* Vitaly Zaitsev via devel:
> On 14/09/2022 05:27, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> Well, we just released the Beta and people have noticed that this is
>> still broken. Do we have an ETA on a fix? Because this is going to be
>> a major black eye for*us* if it stays broken through to GA.
>
> Epic Games had
On ke, 14 syys 2022, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
On 9/14/22 03:55, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 14/09/2022 08:46, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
The only other
non-phishable authentication method is TLS client certificates and
I would be fine with those.
Fedora used to have TLS client
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 7:35 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> How about this:
>
> Drop the term 'jump scare' entirely. IMHO it just sounds bad.
I'm open for proposals on the wording. =)
> Rework the change so it's basically planning on making this change in
> f38.
That makes it closer than currently,
On 9/13/22 21:37, Tommy Nguyen wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-09-06 at 16:14 -0500, Jonathan Wright via devel wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 3:52 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
>> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On 06/09/2022 19:49, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
Of course, hardware
On 14/09/2022 08:46, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
The only other
non-phishable authentication method is TLS client certificates and
I would be fine with those.
Fedora used to have TLS client certificate authorization (in Koji), but
this has been replaced by Kerberos.
since almost every laptop
Copr repo for Signal-Desktop owned by luminoso
561 B/s | 341 B 00:00
Errors during downloading metadata for repository
On Wed, 2022-09-14 at 02:46 -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> Because FIDO2 is not phishable. TOTP and HOTP are. The only other
> non-phishable authentication method is TLS client certificates and
> I would be fine with those.
I'm not entirely convinced. See this paper:
On 9/14/22 03:55, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 14/09/2022 08:46, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>> The only other
>> non-phishable authentication method is TLS client certificates and
>> I would be fine with those.
>
> Fedora used to have TLS client certificate authorization (in Koji), but
>
On 9/13/22 21:37, Tommy Nguyen wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-09-06 at 16:14 -0500, Jonathan Wright via devel wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 3:52 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
>> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On 06/09/2022 19:49, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
Of course, hardware
On 14/09/2022 05:27, Neal Gompa wrote:
Well, we just released the Beta and people have noticed that this is
still broken. Do we have an ETA on a fix? Because this is going to be
a major black eye for*us* if it stays broken through to GA.
Epic Games had more than a month to fix the problem but
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 7:51 PM Chris Adams wrote:
>
> I'd like to piggy-back - is there a Fedora well-supported board that can
> use the Pi-targeted hats? I stayed away from the Pi for a long while,
> because of the support problems, but it just seems like there's so much
> that's just made for
On 13/09/2022 23:50, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
Another option is a TPM-based authenticator. Would this be acceptable?
No. TPM 2.0 chip is a *proprietary* black box. Some of them have known
critical security vulnerabilities[1].
[1]:
On 14/09/2022 10:01, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
Still, even a pure software FIDO2 implementation is much better than
TOTP etc.
I don't think so. Malware can easily steal the private key. Simple TOTP
on a separate device is much better.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
On 14/09/2022 12:11, Florian Weimer wrote:
I see some new build failures in rawhide related to systemd RPM macros:
Processing files: opencryptoki-3.18.0-4.fc38.s390x
error: File must begin with "/": %{_tmpfilesdir}/opencryptoki.conf
error: File must begin with "/": %{_unitdir}/pkcsslotd.service
On Wed, 14 Sept 2022 at 05:28, Alexander Bokovoy
wrote:
>
> Sadly, it cannot be just 'any' certificate, it has to be issued by a
> certificate authority that is trusted by the KDC as well. For example,
> by FreeIPA CA which is already ran by the Fedora project infrastructure
> team. An
I see some new build failures in rawhide related to systemd RPM macros:
Processing files: opencryptoki-3.18.0-4.fc38.s390x
error: File must begin with "/": %{_tmpfilesdir}/opencryptoki.conf
error: File must begin with "/": %{_unitdir}/pkcsslotd.service
[…]
RPM build errors:
File must begin
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220913.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220914.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 174
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 323.29 KiB
Size of dropped packages
# dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37
--enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync
Last metadata expiration check: 0:06:44 ago on Wed 14 Sep 2022 02:12:53 PM CEST.
Error:
Hello folks!
We are approaching Fedora 37 Final Freeze, which will start on 2022-10-04.
There are still 33 packages in Fedora 37 that will need to be rebuilt with
Python 3.11 in order to be installable (most of them). I propose to retire the
non-installable packages if they are not rebuilt by
> On Sep 14, 2022, at 4:17 AM, Tom Hughes via devel
> wrote:
>
>> On 14/09/2022 12:11, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> I see some new build failures in rawhide related to systemd RPM macros:
>>
>> Processing files: opencryptoki-3.18.0-4.fc38.s390x
>> error: File must begin with "/":
Miro Hrončok a écrit :
> profanity
> @fantom
> ASSIGNED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2049682
> Bug status changed ~3 weeks ago without comment,
> not updated since.
> Fixed in rawhide recently, f37-candidate build exists.
>
I just made package update 1 hour ago. Cross-fire :)
On Wed, Sep 14 2022 at 06:58:12 AM +, Tommy Nguyen
wrote:
I'm not entirely convinced. See this paper:
https://eprint.iacr.org/2020/1298.pdf
I only read the abstract of this paper, but looks like the researchers
have found that FIDO is indeed unphishable. Seems their attack relies
on
On Wed, 14 Sep 2022 05:06:29 -
"Richard Myers" wrote:
> This is for F35 -> F37 ...
>
> I sure
> would love it if anybody knows how to fix the below warning(?), which
> shows up every time I run DNF (it has persisted through at least 3 or
> 4 Fedora revisions, maybe more):
>
> Traceback
On ke, 14 syys 2022, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sept 2022 at 05:28, Alexander Bokovoy
wrote:
Sadly, it cannot be just 'any' certificate, it has to be issued by a
certificate authority that is trusted by the KDC as well. For example,
by FreeIPA CA which is already ran by the Fedora
TLS client certificates is actually not a terrible idea. They're not
very popular anymore, but they're supported by all major browsers (I
think?) and they work.
On Wed, Sep 14 2022 at 02:08:32 PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
On 14/09/2022 10:01, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
Still,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 11:45:16AM +0200, Alexander Sosedkin wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 7:35 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > How about this:
> >
> > Drop the term 'jump scare' entirely. IMHO it just sounds bad.
>
> I'm open for proposals on the wording. =)
Well, I guess it depends on if you
I just copied and pasted from the OP...
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
On 14. 09. 22 16:36, Casper wrote:
Miro Hrončok a écrit :
profanity
@fantom
ASSIGNED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2049682
Bug status changed ~3 weeks ago without comment,
not updated since.
Fixed in rawhide recently, f37-candidate build exists.
I just made package update 1 hour ago. Cross-fire
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 10:53 AM Smith, Stewart via devel
wrote:
>
>
> > On Sep 14, 2022, at 4:17 AM, Tom Hughes via devel
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 14/09/2022 12:11, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> I see some new build failures in rawhide related to systemd RPM macros:
> >>
> >> Processing files:
* Tom Hughes via devel:
> On 14/09/2022 12:11, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> I see some new build failures in rawhide related to systemd RPM macros:
>> Processing files: opencryptoki-3.18.0-4.fc38.s390x
>> error: File must begin with "/": %{_tmpfilesdir}/opencryptoki.conf
>> error: File must begin
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 05:47:46PM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On ke, 14 syys 2022, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Sept 2022 at 05:28, Alexander Bokovoy
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Sadly, it cannot be just 'any' certificate, it has to be issued by a
> > > certificate authority that
On Wed, 2022-09-14 at 15:11 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-09-14 at 10:25 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 14 2022 at 06:58:12 AM +, Tommy Nguyen
> > wrote:
> > > I'm not entirely convinced. See this paper:
> > > https://eprint.iacr.org/2020/1298.pdf
> >
>
On Wed, 2022-09-14 at 18:35 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-09-14 at 15:11 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2022-09-14 at 10:25 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 14 2022 at 06:58:12 AM +, Tommy Nguyen
> > > wrote:
> > > > I'm not entirely convinced.
Hello,
I am planning to update gpgme to 1.18.0 in rawhide and since there is
SONAME bump in libqgpgme, I am asking to be a co-maintainer of these
dependant packages:
- https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/isoimagewriter (main admin: lupinix)
- https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kdepim-addons (main
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2022-09-14/fedora_coreos_meeting.2022-09-14-16.30.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2022-09-14/fedora_coreos_meeting.2022-09-14-16.30.txt
Log:
On Wed, 2022-09-14 at 15:49 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> The hardcore way is to say "welp, too bad, your account's gone,
> create
> a new one and start over, including going through the maintainer
> process again", but that might be a bit *too* hardcore.
>
> This is a perennial issue, though,
Hi Miroslav,
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 04:36:47PM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> flac-1.4.0 changes the libFLAC and libFLAC++ sonames. There are also
> some incompatible changes in the API, but I didn't see any packages
> failing to built due to these changes.
>
> The following packages need to
Alexander Sosedkin wrote:
> That's a reason why my initial thread [1] has been named
> "Landing a larger-than-release change (distrusting SHA-1 signatures)":
> flipping the switch is the easy part, unfortunately.
IMHO, a change that breaks so many things that you expect it to take more
than 6
On Wed, 2022-09-14 at 10:25 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 14 2022 at 06:58:12 AM +, Tommy Nguyen
> wrote:
> > I'm not entirely convinced. See this paper:
> > https://eprint.iacr.org/2020/1298.pdf
>
> I only read the abstract of this paper, but looks like the researchers
On Tue, 2022-09-13 at 16:46 +, Timo S via devel wrote:
> $ sudo dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 -
> -enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null
> && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync
> Last metadata
On 14/09/2022 17:26, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
If you want to protect against *both* threats, use a security key, but
you've already pushed back against requiring a hardware purchase.
I never click on links from emails, instant messengers, etc.
I'm using fkinit and my simple custom systemd
OK, third time is the charm. I finally got the command right.
Everything went just fine.:
sudo dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37
--enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno
# dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37
--enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null
&& echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync
Fedora 37 - x86_64
22 MB/s |
81 MB
On Wed, 2022-09-07 at 17:47 +, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> I think this is a bad idea. It's quite hostile to packagers. It will
> break rawhide for months and make it very difficult to stabilize the
> distro before the beta freeze or do any type of rebuild. It very well
> may
> affect
The gap package has a new version available (4.12), which comes with
significant improvements over 4.11. I've been working on updating the
entire gap stack [1] for the new version. The spec files have been
simplified and made more uniform, which should aid future maintenance.
I need one new
On 9/14/22 09:40, Scott Beamer wrote:
I just copied and pasted from the OP...
Ok, but you have to be aware that your email client might reformat the
text and mess up the lines.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 6:40 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 11:45:16AM +0200, Alexander Sosedkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 7:35 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > >
> > > How about this:
> > >
> > > Drop the term 'jump scare' entirely. IMHO it just sounds bad.
> >
> > I'm open
I've updated https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsRepackaging
with the results of this discussion. I'll go the
`nodejs-$MAJOR-unversioned-command` route.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 14. 09. 22 16:01, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello folks!
...
Will be retired one week before the freeze anyway barbecue it's an old NEW.
I don't always spell "because" as "barbecue". But when I do I copy-paste it to
the email 8 times 臘
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
On 2022-09-14 07:01, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello folks!
luya dlib
dlib
@bizdelnick @luya
ASSIGNED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2098694
Bundles old pybind11 which is not Python 3.11 compatible,
needs to be unbundled or at least updated.
Upstream is waiting for the stable release of Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126682
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126682
Bug ID: 2126682
Summary: Remove from a distribution
Product: Fedora
Version: 37
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Lingua-EN-Syllable
Assignee: mhron...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126679
Bug ID: 2126679
Summary: Remove from a distribution
Product: Fedora
Version: 37
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom
Assignee: mhron...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126661
Bug ID: 2126661
Summary: Remove from a distribution
Product: Fedora
Version: 36
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Verilog-CodeGen
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126661
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126677
Bug ID: 2126677
Summary: Remove from a distribution
Product: Fedora
Version: 37
Status: NEW
Component: perl-File-Inplace
Assignee: mhron...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126677
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126679
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126677
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-7f390fcbe8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-7f390fcbe8
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126682
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-7f390fcbe8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-7f390fcbe8
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126661
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-7f390fcbe8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-7f390fcbe8
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126679
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-7f390fcbe8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-7f390fcbe8
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
On 14. 09. 22 16:36, Casper wrote:
Miro Hrončok a écrit :
profanity
@fantom
ASSIGNED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2049682
Bug status changed ~3 weeks ago without comment,
not updated since.
Fixed in rawhide recently, f37-candidate build exists.
I just made package update 1 hour ago. Cross-fire
Hello folks!
We are approaching Fedora 37 Final Freeze, which will start on 2022-10-04.
There are still 33 packages in Fedora 37 that will need to be rebuilt with
Python 3.11 in order to be installable (most of them). I propose to retire the
non-installable packages if they are not rebuilt by
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126661
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-95366a795e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-95366a795e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124543
--- Comment #4 from Damian Wrobel ---
I prepared a request review for 'per(Template::Plugin::CGI)' [1] as well as the
BR for it in [2].
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126943
[2]
Notification time stamped 2022-09-14 20:49:30 UTC
From 13fd2ffada8eeeda83f81cdfdf110b89728f68cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Damian Wrobel
Date: Sep 14 2022 17:25:25 +
Subject: Fix FTBFS (rhbz#2124543).
Signed-off-by: Damian Wrobel
---
diff --git a/perl-SOAP-WSDL.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124543
Damian Wrobel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2126943
Referenced Bugs:
Am 24.05.22 um 19:53 schrieb Maxwell G via epel-devel:
On Monday, May 23, 2022 11:18:38 PM CDT Orion Poplawski wrote:
I've been coming to the thinking that naming the SRPMS
python3X-%{srcname}-epel is a better choice. This makes modifying
original Fedora specs simpler.
I think that makes
On 14. 09. 22 16:01, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello folks!
...
Will be retired one week before the freeze anyway barbecue it's an old NEW.
I don't always spell "because" as "barbecue". But when I do I copy-paste it to
the email 8 times 臘
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
57 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-89ad385971
chromium-103.0.5060.114-1.el8
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-cd091ab1b1
libconfuse-3.3-7.el8
1
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
coturn-4.6.0-1.el7
libmd-1.0.4-2.el7
Details about builds:
coturn-4.6.0-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-cb40cdd267)
TURN/STUN & ICE Server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126978
Bug ID: 2126978
Summary: perl-Regexp-Grammars-1.058 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Regexp-Grammars
Keywords: FutureFeature,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126661
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-95366a795e has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124507
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124508
Bug 2124508 depends on bug 2124507, which changed state.
Bug 2124507 Summary: Please branch and build perl-X11-Protocol in epel9.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124507
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126677
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-7f390fcbe8 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124508
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-X11-Protocol-Other-31-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126661
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-7f390fcbe8 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126679
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-7f390fcbe8 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126682
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-7f390fcbe8 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124460
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Crypt-SSLeay-0.72-37.e
82 matches
Mail list logo