On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 04:30:31AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
If every grouped update did that, Koji would be littered with special tags.
* problems with merging from the special tags (what if dist-f12-kde440 and
dist-f12-someotherlib123 both carry their own rebuilds of, say, compiz? It
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 12:59 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
I volunteer to help with buildroot overrides assuming that it does not
take that much time. I am located in CET/UTC+1, too. Is there maybe a
schedule about how well the timeslots are covered?
Great!
We don't really have a coverage list, but
Caolán McNamara wrote:
All these rpms are still linked to db4-4.7 instead of db4-4.8. They just
don't appear as broken dependencies because of the existence of
compat-db47.
Do we really need that compat package in the first place?
IMHO we should only ship compat packages when it can't be
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
In the file (hostfiles) that tells us what to copy in from the host
system we do use wildcards. But we only wildcard the minor and
release numbers, not the soname major number, since an soname bump
probably implies some sort of major change which requires human
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 18:22 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
If the ticket is assigned to a single person, I doubt we can do the
overwrites in a timely manner. Remember, I'm wasn't talking about a
single overwrite but about large build chains that require 8 or 9 rounds
of builds and up to 15
On 12/31/2009 04:31 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 12/30/2009 02:15 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
It would be nice if others could join in (be it virtual not necessarily
physically). So are there any takers for this ?
It might be useful to have a wiki page listing out the specific content
items
Hi,
I just logged into the bodhi web interface and clicked on my
updates. In the list I see a recent package I pushed to testing -
shorewall-4.4.6-2.fc12. When I click on it, it takes me to a screen
for luckybackup-0.3.5-2.fc12. Something seems to have gone awry with
the hash generation or
On 02/18/2010 02:35 PM, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
Hi,
I just logged into the bodhi web interface and clicked on my
updates. In the list I see a recent package I pushed to testing -
shorewall-4.4.6-2.fc12. When I click on it, it takes me to a screen
for luckybackup-0.3.5-2.fc12. Something seems
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 03:57:58PM -0500, Josh Kayse wrote:
On 02/18/2010 02:35 PM, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
Hi,
I just logged into the bodhi web interface and clicked on my
updates. In the list I see a recent package I pushed to testing -
shorewall-4.4.6-2.fc12. When I click on it, it
When: Friday, 2010-02-19 @ 16:00 UTC (11 AM EST)
Where: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
It's that time again: blocker bug review meeting time! Tomorrow is the
third blocker bug review meeting for Fedora 13 Alpha.
Here are the current bugs listed as blocking the Alpha release. We'll be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527848
Subject: make sure db upgrade to 4.7 and later works correctly
Proposed Fix:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=395003action=diff
Change Description:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=395003action=edit
Thanks,
--noriko
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Unicode-String/EL-4
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20747/EL-4
Modified Files:
perl-Unicode-String.spec
Added Files:
perl-Unicode-String-2.09-utf8doc.patch
Log Message:
- license is same as perl
- carefully
- Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu wrote:
So, I've been tinkering with a process to refresh or generate a
spec
file, with a couple goals in mind... #1 of which is make generation
and updating of Perl specs as routine and trivial as possible, so I
only have to think about the parts that
13 matches
Mail list logo
