* Daniel P. Berrangé:
> Yes, I wouldn't bother thinking about cross compilation using Fedora,
> except for mingw. For Linux cross compilation it is easier to use
> Debian in a container from your Fedora host.
>
> You can install library / devel packages from any Debian architecture
> no matter
Hi,
I use wine and steam (and some libraries which are required to run them) with
total of 254 i686 packages.
Matyáš
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220316.0):
ID: 1179359 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
Hello, Luya.
On Thursday, 17 March 2022 at 04:20, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Hello team, it looks like 'pkgconfig(portaudiocpp) >= 12' is missing in
> EPEL9 repository while available in EPEL8.
>
> See https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=84302098
>
> Could someone port that
* Richard W. M. Jones:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 07:27:05PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>> Native compilation on 32-bit is a dead end.
>
> And I was going to add that this is wrong - 32 bit chroots running on
> 64 bit hosts work fine and run at full speed.
No, not for everyone, they don't.
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 11:10:12AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Richard W. M. Jones:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 07:27:05PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> >> Native compilation on 32-bit is a dead end.
> >
> > And I was going to add that this is wrong - 32 bit chroots running on
> > 64
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 6:25 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 11:10:12AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Richard W. M. Jones:
> >
> > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 07:27:05PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > >> Native compilation on 32-bit is a dead end.
> > >
> > > And
Em sex., 11 de mar. de 2022 às 18:42, Jerry James
escreveu:
>
> HI Paulo,
Hi Jerry,
> It's great to hear from you. I hope you are well.
Sorry for again taking a bit long to respond :( I have sagemath 9.5 built
locally for almost a month, but I will not interfere with your work right
now,
> On Thu, 2022-03-10 at 00:15 +0200, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
>
> Continuing I brought the corrections to Fedora 36
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-db793ad26c
>
> Now only 4 packages more gtk1+ depends on glib
>
> Depending packages (rawhide) (5): bubblemon gtk+ manedit
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 07:27:05PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> Native compilation on 32-bit is a dead end.
And I was going to add that this is wrong - 32 bit chroots running on
64 bit hosts work fine and run at full speed. (Or 32 bit VMs, but you
need to still build kernel.i686 which we
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220316.0):
ID: 1179343 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 09:54:12AM -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
> If you use i686 packages for something now, please respond to this thread.
(1) To compile 32 bit binaries using gcc -m32.
Note that I don't actually care about using these binaries, I use them
only to run the test suite for
Dne 07. 03. 22 v 19:12 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
I watched it over the weekend, and now it's only 3 days behind. ;(
Hopefully it will finish catching up... I'm continuing to watch it.
It eventually caught up and I have received the notifications on time up
until 2022-03-16 15:49:09 UTC. After
On Wednesday, March 16, 2022 1:06:34 PM CET Neal Gompa wrote:
> > For completeness, here is a pull request by Miro Hrončok to change the
> > packaging of curl to something that FESCO would like to have for the
> > proposed Fedora change to be accepted:
> >
> >
> >
> >
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 07:27:05PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> On 3/16/22 10:35, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> > David Cantrell writes:
> >
> >> Why? Since the removal of the i686 kernel in Fedora, we want to
> >> reduce the number of i686 packages provided in the repo. As time
> >> marches
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 09:07:50AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 07:27:05PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > On 3/16/22 10:35, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> > > David Cantrell writes:
> > >
> > >> Why? Since the removal of the i686 kernel in Fedora, we want to
> > >>
OLD: Fedora-36-20220316.n.0
NEW: Fedora-36-20220317.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 8
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
V Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 12:34:52PM +0100, Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> What has the PDC [1] ever done for us? It only bough pain and misery to me
> for no apparent benefit.
>
>
> 1) When we retire packages in dist-git, PDC creates another layer of delay
> between dist-git and Koji and another place
The i686 packages I use are: gamemode, gperftools-devel (to provide a working
version of libtcmalloc_minimal), SDL2, steam, and their dependencies.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Am 16.03.22 um 14:54 schrieb David Cantrell:
If you use i686 packages for something now, please respond to this thread.
mainly for Wine 32 bit compatibility, which is still a think with
windows-software today :(
Best regards,
Marius
___
devel
I use wine and would need 32bit gstreamer; base, good, bad, ugly and libav for
some Visual Novels that use MPEG for video.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora
Dne 14. 03. 22 v 23:23 John Reiser napsal(a):
The default /etc/dnf/dnf.conf lists only a few options
with no individual documentation, and contains no explicit pointer
to more documentation. I expect better: all reasonable attempts
should lead quickly to the relevant documentation. This is the
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 3:09 PM Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 12:34:52PM +0100, Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> > What has the PDC [1] ever done for us? It only bough pain and misery to
> me
> > for no apparent benefit.
> >
> >
> > 1) When we retire packages in dist-git, PDC creates
Hi,
> > +1 on cross-compilation. Native compilation on 32-bit is a dead end.
>
> Cross-compilation isn't really practical for RPMs the way we do things
> now. We would have to go all-in the way OpenSUSE has done, but that's
> a huge change.
cross builds is a thing for kernel and firmware
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 6:25 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 11:10:12AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Richard W. M. Jones:
> >
> > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 07:27:05PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > >> Native compilation on 32-bit is a dead end.
> > >
> > > And
Dne 17. 03. 22 v 12:34 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
Where is the sanitation, medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, a fresh water system, and public
health that the PDC have done for us?
ABRT uses PDC to (automaticaly) determine which release is active, what Fedora
versions
Hello Fedora packagers.
What has the PDC [1] ever done for us? It only bough pain and misery to me for
no apparent benefit.
1) When we retire packages in dist-git, PDC creates another layer of delay
between dist-git and Koji and another place when synchronization regularly breaks.
On 17/03/2022 11:24, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
This is true, but what proportion of packages does this really affect?
Telegram Desktop (and tdlib) requires more than 16 GB of RAM.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel
V Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 08:36:55AM -, Leigh Scott napsal(a):
> > On Thu, 2022-03-10 at 00:15 +0200, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
> > xvattr (maintained by: ppisar, thias)
> > gxvattr-1.3-44.fc36.x86_64 requires libgdk-1.2.so.0()(64bit), libglib-
> > 1.2.so.0()(64bit), libgtk-1.2.so.0()(64bit)
> >
>
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 12:16 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> xconvers (maintained by: hobbes1069)
> xconvers-0.8.3-29.fc36.x86_64 requires libglib-1.2.so.0()(64bit)
>
> still only available on aur and Fedora
> https://repology.org/project/xconvers/versions
This can probably be retired. I'll check on
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/48 (x86_64)
ID: 1180045 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gnome_text_editor
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1180045
ID: 1180053 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_login
URL:
The issue on our home systems is 3rd party printer drivers.
Eg
mfc9140cdncupswrapper-1.1.4-0.i386
dcpj4120dwlpr-3.0.1-1.i386
dcpj4120dwcupswrapper-3.0.1-1.i386
mfc9140cdnlpr-1.1.2-1.i386
These then pull in a whole load of dependencies relating to CUPs etc.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 9:54 AM David Cantrell wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Our most recent FESCo meeting involved discussing the proposal to drop i686
> builds of jdk8,11,17 from Fedora 37 onward. The topic quickly changed to the
> larger question of "what do people use i686 packages for?"
>
> Rather
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 11/229 (x86_64), 10/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220316.n.0):
ID: 1179494 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1179494
ID: 1179505 Test: x86_64
On Thu, 2022-03-17 at 12:34 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Where is the sanitation, medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation,
> roads, a fresh water system, and public health that the PDC have done for us?
>
>
> Serious question: Why do we need PDC? What actual problems does it
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 12:29 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> It stores the metadata of all composes that have been run, ever. (Well,
> when there isn't a bug in the sync, anyway). This is useful in several
> ways:
[snip]
I think a lot of the Fedora infrastructure complexity and difficulty
On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 at 13:55, David Cantrell wrote:
>
> If you use i686 packages for something now, please respond to this thread.
>
>
steam / wine
--
"Never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in
except to convictions of honour and good sense. Never yield to force;
V Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 04:13:44PM +0100, Tomas Hrcka napsal(a):
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 3:09 PM Petr Pisar wrote:
> > Having the dist-git retirement as a primary source of truth has the problem
> > that you need to clone a dist-git branch to get the data. And then for each
> > package you are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064808
--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar ---
When building it for F35, please build perl into a side-tag together with the
few package which requires exact perl version. E.g. polymake and
perl-PAR-Packer. Unfortunately, "dnf repoquery --whatrequires
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2065018
Bug ID: 2065018
Summary: perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.52 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-DateTime-TimeZone
Keywords: FutureFeature,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064353
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2065503
Bug ID: 2065503
Summary: perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.083 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-PPIx-Regexp
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061133
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061133
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-CLASS-1.1.7-1.fc37
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061470
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
20 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-17ae719cb2
syncthing-1.18.6-3.el8
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-d431be322b
zabbix40-4.0.39-1.el8
3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064353
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-c7fab5f521 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e1430e72de
wordpress-5.1.13-1.el7
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-bd2c412d62
zabbix40-4.0.39-1.el7
3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2065327
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build failed. Details bellow:
BuilderException: Build started, but failure happened during post build
operations:
Command '['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .',
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2065327
Bug ID: 2065327
Summary: perl-Scalar-List-Utils-1.62 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Scalar-List-Utils
Keywords: FutureFeature,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064353
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-636a578502 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064808
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064642
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #13 from
53 matches
Mail list logo
