On 1/9/22 14:43, None Business wrote:
I use(d) fedora to run my IDEs ( c++), now it is all floating-contracting
windows , with gazilion 'drag-your-window' nonsense . I guess I am not cool
enough to use this clusterfu..k, it is simply unusable for me , so I am looking
for something that looks
On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 10:56:50PM +0200, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
>
> Ok, I start to see this better now. I was under the impression that both
> FE-NEEDSPONSOR and the tracker were on equal footing and generally speakin,
> receive similar attention from the sponsors. But, if the reason for having
On Sun, Jan 9, 2022 at 6:58 PM Peter Boy wrote:
>
>
>
> > Am 10.01.2022 um 00:25 schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia :
> >
> > ... it has gotten out of hand.
>
> Indeed. When Gnome 3 hit Fedora years ago, I tried hard, but then decided
> heavy heartedly to switch all my desktops and laptops to macOS. It
> Am 10.01.2022 um 00:25 schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia :
>
> ... it has gotten out of hand.
Indeed. When Gnome 3 hit Fedora years ago, I tried hard, but then decided heavy
heartedly to switch all my desktops and laptops to macOS. It has remained that
way until today. But I’m happy with Fedora
Thank you, and what about EPEL8 build failure? Such branch is not
affected by that bug
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81021476
Thank you
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Sun, Jan 9, 2022 at 6:02 PM Peter Boy wrote:
> > Am 09.01.2022 um 23:43 schrieb None Business :
> >
> > I use(d) fedora to run my IDEs ( c++), now it is all floating-contracting
> > windows , with gazilion 'drag-your-window' nonsense . I guess I am not cool
> > enough to use this
> Am 09.01.2022 um 23:43 schrieb None Business :
>
> I use(d) fedora to run my IDEs ( c++), now it is all floating-contracting
> windows , with gazilion 'drag-your-window' nonsense . I guess I am not cool
> enough to use this clusterfu..k, it is simply unusable for me , so I am
> looking for
I use(d) fedora to run my IDEs ( c++), now it is all floating-contracting
windows , with gazilion 'drag-your-window' nonsense . I guess I am not cool
enough to use this clusterfu..k, it is simply unusable for me , so I am looking
for something that looks like early Fedora to simplify my
I use(d) fedora to run my IDEs ( c++), now it is all floating-contracting
windows , with gazilion 'drag-your-window' nonsense . I guess I am not cool
enough to use this clusterfu..k, it is simply unusable for me , so I am looking
for something that looks like early Fedora to simplify my
I use(d) fedora to run my IDEs ( c++), now it is all floating-contracting
windows , with gazilion 'drag-your-window' nonsense . I guess I am not cool
enough to use this clusterfu..k, it is simply unusable for me , so I am looking
for something that looks like early Fedora to simplify my
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038692
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from
On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 16:52:29 +0100
Germano Massullo wrote:
> Good day. darktable maintainer here.
> I am experiencing a ppc64le build failure on F34 and EPEL8, EPEL8-next only.
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81021540
>
Igor Raits kirjoitti 9.1.2022 klo 13.24:
Hello,
I'm interested to hear if there are any users of the `starship'
application here in Fedora that consume it from the repositories.
Please speak up if you do!
I use it, too.
___
devel mailing list --
Notification time stamped 2022-01-09 13:35:06 UTC
From bbc788a5b9447fc7a4178dcf97f8891ad0fb84e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Jan 09 2022 13:34:01 +
Subject: Update to 1.049
- New upstream release 1.049
- Fix a link in the README.pod
- Add patch to fix test failures
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038576
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038204
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038692
--- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth ---
(In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #1)
> xavierb already is "admin" and BZ-contact for epel.
>
> I've added you, Paul, as "collaborator".
Probably not necessary this time as Xavier is doings lots
I used to until two days ago, when I switched to this COPR repo with a most
recent version:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/atim/starship/
On Sun, 9 Jan 2022, at 12:24, Igor Raits wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I saw some recent discussions (yet another time) how packaging Rust /
> Go / Node.js
Good day. darktable maintainer here.
I am experiencing a ppc64le build failure on F34 and EPEL8, EPEL8-next only.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81021540
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81021476
On F34 the error is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038692
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
---
I use it as well straight from the repos :) !
❯ starship --version
starship 0.56.0
branch:
commit_hash:
build_time:2021-09-30 12:45:52
build_env:rustc 1.55.0 (Fedora 1.55.0-1.fc35),
I'm not very familiar with rust packaging (though I do know and use rust
itself), but I could try to do some
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038692
Bug ID: 2038692
Summary: Please branch and build perl-Lingua-EN-Sentence for
EPEL-9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036510
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036496
--- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth ---
Will you be able to branch and build perl-Test-Trap in epel9?
I would be happy to be a co-maintainer if you do not wish
to build it on epel9.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
Yes, here is mine :)
starship-0.56.0-4.fc35.x86_64
Name : starship
Version : 0.56.0
Release : 4.fc35
Architecture : x86_64
Size : 5.4 M
Source : rust-starship-0.56.0-4.fc35.src.rpm
Repository : @System
From repo : updates
Summary : Minimal,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038673
Bug ID: 2038673
Summary: perl-App-Cme-1.035 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-App-Cme
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Yup! I get my starship straight from the repos.
On Sun, 9 Jan, 2022, 4:55 pm Igor Raits, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I saw some recent discussions (yet another time) how packaging Rust /
> Go / Node.js is horrible, we should simply bundle everything and such.
> Let's not discuss this here, though.
>
>
Hello,
I saw some recent discussions (yet another time) how packaging Rust /
Go / Node.js is horrible, we should simply bundle everything and such.
Let's not discuss this here, though.
I'm interested to hear if there are any users of the `starship'
application here in Fedora that consume it from
Il 08/01/22 23:41, Jerry James ha scritto:
> On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 6:37 AM Mattia Verga via devel
> wrote:
>> `E: shared-library-without-dependency-information
>> /usr/lib64/libapogee.so.3.2`
>> I'm not sure if this is a rpmlint false positive. All I can found
>> searching is an issue in rpmlint
On 08. 01. 22 10:37, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello packagers,
I intent to rebuild the following packages with libffi 3.4 in Rawhide side tag
f36-build-side-49314 today.
The previous version remains available as libffi13.1, so failures to build will
not result in uninstallable packages.
You
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220108.0):
ID: 1099021 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220108.0):
ID: 1099005 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
32 matches
Mail list logo
