Re: libjpeg for F14

2010/5/25 Chris Jones > > > I'm curious as to what Debian/Ubuntu are using as a replacement for > libpng10? > > > Debian updated libpng10 to libpng12 long ago, they don't keep multiversion libpng. Almost all packages which still depend on libpng10 is dead.inupstream. Chen Lei -- devel mailing l

Re: libjpeg for F14

On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Chen Lei wrote: > repoquery --whatrequires --alldeps libpng10 > libpng10-0:1.0.53-1.fc14.x86_64 > libpng10-0:1.0.53-1.fc14.i686 > gnome-libs-1:1.4.2-15.fc12.i686 > libpng10-devel-0:1.0.53-1.fc14.i686 > gnome-libs-1:1.4.2-15.fc12.x86_64 > libpng10-devel-0:1.0.53-1

Re: libjpeg for F14

repoquery --whatrequires --alldeps libpng10 libpng10-0:1.0.53-1.fc14.x86_64 libpng10-0:1.0.53-1.fc14.i686 gnome-libs-1:1.4.2-15.fc12.i686 libpng10-devel-0:1.0.53-1.fc14.i686 gnome-libs-1:1.4.2-15.fc12.x86_64 libpng10-devel-0:1.0.53-1.fc14.x86_64 libpng10 is removed in many distributions including

Re: systemd (Was Re: tmpfs for strategic directories)

On Sun, 2010-05-23 at 00:34 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Sun, 23.05.10 02:40, Rahul Sundaram (methe...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > > > On 05/23/2010 02:36 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > > > > (And as a side note: systemd by default puts a tmpfs to both /var/run > > > and /var/lock). > >

Re: base kernel to build fedora

On 05/24/2010 04:12 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: >> what would be involved in keeping the vm updated to Fedora N-1 ? > > It is built with itself, all except the running kernel behind the mock > chroot. > Oh thats great ... thank you -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admi

Re: base kernel to build fedora

On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:31:09PM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote: >On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 01:14:07PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: >> On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 13:01 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> > On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 04:45:49PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >> > > People already ready run scripts

Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2010-05-25)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting tomorrow at 19:00UTC (3pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. = Followups = #351 Create a policy for updates - status report on implementation https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/351 = New business = #381 ye

Re: base kernel to build fedora

On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 23:31 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > It is certainly possible. Often in experimental state, but > nevertheless. > We have the technology for VMs. > > Right, sounds perfect for running a build system under... -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http

Re: base kernel to build fedora

On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 01:14:07PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 13:01 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 04:45:49PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > > People already ready run scripts to look for FTBFS packages now. Having to > > > deal with all of

Re: base kernel to build fedora

On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 13:01 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 04:45:49PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > People already ready run scripts to look for FTBFS packages now. Having to > > deal with all of these at once would be a real problem. Doing this this way > > allows u

Re: base kernel to build fedora

On Sun, 2010-05-23 at 17:21 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 05/23/2010 02:25 PM, Mike McGrath wrote: > > > > > I don't think anyone thinks rebuilding the builders every 6 months (and > > fixing all the bugs that comes with that) is a good use of their time. > > > > -Mike > > But a relea

Re: Compilation error building kernel-2.6.32.12-115.fc12

On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 05/24/2010 12:01 AM, Jarod Wilson wrote: > >> I didn't say there was a vanilla-kernel.src.rpm, but there doesn't >> need to be. You rebuild the Fedora kernel src.rpm file using rpmbuild, >> passing in the flag '--with vanilla', which res

Re: rawhide report: 20100517 changes

On 05/22/2010 12:27 PM, Till Maas wrote: > On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 05:40:45PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >>> Unfortunately I couldn't find a really good way to differentiate >>> between Debian from Ubuntu without using 'lsb_release -i'. >> >> /etc/issue contains that in

Re: Koji issue?

On Monday 24 May 2010 17:16:58 Jon Ciesla wrote: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2205859&name=root.log It's already fixed, you can just resubmit job. Jaroslav > -J -- Jaroslav Řezník Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno Office: +420 532 294 275 Mobile: +420 602

Re: Koji issue?

On Monday, May 24, 2010 10:16:58 am Jon Ciesla wrote: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2205859&name=root.log > > -J the gmp maintainer bumped the release which had a soname bump which broke the buildroot. it has been untagged so we can work out a plan to bump it correctly. De

Koji issue?

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2205859&name=root.log -J -- - in your fear, speak only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: base kernel to build fedora

On 05/23/2010 11:11 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > I still carry the scars from when mysql stopped building in brew, a > couple years ago. Not just rawhide, but brew in general. Eventually > (after a couple months of bewilderment) it emerged that the build > Frustrating I am sure - but it could hav

rawhide report: 20100524 changes

Compose started at Mon May 24 08:15:05 UTC 2010 Broken deps for i386 -- SolarModel-2.1-7.fc14.i686 requires libIrrlicht.so.1.6 anjal-0.3.2-2.fc14.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.11 anjal-0.3.2-2.fc14.i686 requires

Re: Compilation error building kernel-2.6.32.12-115.fc12

On 05/24/2010 12:01 AM, Jarod Wilson wrote: > I didn't say there was a vanilla-kernel.src.rpm, but there doesn't > need to be. You rebuild the Fedora kernel src.rpm file using rpmbuild, > passing in the flag '--with vanilla', which results in building a > (mostly) pure vanilla upstream kernel with

Re: systemd (Was Re: tmpfs for strategic directories)

On 05/23/2010 04:19 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Lennart Poettering wrote: >> So far response from the community has been very positive, but we didn't >> have a fedora-devel discussion about this yet, so we'll have to see >> whether we can somehow make the broader community as enthusiastic about >> th

Re: Quake3 security issue and non-responsive maintainer: Xavier Lamien

On 05/20/2010 10:44 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, 11 May 2010 11:10:39 -0800 > Jeff Spaleta wrote: > > >> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Jon Ciesla >> wrote: >> >>> Well, no, not if there's an easy way to find the existing stuff. Is >>> there a way to extract this info from Bugzil

Re: libjpeg for F14

On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 05:55:39PM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: >> The libjpeg version(6b) in Fedora is quite old(27-Mar-1998). >> And newer versions were released on: >> >> Version 7   27-Jun-2009 >> Version 8   10-Jan-2010 >> Versi

Re: libjpeg for F14

On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 05:55:39PM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > The libjpeg version(6b) in Fedora is quite old(27-Mar-1998). > And newer versions were released on: > > Version 7 27-Jun-2009 > Version 8 10-Jan-2010 > Version 8a 28-Feb-2010 > Version 8b 16-May-2010 >

Re: base kernel to build fedora

On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 11:11:57PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I could maybe buy "fedora N is built on fedora N-1", but there are two > problems with that: first, you'd need a separate build farm for every > branch, With mock running directly inside Xen VMs as is the case now, then yes. But with moc

Re: base kernel to build fedora

On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 04:45:49PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > People already ready run scripts to look for FTBFS packages now. Having to > deal with all of these at once would be a real problem. Doing this this way > allows us to spread out the fixing over time. The problem isn't FTBFS packag

Re: undefined reference to symbol 'SHA256_Init'

On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 12:58:32AM +0200, Uwe Kubosch wrote: >Thank you for your reply.  I was able to fix the immediate error by >linking with libcrypto as suggested. >Now I get > > gcc -o cmd/zdb/zdb -pipe -Wall -s cmd/zdb/zdb.o cmd/zdb/zdb_il.o > cmd/zdb/ptrace.o lib/libavl/libavl

Re: web-m and Fedora 14

On Saturday 22 May 2010 10:14:01 Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 20.05.2010 18:42, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 14:25 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > >> I'd expect most of the support to end up in F13 updates, so I'm not > >> sure a feature page really makes sense. > > > > This happ