2010/2/8 Christoph Wickert christoph.wick...@googlemail.com:
* edje -- A graphical layout and animation library
* eet -- Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and
compression
* epeg -- Immensely fast JPEG thumbnailer
* epsilon -- Small, display independent,
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Christoph Wickert wrote:
After more than 7 months John T. Guthrie III is now officially AWOL, see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514882 and my previous mail
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-January/130011.html
John owned 18 packages:
11
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 05:03:51PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
Unblocked orphan perl-MooseX-Traits-Attribute-CascadeClear
This package is only orphaned in devel and the perl-sig is watching it,
so maybe it should be retired instead of orphaned.
Regards
Till
pgpRU13h5W5iz.pgp
Description: PGP
Eric Springer wrote:
In my experience, it's only good for building opensuse packages. The
problem I had with building Fedora packages is that it builds against
Fedora at release, rather than against updates (and in my case
wouldn't even run on an updated system). I asked around on IRC and
John owned 18 packages:
* checkdns -- A Domain Name Server analysis and reporting tool
I'll take this one.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
perl-Padre has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Padre-0.50-3.fc13.noarch requires perl(Win32::API)
On i386:
perl-Padre-0.50-3.fc13.noarch requires perl(Win32::API)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
Compose started at Mon Feb 8 08:15:08 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
PySolFC-cardsets-1.1-5.2.noarch requires PySolFC = 0:1.1
PySolFC-music-4.40-5.noarch requires PySolFC = 0:1.1
blahtexml-0.6-5.fc12.i686 requires
Start End Name
Tue 09-Feb Tue 09-Feb Feature Freeze (Testable|Complete)
Tue 09-Feb Tue 09-Feb Branch Fedora 13 from Rawhide
Tue 09-Feb Tue 09-Feb Orphan Rawhide Packages
Tue 09-Feb Tue 09-Feb Spins Freeze
Wed 10-Feb Thu 11-Feb Create Alpha Test Compose (TC)
Thu 11-Feb Wed
On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 16:52 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
As I said, I don't understand much about them. i.e., I don't know what
they're used for. i.e., flippant answers aren't terribly helpful. =) I
am terribly sorry for only having shown up within the last decade or so,
I fully appreciate
On Sat, 2010-02-06 at 04:28 -0300, Mario Chacon wrote:
I am trying to get the XDG_SESSION_COOKIE value on SSH connection, but
I get an empty value, Why do I get empty value? Is it an authorization
issue?
This isn't really a Fedora issue, but.
You don't have an XDG session cookie when ssh'ing
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 12:03 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
* dxpc -- A Differential X Protocol Compressor
Yoink.
- ajax
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Jiri Moskovcak jmosk...@redhat.com wrote:
- it actually does work, but it's bug detection/analyse is too general for
some apps, this is something we know about and it's not in our powers to fix
(it's not even considered a bug). This is actually the reason why is
On 02/08/2010 05:36 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
Michael Schwendtmschwe...@gmail.com writes:
I believe ABRT shouldn't file a bug report unless it is filled in
properly.
Yeah, some of us have pointed out that before.
I'm happy about every detailed backtrace I get, but I would be even more
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 02:19:41PM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
fusecompress-2.6-3.fc12.i686 requires libboost_serialization-mt.so.5
fusecompress-2.6-3.fc12.i686 requires libboost_system-mt.so.5
fusecompress-2.6-3.fc12.i686 requires libboost_program_options-mt.so.5
the kde-sig is beginning work to prepare qt-4.6/kde-4.4 updates, which
will be landing in f11 and f12 koji buildroots shortly.
Maintainers of qt/kde packages, please be aware of this if doing builds
yourself. If you have any concerns or questions, please drop by
#fedora-kde on freenode/irc
With a burst of testing last week, we confirmed that our infrastructure
should handle No Frozen Rawhide
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/No_Frozen_Rawhide_Proposal . Feature
freeze is tomorrow, which is when we'd branch our source control, and
when we'd enact no frozen rawhide. The timing is a bit
On 02/08/2010 02:22 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 07.02.2010, 22:26 +0100 schrieb Karel Klic:
I
placed the list of found bugs to the Fedora wiki [2]. IMHO only bugs
with 2 comments should be closed, because 2 comments mean that the
package maintainer did not touch the bug (ABRT
Jiri Moskovcak jmosk...@redhat.com writes:
Such log would be nice, but it might take some time (even days) before
the app crashes again and I can imagine that could generate quite a
large log :-/ Maybe if it would store just last few syscalls...
Sure, some circular logging, the last few
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 15:40:48 +0100,
Thomas Janssen thom...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Same here, a slowly growing list of packages.
What's up with the maintainers of the packages? MIA? Most of the
packages in this broken-list are broken since some time.
glest got broke by the xerces
Hi,
here is another update of packages that are afaik going to be removed
from F13 tomorrow. I started to collect some end user feedback and until
now for these packages interest has been shown:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/muine
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Eric Springer wrote:
In my experience, it's only good for building opensuse packages. The
problem I had with building Fedora packages is that it builds against
Fedora at release, rather than against updates (and in my
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 10:36 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
You might like to install additional packages before actually running
the rpmbuild -bs, but rpm has no way of expressing this kind of
SourceBuildRequires.
By default, rpmbuild -bs fails if BuildRequires aren't present. This
suggests that
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 21:00 +0100, Iain Arnell wrote:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Eric Springer wrote:
In my experience, it's only good for building opensuse packages. The
problem I had with building Fedora packages is that it builds against
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 12:54 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 10:36 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
You might like to install additional packages before actually running
the rpmbuild -bs, but rpm has no way of expressing this kind of
SourceBuildRequires.
By default,
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 11:30 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 09:07:56 -0800,
Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
Even though we've been talking about No Frozen Rawhide for quite a
while, this will indeed surprise some people, so we will be trying to be
extra
On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:54:56 -0800, Adam wrote:
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 10:36 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
You might like to install additional packages before actually running
the rpmbuild -bs, but rpm has no way of expressing this kind of
SourceBuildRequires.
By default, rpmbuild -bs
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 02:19:41PM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
geglmm-0.1.0-2.fc12.i686 requires libbabl-0.0.so.0
geglmm-0.1.0-2.fc12.x86_64 requires libbabl-0.0.so.0()(64bit)
I have just rebuilt these, so it should hopefully be fixed in the next
push.
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-Google-AuthSub:
edd1363bd9db1e96d2cd2d4893d62537 Net-Google-AuthSub-0.5.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 8 February 2010 14:40, Thomas Janssen thom...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
2010/2/8 Rawhide Report rawh...@fedoraproject.org:
Compose started at Mon Feb 8 08:15:08 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
A list of packages that grows slowly.
This is just an update to let maintainers know that the changes to
LD outlined here :
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ChangeInImplicitDSOLinking
will be in fedora rawhide pretty soon.
The details behind what this feature will do, along with how to
get failing packages to build can be
Adam Williamson wrote:
Right, I was actually wondering about that the other day. How do Novell
deal with it? Surely even they don't have a patent grant for every
patent in the world that extends to anything anyone might choose to run
through OBS...
According to traceroute, build.opensuse.org
Jesse Keating wrote:
The major hurdle of having koji make use of repos of packages external
to it has been cleared though, that work went into koji recently.
I can verify this works. Today I successfully built a custom RPM that is
completely proprietary software using Koji installed on a local
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 11:35:35PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Till Maas wrote:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/showimg
The big problem with this one is that it's dead upstream (since 2006!) and
stuck at KDE 3 (which also implies that its kipi-plugins support no longer
Worth clarifying here: Rawhide or (and?) F13?
They are still the same thing, so both. gcc-4.4.3-5.fc13 is there right now.
Thanks,
Roland
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 18:47 -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
Worth clarifying here: Rawhide or (and?) F13?
They are still the same thing, so both.
They will only be so for a fairly short time, and you gave no specific
time frame for landing the change (only 'pretty soon'), so it was not
entirely
On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 14:16 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
because I guess they would just sit there until bugzapping period.
There's no 'bugzapping period', exactly. BugZappers work all the time,
but only on a small subset of all Fedora packages, we simply do not have
the manpower to cover all
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream:
b311a38e4d81f231d1c737501e2b0a63 Wx-Perl-ProcessStream-0.24.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi,
I saw these bug reports starting to flow in two days ago,
just in time to mention them during my talk on FOSDEM.
The problem seems to be that the rpm builder extracted the list of
dependencies of Padre from its source code. This did not notice that
Win32::API is use only when running on
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561383
--- Comment #10 from John Griffiths fedor...@grifent.com 2010-02-08 12:50:57
EST ---
Got this additional AVC.
Summary:
Author: andriy
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Net-Google-AuthSub/F-11
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1072
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
perl-Net-Google-AuthSub.spec
Log Message:
Initial import (accepted in #478683)
--- NEW FILE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539136
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539136
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539136
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2010-02-09 00:08:54 EST ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539136
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2010-02-09 00:09:20 EST ---
Hello,
I want to ask upstream about it ;-)
I used cpanspec for generating spec, but that doesn't help
if rpm automagically creates requires probably from Makefile.
In Makefile.PL are tests like:
requires 'Win32::API' = '0.58' if win32;
but it doesn't seem to work in this case. I was
Marcela,
cpanspec does the right thing. It creates the list of requires from the
list in META.yml.
rpm does the wrong thing by parsing the source code and looking for
use statements.
My advice is to trust cpanspec and not to use the rpm dependency
auto-generation. I do this by adding:
46 matches
Mail list logo
