Self Introduction: James Read

2022-11-12 Thread James Read via devel
Hey folks, I'm joining this list as a hobbyist developer (although I'm also a Red Hat employee for 11 years), with the hope that I can package one of my projects that has had some interest and success since releasing it 1 year ago; OliveTin - http://olivetin.app . I'm sending this email as

Re: Self Introduction: James Read

2022-11-12 Thread Fabio Alessandro Locati
Welcome James :-). Best, Fale On Sat, Nov 12, 2022, at 13:07, James Read via devel wrote: > Hey folks, > > I'm joining this list as a hobbyist developer (although I'm also a Red > Hat employee for 11 years), with the hope that I can package one of my > projects that has had some interest and

Re: HEADS UP: gdal-3.6.0 landing in rawhide

2022-11-12 Thread Sandro Mani
Hi Markus Actually kealib fails to build [1] because OldSetGCPsFromNew and others were removed. Do you have any suggestions? Sandro [1]https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2087861 On 12.11.22 12:06, Markus Neteler wrote: Hi Sandro, If you like you may enable the KEA

Re: HEADS UP: gdal-3.6.0 landing in rawhide

2022-11-12 Thread Markus Neteler
Hi Sando, strange because it previously compiled: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2084540 I have reported it upstream: https://github.com/ubarsc/kealib/issues/26 Markus On Sat, Nov 12, 2022 at 1:02 PM Sandro Mani wrote: > > Hi Markus > > Actually kealib fails to build

Re: Self Introduction: James Read

2022-11-12 Thread Peter Boy
> Am 12.11.2022 um 10:07 schrieb James Read via devel > : > > Hey folks, > > I'm joining this list as a hobbyist developer Welcome as well > ( OliveTin - http://olivetin.app . looks nice an really useful, specifically to handle urgend cases from remote -- Peter Boy

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20221112.n.0 changes

2022-11-12 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-2022.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20221112.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 5 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 57 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 788.58 KiB Size of dropped packages:0

HEADS UP: gdal-3.6.0 landing in rawhide

2022-11-12 Thread Sandro Mani
Hi I'll be updating to gdal-3.6.0 in rawhide in the f38-build-side-60042 side tag. I'll be rebuilding all affected packages:    GMT    mapserver    liblas    python-fiona    postgis    merkaartor    R-rgdal    bes    saga    qmapshack    PDAL    osgearth    ncl    vfrnav    python-rasterio   

Re: OpenMPI tests blocked

2022-11-12 Thread Antonio T. sagitter
Great! Thank you all. On 11/11/22 16:13, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 11/11/22 07:52, Christoph Junghans wrote: On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 10:27 PM Orion Poplawski wrote: On 11/6/22 07:31, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: On Saturday, 05 November 2022 at 21:27, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:

Re: HEADS UP: gdal-3.6.0 landing in rawhide

2022-11-12 Thread Markus Neteler
Hi Sandro, If you like you may enable the KEA driver which I recently added to rawhide: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kealib Best, Markus Sandro Mani schrieb am Sa., 12. Nov. 2022, 09:47: > Hi > > I'll be updating to gdal-3.6.0 in rawhide in the f38-build-side-60042 > side tag. I'll be

Scotch-7.0/PETSc-3.18.1 upgrade

2022-11-12 Thread Antonio Trande
> Hi > > Some time ago I've started working on updating to scotch-7.x, with some > initial test builds here [1]. To finalize the update, I'd like to gather > some opinions (potentially affected maintainers in CC): Hi all. Hi Sandro. PETSc is ready/tested for Scotch-7* with the release 3.18.1

Re: webkit2gtk5.0 -> webkitgtk6.0

2022-11-12 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 11/11/2022 18:06, Michael Catanzaro wrote: OK, I think telegram-desktop will actually be fine with no changes. When webkit2gtk-5.0 disappears, it should just fall back to using the stable GTK 3 version instead of the unstable GTK 4 version, which is probably a good idea for now. It has an

Re: webkit2gtk5.0 -> webkitgtk6.0

2022-11-12 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 3:52 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 11/11/2022 17:48, Neal Gompa wrote: > > Vitaly Zaitsev is the maintainer. It hasn't moved to Fedora yet. > > We can't move yet, because it requires openh264-devel at the build time. > We should be able to convert that to a

Re: Scotch-7.0/PETSc-3.18.1 upgrade

2022-11-12 Thread Sandro Mani
On 12.11.22 12:19, Antonio Trande wrote: Hi Some time ago I've started working on updating to scotch-7.x, with some initial test builds here [1]. To finalize the update, I'd like to gather some opinions (potentially affected maintainers in CC): Hi all. Hi Sandro. PETSc is ready/tested for

Re: webkit2gtk5.0 -> webkitgtk6.0

2022-11-12 Thread Kevin Kofler via devel
Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > What about packages that use dlopen() like Telegram Desktop? Why the heck does a Qt application like Telegram Desktop dlopen WebKitGTK? They are supposed to use QtWebEngine. Kevin Kofler ___ devel mailing list

Re: Help needed with build failing in Koji for rawhide i686

2022-11-12 Thread Gary Buhrmaster
On Sat, Nov 12, 2022 at 6:16 PM Sandro wrote: > I appreciate any pointers, This change to the mpg123 build looks suspicious to me: * Fri Nov 11 2022 Phil Wyett - 1.31.1-2 - Use --disable-largefile and allow co-installable arch devel packages

Re: Help needed with build failing in Koji for rawhide i686

2022-11-12 Thread Otto Liljalaakso
Sandro kirjoitti 12.11.2022 klo 20.16: I recently updated brewtarget to 3.0.3. In koji the build fails[1] only for rawhide i686 arch with the following error: /usr/bin/ld: /lib/libsndfile.so.1: undefined reference to `mpg123_open_handle_64' /usr/bin/ld: /lib/libsndfile.so.1: undefined

Re: Help needed with build failing in Koji for rawhide i686

2022-11-12 Thread Sandro
On 12-11-2022 21:35, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 12/11/2022 19:16, Sandro wrote: /usr/bin/ld: /lib/libsndfile.so.1: undefined reference to `mpg123_open_handle_64' This broken update proposed for stable releases too: - https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-7568890645 -

Re: Help needed with build failing in Koji for rawhide i686

2022-11-12 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
I have the same issue with mpv: /usr/bin/ld: /lib/libopenmpt.so.0: undefined reference to `mpg123_open_handle_64' /usr/bin/ld: /lib/libopenmpt.so.0: undefined reference to `mpg123_replace_reader_handle_64' /usr/bin/ld: /lib/libsndfile.so.1: undefined reference to `mpg123_seek_64' /usr/bin/ld:

Re: Help needed with build failing in Koji for rawhide i686

2022-11-12 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 12/11/2022 19:16, Sandro wrote: /usr/bin/ld: /lib/libsndfile.so.1: undefined reference to `mpg123_open_handle_64' This broken update proposed for stable releases too: - https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-7568890645 -

Re: Help needed with build failing in Koji for rawhide i686

2022-11-12 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 12/11/2022 22:21, Vitaly Zaitsev wrote: It looks like --disable-largefile flag changed ABI and all dependent packages must be rebuilt. -./libmpg123.so.0.47.0-1: file format elf32-i386 +./libmpg123.so.0.47.0-2: file format elf32-i386 DYNAMIC SYMBOL TABLE: - DF *UND*

Re: Direct to stable updates

2022-11-12 Thread Kevin Kofler via devel
Stephen Smoogen wrote: > Pretty much every one of those bodhi requirements is because either > > * a developer did not use that wonderful organ for some reason, and people > said 'that should never happen again.' > * what the developer decided was not liked by other developers enough that > it

Re: Direct to stable updates

2022-11-12 Thread Gary Buhrmaster
On Sat, Nov 12, 2022 at 7:19 PM Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > (E.g., many maintainers > enable automatic pushes because they need to wait so long to be allowed to > push an update to stable that they would forget to push it manually. But > automatic pushes are the most common source of bad

Re: Help needed with build failing in Koji for rawhide i686

2022-11-12 Thread Sandro
On 12-11-2022 19:46, Otto Liljalaakso wrote: Sandro kirjoitti 12.11.2022 klo 20.16: I recently updated brewtarget to 3.0.3. In koji the build fails[1] only for rawhide i686 arch with the following error: /usr/bin/ld: /lib/libsndfile.so.1: undefined reference to `mpg123_open_handle_64'

Announcing mpv soversion bump

2022-11-12 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
Hello all. mpv 0.35.0 will include a soversion bump from .1 to .2. Affected Fedora packages: - celluloid - haruna Affected RPM Fusion packages: - mpc-qt - mpv-mpris - smplayer - vdr-mpv - xt7-player-mpv I will use my PP rights to rebuild everything in a side tag for Rawhide and F37. --

Help needed with build failing in Koji for rawhide i686

2022-11-12 Thread Sandro
I recently updated brewtarget to 3.0.3. In koji the build fails[1] only for rawhide i686 arch with the following error: /usr/bin/ld: /lib/libsndfile.so.1: undefined reference to `mpg123_open_handle_64' /usr/bin/ld: /lib/libsndfile.so.1: undefined reference to `mpg123_replace_reader_handle_64'

Re: Help needed with build failing in Koji for rawhide i686

2022-11-12 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 12/11/2022 22:09, Sandro wrote: I did an 'rpm -qf /lib/libsndfile.so.1' and that pointed me to the libsndfile package, which wasn't updated recently. It looks like --disable-largefile flag changed ABI and all dependent packages must be rebuilt. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev

Re: Scotch-7.0/PETSc-3.18.1 upgrade

2022-11-12 Thread Antonio T. sagitter
Okay. I'm rebuilding your package in my Copr project (https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/); please, require builder permissions inside it to build all Scotch dependent packages you maintain. Same thing i will do with those mine. When all RPMs will be ready, we will

Pull-request related question.

2022-11-12 Thread Sergey Mende
Hi, during development of my own project I hit the bug in `gdb` that is already fixed upstream but not backported to rawhide yet. I did a backport and ready to submit a PR. What is the right way to proceed: a) just file a PR; b) open a bug in bugzilla, submit a PR; c) submit a PR, open a bug in

Re: Direct to stable updates

2022-11-12 Thread Kevin Kofler via devel
Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > Interesting. I have never seen such analysis results > shared (either the part about why maintainers do it, > or the pushes being the common causes of bad > updates), and of course, anecdotal experience does > not lead to a supportable conclusion. Where was > that

Re: Help needed with build failing in Koji for rawhide i686

2022-11-12 Thread Sandro
On 12-11-2022 22:21, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 12/11/2022 22:09, Sandro wrote: I did an 'rpm -qf /lib/libsndfile.so.1' and that pointed me to the libsndfile package, which wasn't updated recently. It looks like --disable-largefile flag changed ABI and all dependent packages must be

Re: Pull-request related question.

2022-11-12 Thread Scott Talbert
On Sat, 12 Nov 2022, Sergey Mende wrote: Hi, during development of my own project I hit the bug in `gdb` that is already fixed upstream but not backported to rawhide yet. I did a backport and ready to submit a PR. What is the right way to proceed: a) just file a PR; b) open a bug in bugzilla,

Re: Pull-request related question.

2022-11-12 Thread Sergey Mende
Thank you, Scott. Regards, Sergey On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 6:04 AM Scott Talbert wrote: > On Sat, 12 Nov 2022, Sergey Mende wrote: > > > Hi, > > during development of my own project I hit the bug in `gdb` that is > already fixed upstream but not backported to rawhide yet. > > I did a backport

Re: webkit2gtk5.0 -> webkitgtk6.0

2022-11-12 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 12/11/2022 13:15, Neal Gompa wrote: We should be able to convert that to a dlopen dependency. It should be done in Google's WebRTC upstream. Which part of it uses it directly instead of through ffmpeg? tg_owt, fork of WebRTC. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)

[Bug 2130626] Please branch and build perl-Pegex in epel9

2022-11-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2130626 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2022-b15398a7ea has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here:

[Bug 2130625] Please branch and build perl-Inline in epel9

2022-11-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2130625 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 2130630] Please branch and build perl-TestML in epel9

2022-11-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2130630 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

2022-11-12 Thread updates
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing castxml-0.4.7-1.el8 js-jquery-ui-1.13.2-1.el8 kf5-akonadi-calendar-21.12.2-1.el8 kf5-calendarsupport-21.12.2-1.el8 kf5-eventviews-21.12.2-1.el8 kf5-mailimporter-21.12.2-1.el8 ksirk-21.12.2-1.el8

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

2022-11-12 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4d30ee90cd nginx-1.20.1-10.el7 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing js-jquery-ui-1.13.2-1.el7 Details about builds: