Re: Reasons for hall monitoring

2010-05-08 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 05/08/2010 01:41 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote: Dne 7.5.2010 16:56, Przemek Klosowski napsal(a): It seemed like the combination of best of being completely independent and maintaining your own repository (what would be now called PPA; I haven't heard the term then yet) and having support and

Re: Reasons for hall monitoring

2010-05-08 Thread Matěj Cepl
Dne 8.5.2010 07:33, James Antill napsal(a): The thread was repetitive from a thread that had been shut down because it had degenerated way past be excellent to each other, and seemingly was restarted explicitly to incite more flames, misinformation and hatred. What if, somebody is not happy

Re: use MALLOC_PERTURB_ ... or lose

2010-05-08 Thread Alexander Boström
ons 2010-05-05 klockan 17:30 +0200 skrev Jim Meyering: I propose (seriously, now) to add this to /etc/profile, or to some always-sourced file like /etc/profile.d/glibc.sh: # Enable glibc's malloc perturbing feature in Rawhide. # http://udrepper.livejournal.com/11429.html read

Outdated Wine versions in koji?

2010-05-08 Thread Zoltan Boszormenyi
Hi, the latest version of Wine found in koji is 1.1.38, which was released in february this year. The latest mainstream Wine is 1.1.44. Why isn't there a newer version compiled for Fedora? Thanks in advance, Zoltán Böszörményi -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: usb_modeswitch 1.1.2 in Fedora 11

2010-05-08 Thread Huzaifa Sidhpurwala
Hi Bernie, Works for me, Since you are already a provenpackager i dont think you need explicit cvs access on that package, so i would say go ahead and thanks for doing it. Regards, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala. - Original Message - From: Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org To: Huzaifa

Re: Outdated Wine versions in koji?

2010-05-08 Thread drago01
2010/5/8 Zoltan Boszormenyi zbos...@freemail.hu: Hi, the latest version of Wine found in koji is 1.1.38, which was released in february this year. The latest mainstream Wine is 1.1.44. Why isn't there a newer version compiled for Fedora? You'd have to ask the maintainer ... there is a bug

Re: GConf error

2010-05-08 Thread Pierre-Yves
On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 13:24 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: (Since this might be a regression in gconf2, you might need to still add the %posttrans scriptlet wth the new scriptlets. If Colin knows that this is %a bug that won't be fixed in some versions of Fedora I'll add the killall %to the

Re: Outdated Wine versions in koji?

2010-05-08 Thread Andreas Bierfert
On Sat, 2010-05-08 at 12:20 +0200, drago01 wrote: 2010/5/8 Zoltan Boszormenyi zbos...@freemail.hu: Hi, the latest version of Wine found in koji is 1.1.38, which was released in february this year. The latest mainstream Wine is 1.1.44. Why isn't there a newer version compiled for

rawhide report: 20100508 changes

2010-05-08 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Sat May 8 08:15:06 UTC 2010 Broken deps for i386 -- almanah-0.7.2-1.fc13.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.11 almanah-0.7.2-1.fc13.i686 requires libedataserverui-1.2.so.8 anjal-0.3.2-2.fc14.i686

How this bug can come out of its dead-end? Any suggestions?!

2010-05-08 Thread Hedayat Vatankhah
Hi all, There is a bug in Fedora package management since FC4 (except Fedora 8) that potentially affects ALL of the Fedora installation DVD users (people who are not annoyed by this bug will probably find other alternatives more suitable (e.g. Live CD install, Network install or the new BFO if

Re: How this bug can come out of its dead-end? Any suggestions?!

2010-05-08 Thread drago01
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Hedayat Vatankhah heda...@grad.com wrote: Hi all, There is a bug in Fedora package management since FC4 (except Fedora 8) that potentially affects ALL of the Fedora installation DVD users (people who are not annoyed by this bug will probably find other

Re: How this bug can come out of its dead-end? Any suggestions?!

2010-05-08 Thread Thomas Spura
Am Samstag, den 08.05.2010, 15:31 +0200 schrieb drago01: On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Hedayat Vatankhah heda...@grad.com wrote: Hi all, There is a bug in Fedora package management since FC4 (except Fedora 8) that potentially affects ALL of the Fedora installation DVD users (people who

Re: Could someone, please, clarify situation with *-javadoc

2010-05-08 Thread Alexander Boström
lör 2010-05-08 klockan 00:56 +0200 skrev Guido Grazioli: Someone would disagree with me; however i think any decision is taken on that topic would be turned in a MUST (depend or not depend) for the sake of coherency. I can only think of rather far-fetched situations where such a dependency

Re: How this bug can come out of its dead-end? Any suggestions?!

2010-05-08 Thread John Reiser
On 05/08/2010 06:31 AM, drago01 wrote: The installation DVD is for installing the system that's it. That's only part of it. There's around 4GB of data, and more than a few persons would like to use via PackageKit after the initial install, too. I frequently install just the Internet Desktop,

Re: Outdated Wine versions in koji?

2010-05-08 Thread Rex Dieter
Andreas Bierfert wrote: On Sat, 2010-05-08 at 12:20 +0200, drago01 wrote: 2010/5/8 Zoltan Boszormenyi zbos...@freemail.hu: Hi, the latest version of Wine found in koji is 1.1.38, which was released in february this year. The latest mainstream Wine is 1.1.44. Why isn't there a newer

Re: Reasons for hall monitoring

2010-05-08 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
2010/5/8 Matěj Cepl mc...@redhat.com: Dne 8.5.2010 03:39, Stephen John Smoogen napsal(a): It is a blessing and it is a curse. Why do more developers show up at conferences these days running Ubuntu or Debian systems.. many who used to run Fedora or RHL? My very non-scientific survey has been

Re: GConf error

2010-05-08 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 12:26:17PM +0200, Pierre-Yves wrote: On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 13:24 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: (Since this might be a regression in gconf2, you might need to still add the %posttrans scriptlet wth the new scriptlets. If Colin knows that this is %a bug that won't be

Re: How this bug can come out of its dead-end? Any suggestions?!

2010-05-08 Thread Hedayat Vatankhah
On ۱۰/۰۵/۰۸ 06:01, drago01 wrote: On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Hedayat Vatankhahheda...@grad.com wrote: Hi all, There is a bug in Fedora package management since FC4 (except Fedora 8) that potentially affects ALL of the Fedora installation DVD users (people who are not annoyed by

Re: How this bug can come out of its dead-end? Any suggestions?!

2010-05-08 Thread Hedayat Vatnakhah
Hi again, /*John Reiser jrei...@bitwagon.com*/ wrote on ‫شنبه ۰۸ مه ۱۰، ۱۹:۵۴:۰۳‬: On 05/08/2010 06:31 AM, drago01 wrote: The installation DVD is for installing the system that's it. That's only part of it. There's around 4GB of data, and more than a few persons would like to use

Re: How this bug can come out of its dead-end? Any suggestions?!

2010-05-08 Thread Hedayat Vatnakhah
On ۱۰/۰۵/۰۸ 06:01, drago01 wrote: On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Hedayat Vatankhahheda...@grad.com wrote: Hi all, There is a bug in Fedora package management since FC4 (except Fedora 8) that potentially affects ALL of the Fedora installation DVD users (people who are not annoyed by

Re: How this bug can come out of its dead-end? Any suggestions?!

2010-05-08 Thread Frank Murphy
On 08/05/10 19:15, Hedayat Vatnakhah wrote: Please have a look at the last comments of the bug. Most of the implementation is done, the only missing part is how to mount the CD/DVD in PackageKit! Thanks, Hedayat If you can install gnome-packagekit-extra if using Gnome? Is houls allow

Re: How this bug can come out of its dead-end? Any suggestions?!

2010-05-08 Thread Richard Zidlicky
On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 03:31:04PM +0200, drago01 wrote: Why? The installation DVD is for installing the system that's it. strongly disagree. Many people do not like to spend much time during installation to decide which packages to install. It should be easy to do it after installation.

Seeking co-maintainers

2010-05-08 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi, I recently was offline for about a week due to health issues and realized that a number of my packages don't have any co-maintainers or could use more help and it would be quite nice to have a few more people taking care of these packages rather than relying solely on me. If anyone is

Re: FYI: NVR issues from f12 - f13

2010-05-08 Thread Kevin Kofler
Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 16:21:54 -0500, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: Here's a list of f12 - f13 with unclean update paths based on srpm. I'll work with FES to to go through and get some builds out. Some might make it in to F13 final, some will go out as

Re: GCC precompiled headers question

2010-05-08 Thread Kevin Kofler
Christoph Höger wrote: Unfortunately g++ also allows one single precompiled header per compilation unit. Does anyone know why? Because a g++ precompiled header is more or less a dump of the complete compiler state, which is loaded and from which compilation continues. Obviously this can only

Re: Seeking co-maintainers

2010-05-08 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 02:24 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Hi, I recently was offline for about a week due to health issues and realized that a number of my packages don't have any co-maintainers or could use more help and it would be quite nice to have a few more people taking care of these

Retire glib and gtk+ 1.2 from rawhide?

2010-05-08 Thread Chen Lei
Hi all, GTK+ 1.2 has been retired by upstream for 8 years and was deprecated in many linux disritbutions, e.g. debian arch. Few applications in our repos now depends on gtk+ 1.2 and there is no security support for it. I think it is time to retire it entirely from our repos, though it may break

rpms/perl-App-Nopaste/devel perl-App-Nopaste.spec,1.16,1.17

2010-05-08 Thread Iain Arnell
Author: iarnell Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-App-Nopaste/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv31735 Modified Files: perl-App-Nopaste.spec Log Message: * Sat May 08 2010 Iain Arnell - 0.21-2 - bump for rebuild with perl-5.12.0 Index: perl-App-Nopaste.spec

rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap/devel perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap.spec, 1.11, 1.12

2010-05-08 Thread Iain Arnell
Author: iarnell Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv4364 Modified Files: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap.spec Log Message: * Sat May 08 2010 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.13-3 -

rpms/perl-Email-Sender/devel perl-Email-Sender.spec,1.5,1.6

2010-05-08 Thread Iain Arnell
Author: iarnell Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Email-Sender/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv5200 Modified Files: perl-Email-Sender.spec Log Message: * Sat May 08 2010 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.100460-4 - disable t/a-perl-minver.t (fails under perl

Re: perl 5.12 status

2010-05-08 Thread Iain Arnell
2010/5/7 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com: Rebuild finished. Approximately ~150 packages didn't pass. Feel free to fix your package, I'll be going through list and working on the rest of them next week. I plan some list of failed builds later. Of those failures, many seem to need only a

File Test-POE-Server-TCP-1.10.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by yaneti

2010-05-08 Thread Yanko Kaneti
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-POE-Server-TCP: aeb6608793916ac5f7620e017026934e Test-POE-Server-TCP-1.10.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

rpms/perl-Test-POE-Server-TCP/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 perl-Test-POE-Server-TCP.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2

2010-05-08 Thread Yanko Kaneti
Author: yaneti Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Test-POE-Server-TCP/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv433/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log perl-Test-POE-Server-TCP.spec Log Message: Initial import --- NEW FILE

rpms/perl-Test-POE-Server-TCP/F-13 import.log, NONE, 1.1 perl-Test-POE-Server-TCP.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2

2010-05-08 Thread Yanko Kaneti
Author: yaneti Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Test-POE-Server-TCP/F-13 In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv677/F-13 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log perl-Test-POE-Server-TCP.spec Log Message: Initial import on branch F-13 --- NEW

rpms/perl-File-Remove/devel File-Remove-1.42.diff, NONE, 1.1 perl-File-Remove.spec, 1.30, 1.31

2010-05-08 Thread corsepiu
Author: corsepiu Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-File-Remove/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv2574 Modified Files: perl-File-Remove.spec Added Files: File-Remove-1.42.diff Log Message: * Sun May 09 2010 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org -