No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220202.0):
ID: 1118600 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On Thu, 2022-02-03 at 10:09 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Richard W. M. Jones:
>
> > Thinking about this a bit more, the implementation of this feature
> > simply seems to be wrong. RPM already has a final stage where it
> > strips ELF files and builds debuginfo. Why wasn't the addition of
>
Hi list,
tl;dr: Why is the Fedora ID server using HTTP communication by default?
Some context:
I was debugging a login process for the www.softwarecollections.org
website, which utilizes Fedora ID. After pulling my hair for a bit,
it turned out that the somewhere along the network road,
any
On Thu, 2022-02-03 at 16:22 +0100, Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 09:26:09AM -0500, Simo Sorce napsal(a):
> > On Thu, 2022-02-03 at 15:15 +0100, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > > V Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 08:56:20AM -0500, Simo Sorce napsal(a):
> > > > On Thu, 2022-02-03 at 10:09 +0100, Florian
Eh, i missed this time due Nvidia lag with 510 driver update. But rpm fusion
folks already built [1] it so i hope it will appears in repos very soon.
[1]: https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=21262
___
devel mailing list --
V Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 08:56:20AM -0500, Simo Sorce napsal(a):
> On Thu, 2022-02-03 at 10:09 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Richard W. M. Jones:
> >
> > > Thinking about this a bit more, the implementation of this feature
> > > simply seems to be wrong. RPM already has a final stage where it
On Thu, 2022-02-03 at 15:15 +0100, Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 08:56:20AM -0500, Simo Sorce napsal(a):
> > On Thu, 2022-02-03 at 10:09 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > * Richard W. M. Jones:
> > >
> > > > Thinking about this a bit more, the implementation of this feature
> > > >
V Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 12:13:11PM +, Ian McInerney via devel napsal(a):
> I am trying to install a bodhi update that was pushed to testing last night
> (https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-20f36a8b0e), and I am
> using the DNF line it gives me but seeing this string instead:
>
On 03. 02. 22 16:53, Jiri Vanek wrote:
Tag in the older gcc into your side tag, do the rebuilds, untag it?
I'm in favour of doing this as most strightforward solution.
I'm failing to judge all consequences.
There are some obstacles. It might not be just gcc that needs tagging in. It's
Hi,
the koji build of Carla-2.4.1-4.fc35.src.rpm [1] fails for F35[2] and rawhide
[3]
DEBUG util.py:444: No matches found for the following disable plugin patterns:
local, spacewalk, versionlock
DEBUG util.py:444: No matching package to install: 'freetype-devel(x86-32)'
DEBUG util.py:444:
On 03/02/2022 15:15, Petr Pisar wrote:
You can disable embedding the package notes by undefining _package_note_file
This is not a fix. Package notes implementation should not touch linker
flags.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
Hi Jonathan-
The issue isn’t the variable, really, it’s the functions that are
used in the macros. I ran a scratch build on koji so you can see the
errors in question:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=82338440
The build log shows the issue when trying to build block.cpp
Beginning next week, the Fedora Prioritized Bugs meetings will be held
on alternate Wednesdays at 10:00 AM US/Eastern (currently 1500 UTC)[1]
in #fedora-meeting-1. This is one hour earlier than the previous time.
For more information on the Prioritized Bugs process, see the docs[2].
[1]
Hey All,
This has been the best Kernel Test Week[0] ever!
Here's the TLDR
Total tests run: 510
Total testers: 143
Non x86 tests: 40
Non x86 testers: 8
Scaling up and retaining contributors has always been a goal for the
Fedora QA community.
This success is credited to the strong community and
V Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 09:26:09AM -0500, Simo Sorce napsal(a):
> On Thu, 2022-02-03 at 15:15 +0100, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > V Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 08:56:20AM -0500, Simo Sorce napsal(a):
> > > On Thu, 2022-02-03 at 10:09 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > > * Richard W. M. Jones:
> > > >
> > > > >
On 03. 02. 22 10:02, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 03:56:32PM -0500, James Antill wrote:
= Open Floor =
For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. The
report of the agenda items can be found at:
I am trying to install a bodhi update that was pushed to testing last night
(https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-20f36a8b0e), and I am
using the DNF line it gives me but seeing this string instead:
$ sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-20f36a8b0e
On February 3, 2022 6:28:33 PM UTC, Michael Kuhn
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>jetbrains-mono-fonts is scheduled for retirement due to not building
>since Fedora 33. I have opened a PR some time ago, fixing this problem:
>https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/jetbrains-mono-fonts/pull-request/2
>However, the
* Michael Catanzaro:
> I have the following i686-only WebKitGTK build failure in rawhide [1]:
>
> ninja: build stopped: stat(lib/libWebCoreGTK.a): Value too large for
> defined data type.
>
> Based on [2], I assume the problem is that either ar or ranlib is not
> built with large file support.
Hi everyone,
My name is Julien Rische. I'm from north-east France.
I joined the Red Hat IdM team last month to take part in the development of
FreeIPA, especially its Kerberos components. I will be contributing upstream
and participating to the maintenance of these packages for Fedora.
I am
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 11:08 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 03. 02. 22 16:53, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> >>
> >> Tag in the older gcc into your side tag, do the rebuilds, untag it?
> >
> > I'm in favour of doing this as most strightforward solution.
> > I'm failing to judge all consequences.
>
> There
On 03. 02. 22 16:36, Simo Sorce wrote:
No. krb5-libs will miss its notes. But python-gssapi will contain its correct
notes. (Provided python-gssapi links to krb5-libs dynamically. I don't know
whether the notes only record a source package name the ELF file belongs to,
or whether they try to
Hi Dan,
thanks for the information! I just found similar statements in the
"List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in March" thread, which
I didn't see before sending my previous e-mail. Let's see whether he
replies; if not, I will follow up with a FESCo issue.
FYI: I forgot to CC nim in
On 03. 02. 22 15:53, Martin Gansser wrote:
Hi,
the koji build of Carla-2.4.1-4.fc35.src.rpm [1] fails for F35[2] and rawhide
[3]
DEBUG util.py:444: No matches found for the following disable plugin patterns:
local, spacewalk, versionlock
DEBUG util.py:444: No matching package to install:
Hi,
I have the following i686-only WebKitGTK build failure in rawhide [1]:
ninja: build stopped: stat(lib/libWebCoreGTK.a): Value too large for
defined data type.
Based on [2], I assume the problem is that either ar or ranlib is not
built with large file support. Does this seem correct?
On 02. 02. 22 17:15, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
How do I solve this?
I need to update to a new version of python-gssapi but I cvan't build
it right now.
There is a similar bug against krb5:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048909
I guess we need to fix krb5 this way too.
Not
On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 06:38:11PM +, Ian McInerney via devel wrote:
>
> I guess it was a mirror caching issue. I tried again just now and it picked
> up the update just fine. I didn't think the updates-testing repo was
> mirrored though, but it is very annoying that the mirror sync and the
Hi,
jetbrains-mono-fonts is scheduled for retirement due to not building
since Fedora 33. I have opened a PR some time ago, fixing this problem:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/jetbrains-mono-fonts/pull-request/2
However, the maintainer seems to be inactive at the moment. I would be
happy to
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 1:15 PM Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 12:13:11PM +, Ian McInerney via devel napsal(a):
> > I am trying to install a bodhi update that was pushed to testing last
> night
> > (https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-20f36a8b0e), and I
> am
> >
Here’s a question: what if the following was added to stdatomic.h at the end of
the file:
#else
#include_next
#endif // C++23
Since the rest of the file is gated by C++23, this allows C++ programs that
reference this header to have a chance to pick up the Clang one, if it exists.
If Clang
On 2/3/22 16:47, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 03. 02. 22 16:06, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 2:32 PM Jiri Vanek wrote:
Hello Fesco
As the branching of f36 get close, java had to fall to troubles.
After the last GCC mass rebuild, jdk11 is no longer buildable on i686.
We had a
On 02. 02. 22 17:36, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Still the same fallout from that rage quit ...
Do we have @nim on record saying they are no longer interested in maintaining
their Fedora packages? If so, I'd like to get them orphaned, so we know where
are the problematic packages before we have
On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 05:22:44PM -, Julien Rische wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> My name is Julien Rische. I'm from north-east France.
>
> I joined the Red Hat IdM team last month to take part in the development of
> FreeIPA, especially its Kerberos components. I will be contributing upstream
>
On 2/3/22 17:39, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 02. 02. 22 17:36, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Still the same fallout from that rage quit ...
Do we have @nim on record saying they are no longer interested in
maintaining their Fedora packages? If so, I'd like to get them orphaned,
so we know where are
On Thu, Feb 3 2022 at 02:06:19 PM -0600, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
For now, I'll test dropping down to -g0, but even this will be a
temporary solution ta best. (I don't know if that will work or not
yet. Will try now.)
BTW this seems to have worked. I had to drop the debuginfo packages
too,
> On 03. 02. 22 16:36, Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> I've just tried to build python-gssapi with notes enabled after krb5 was
> fixed
> and it builds fine.
>
> See https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-gssapi/pull-request/4
It looks like it's not the first time that krb5-config causes issues
Jan 22, 2022 10:07:29 AM Fabio Valentini :
> Hi everybody,
>
> The Rust SIG and I have been waiting for responses from Olivier (FAS:
> olem) for a while. I had noticed that their Rust packages started
> accumulating FTBFS / FTI / release-monitoring bugs, as we get CCd on
> those bugzillas.
Hello all,
I first mentioned a couple of months ago that I would like to retire
from maintaining mathematical packages in Fedora, so that I can focus
on code analysis and formal methods packages. Thank you to those who
responded and took some of those packages from me. I still have quite
a pile
> On 3 Feb 2022, at 09:45, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 02. 02. 22 v 21:59 Michel Alexandre Salim napsal(a):
>>> On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 06:41:16PM +0100, Alain Vigne wrote:
>>> My problem is : I don't know how to debug in the mock environment. (But, I
>>> should persevere: there is always a
Some background:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043092
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/WZKX43VDK4R7BJMA3DEPOHY35RHMGDRX/#O4RK2PKCLU5GD4BTRFARUFOG2W465GS3
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 03:56:32PM -0500, James Antill wrote:
> = Open Floor =
>
> For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. The
> report of the agenda items can be found at:
>
> https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues?status=Open=meeting
Is this meeting a good
* Richard W. M. Jones:
> Thinking about this a bit more, the implementation of this feature
> simply seems to be wrong. RPM already has a final stage where it
> strips ELF files and builds debuginfo. Why wasn't the addition of
> package notes done there?
The package notes are in an allocatable
Dne 02. 02. 22 v 21:59 Michel Alexandre Salim napsal(a):
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 06:41:16PM +0100, Alain Vigne wrote:
My problem is : I don't know how to debug in the mock environment. (But, I
should persevere: there is always a solution, you proved it to me ;)
Try `mock shell`.
I think
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220202.0):
ID: 1118617 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041074
--- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth ---
Looks like a Stalled EPEL Package ticket will be needed here.
Robert, do you want to co-maintain?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030601
--- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar ---
(In reply to Andrew Bauer from comment #4)
> I'll take the entire project. My FAS account is kni.
>
Great to hear there is somebody willing to maintain mod_perl. Do you want only
EPEL, or also Fedora?
> It
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041074
--- Comment #4 from Robert Scheck ---
(In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #3)
> Robert, do you want to co-maintain?
Yes, makes sense due to the dependency chain.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050084
Bug ID: 2050084
Summary: Upgrade perl-Set-Object to 1.42
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Set-Object
Assignee: kra...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050091
Bug ID: 2050091
Summary: perl-CGI-4.54 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-CGI
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041074
--- Comment #5 from Paul Howarth ---
Stalled EPEL package ticket:
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10612
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041074
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049898
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Bauer ---
That's interesting, because my Copr builds of mod_perl were failing yesterday
due to this package being missing from the CentOS Stream 9 repository.
I wonder if that was just a mirror sync issue?
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049731
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-a3d0a9fa80 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-a3d0a9fa80
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049731
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049731
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-007978fe30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-007978fe30
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049898
--- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth ---
(In reply to Andrew Bauer from comment #2)
> That's interesting, because my Copr builds of mod_perl were failing
> yesterday due to this package being missing from the CentOS Stream 9
> repository.
> I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045029
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Image-ExifTool-12.38-1 |perl-Image-ExifTool-12.38-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044851
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044825
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Unicode-MapUTF8-1.14-2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044825
Bug 2044825 depends on bug 2044851, which changed state.
Bug 2044851 Summary: Please branch and build perl-Unicode-Map8 for EPEL-9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044851
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031807
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Net-OAuth-0.28-27.el9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031812
Bug 2031812 depends on bug 2039077, which changed state.
Bug 2039077 Summary: perl-Authen-Simple-Passwd for EPEL 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039077
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037243
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045028
Bug 2045028 depends on bug 2045029, which changed state.
Bug 2045029 Summary: CVE-2022-23935 perl-Image-ExifTool: lib/Image/ExifTool.pm
in ExifTool before 12.38 mishandles a $file =~ /\|$/ check [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045029
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Image-ExifTool-12.38-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045029
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Image-ExifTool-12.38-1 |perl-Image-ExifTool-12.38-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039505
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039077
Bug 2039077 depends on bug 2038269, which changed state.
Bug 2038269 Summary: perl-Authen-Simple for EPEL 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038269
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038269
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039077
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046233
Bug 2046233 depends on bug 2046206, which changed state.
Bug 2046206 Summary: Please branch and build perl-TeX-Hyphen for EPEL-9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046206
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046206
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046228
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Text-Reform-1.20-32.el
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046233
Bug 2046233 depends on bug 2046228, which changed state.
Bug 2046228 Summary: Please branch and build perl-Text-Reform for EPEL-9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046228
What|Removed |Added
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-f96cb2d539
dislocker-0.7.3-2.el8 mbedtls-2.28.0-2.el8 nekovm-2.3.0-2.el8
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-c11b187333
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021149
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044096
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049731
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049731
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-007978fe30 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045029
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Image-ExifTool-12.38-1 |perl-Image-ExifTool-12.38-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043770
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Net-HTTP-6.22-1.fc35 |perl-Net-HTTP-6.22-1.fc35
80 matches
Mail list logo
