Hi everyone,
This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering)
Team. If you have any questions or feedback, please respond to this
report or contact us on #redhat-cpe channel on libera.chat
(https://libera.chat/).
Week: 09th May - 13th May 2022
If you wish to read this
Hello everybody,
it's been almost a year that rpmautospec was released in production on
Koji builders and its about time for an update. Last week I released
version 0.2.6 as a Fedora package and deployed it to Koji in staging
infra for testing meanwhile.
So, if you use rpmautospec in your
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220512.0):
ID: 1266220 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
Sorry what I meant was that I took a fresh installation of F35 and
converted it to Rawhide.
On 12 May 2022, at 14:45, Dux Amour wrote:
Rawhide is rolling so im confused what you mean by 35? Rawhide is
going
towards 37 Beta...
Also for Rawhide i get all the configs in git and just do nightly
It works for me and really like this new approach. Switched couple of my
packages and no issue so far with rpmautospec itself. But some 3rd-party tools
requires some work and adaption. For example if you already switched to
rpmautospec format and try to:
$ fedpkg import foo.fc36.src.rpm
On Fri, 2022-05-13 at 10:27 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BIOSBootISOWithGrub2
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This proposal will only
So I went to do a dnf system-upgrade from F35 to F36 on a test machine,
as part of my usual testing. In the middle of the process, it appears
that /var filled up and that left the system in an unfortunate state.
Surprisingly (to me) it did boot with a random mix of F35 and F36
packages and even
I had issues with this for several releases now, although I never got a
broken upgrade like you're reporting: every time so far I got a message
'you need additional 4GB on /' before the actual upgrade started. It
would be sad if the free space estimation code didn't work and allowed
broken,
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 1:21 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2022-05-13 at 10:27 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BIOSBootISOWithGrub2
> >
> > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> > process, proposals are publicly announced
On Friday, May 13, 2022 10:45:55 AM CDT Artem Tim wrote:
> Does rpmautospec compatible with EPEL-9, EPEL-8 branches?
Not currently. There has been an effort[0] to get it branched for epel9, but it
has stalled. I submitted a PR[1] to make it work, but it has not yet been
reviewed.
[0]:
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Failed openQA tests: 2/15 (x86_64), 6/15 (aarch64)
ID: 1266909 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1266909
ID: 1266911 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 11/231 (x86_64), 22/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220512.n.0):
ID: 1266367 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso
Ben Cotton writes:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BIOSBootISOWithGrub2
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
> by
On Fri, May 13, 2022, at 06:18, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> * Relevant for local use (i.e. doesn't need deployment into production,
> only the 0.2.6 version installed locally)
>
>* Add rpmautospec convert command which converts a package repository
>to using %autorelease and %autochangelog
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BIOSBootISOWithGrub2
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
Does rpmautospec compatible with EPEL-9, EPEL-8 branches?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
I have some jobs queued up on copr, and while the x86_64 builders are working fine, the ppc64le
builders appear to be down. "State" has remained "pending" for about an hour,
so far.
Is this a planned outage?
Steve
___
devel mailing list --
+1
My main machine still uses bios boot.
Steve
On 5/13/22 10:27 AM, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BIOSBootISOWithGrub2
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
Changing the default in Python was discussed multiple times over the
last 20 years. Every time, it was said that it's convenient and it's
not worth it to break use cases to increase the default security.
Python 3.4 already has -I (isolated mode) which imply Python 3.11 -P
option, but it also
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 10:21:12AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-05-13 at 10:27 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BIOSBootISOWithGrub2
> >
> > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> > process, proposals are publicly
Thanks, Ewoud!
I'm happy to return the favour, but it might take me a few days to find the
time. This will be my first time reviewing a Fedora packaging request, so I
feel I ought to do some more in-depth reading in preparation.
Best,
Christoph
On Thursday, 12 May 2022 11:20:11 CEST Ewoud
On Fri, 2022-05-13 at 14:02 -0700, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 10:21:12AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2022-05-13 at 10:27 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BIOSBootISOWithGrub2
> > >
> > > This document represents a proposed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085374
Bug ID: 2085374
Summary: perl-BerkeleyDB-0.65 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-BerkeleyDB
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085379
Bug ID: 2085379
Summary: perl-DB_File-1.858 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-DB_File
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043798
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043798
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Curses-UI-0.9609-20.fc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085376
Bug ID: 2085376
Summary: perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.104 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib
Keywords:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2083048
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|2076898 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085374
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jples...@redhat.com |p...@city-fan.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890597
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076898
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|2083048 |
--- Comment #4 from Emmanuel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085376
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.10
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666098
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|34 |rawhide
--
You are receiving
Hello everybody,
it's been almost a year that rpmautospec was released in production on
Koji builders and its about time for an update. Last week I released
version 0.2.6 as a Fedora package and deployed it to Koji in staging
infra for testing meanwhile.
So, if you use rpmautospec in your
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2083048
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2076898
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076898
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2083048
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379554
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|34 |36
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085374
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043798
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076898
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ---
Emmanuel, any progress? If you give me permissions, I can try adding this
package to EPEL8.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1716324
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|34 |35
--- Comment #9 from Petr Pisar ---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890602
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085376
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1975700
Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|34 |36
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076898
--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar ---
This about EPEL8. You linked an EPEL9 bug #2083048.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076898
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076898
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085988
Bug ID: 2085988
Summary: perl-XML-XPath-1.47 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-XML-XPath
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 8:01 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 9:31 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
>
>> During the past week qt5 was updated on CentOS Stream 8 and 9 to version
>> 5.15.3. This caused updates to break for KDE users running CentOS Stream 8
>> and 9. The epel 8 and 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085379
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Fixed In Version|
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-XML-XPath` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-XML-XPath/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BIOSBootISOWithGrub2
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-XML-XPath` that
you are following:
``
Tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-XML-XPath/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085270
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085379
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jples...@redhat.com,|
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-5c7d584007
clamav-0.103.6-1.el9
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing
gcc-epel-11.2.1-10.el9
plantuml-1.2022.4-1.el9
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-670a0795bf
slurm-20.11.9-1.el8
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-dd1b016ba4
ecdsautils-0.4.1-1.el8
5
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-66c028a837
slurm-20.11.9-1.el7
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-d7255ac6f5
ecdsautils-0.4.1-2.el7
5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076898
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
58 matches
Mail list logo
