(I'm announcing this myself as per https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3051.)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Revitalize_Forge_Macros
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community
feedback. This
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230818.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230819.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 8
Added packages: 10
Dropped packages:6
Upgraded packages: 77
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 9.48 MiB
Size of dropped packages
I am trying to package the software necessary to operate the LulzBot
Taz-6 3D printer. This seems to have been supported in previous versions
of Fedora [1], so I am trying to take ownership of retired packages.
Some of the dependencies should be broadly useful, like the arduino
package. I could
OLD: Fedora-39-20230818.n.0
NEW: Fedora-39-20230819.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 9
Dropped packages:6
Upgraded packages: 59
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 20.14 MiB
Size of dropped packages:26.80 MiB
On 19. 08. 23 19:44, Maxwell G wrote:
Hi Pythonistas,
%pyproject_save_files automatically handles marking license files
with %license when a build backend installs them into a package's
dist-info directory and the License-File header is specified in the
METADATA file. Currently, only setuptools
On Sat Aug 19, 2023 at 22:13 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 19. 08. 23 19:44, Maxwell G wrote:
> > Hi Pythonistas,
> >
> > %pyproject_save_files automatically handles marking license files
> > with %license when a build backend installs them into a package's
> > dist-info directory and the
(I'm announcing this myself as per https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3051.)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Revitalize_Forge_Macros
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community
feedback. This
Hi Pythonistas,
%pyproject_save_files automatically handles marking license files
with %license when a build backend installs them into a package's
dist-info directory and the License-File header is specified in the
METADATA file. Currently, only setuptools and hatchling meet this
criteria.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232889
Bug ID: 2232889
Summary: perl-ORLite-2.00 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-ORLite
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-917679773c
GitPython-3.1.32-1.el9
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-e2fcc4af81
llhttp-8.1.1-1.el9 python-aiohttp-3.8.5-1.el9
0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232294
--- Comment #7 from Scott Talbert ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #5)
> > How to prevent this kind of issue?
>
> We could add something like this to perl-Wx:
>
> Requires: wxGTK = %(rpm -q wxGTK --qf='%%{VERSION}')
>
> That
11 matches
Mail list logo
