Process to become package maintainer stalled?

2010-04-14 Thread Klaus Grue
Hello, In the process of becomming a package maintainer, the following has magically appeared when I log in to my Fedora account: To do queue: Miscellaneous Tasks Download a client-side certificate I downloaded a certificate April 11, got a reciept by e-mail, and used the certificate

Re: Process to become package maintainer stalled?

2010-04-14 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:01:50 +0200 (CEST), Klaus wrote: Hello, In the process of becomming a package maintainer, the following has magically appeared when I log in to my Fedora account: To do queue: Miscellaneous Tasks Download a client-side certificate I downloaded a certificate

radeon powersaving

2010-04-14 Thread Christoph Höger
Hi all, I was wondering if I could that last noisy fan on my pc to rest (sitting on my 4850): Is there any part of radeon powersaving yet in fedora 12 (in what package should it be, kernel, ati or radeon)? If so, where can I start testing? regards Christoph signature.asc Description: Dies

Re: Bodhi allows resubmitting an update with different packages?!

2010-04-14 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Sat, 2010-04-10 at 22:30 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 20:05 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote: How hard is it to use Bodhi properly? To be clear, there's nothing 'improper' about editing updates, it's common practice. You can suggest ways that the practice could be

Re: Process to become package maintainer stalled?

2010-04-14 Thread Klaus Grue
... the instructions there say I should wait for a fedora-cvs flag ... I can find no such flag ... Am I missing something? ... Things to check: ... 2) In the bugzilla ticket, do you see the Flags: field at the right? 3) If you log in, can you click Edit right of the Flags: field? 4) Then

Re: potentially unmaintained packages

2010-04-14 Thread Felix Kaechele
Hi Michael, On 14.04.2010 09:19, Michael Schwendt wrote: Why would it need to be rebuilt manually? You don't need to. If a package is working perfectly fine and no update is available there's no need to rebuild. Hey, this pkg hasn't been built, even in rawhide, in a while, maybe you should

Re: devkit-power-daemon broken?

2010-04-14 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 14:24 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com wrote: hey, I've had this issue for quite a while now. I have a HP pavilion laptop that runs a Fedora 12 (up to date) and vista (the original that came with the

Re: potentially unmaintained packages

2010-04-14 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:20:05 +0200, Felix wrote: Hey, this pkg hasn't been built, even in rawhide, in a while, maybe you should 1. check that out and 2. if the pkg is dead or unmaintained consider retiring it. It's stable, works, and is still being used by dependencies. Would I

Re: potentially unmaintained packages

2010-04-14 Thread Seth Vidal
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:03:55 -0400 (EDT), Seth wrote: Hi, I worked on a script back in January which produced a list of packages that needed to be looked at. The reason was that the pkg had not been built by koji into dist-rawhide by a

Heads-up: Configuration language changes in new varnish version

2010-04-14 Thread Ingvar Hagelund
varnish is a high performance http accellerator. I'm just to tag and build the new upstream version 2.1.0 of varnish. This new version has a change in the vcl configuration language that may need changes to existing vcl code. If you are using varnish, please read the release notes carefully.,

Re: radeon powersaving

2010-04-14 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 09:36:54AM +0200, Christoph Höger wrote: Hi all, I was wondering if I could that last noisy fan on my pc to rest (sitting on my 4850): Is there any part of radeon powersaving yet in fedora 12 (in what package should it be, kernel, ati or radeon)? If so, where can I

Re: Heads-up: Configuration language changes in new varnish version

2010-04-14 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 02:31:42PM +0200, Ingvar Hagelund wrote: varnish is a high performance http accellerator. I'm just to tag and build the new upstream version 2.1.0 of varnish. This new version has a change in the vcl configuration language that may need changes to existing vcl code.

Re: Reverting kaddressbook back to previous version?

2010-04-14 Thread Thomas Janssen
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Juha Tuomala juha.tuom...@iki.fi wrote: On Mon, 12 Apr 2010, Ryan Rix wrote: On Mon 12 April 2010 6:40:59 am Juha Tuomala wrote: I recall, that the earlier version had some level of Akonadi support as well, so in theory, would it be possible to revert the

Re: potentially unmaintained packages

2010-04-14 Thread Jon Ciesla
On 04/14/2010 05:20 AM, Felix Kaechele wrote: Hi Michael, On 14.04.2010 09:19, Michael Schwendt wrote: Why would it need to be rebuilt manually? You don't need to. If a package is working perfectly fine and no update is available there's no need to rebuild. Hey, this pkg hasn't been

F13 Beta release notes

2010-04-14 Thread Paul W. Frields
The Documentation team has prepared and posted a draft of the Fedora 13 Release Notes for the Beta release: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/drafts.html It's recommended that developers check out sections that are relevant or important to them. If you find that a page needs changes, you can use

Re: F13 Beta release notes

2010-04-14 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:20:32 -0400, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote: The Documentation team has prepared and posted a draft of the Fedora 13 Release Notes for the Beta release: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/drafts.html It's recommended that developers check out sections

Re: F13 Beta release notes

2010-04-14 Thread drago01
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote: The Documentation team has prepared and posted a draft of the Fedora 13 Release Notes for the Beta release: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/drafts.html PPC is no longer a primary arch, so the wording about supporting it

Graphics Test Week in progress: ATI/AMD today

2010-04-14 Thread Adam Williamson
Just a reminder to everyone that we're still right in the middle of Graphics Test Week. The NVIDIA Test Day[1] yesterday went very well, and of course you can still add results to that page if you didn't get around to testing yet. Today is the ATI/AMD Test Day[2], so if your graphics card is from

Re: Heads-up: Configuration language changes in new varnish version

2010-04-14 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 01:50:58PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 02:31:42PM +0200, Ingvar Hagelund wrote: varnish is a high performance http accellerator. I'm just to tag and build the new upstream version 2.1.0 of varnish. This new version has a change in the vcl

Re: intent to retire: kudzu

2010-04-14 Thread Nils Philippsen
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 16:45 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) said: I'd like to retire kudzu for F-13. Why? - There are places where it almost certainly does not work with current kernels - It's so deprecated that one of its replacements (HAL) has

Re: potentially unmaintained packages

2010-04-14 Thread Patrice Dumas
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 05:03:55PM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote: Hi, Hey, this pkg hasn't been built, even in rawhide, in a while, maybe you should 1. check that out and 2. if the pkg is dead or unmaintained consider retiring it. The junction with bug information is also interesting. I think

Re: F13 Beta release notes

2010-04-14 Thread Michael Cronenworth
drago01 wrote: PPC is no longer a primary arch, so the wording about supporting it should be removed. Sony recently removed Other OS support from all PS3 units. Should the Playstation line be removed as well? (I haven't updated my PS3 yet so I can still use Fedora) -- devel mailing list

Re: potentially unmaintained packages

2010-04-14 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 09:38:03AM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote: Am Dienstag, den 13.04.2010, 17:03 -0400 schrieb Seth Vidal: http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/misc/potentially-unmaintained/2010-04-13/ I see packages_by_user, pkgs_with_bugs and everything. What I would like to see is

Re: rawhide report: 20100413 changes

2010-04-14 Thread James Antill
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 22:03 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:35:09 -0700, Jesse wrote: I wonder if there's something about the commit message which caused the report to chop it off? No, it's a [fixed] bug in repodiff, which ignores %changelog entries added

Re: potentially unmaintained packages

2010-04-14 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
TK == Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com writes: TK Querying bugzilla is a comparatively expensive process so it's TK probably something we need to do by syncing the count of bugs into TK the db via a cron job. Any takers? I could probably whip something up. - J -- devel mailing list

Re: potentially unmaintained packages

2010-04-14 Thread Jeff Spaleta
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 6:09 AM, Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net wrote: I agree, and thought Seth made his point well.  I typically consider the set of things in Fedora I need to worry about to be the set of bugs assigned to me, plus the ones I've files, plus any FTFFS or broken deps I'm aware

rawhide report: 20100414 changes

2010-04-14 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Wed Apr 14 08:15:04 UTC 2010 Broken deps for i386 -- evolution-couchdb-0.3.2-2.fc13.i686 requires libcouchdb-glib-1.0.so.1 fwfstab-0.03-5.fc12.noarch requires kudzu hornsey-1.5.2-0.1.fc13.i686

Re: potentially unmaintained packages

2010-04-14 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 09:19 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:03:55 -0400 (EDT), Seth wrote: Hi, I worked on a script back in January which produced a list of packages that needed to be looked at. The reason was that the pkg had not been built by koji into

Re: devkit-power-daemon broken?

2010-04-14 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 16:44 +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote: There appear to be bugs on this issue[1][2] with lengthy discussions already having taken place. The bug has been reported in 9/2009, which is 6 months back. Can the concerned maintainers please prioritize this bug and squash it asap?

Re: potentially unmaintained packages

2010-04-14 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:01:01 -0700, Adam wrote: It seems to me that Seth quite carefully wrote his email specifically to forestall replies of this kind. Apparently it wasn't enough... Of course not. The subject says potentially unmaintained packages. The message makes a fuss about it, even

Re: potentially unmaintained packages

2010-04-14 Thread Seth Vidal
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:01:01 -0700, Adam wrote: It seems to me that Seth quite carefully wrote his email specifically to forestall replies of this kind. Apparently it wasn't enough... Of course not. The subject says potentially unmaintained

Re: F13 Beta release notes

2010-04-14 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 10:20 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: The Documentation team has prepared and posted a draft of the Fedora 13 Release Notes for the Beta release: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/drafts.html Thanks for updating the system requirements. However, this looks like a typo:

Re: Reverting kaddressbook back to previous version?

2010-04-14 Thread Ryan Rix
On Wed 14 April 2010 6:53:24 am Thomas Janssen wrote: On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Juha Tuomala juha.tuom...@iki.fi wrote: On Mon, 12 Apr 2010, Ryan Rix wrote: On Mon 12 April 2010 6:40:59 am Juha Tuomala wrote: I recall, that the earlier version had some level of Akonadi support as

F-13 Branched report: 20100414 changes

2010-04-14 Thread Branched Report
Compose started at Wed Apr 14 09:15:04 UTC 2010 Broken deps for i386 -- gnome-shell-2.29.1-4.i686 requires gobject-introspection = 0:0.6.9 hornsey-1.5.2-0.1.fc13.i686 requires libclutter-gst-0.10.so.0

Re: Can I have some documentation examples excluded from Abrt crash collection?

2010-04-14 Thread Karel Klic
Hi Jeff, Good idea, also the opencv package would use this feature for its Python programming examples. Current ABRT cannot ignore crashes based on paths, so it must be developed. Please file a RFE in Bugzilla, and include the filename mask(s) marking the files you want to exclude. I think it

Re: urgent testing call: F13 kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13

2010-04-14 Thread Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
On Mi, 2010-04-07 at 16:51 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 22:30 +0200, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote: On Mi, 2010-04-07 at 09:17 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: [...] Thanks to everyone for their testing, it's greatly appreciated. Based on the positive response

Re: Can I have some documentation examples excluded from Abrt crash collection?

2010-04-14 Thread Mathieu Bridon
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 21:53, Karel Klic kk...@redhat.com wrote: Hi Jeff, Good idea, also the opencv package would use this feature for its Python programming examples. Current ABRT cannot ignore crashes based on paths, so it must be developed. Please file a RFE in Bugzilla, and include

Re: Reverting kaddressbook back to previous version?

2010-04-14 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 15:53 +0200, Thomas Janssen wrote: On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Juha Tuomala juha.tuom...@iki.fi wrote: On Mon, 12 Apr 2010, Ryan Rix wrote: On Mon 12 April 2010 6:40:59 am Juha Tuomala wrote: I recall, that the earlier version had some level of Akonadi support

Re: Can I have some documentation examples excluded from Abrt crash collection?

2010-04-14 Thread Jeff Spaleta
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Karel Klic kk...@redhat.com wrote: Please file a RFE in Bugzilla, and include the filename mask(s) marking the files you want to exclude. I think it will be something like: /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/scipy/*/examples/*.py do you want that in Fedora

Re: Reverting kaddressbook back to previous version?

2010-04-14 Thread Rex Dieter
Matt McCutchen wrote: Please take the request seriously. If Tuju is right that most users would be better off with the older version, then that's what Fedora should ship. I appreciate the comment, but that oversimplifies things quite a bit. there are a lot of other packages and issues and

Re: Can I have some documentation examples excluded from Abrt crash collection?

2010-04-14 Thread Karel Klic
Dne 14.4.2010 22:40, Jeff Spaleta napsal(a): On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Karel Klickk...@redhat.com wrote: Please file a RFE in Bugzilla, and include the filename mask(s) marking the files you want to exclude. I think it will be something like:

Re: Reverting kaddressbook back to previous version?

2010-04-14 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 15:51 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: Matt McCutchen wrote: Please take the request seriously. If Tuju is right that most users would be better off with the older version, then that's what Fedora should ship. I appreciate the comment, but that oversimplifies things quite

Re: Can I have some documentation examples excluded from Abrt crash collection?

2010-04-14 Thread Karel Klic
Dne 14.4.2010 22:02, Mathieu Bridon napsal(a): I'm not sure if that could be used for my own issues with ABRT, but let me explain it. When I'm developing a TG2 application, I sometimes get a traceback (well, I'm not perfect :). ABRT sees the traceback, and wants me to report a bug against

Re: Reverting kaddressbook back to previous version?

2010-04-14 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 17:03 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote: You should have given this answer to Tuju's original question rather than snippily dismissing it. Whoops, sorry, I confused Rex Dieter with Ryan Rix. That remark was meant for Ryan, not Rex. -- Matt -- devel mailing list

Re: Can I have some documentation examples excluded from Abrt crash collection?

2010-04-14 Thread Roland McGrath
Ideally I think abrt's crash signature stuff ought to find two characteristic failures are the same, and so send a reporter to an existing bug report. Then that bug can be marked closed with an annotation explaining what you need to install. (Of course, it's also arguably wiser to have a hook in

Re: Can I have some documentation examples excluded from Abrt crash collection?

2010-04-14 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 14:14 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: Ideally I think abrt's crash signature stuff ought to find two characteristic failures are the same, and so send a reporter to an existing bug report. Then that bug can be marked closed with an annotation explaining what you need to

How should chains be done in non-rawhide?

2010-04-14 Thread Jeff Johnston
I am trying to update the eclipse-egit package to 0.7.1 and it requires eclipse-jgit = 0.7.1 which I just built. I would like both packages to be in updates-testing at the same time since use of the eclipse-egit package is the real test of the eclipse-jgit package. For rawhide, I just used

Re: How should chains be done in non-rawhide?

2010-04-14 Thread Jesse Keating
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 17:31 -0400, Jeff Johnston wrote: I am trying to update the eclipse-egit package to 0.7.1 and it requires eclipse-jgit = 0.7.1 which I just built. I would like both packages to be in updates-testing at the same time since use of the eclipse-egit package is the real

summer coding and you

2010-04-14 Thread Karsten Wade
I'm talking to you because I know some of you work at companies, organizations, foundations, consortiums, and so forth. And you may be in the perfect position to sponsor a student for Fedora Summer Coding. We're moving the schedule back an extra month to give a chance for more sponsors. The

HEADS UP: xorg.conf.d changes

2010-04-14 Thread Peter Hutterer
There will be another set of changes to the xorg.conf.d system, in rawhide and F-13. This may affect your input device configuration in X. My apologies for the inconvenience, especially after the Beta. Long story short, when the xorg.conf.d stuff went into rawhide we (well, I, so blame me for