Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for cottsay

On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 11:06:46AM -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote: > The package hackrf has several open bugs [1], [2]. > > I've started the non-responsive maintainer process by filing [3]. > > I've CC'd the maintainer on this email, but if anyone knows how else to > contact them, please let me

rpmautospec-0.3.1 released and deployed into staging

Hey everybody, I've recently release version 0.3.1 of rpmautospec with a couple of accrued fixes and enhancements. Some highlights: - Use a dash before the version-release bit in changelog entries. - Don’t trip over %include directives. - Allow skipping changelog entries with `[skip changelog]`

EPEL-9 terrible updates (dav1d, libavif...)

It looks like EPEL-9 is managed like rawhide. 1/ dav1d 1.0.0 update (also in F37) https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-40bb8ce9c5 This introduce a soname change breaking lot of stuff including libavif (from EPEL) and packages in RPMFusion 2/ libavif 0.11.1 update (only in

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: ELN SIG on 2022-11-18 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat The meeting will be about: Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/10133/ ___ devel

Re: EPEL-9 terrible updates (dav1d, libavif...)

On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 1:33 PM Bob Mauchin wrote: > > > > On Thu, 17 Nov 2022, 10:09 Remi Collet, wrote: >> >> It looks like EPEL-9 is managed like rawhide. >> >> >> 1/ dav1d 1.0.0 update (also in F37) >> >> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-40bb8ce9c5 >> >> This

Re: EPEL-9 terrible updates (dav1d, libavif...)

Hi, This is entirely my fault, and I apologize. Will respond inline and discuss potential workarounds below. Also cc:ing epel-devel which is relevant. On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 02:18:48PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 1:33 PM Bob Mauchin wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, 17

Re: EPEL-9 terrible updates (dav1d, libavif...)

On Thu, 17 Nov 2022, 10:09 Remi Collet, wrote: > It looks like EPEL-9 is managed like rawhide. > > > 1/ dav1d 1.0.0 update (also in F37) > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-40bb8ce9c5 > > This introduce a soname change breaking lot of stuff > including libavif (from

Re: hackrf package

On 11/16/22 06:25 PM, Scott Talbert wrote: I just upgraded my system to Fedora 37 and noticed that the package "hackrf" was still from Fedora 36. I found a failed build from the f37-rebuild, dated 2022-07-21 [1]. It apparently failed on aarch64, but the logs are long gone - at least I don't

Non-responsive maintainer check for cottsay

The package hackrf has several open bugs [1], [2]. I've started the non-responsive maintainer process by filing [3]. I've CC'd the maintainer on this email, but if anyone knows how else to contact them, please let me know. Thanks, Steve [1]

Re: SPDX - How to handle MIT and BSD

> On Tue, Nov 15, 2022, 12:24 Miro Hrončok > > > > I package askalono-cli which can detect license texts and outputs an SPDX > identifier: https://github.com/jpeddicord/askalono > > We use it in go2rpm. > Looking through this thread, it seems there are a range of tools that package

Re: Direct to stable updates

On Wed, 2022-11-16 at 17:37 +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > > Kevin, the PR for Bodhi is nearly finished, it will add support for > using the 'frozen' release state to avoid pausing the push cron job and > avoid direct pending to stable push of updates when the release is frozen. > > I'll

F38 proposal: Remove Guile Support from GDB (Self-Contained Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RemoveGuileFromGdb This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved by the Fedora Engineering Steering

Non-responsive maintainer check for jehane

Almost a year later we haven't any reply https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031448 Marianne not have any activity since Fev 2022 (expect in a tag_package_owners entry!?!? ) Last login in FAS: jehane 2021-02-18 Last action on koji: Fri, 09 Sep 2022 tag_package_owners entry created

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20221117.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20221116.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20221117.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:3 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 63 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 1.49 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B

[Bug 2139510] perl-URI-5.17 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2139510 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2da86b14b9 js-jquery-ui-1.13.2-1.el8 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-15e4c3606e ntfs-3g-2022.10.3-1.el8 1

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a06d5c7af1 js-jquery-ui-1.13.2-1.el7 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-d6012d25d2 drupal7-link-1.11-1.el7 2

[CFP] FOSDEM 2023 — Image-based Linux and Secure Measured Boot Devroom

The UAPI group, a community for people with an interest in innovating how we build, deploy, run, and update modern security-focused Linux operating systems, will host a devroom at FOSDEM 2023. A "devroom" (a FOSDEM term) is a co-located mini-conference with its own separate track. FOSDEM is a

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL-9 terrible updates (dav1d, libavif...)

Hi, This is entirely my fault, and I apologize. Will respond inline and discuss potential workarounds below. Also cc:ing epel-devel which is relevant. On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 02:18:48PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 1:33 PM Bob Mauchin wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, 17

Successful Mail Delivery Report

This is the mail system at host mailman01.iad2.fedoraproject.org. Your message was successfully delivered to the destination(s) listed below. If the message was delivered to mailbox you will receive no further notifications. Otherwise you may still receive notifications of mail delivery errors

[Bug 2143735] New: perl-Getopt-Long-2.54 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143735 Bug ID: 2143735 Summary: perl-Getopt-Long-2.54 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Getopt-Long Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

F38 proposal: Remove Guile Support from GDB (Self-Contained Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RemoveGuileFromGdb This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved by the Fedora Engineering Steering

[Bug 2031448] Please branch and build perl-XML-TreePP in epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031448 --- Comment #7 from Sergio Basto --- This bug is part of the non-responsive maintainer procedure for cottsay, following https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/. Please respond if you are still