Hi,
I've imported monodevelop-debugger-gdb for f13 and rawhide and have
tried to build it. Koji is going through the setup, but then falling
over on the build. Looking at the logs, it looks like a python
problem...
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2034431name=build.log
Can
On 03/06/2010 11:35 AM, Paul wrote:
Hi,
I've imported monodevelop-debugger-gdb for f13 and rawhide and have
tried to build it. Koji is going through the setup, but then falling
over on the build. Looking at the logs, it looks like a python
problem...
On 06/03/10 10:04, Till Maas wrote:
--snipped--
DB)
3) once a day a crawler reads all files and counts for each package how
often they are installed,
What about uninstalled?
Update bring in upd to X, but package Y,Z. come in.
User removes Y,Z without breaking anything.
I am not really
make tag TAG_OPTS=-F
make build
在2010-03-06?17:35:55，Paul?p...@all-the-johnsons.co.uk?写道：
Hi,
I've?imported?monodevelop-debugger-gdb?for?f13?and?rawhide?and?have
tried?to?build?it.?Koji?is?going?through?the?setup,?but?then?falling
On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 11:19:27AM +, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 06/03/10 10:04, Till Maas wrote:
--snipped--
DB)
3) once a day a crawler reads all files and counts for each package how
often they are installed,
What about uninstalled?
Update bring in upd to X, but package Y,Z.
On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 08:44:13AM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Paulo Cavalcanti writes:
« HTML content follows »
I am trying to build a package on F13, and got a gcc internal error:
URL:http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2034791http://koji
Compose started at Sat Mar 6 08:15:05 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
blahtexml-0.6-5.fc12.i686 requires libxerces-c.so.28
easystroke-0.5.2-1.fc13.i686 requires libboost_serialization-mt.so.5
While we are at it, here is another great update:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2010-3326
* New version introduced in F11.
* Doesn't fix any bugs but it's an enhancement only.
* Useless update description update to 4.7.1.
* And *of course* it was
Hi,
2010/3/6 Christoph Wickert christoph.wick...@googlemail.com:
While we are at it, here is another great update:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2010-3326
* New version introduced in F11.
* Doesn't fix any bugs but it's an enhancement only.
* Useless
Am Samstag, den 06.03.2010, 18:17 +0100 schrieb Michał Piotrowski:
Hi,
2010/3/6 Christoph Wickert christoph.wick...@foomail.com:
While we are at it, here is another great update:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2010-3326
* New version introduced in F11.
*
On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 06:49:03PM +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
maintainers, I think KDE or this update show that we were better off
with an official policy.
Did the mc update break something?
Regards
Till
pgpdxHb1B1LoX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
On 03/06/2010 11:28 PM, Till Maas wrote:
On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 06:49:03PM +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
maintainers, I think KDE or this update show that we were better off
with an official policy.
Did the mc update break something?
Even if it did not it would be useful to
2010/3/6 Christoph Wickert christoph.wick...@googlemail.com:
Am Samstag, den 06.03.2010, 18:17 +0100 schrieb Michał Piotrowski:
Hi,
2010/3/6 Christoph Wickert christoph.wick...@foomail.com:
While we are at it, here is another great update:
2010/3/6 Naheem Zaffar naheemzaf...@gmail.com:
2010/3/6 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com
Why I can install KDE 4.4 in F11 and I can't install latest gnome?
(I'm just asking because I'm curious, not because I use Linux on
desktop)
I think for many people the issue is not that it can be
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Rajeesh K Nambiar
rajeeshknamb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Peter Hutterer
peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
Rajeesh K Nambiar wrote:
Any pointers on how to migrate the 'enable touchpad tap-to-click'
feature from the existing .fdi
I thought to myself yesterday, 'what this long and fractious thread
about update policy *really* needs is some unscientific and
controversial numbers'. =) So, I ran a forum poll! Everyone loves those,
right?
Here it is: http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=241710
I tried to present the
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 08:14:38AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 13:27 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
Especially it needs to be made sure that only bugs created prior to
adding F13 to RedHat Bugzilla or the branching of F13, depending on
what happened later, are touched by
On 3/6/2010 9:04 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
I thought to myself yesterday, 'what this long and fractious thread
about update policy *really* needs is some unscientific and
controversial numbers'. =) So, I ran a forum poll! Everyone loves those,
right?
What do people make of this?
I
Am Samstag, den 06.03.2010, 19:03 +0100 schrieb Haïkel Guémar:
Following the previous thread on opencv:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-February/131584.html
Almost all packages have been rebuilt against opencv-2.0.0-7 (thank you,
guys !) except mrpt.
We didn't get any
Compose started at Sat Mar 6 09:15:12 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
blahtexml-0.6-5.fc12.i686 requires libxerces-c.so.28
doodle-0.6.7-5.fc12.i686 requires libextractor.so.1
easystroke-0.5.2-1.fc13.i686 requires
On Saturday, 06 March 2010 at 18:49, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Samstag, den 06.03.2010, 18:17 +0100 schrieb Michał Piotrowski:
[...]
Because I don't understand the
criteria for Fedora package update.
Why I can install KDE 4.4 in F11 and I can't install latest gnome?
Because the KDE
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
I thought to myself yesterday, 'what this long and fractious thread
about update policy *really* needs is some unscientific and
controversial numbers'. =) So, I ran a forum poll! Everyone loves those,
right?
Here it
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010, Adam Williamson wrote:
I thought to myself yesterday, 'what this long and fractious thread
about update policy *really* needs is some unscientific and
controversial numbers'. =) So, I ran a forum poll! Everyone loves those,
right?
Here it is:
Am Samstag, den 06.03.2010, 19:30 +0100 schrieb Michał Piotrowski:
I have seen some discussions, but I don't follow them. I'm waiting for
results ;)
Get involved, try to influence the discussion.
Pity. There are many Fedora policies that are useless for end users
like me, but update policy
Am Samstag, den 06.03.2010, 21:10 +0100 schrieb Dominik 'Rathann'
Mierzejewski:
On Saturday, 06 March 2010 at 18:49, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Samstag, den 06.03.2010, 18:17 +0100 schrieb Michał Piotrowski:
[...]
Because I don't understand the
criteria for Fedora package update.
Am Samstag, den 06.03.2010, 19:38 +0100 schrieb Michał Piotrowski:
2010/3/6 Naheem Zaffar naheemzaf...@gmail.com:
[snipped]
PS other places that have more stable updates also have their problems -
there are many users who dislike Ubuntu because bugs are not fixed and they
have to live
Good news everyone,
you can probably expect to receive more positive bodhi karma for your
updates in the future (or you already got unexpected much), because
there is now a script called 'fedora-easy-karma'[0], that makes
providing feedback a lot easier.
This makes it more important to consider
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
+1, Michał! People who want the latest and greatest have already updated
to F12 months ago anyway, so there is not much use in pushing new
versions to F11.
Why? I don't want to update/reinstall all my machines every 6 months.
And I
On 03/07/2010 12:34 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
I thought to myself yesterday, 'what this long and fractious thread
about update policy *really* needs is some unscientific and
controversial numbers'. =) So, I ran a forum poll! Everyone loves those,
right?
Here it is:
On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 11:16:45PM +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Samstag, den 06.03.2010, 19:38 +0100 schrieb Michał Piotrowski:
2010/3/6 Naheem Zaffar naheemzaf...@gmail.com:
[snipped]
PS other places that have more stable updates also have their problems -
there are many users
As there are no objections I have added to Sound and Video
v4l2ucp in comps.xml for F12-F14,
ucview for F11-F14, EL5 (Robert Scheck replied that I can do it)
and gtk-v4l for F13-F14.
Alexey Kurov nuc...@fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
2010/3/6 Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
+1, Michał! People who want the latest and greatest have already updated
to F12 months ago anyway, so there is not much use in pushing new
versions to F11.
Why? I don't want to update
On 03/07/2010 12:25 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
+1, Michał! People who want the latest and greatest have already updated
to F12 months ago anyway, so there is not much use in pushing new
versions to F11.
Why? I don't want to
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 03/07/2010 12:25 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
+1, Michał! People who want the latest and greatest have already updated
to F12 months ago anyway, so there is not much use in pushing new
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 12:48:23AM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
deal with the problems that might arise with the new version. But if the
new version is dumped upon me in the middle of a week, I'm left without
a choice. I have to immediately deal with whatever problems arise from
the upgrade.
On 03/07/2010 04:14 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
I'm just a guest here :)
I'm not a Fedora developer so my vote doesn't really matter.
Getting involved does not require a vote and any user position if
expressed in a constructive fashion does matter and is part of how we
can form a decision
2010/3/6 Michał Piotrowski:
2010/3/6 Orcan Ogetbil:
The numbers 11, 12 should only indicate the core
components revision number .
I'm not convinced to this philosophy. I have used a few Linux distros
in past 11 years, and this is something new to me...
I understand that. However there are
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 17:48 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
2010/3/6 Michał Piotrowski :
But you are updating to latest KDE in f11. So what is the deal with
full system update?
Time. A simple yum update or make a selective update takes a few
minutes. A whole system update takes more.
I've
On 03/07/2010 12:52 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Yet moreover you also have the option of updating bugfixes in
addition, leaving the enhancement updates out.
I really don't think I have that option. It might work in some cases,
but generally it's bound to fail.
A security update in an application
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 17:48 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
2010/3/6 Michał Piotrowski :
But you are updating to latest KDE in f11. So what is the deal with
full system update?
Time. A simple yum update or make a selective update takes a
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 01:28:32AM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 03/07/2010 12:52 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Yet moreover you also have the option of updating bugfixes in
addition, leaving the enhancement updates out.
I really don't think I have that option. It might work in some cases,
but
Em Sáb, 2010-03-06 às 18:00 +0100, Christoph Wickert escreveu:
While we are at it, here is another great update:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2010-3326
* New version introduced in F11.
* Doesn't fix any bugs but it's an enhancement only.
* Useless
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 05:32:11PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
can be packaged. Another obvious TODO is to get bodhi_update_str()
included in the bodhi client in fedora-python.
I'll be happy to take that patch.
Looking like I'll be pushing out an updated python-fedora next week.
Depending on the
Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Moreover you also have the option of updating security fixes only.
That option doesn't really exist, as was already demonstrated:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-March/131926.html
Björn Persson
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
On 6.3.2010 23:21, Till Maas wrote:
Good news everyone,
you can probably expect to receive more positive bodhi karma for your
updates in the future (or you already got unexpected much), because
there is now a script called 'fedora-easy-karma'[0], that makes
providing feedback a lot easier.
2010/3/7 Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com:
2010/3/6 Michał Piotrowski:
2010/3/6 Orcan Ogetbil:
The numbers 11, 12 should only indicate the core
components revision number .
I'm not convinced to this philosophy. I have used a few Linux distros
in past 11 years, and this is something new
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 03/07/2010 12:52 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Yet moreover you also have the option of updating bugfixes in
addition, leaving the enhancement updates out.
I really don't think I have that option. It might work in some cases,
but generally
2010/3/6 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com:
2010/3/7 Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com:
2010/3/6 Michał Piotrowski:
2010/3/6 Orcan Ogetbil:
The numbers 11, 12 should only indicate the core
components revision number .
I'm not convinced to this philosophy. I have used a few Linux distros
Why? I don't want to update/reinstall all my machines every 6 months.
Since you don't want to update every 6 months, you want people to keep
updating every now and then?
Cheers,
Debarshi
--
One reason that life is complex is that it has a real part and an
imaginary part.
-- Andrew Koenig
On 03/07/2010 06:47 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Again I say updates-testing! Leaving php-5.3 in testing on F-11 for
a couple months will warn the users what is coming up and gives them
plenty of time to adapt.
If you have a large codebase two months is barely enough time to even
big
2010/3/7 Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com:
On 03/07/2010 06:47 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Again I say updates-testing! Leaving php-5.3 in testing on F-11 for
a couple months will warn the users what is coming up and gives them
plenty of time to adapt.
If you have a large codebase two months
On 6 March 2010 17:00, Christoph Wickert
christoph.wick...@googlemail.com wrote:
While we are at it, here is another great update:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2010-3326
* New version introduced in F11.
* Doesn't fix any bugs but it's an enhancement only.
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 03/07/2010 06:47 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Again I say updates-testing! Leaving php-5.3 in testing on F-11 for
a couple months will warn the users what is coming up and gives them
plenty of time to adapt.
If you have a large codebase
Again I say updates-testing! Leaving php-5.3 in testing on F-11 for
a couple months will warn the users what is coming up and gives them
plenty of time to adapt.
If you have a large codebase two months is barely enough time to even
big evaluating a move
Then make it 3 months, 4 months...
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 03/07/2010 07:17 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Then make it 3 months, 4 months... Leave it in testing forever if you
get too many complaints. But make it available for those who want it.
updates-testing should not be used for this purpose
2010/3/7 Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 03/07/2010 07:17 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Then make it 3 months, 4 months... Leave it in testing forever if you
get too many complaints. But make it available for those who want it.
2010/3/6 Michał Piotrowski:
2010/3/7 Orcan Ogetbil:
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 03/07/2010 07:17 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Then make it 3 months, 4 months... Leave it in testing forever if you
get too many complaints. But make it available for those who want it.
On 6 March 2010 02:50, Adam Miller wrote:
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
We have various different definitions of the Alpha, it seems. The
working definition that QA / rel-eng have always worked on when deciding
whether to ship it is, broadly, 'can
Am Sonntag, den 07.03.2010, 01:49 +0100 schrieb Michał Piotrowski:
Let's consider a situation - I'm developing a project in php 5.2. This
project might work fine on php 5.3 - I don't know I didn't tested it
yet. I'm depending on 5.2 version. Testing this code for a new php
will take some time.
Added marketing in cc (probably better place for discussion).
Does it make sense to ship a small pdf (say having a title Welcome to
Fedora) or if possible a video for users as an introduction to our
distribution ?
If yes, because it makes sense to keep it as small/simple as possible
what should
On Sat 6 March 2010 5:54:11 pm Conrad Meyer wrote:
All Fedora developers are people, too -- please remember to show
some respect.
Be excellent to eachother
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Overview#Our_Community
--
Ryan Rix
== http://hackersramblings.wordpress.com | http://rix.si/ ==
Author: hvad
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Tk-DirSelect/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv27716/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
import.log perl-Tk-DirSelect.spec
Log Message:
--- NEW FILE import.log ---
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DBIx-Class-DateTime-Epoch:
1b3df66e26f6a78f52a2bab7b56d5279 DBIx-Class-DateTime-Epoch-0.06.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Author: cweyl
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-DBIx-Class-DateTime-Epoch/F-13
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21365
Modified Files:
perl-DBIx-Class-DateTime-Epoch.spec sources
Log Message:
* Sat Mar 06 2010 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 0.06-1
- update by
Author: cweyl
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-DBIx-Class-DateTime-Epoch/F-12
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21732
Modified Files:
perl-DBIx-Class-DateTime-Epoch.spec sources
Log Message:
* Sat Mar 06 2010 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 0.06-1
- update by
Author: cweyl
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-CatalystX-Component-Traits/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1551
Modified Files:
perl-CatalystX-Component-Traits.spec
Log Message:
* Sun Mar 07 2010 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 0.14-3
- update by
66 matches
Mail list logo
