Is there a chance to have Octave 8.1 at F38?
вс, 9 апр. 2023 г. в 18:49, Orion Poplawski :
>
> On 4/8/23 17:27, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > On 4/5/23 20:22, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> >> I will be updating octave to 8.1 this weekend. This involves a soname
> >> bump and I will be rebuilding all
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230414.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230415.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 150
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 9.20 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 08:38:47AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
> On 4/15/23 00:10, David Abdurachmanov wrote:
>
>
> >
> > We have to support SCBs as-is. We even have 64-core OoO (and even
> > dual-socket 128-core) systems coming that are still RVA20 (what I call
> > "a large scale SBC trying
On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 5:30 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 10:01 PM Jeff Law wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 4/12/23 10:08, przemek klosowski via devel wrote:
> > >>
> > >> That may rule out certain processors, but it ultimately provides a
> > >> higher performing baseline
On 4/15/23 00:25, David Abdurachmanov wrote:
On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 7:08 AM Jeff Law wrote:
On 4/14/23 20:14, Neal Gompa wrote:
We should not screw up with RISC-V in Fedora like RHEL did with ARM.
Yes, I'm saying RHEL's ARM strategy was a mistake, and still is, to
some degree. We
Once upon a time, David Abdurachmanov said:
> I would love to avoid supporting SBCs, especially as some of them are
> really not suitable for feature rich Linux distributions.
For me, my only interest in the foreseeable future for RISC-V would be
SBCs, as an alternative to ARM (e.g. Raspberry
On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 7:08 AM Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/14/23 20:14, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> >>
> >
> > We should not screw up with RISC-V in Fedora like RHEL did with ARM.
> > Yes, I'm saying RHEL's ARM strategy was a mistake, and still is, to
> > some degree. We see aspects of this being
On 4/15/23 00:10, David Abdurachmanov wrote:
We have to support SCBs as-is. We even have 64-core OoO (and even
dual-socket 128-core) systems coming that are still RVA20 (what I call
"a large scale SBC trying to be a server").
I think elsewhere you suggested treating the profile as the
Hi Zbyszek,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 1:55 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 09:34:14AM -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> > On Wed, 2023-02-22 at 10:30 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > > dnf --releasever=38
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2170647
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2170647
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-4821639cb4
chromium-112.0.5615.49-1.el7
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-fca191b57e
libyang-2.0.164-2.el7
The following builds
12 matches
Mail list logo
