi, On 12/16/21 09:56, Martin Stransky wrote: On 12/16/21 06:44, Reon Beon via devel wrote: I don't want to run MOZ_ENABLE_WAYLAND=1 firefox from the command line forever. I just edit the file at `/usr/bin/firefox` on every update. Not the most comfortable but at least I don't have to go to

Re: rust-find-crate

On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 7:55 AM Rémi Lauzier via devel wrote: > > A few months ago, i have open RHBZ#1983762 to include rust-find-crate in > fedora because i need it for rust-palette_derive. But now it seem to have > been integrate by another person without mentioning me that my bug was been >

Re: rust-find-crate

On Thursday, December 16, 2021 8:51:44 AM CST Fabio Valentini wrote: > Among other reasons, this is why I started to use fedora-create-review > (from the fedora-review package) to submit my Package Review tickets, > because it checks if a review request for the package already exists, > before

Re: F36 Change: Enable fs-verity in RPM (System-Wide Change proposal)

> On Wed, Dec 15, 2021, at 1:45 PM, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > Hmm. Some interesting stuff going on there but I would have started with a > new SELinux > access vector. That'd allow fine-grained constraints, e.g. disallowing > `init_t` but > allowing `unconfined_service_t`. Possibly also

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20211216.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211215.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211216.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 14 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 124 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 9.36 MiB Size of dropped packages

Fedora-Rawhide-20211216.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 20 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 97/228 (x86_64), 67/159 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed

Re: Any interest in ROCm packaging?

On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 05:07:10PM -, Jeremy Newton wrote: > I see there's a few packages already, and I'm hoping to help with some > internal processes to make ROCm more distro friendly, such as better FHS > compliance, clearer licensing, etc. > > Anyone interested? I would be happy to try to

Heads-up: trousers (TPM 1.2) silently orphaned

Hi all, `trousers` got silently orphaned around the time an EPEL9 branch for it was requested: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032258 Looks like we're slowly uncoupling ourselves from it, e.g. - for ARM, uboot-tools no longer pulls in vboot-utils which pulls in trousers:

Re: Any interest in ROCm packaging?

I maintain the now-deprecated pure-Python “rocm-smi” package, and I’ve looked a few times at packaging rocm_smi_lib[1] to replace it, but the kinds of distro-friendliness issues you mention, e.g. [2][3], have so far been more than I was willing to work around. I was also partially dissuaded

Any interest in ROCm packaging?

Full disclosure, I am both a Fedora packager and an employee at AMD. To be clear, the following is not at all endorsed by my employer; my interest and use of Fedora is purely a personal hobby and I would like to keep it that way. There has been a recent effort to step up Debian packaging of

Mock v2.16 release, mock-core-configs v36.4

Hello! I'm glad I can announce that we have a new release of Mock. See the full release notes [1]. The major change that happened is the removal of 'epel-8' config files, as a follow-up for [2] discussion (and of course on *devel lists, big thanks to everyone for the discussion). Note that

Re: Any interest in ROCm packaging?

On 12/16/21 09:07, Jeremy Newton wrote: Full disclosure, I am both a Fedora packager and an employee at AMD. To be clear, the following is not at all endorsed by my employer; my interest and use of Fedora is purely a personal hobby and I would like to keep it that way. There has been a recent

Recent python-pytest-cov update in F34/F35 causes many FTBFS

It looks like python-pytest-cov was recently updated to 3.0.0 in F35[1] and F34[2]. I noticed this because, between my own packages and those maintained through @neuro-sig, I saw a wave of FTBFS notifications from Koschei. Unfortunately, because packages commonly pin a particular major

Re: When is Firefox on Wayland Going to be the Default On KDE

"Looks a similar ticket was already filed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996921; Yes it would be nice to remove firefox-wayland and re-enable the script for KDE/sway. Thanks. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: When is Firefox on Wayland Going to be the Default On KDE

> Hi, > > On 12/16/21 09:56, Martin Stransky wrote: > I just edit the file at `/usr/bin/firefox` on every update. Not > the most > comfortable but at least > I don't have to go to terminal for running firefox. > > I'll file a ticket (if someone was not faster). > > I am afraid it is not

F36 Change: Golang 1.18 (System-Wide Change proposal)

Note that this replaces the approved Golang 1.17 Change https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/golang1.18 == Summary == Rebase of Golang package to upcoming version 1.18 in Fedora 36, including the rebuild of all dependent packages(the pre-release version of Go will be used for the rebuild if

Re: F36 Change: Enable fs-verity in RPM (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 12/12/21 8:26 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: > >> Some more questions about how the verification happens… IIUC, I need to >> load some keys to the kernel keyring, and then set >> fs.verity.require_signatures. >> >> Where do the keys come from? How are the keys

Re: Review request to fix FailsToInstall: mingw-qt6-qtshadertools

On 16.12.21 00:31, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 10:58:24PM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi I'd need mingw-qt6-qtshadertools reviewed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009221 mingw-qt6-qtdeclarative, which is currently FailsToInstall, grew a dependency on

F36 Change: DIGLIM (System-Wide Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DIGLIM == Summary == Digest Lists Integrity Module (DIGLIM) provides a repository of file digests from authenticated sources, such as RPM headers, to be used by kernel services for remote attestation and/or secure boot at application level. == Owner == *

Re: Any interest in ROCm packaging?

For anyone else wondering: https://rocmdocs.amd.com/en/latest/index.html AMD ROCm is the first open-source software development platform for HPC/Hyperscale-class GPU computing. AMD ROCm brings the UNIX philosophy of choice, minimalism and modular software development to GPU computing.

Re: Recent python-pytest-cov update in F34/F35 causes many FTBFS

On 16. 12. 21 20:09, Ben Beasley wrote: It looks like python-pytest-cov was recently updated to 3.0.0 in F35[1] and F34[2]. I noticed this because, between my own packages and those maintained through @neuro-sig, I saw a wave of FTBFS notifications from Koschei. Unfortunately, because

FedoraRespin-35-updates-20211201.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Soas live x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 3/67 (x86_64), 1/18 (aarch64) ID: 1084171 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade upgrade_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1084171 ID: 1084192 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade upgrade_desktop_64bit@uefi

Re: Packaging pgAdmin4

On 12/10/21 6:56 AM, Sandro Mani wrote: > On 10.12.21 01:54, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: >> On 12/9/21 1:05 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: >>> On 09.12.21 17:31, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 09/12/2021 16:56, Sandro Mani wrote: > This does not appear to be accurate for nodejs packages - take

FedoraRespin-35-updates-20211216.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Soas live x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 1/46 (x86_64) ID: 1088228 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1088228 Soft failed openQA tests: 2/46 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) ID:

Re: HEADS UP: Update to tesseract-5.0.0 in rawhide

On 12/15/21 4:11 AM, Michael J Gruber wrote: Are you planning to bring these to F35, as well? Tesseract-5.0.0 appears to be mostly a bugfix release along with some other improvements, so I dunno (and haven't tested so far - the heads up was a few hours before the push). Sorry to pile on but

Re: Any interest in ROCm packaging?

> On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 05:07:10PM -, Jeremy Newton wrote: > > I think that'd be awesome -- and those internal clean-ups are really > appreciated. Having the infrastructure there is nice, but I'm also curious: > are there any application-level tools that are in Fedora Linux already or >

Re: Any interest in ROCm packaging?

Yeah I think the technical leads are mostly on board with following FHS as close as possible, which is an obvious plus for Fedora. I think the biggest issue is the scale of the problem, and it almost feel likes they need to work component by component, but [2] will definitely be fixed for all

Re: Recent python-pytest-cov update in F34/F35 causes many FTBFS

It turns out that while a couple of packages I care about were actually broken by the bump to 3.0, most of them were instead broken by the update failing to install on F34[1]. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201 On 12/16/21 14:09, Ben Beasley wrote: It looks like

Re: When is Firefox on Wayland Going to be the Default On KDE

Reon, On 2021-12-17 08:17, Reon Beon via devel wrote: "Looks a similar ticket was already filed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996921; Yes it would be nice to remove firefox-wayland and re-enable the script for KDE/sway. +1 P. -- Philip Rhoades PO Box 896 Cowra NSW 2794

[Bug 2032452] perl-Test-Perl-Critic for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032452 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value

[Bug 2033227] Please branch and build perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033227 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2032452 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 2033226] Please branch and build perl-Test-Object for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033226 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2032452 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 2033001] perl-Module-Install-CheckLib-0.14 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033001 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[EPEL-devel] Re: Requesting branches for epel9

On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 6:26 AM Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 06:31:04AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > Where is that checklist? I found > > I don't know myself. > > Fair -- a lot of this stuff is individual experience and wisdom that we > haven't recorded, but need

[Bug 2033001] perl-Module-Install-CheckLib-0.14 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033001 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-f71d0d86bd has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-f71d0d86bd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 2033073] Please branch and build perl-Test-MemoryGrowth for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033073 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Doc Type|---

[Bug 2033227] New: Please branch and build perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033227 Bug ID: 2033227 Summary: Please branch and build perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect for EPEL-9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component:

[Bug 2033001] perl-Module-Install-CheckLib-0.14 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033001 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1744782] (RFE) EPEL8 branch of perl-Crypt-SSLeay

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744782 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #9 from

[Bug 2033226] New: Please branch and build perl-Test-Object for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033226 Bug ID: 2033226 Summary: Please branch and build perl-Test-Object for EPEL-9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: perl-Test-Object Assignee:

[Bug 2033073] Please branch and build perl-Test-MemoryGrowth for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033073 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2032452 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 2033001] perl-Module-Install-CheckLib-0.14 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033001 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-aef35c3282 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-aef35c3282 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 2030601] mod_perl in EPEL9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030601 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment

[Bug 2031488] branch request: perl-ZMQ-Constants for epel8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031488 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 2026088] perl-CPAN-2.29 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2026088 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug 2032857] please branch and build perl-Module-Install-CheckLib for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032857 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Module-Install-CheckLi

[Bug 2031486] branch request: perl-XML-Hash-LX for epel8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031486 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||2033327 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 2031486] branch request: perl-XML-Hash-LX for epel8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031486 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|jples...@redhat.com |ppi...@redhat.com -- You are

[Bug 2033327] New: Add perl-lib-abs to EPEL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033327 Bug ID: 2033327 Summary: Add perl-lib-abs to EPEL8 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-lib-abs Keywords: FutureFeature Assignee:

[Bug 2033073] Please branch and build perl-Test-MemoryGrowth for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033073 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 2031486] branch request: perl-XML-Hash-LX for epel8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031486 Saad changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value

[Bug 2031488] branch request: perl-ZMQ-Constants for epel8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031488 Saad changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|ppi...@redhat.com |jples...@redhat.com -- You are receiving

[Bug 2033327] Add perl-lib-abs to EPEL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033327 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar

[Bug 2033314] perl-Net-DNS-1.33 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033314 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1846577 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1846577=edit Update to 1.33 (#2033314) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

[Bug 2033314] New: perl-Net-DNS-1.33 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033314 Bug ID: 2033314 Summary: perl-Net-DNS-1.33 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Net-DNS Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 2033314] perl-Net-DNS-1.33 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033314 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of perl-Net-DNS-1.33-1.fc34.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=80085127 -- You are

[Bug 2031486] branch request: perl-XML-Hash-LX for epel8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031486 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||200 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 2033330] New: perl-lib-abs for EPEL 8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200 Bug ID: 200 Summary: perl-lib-abs for EPEL 8 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: perl-lib-abs Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter:

[Bug 2033327] Add perl-lib-abs to EPEL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033327 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jples...@redhat.com --- Comment

[Bug 2031486] branch request: perl-XML-Hash-LX for epel8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031486 Bug 2031486 depends on bug 200, which changed state. Bug 200 Summary: perl-lib-abs for EPEL 8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 2033330] perl-lib-abs for EPEL 8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 2033349] New: perl-Test-Modern for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033349 Bug ID: 2033349 Summary: perl-Test-Modern for EPEL 9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: perl-Test-Modern Assignee: p...@city-fan.org

[Bug 2033348] New: perl-Sub-Infix for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033348 Bug ID: 2033348 Summary: perl-Sub-Infix for EPEL 9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: perl-Sub-Infix Assignee: rc040...@freenet.de

[EPEL-devel] Heads-up: trousers (TPM 1.2) silently orphaned

Hi all, `trousers` got silently orphaned around the time an EPEL9 branch for it was requested: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032258 Looks like we're slowly uncoupling ourselves from it, e.g. - for ARM, uboot-tools no longer pulls in vboot-utils which pulls in trousers:

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2021-12-15 20:36:11 UTC From 1a1dfda6223d67beb93abdf3a75c0cc3e9d1afc6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jan 30 2020 01:09:44 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (epel9). "Perl 5.30 rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2021-12-15 20:36:11 UTC From 2a63f8167f2ba255f3ce7a7626012375e61581bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: May 31 2019 05:31:50 + Subject: Perl 5.30 rebuild --- diff --git a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec index 8565b44..ae13c9c 100644

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2021-12-15 20:36:11 UTC From 592b7121deb7ca4bdb42b4cf9427c75128cd4968 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jul 26 2019 03:47:34 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2021-12-15 20:36:11 UTC From edf9a82152fc2e3993c1c46fd2e87a879bfe10e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Feb 08 2018 21:56:40 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2021-12-15 20:36:11 UTC From 6431451a1c14540df448c1b83c498f7a13b6ded6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jul 28 2020 16:20:40 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (epel9). "Update to 1.3 (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2021-12-15 20:36:11 UTC From 7344b951f09c4b41d8b4ff34561a98a599e768b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Jan 04 2021 17:57:59 + Subject: Update to 1.3 - New upstream release 1.3 - Do not leak memory on unsuccessful recv - Use %license

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (epel9). "Perl 5.32 rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2021-12-15 20:36:11 UTC From 7919426af89d9375552ec2d6db4dd52dd61b8843 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Jun 23 2020 08:55:07 + Subject: Perl 5.32 rebuild --- diff --git a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec index 3e2f623..b2d31fa 100644

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (epel9). "Use author-independent source URL"

Notification time stamped 2021-12-15 20:36:11 UTC From f62ede90dc0c84b06d27e6222ff9200465a4e913 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Sep 28 2019 18:45:41 + Subject: Use author-independent source URL --- diff --git a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec index

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Mass_Rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2021-12-15 20:36:11 UTC From 5c41eba4272fd68f29d3842d3db5d98fe82ab93b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Feb 11 2017 03:34:50 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Mass_Rebuild --- diff --git

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (epel9). "Initial import (perl-IO-FDPass-1.1-3) (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2021-12-15 20:36:11 UTC From e757b89eafe88bc49756924dd70dd93e902b8c15 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Sep 22 2016 14:09:52 + Subject: Initial import (perl-IO-FDPass-1.1-3) This small low-level module only has one purpose: pass a file descriptor

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (epel9). "cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN "

Notification time stamped 2021-12-15 20:36:11 UTC From 59f2aa14a5a296720914ba8b57e99c39fe80c536 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jun 04 2018 12:54:46 + Subject: cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN --- diff

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2021-12-15 20:36:11 UTC From 2568770f6aa834d3efc2c89d4c568ea005931b1b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jul 27 2017 04:24:29 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild --- diff --git

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2021-12-15 20:36:11 UTC From 5cb0f29fa55f14ce246cbc073b8b64591b20722d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jul 13 2018 17:54:53 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2021-12-15 20:36:11 UTC From d41466f100f6f71eb826aa2bf0f6f74a2ee9cb99 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Feb 01 2019 21:26:00 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Binutils_Mass_Rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2021-12-15 20:36:11 UTC From 4a4adb0e03b52e136662b5e64826007caf145925 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Aug 03 2017 05:23:33 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Binutils_Mass_Rebuild --- diff --git

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (epel9). "Perl 5.26 rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2021-12-15 20:36:11 UTC From 9833f773d7f2e3fc51fa0122c8fc8d4c4294b954 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Jun 04 2017 17:25:00 + Subject: Perl 5.26 rebuild --- diff --git a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec index e3585b2..9ddfef8 100644

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (epel9). "perl dependency renamed to perl-interpreter "

Notification time stamped 2021-12-15 20:36:11 UTC From 1f939576c95752d85886932929a1f2dbfba76719 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jul 12 2017 12:31:05 + Subject: perl dependency renamed to perl-interpreter

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (epel9). "Perl 5.28 rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2021-12-15 20:36:11 UTC From f333fe8cc19cf2c0297434ce5c38d13a309ecadb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Jun 28 2018 04:36:31 + Subject: Perl 5.28 rebuild --- diff --git a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec index d86b57e..9b562aa 100644

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (epel9). "Update to 1.2 (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2021-12-15 20:36:11 UTC From c08042c2c66203bc1a4290d7f32fe4dd49ea401b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Sep 25 2016 17:04:56 + Subject: Update to 1.2 - New upstream release 1.2 - Compatibility macros were still using C++ syntax, fortunately only

[Bug 2033436] New: Please branch and build perl-Coro-Multicore for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033436 Bug ID: 2033436 Summary: Please branch and build perl-Coro-Multicore for EPEL-9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: perl-Coro-Multicore Assignee:

[Bug 2033439] Please branch and build perl-CBOR-XS for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033439 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value

[Bug 2032440] perl-JSON-MaybeXS for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032440 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||2033439 Referenced Bugs:

  1   2   >