Il 27/09/23 19:01, Stephen Gallagher ha scritto:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 12:59 PM Ron Olson wrote:
>> I mean this sincerely: Where is the excellent documentation? I admit that
>> I’ve been frustrated that web searches leads me all over the place,
>> sometimes the documentation is obsolete, or
OLD: Fedora-39-20230927.n.0
NEW: Fedora-39-20230928.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:31
Upgraded packages: 113
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 202.01 KiB
Size of dropped packages:2.83 MiB
Hi,
> On 28. Sep 2023, at 14:06, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> On 9/27/23 20:37, Alexander Sosedkin wrote:
>>
>> In fact, even Chrome can't be installed with the change properly reverted.
>> Guess I'll have to shelve the wide discussion for a while, we aren't ready.
>> =(
>
> AIUI the current
This email was sent both to the mailing list for raising awareness to
the community and BCC directly to the affected users from which we need
a reply. If you have received this email only from the mailing list, you
can ignore the next part.
Hello,
during our periodic check as per
* Mattia Verga via devel:
> Il 27/09/23 19:01, Stephen Gallagher ha scritto:
>> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 12:59 PM Ron Olson wrote:
>>> I mean this sincerely: Where is the excellent documentation? I admit that
>>> I’ve been frustrated that web searches leads me all over the place,
>>> sometimes
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 9:12 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Stephen Gallagher:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 12:59 PM Ron Olson wrote:
> >>
> >> I mean this sincerely: Where is the excellent documentation? I admit that
> >> I’ve been frustrated that web searches leads me all over the place,
>
* Stephen Gallagher:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 12:59 PM Ron Olson wrote:
>>
>> I mean this sincerely: Where is the excellent documentation? I admit that
>> I’ve been frustrated that web searches leads me all over the place,
>> sometimes the documentation is obsolete, or it’s someone’s blog
On 28-09-2023 21:12, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Stephen Gallagher:
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 12:59 PM Ron Olson wrote:
I mean this sincerely: Where is the excellent documentation? I admit that I’ve
been frustrated that web searches leads me all over the place, sometimes the
documentation is
=
#fedora-meeting-2: FESCO (2023-09-28)
=
Meeting started by sgallagh at 17:00:22 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2023-09-28/fesco.2023-09-28-17.00.log.html
.
Meeting
On Wed, 2023-09-27 at 11:56 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello packagers,
> here is the list of packages that still need a Python 3.12 rebuild
> for Fedora 39+.
>
> Packages on this list have broken dependencies and hence the users of
> Fedora
> Linux 39+ cannot install them at all.
> Moreover,
Hey
On 2023-09-27 11:56, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello packagers,
here is the list of packages that still need a Python 3.12 rebuild for
Fedora 39+.
Thanks for the reminder
sdyroffpython-ansi
I retired this package for rawhide and f39. As this was my first
retirement :) please let me
Il 27/09/23 23:49, Neal Gompa ha scritto:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 5:41 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 10:05:38AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 9:48 AM Richard Hughes wrote:
On Wed, 27 Sept 2023 at 13:23, Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
>
On Wed, 27 Sept 2023 at 22:41, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I'm not sure at all that it would be possible to do at compose-time...
> composes are taking around 3.5-4hours and thats after I have done
> a lot to speed them up, but might be worth some benchmarking
> to see how much slower it would be. If we
On 9/27/23 20:37, Alexander Sosedkin wrote:
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 11:19 AM Alexander Sosedkin
wrote:
Hello,
6 months ago, there's been a F38 blocker: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2960
Long story short:
RPM has moved to sequoia,
sequoia has started respecting crypto-policies,
Google repos
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230927.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230928.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 13
Dropped packages:31
Upgraded packages: 95
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 3.30 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On 27-09-2023 19:01, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 12:59 PM Ron Olson wrote:
I mean this sincerely: Where is the excellent documentation? I admit that I’ve
been frustrated that web searches leads me all over the place, sometimes the
documentation is obsolete, or it’s
I must say that I found appstreamcli to be to unstable in CI of projects that I used to
maintain, and file format documentation and validator source code reality diverge, and
behaviour is understandably changed between appstreamcli revisions. We had to disable and
later re-enable the metainfo
This email was sent both to the mailing list for raising awareness to
the community and BCC directly to the affected users from which we need
a reply. If you have received this email only from the mailing list, you
can ignore the next part.
Hello,
during our periodic check as per
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-981e9f53ff
chromium-117.0.5938.92-2.el7
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-ffb6e04eb7
drupal7-7.98-1.el7
2
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-49fe68774a
plantuml-1.2023.11-1.el8
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-9abc3565b5
chromium-117.0.5938.92-2.el8
1
It recently came to my attention that the klee package in EPEL 9
needed to be rebuilt against the LLVM 15 library that shipped in RHEL
9.2. I filed a bug for this [0], and then noticed it was assigned to
"Orphan Owner". It looks like the maintainer retired it from Fedora
[1][2] due the upstream
21 matches
Mail list logo