Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
That would probably avoid the koji display problem but is sure to
introduce packaging bugs. The macro call has been put in this particular
place because experience shows that reduces human mistakes. It's never
easy to do back and forths between two parts of the same
Kevin Kofler wrote on 03.02.2010 19:08:
Josh Boyer wrote:
It is. It's one step removed. There were people actively wanting to make
Zope/Plone work via a compat-python stack. It went all the way to FESCo
and got voted down. The zope/plone users were the target audience there.
There were
I would like to follow debian and add a tmpfs to /lib/init/rw , which would
serve as a transition from initramfs to real root for files from daemons, which
need to transition from initramfs, like mdmon, dmeventd, rpc.statd, etc.
FYI, /var is not an option, because it can be on a seperate
Le Jeu 4 février 2010 10:26, Till Maas a écrit :
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 09:20:12AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
That would probably avoid the koji display problem but is sure to
introduce packaging bugs. The macro call has been put in this particular
place because
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 11:09 +0100, Harald Hoyer wrote:
I would like to follow debian and add a tmpfs to /lib/init/rw , which would
serve as a transition from initramfs to real root for files from daemons,
which
need to transition from initramfs, like mdmon, dmeventd, rpc.statd, etc.
FYI,
On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 20:51 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, inode0 wrote:
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, Mike McGrath wrote:
I really don't know what our users are a measure of. I don't think it's
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 10:26:05AM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 09:20:12AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
That would probably avoid the koji display problem but is sure to
introduce packaging bugs. The macro call has been put in this particular
Compose started at Thu Feb 4 08:15:08 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
PySolFC-cardsets-1.1-5.2.noarch requires PySolFC = 0:1.1
PySolFC-music-4.40-5.noarch requires PySolFC = 0:1.1
doodle-0.6.7-5.fc12.i686 requires
Harald Hoyer (har...@redhat.com) said:
I would like to follow debian and add a tmpfs to /lib/init/rw , which would
serve as a transition from initramfs to real root for files from daemons,
which
need to transition from initramfs, like mdmon, dmeventd, rpc.statd, etc.
My bikeshedding
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bill Nottingham wrote:
My bikeshedding opinion is /lib/init/state might be better. But if
it's just to be temporary, why isn't /dev/.initramfs OK?
+1.
After starting udev daemon old content of /dev catalog will be hidden
(/dev/.initramfs too). So
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 11:49:46AM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Jeu 4 février 2010 10:26, Till Maas a écrit :
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 09:20:12AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
That would probably avoid the koji display problem but is sure to
introduce
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:41 AM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 20:51 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, inode0 wrote:
Sadly they don't have categories like the best linux distribution for
developers there.
Is that what we're doing? If so would
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 12:52 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
cdparanoia 547682
liboggz 556070
Fixed in rawhide.
- ajax
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561383
Daniel Walsh dwa...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
W dniu 04.02.2010 19:41, Erik van Pienbroek pisze:
Op woensdag 03-02-2010 om 19:33 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Julian
Sikorski:
Hello,
today I have decided to retire gnome-applet-netspeed. The upstream
repository has not seen a single commit which is not a translation in
ages, and with
On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 17:03 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
It's that time of the release cycle again, to purge the orphans before
we get to feature freeze. Any unblocked orphans will be purged by the
feature freeze. A list of unblocked orphans and the broken deps they
would cause is at the end
On 1/27/10 5:13 PM, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
... looking pretty good. Thanks everybody!
Did it go so well we can do it again?
That is, is there any chance of getting Boost 1.42.0 into F13?
--
Braden McDaniel bra...@endoframe.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
There will be an outage starting at 2010-02-10 17:00 UTC, which will
last approximately X hours. Outages will be small but noticeble for
small segments as systems are updated and rebooted.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or
There will be an outage starting at 2010-02-04 23:00 UTC, which will last
approximately 1 hour.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2010-02-04 23:00 UTC'
Affected Services:
Bodhi
Buildsystem
CVS / Source
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 11:26:22PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
No, my argument is that the problem this tries to protect against is
purely cosmetic, and is cosmetic in an area which has little practical
importance. That makes it very low in my priority scale. Nevertheless I
would support
Hi there.
I would like to rebuild all the binaries of the current versions
of Fedora 12 packages (that is, only the latest update of each
package). The reason I would like to do that is to extensively
test an experimental version of the toolchain.
Of course, the trivial for k in
On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 01:34 +0100, Milos Jakubicek wrote:
choose which threads they will follow. They definitely don't read
threads with such a provocative subject (I'd just mark it as read
In addition, starting a new thread with a provocative topic just because
you didn't like the ending of
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 22:12 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 01:34 +0100, Milos Jakubicek wrote:
choose which threads they will follow. They definitely don't read
threads with such a provocative subject (I'd just mark it as read
In addition, starting a new thread
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 18:39 +0200, Juha Tuomala wrote:
There are around 200 countries and some have quite long distances,
requiring to meet people face to face doesn't really sound very
feasible. Not being feasible doesn't remove the problem however.
Easier would be to write red warning
On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 03:34 +, Leigh Scott wrote:
I will take avant-window-navigator but I haven't got the time to go
through all the bugs reported against it.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/bugs/avant-window-navigator?
Is there any chance a bug zapper could help ?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561383
--- Comment #8 from John Griffiths fedor...@grifent.com 2010-02-04 17:15:25
EST ---
This occurs every time amavisd is
26 matches
Mail list logo
