Re: i386-class support changed in F-13?

2010-06-01 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 06/02/2010 12:09 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > It does work in F-12, the response for the lack of support in F-13 was > 'deal with it'. There is suppose to be a patch to emulate it in the > kernel but apparently it won't go upstream until its a generic infra > patch that can allow support of other

Re: systemd (Was Re: tmpfs for strategic directories)

2010-06-01 Thread Dave Airlie
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 07:58 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Dave Airlie wrote: > > So does gdm use multiple X servers, I wasn't aware there was any other > > way. > > So what does it do exactly? Spawn a new X server on the same vterm? Or on a > different vterm? What KDM does is to spawn a new X serv

Re: i386-class support changed in F-13?

2010-06-01 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 22:43:25 +0200, >  Gland Vador wrote: >> On 05.04.2010 14:48, Dan Horák wrote: >> > >> > I was trying to install i686 variant of F-13 to an Alix board (2D13 with >> > Geode LX) and got into troubles. The kernel boots

Re: rawhide report: 20100601 changes

2010-06-01 Thread Rakesh Pandit
On 1 June 2010 17:50, Rawhide Report wrote: > Compose started at Tue Jun  1 08:15:16 UTC 2010 > [..] >        iaxclient-devel-2.1-0.5.beta3.fc13.i686 requires liboggz.so.1 >        iaxclient-devel-2.1-0.5.beta3.fc13.i686 requires > liboggz.so.1(liboggz.so.0.2) [..] >        libannodex-0.7.3-13.fc1

Re: systemd (Was Re: tmpfs for strategic directories)

2010-06-01 Thread Kevin Kofler
Matt McCutchen wrote: > Please be careful not to take Lennart's remark out of context. A server > takes longer /than a desktop/ since it doesn't take full advantage of > systemd; it doesn't take longer than without systemd, because presumably > the SysV init emulation doesn't have a significant pe

Re: systemd (Was Re: tmpfs for strategic directories)

2010-06-01 Thread Kevin Kofler
Dave Airlie wrote: > So does gdm use multiple X servers, I wasn't aware there was any other > way. So what does it do exactly? Spawn a new X server on the same vterm? Or on a different vterm? What KDM does is to spawn a new X server on a different vterm. Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing

Re: Package maintainers -- want test results by mail?

2010-06-01 Thread Peter Lemenkov
2010/6/2 James Laska : > Greetings package maintainers, > > Want to get notification of any breakage in your just-built koji > packages? It would be great if rpmlint logs will be automatically generated on each koji build ans will be stored with oher koji build logs (in separate file(s)). This gre

Re: i386-class support changed in F-13?

2010-06-01 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 22:43:25 +0200, Gland Vador wrote: > On 05.04.2010 14:48, Dan Horák wrote: > > > > I was trying to install i686 variant of F-13 to an Alix board (2D13 with > > Geode LX) and got into troubles. The kernel boots fine, but when it > > should start initramfs the kernel panics

Re: Package maintainers -- want test results by mail?

2010-06-01 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 18:00:52 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > > Can I opt in for all packages I am the owner or all packagers I co-maintain > > with one command? > > one command per pkg, yes. > > autoqa-optin pkgname devel F-14 F-13 F-12 EL-6 EL-5 EL-4 That answers my question. If mail woul

Re: systemd (Was Re: tmpfs for strategic directories)

2010-06-01 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 09:58:37PM +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Sat, 29.05.10 19:48, Roberto Ragusa (m...@robertoragusa.it) wrote: > >> Well, I really do not want to flame anyone, but please consider that > >> the guy proposing the change already gave us pulseaudi

Re: systemd (Was Re: tmpfs for strategic directories)

2010-06-01 Thread Dave Airlie
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 02:33 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Roberto Ragusa wrote: > > In recent times some stupid (IMHO) ideas have been adopted in Linux > > just to copy what others do. Just as examples: the control of desktop > > widgets in KDE4 (functional GUI elements modified by a mouse-over???),

Re: tor-lsb -- hey, look, package script, don't complain to _me_. I'm just installing you.

2010-06-01 Thread Chen Lei
2010/6/2 Kevin Kofler : > Chen Lei wrote: >> The maintainer refuse some others to co-maintain tor package or help >> him to solve this issue. It's a bit complicated to fix this, fedora >> policy seems don't permit provenpackagers to commit a package if the >> maintainer are very unwilling to do so.

Re: systemd (Was Re: tmpfs for strategic directories)

2010-06-01 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 02:50 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Lennart Poettering wrote: > > It's OK if a server takes a bit longer to boot. > > A longer boot time for your server means more downtime if you need to reboot > your server for whatever reason. Please be careful not to take Lennart's remar

Re: Package maintainers -- want test results by mail?

2010-06-01 Thread seth vidal
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 18:29 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > seth vidal writes: > > > > > I just added autoqa-optout to fedorapeople. > > > > it does what you expect it to do and acts just like autoqa-optin > > Would it be a good idea to mention these scripts somewhere in > http://fedoraproject

Re: tor-lsb -- hey, look, package script, don't complain to _me_. I'm just installing you.

2010-06-01 Thread Kevin Kofler
Chen Lei wrote: > The maintainer refuse some others to co-maintain tor package or help > him to solve this issue. It's a bit complicated to fix this, fedora > policy seems don't permit provenpackagers to commit a package if the > maintainer are very unwilling to do so. It should be decided by fesco

Re: systemd (Was Re: tmpfs for strategic directories)

2010-06-01 Thread Kevin Kofler
Lennart Poettering wrote: > It's OK if a server takes a bit longer to boot. A longer boot time for your server means more downtime if you need to reboot your server for whatever reason. Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai

Re: systemd (Was Re: tmpfs for strategic directories)

2010-06-01 Thread Kevin Kofler
Roberto Ragusa wrote: > In recent times some stupid (IMHO) ideas have been adopted in Linux > just to copy what others do. Just as examples: the control of desktop > widgets in KDE4 (functional GUI elements modified by a mouse-over???), I only know of 2 plasmoids triggering actions on mouse-over:

Re: Package maintainers -- want test results by mail?

2010-06-01 Thread Sam Varshavchik
seth vidal writes: I just added autoqa-optout to fedorapeople. it does what you expect it to do and acts just like autoqa-optin Would it be a good idea to mention these scripts somewhere in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join? pgpF35QPUIyEW.pgp Description: PGP signat

Re: Package maintainers -- want test results by mail?

2010-06-01 Thread seth vidal
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 16:43 -0400, James Laska wrote: > Greetings package maintainers, > > Want to get notification of any breakage in your just-built koji > packages? This includes results of rpmlint [1], rpmguard [2] and, if > applicable, initscript [3] tests. Good news, you can now opt-in to

Re: Package maintainers -- want test results by mail?

2010-06-01 Thread seth vidal
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 16:32 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > Who gets the email? What if I am a co-maintainer, do I get the email or > does it go to the package owner? we send the email to the pkgname-owner email address so all the folks on that alias get it. > Can I opt in for all packages I

Re: FC13 nss-softokn-freebl update issues

2010-06-01 Thread Bill Nottingham
Elio Maldonado (emald...@redhat.com) said: > Getting back to > >> (i.e., libfreebl3.so instead of libfreebl.so.3)? > > No danger of the name class I alluded for nss but we still want to preserve > the names so as not to break other dependent packages. I wonder if aliases > may help in any way.

Re: Package maintainers -- want test results by mail?

2010-06-01 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 16:43:07 -0400, James Laska wrote: > Greetings package maintainers, > > Want to get notification of any breakage in your just-built koji > packages? This includes results of rpmlint [1], rpmguard [2] and, if > applicable, initscript [3] tests. Good news, you can now op

Re: FC13 nss-softokn-freebl update issues

2010-06-01 Thread Elio Maldonado
Bill, Getting back to >> (i.e., libfreebl3.so instead of libfreebl.so.3)? No danger of the name class I alluded for nss but we still want to preserve the names so as not to break other dependent packages. I wonder if aliases may help in any way. If we were to add, via the spec file, libfreebl.

Re: FC13 nss-softokn-freebl update issues

2010-06-01 Thread Bill Nottingham
Elio Maldonado (emald...@redhat.com) said: > I don't know when the 3 suffix was added. It may have been due to versioning > at some time but if I recall correctly we keep the 3 suffix to avoid a name > class with with the other nss package (name switch service I believe). Bob or > Kai can set m

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-06-01)

2010-06-01 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Forgot to attach minutes: 19:00:03 #startmeeting FESCO (2010-06-01) 19:00:03 Meeting started Tue Jun 1 19:00:03 2010 UTC. The chair is nirik. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 19:00:03 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 19:00:03 #me

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-06-01)

2010-06-01 Thread Kevin Fenzi
=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2010-06-01) === Meeting started by nirik at 19:00:03 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-06-01/fesco.2010-06-01-19.00.log.html Meeting summary -

Package maintainers -- want test results by mail?

2010-06-01 Thread James Laska
Greetings package maintainers, Want to get notification of any breakage in your just-built koji packages? This includes results of rpmlint [1], rpmguard [2] and, if applicable, initscript [3] tests. Good news, you can now opt-in to receive test results by mail! All you have to do is: 1. L

Nightly live spins moving on to rawhide

2010-06-01 Thread Kevin Fenzi
With the release of Fedora 13, the nightly live composes will start tracking rawhide as of today (2010-05-31). See: http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/ For logs, images and more information. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___

Re: i386-class support changed in F-13?

2010-06-01 Thread Gland Vador
On 05.04.2010 14:48, Dan Horák wrote: > > I was trying to install i686 variant of F-13 to an Alix board (2D13 with > Geode LX) and got into troubles. The kernel boots fine, but when it > should start initramfs the kernel panics. Everything works well when > using complete F-12 environment and when

rpms/perl-Mail-Mbox-MessageParser/devel Mail-Mbox-MessageParser-1.5002-warning.patch, NONE, 1.1 perl-Mail-Mbox-MessageParser.spec, 1.19, 1.20

2010-06-01 Thread Paul Howarth
Author: pghmcfc Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Mail-Mbox-MessageParser/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv28172 Modified Files: perl-Mail-Mbox-MessageParser.spec Added Files: Mail-Mbox-MessageParser-1.5002-warning.patch Log Message: Fix used-only-once wa

Re: FC13 nss-softokn-freebl update issues

2010-06-01 Thread Elio Maldonado
I don't know when the 3 suffix was added. It may have been due to versioning at some time but if I recall correctly we keep the 3 suffix to avoid a name class with with the other nss package (name switch service I believe). Bob or Kai can set me straight on this matter. Another thing that puzz

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-05-27 i386

2010-06-01 Thread Matt Domsch
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 08:36:44PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Is this a second run after fixing the tmpfs problem? > > I looked at your logs and still see build failures for libguestfs > which are down to 'No space left on device' errors. the run with the tmpfs fix is still in progress

Re: systemd (Was Re: tmpfs for strategic directories)

2010-06-01 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 01.06.10 15:25, Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) wrote: > Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) said: > > > > Requires=basic.target sockets.target dbus.socket > > > > After=basic.target sockets.target dbus.socket > > > > > > What does this goop mean and why is it necessary? > >

Re: systemd (Was Re: tmpfs for strategic directories)

2010-06-01 Thread Roberto Ragusa
Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Sat, 29.05.10 19:48, Roberto Ragusa (m...@robertoragusa.it) wrote: >> Well, I really do not want to flame anyone, but please consider that >> the guy proposing the change already gave us pulseaudio, which promised the >> "it will do anything you do now, just easier" f

Re: rebuild of packages dependent on perl

2010-06-01 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 02:49:52PM +0200, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: > If your package didn't pass rebuild, we (Perl-SIG) will be happy if you > fix it by yourself. If you can't, don't panic. We'll be looking at > packages, which didn't pass. Also you can ask for help at: > perl-de...@lists.fed

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-05-27 i386

2010-06-01 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
Is this a second run after fixing the tmpfs problem? I looked at your logs and still see build failures for libguestfs which are down to 'No space left on device' errors. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones virt-p2v converts physical machines

Re: systemd (Was Re: tmpfs for strategic directories)

2010-06-01 Thread Bill Nottingham
Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) said: > > > Requires=basic.target sockets.target dbus.socket > > > After=basic.target sockets.target dbus.socket > > > > What does this goop mean and why is it necessary? > > basic.target encapsulates the early boot process (kinda the same stuff > rc.sys

Re: FC13 nss-softokn-freebl update issues

2010-06-01 Thread Bill Nottingham
Elio Maldonado (emald...@redhat.com) said: > Not sure but I strongly suspect a change made to nss.spec to be the cause. > See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596840#c7 It's due to the fact that nss-softokn-freebl (actually, *all* the nss/nspr libraires) do not fit the normal library

Re: rebuild of packages dependent on perl

2010-06-01 Thread Chen Lei
2010/6/1 Marcela Mašláňová : > Hello maintainers, > I started rebuild of packages dependent on perl. At the moment are packages > rebuilt in > test buildroot dist-f14-perltest. It's quite possible that some will fail > with new perl-5.12.0. > If your package didn't pass rebuild, we (Perl-SIG) will

Re: libjpeg for F14

2010-06-01 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 01:35:20PM +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: > Hi, > > I'm still interested in seeing a linjpeg-turbo merger with ijg's own > code base. I'd say that the most performance boost brought in by > libjpeg-turbo is due to the specialized SIMD routines, which > theoretically can be easil

Re: tor-lsb -- hey, look, package script, don't complain to _me_. I'm just installing you.

2010-06-01 Thread Chen Lei
2010/6/2 Paul Wouters : > On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > Does FESCO know you'd be willing to become the maintainer? >>> >>> I've definately talked to quite a few of them (online and in person) over >>> the years this has been going on. I even had a tor package made and >>> submit

Re: tor-lsb -- hey, look, package script, don't complain to _me_. I'm just installing you.

2010-06-01 Thread Chen Lei
2010/6/1 Bruno Wolff III : >> I've definately talked to quite a few of them (online and in person) over >> the years this has been going on. I even had a tor package made and >> submitted it, but Enrico and my package crossed paths and his was a day >> earlier, so his "personal" version instead of

Re: tor-lsb -- hey, look, package script, don't complain to _me_. I'm just installing you.

2010-06-01 Thread Paul Wouters
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >>> Does FESCO know you'd be willing to become the maintainer? >> >> I've definately talked to quite a few of them (online and in person) over >> the years this has been going on. I even had a tor package made and >> submitted it, but Enrico and my packag

Re: tor-lsb -- hey, look, package script, don't complain to _me_. I'm just installing you.

2010-06-01 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 11:48:02 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > >>Fixing init scripts and %post is now left in the state "maintainer is too > >>busy to fix". In the past I already offered co-maintainership or taking > >>over the package due to my clo

Re: tor-lsb -- hey, look, package script, don't complain to _me_. I'm just installing you.

2010-06-01 Thread Paul Wouters
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >> Fixing init scripts and %post is now left in the state "maintainer is too >> busy to fix". In the past I already offered co-maintainership or taking >> over the package due to my close relationship with upstream. It's a lame >> excuse for leaving it in

[Bug 598539] perl-Padre-0.62 bump

2010-06-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598539 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 598539] perl-Padre-0.62 bump

2010-06-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598539 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar 2010-06-01 11:29:40 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=418683) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/a

[Bug 598539] perl-Padre-0.62 bump

2010-06-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598539 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 598539] New: perl-Padre-0.62 bump

2010-06-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Padre-0.62 bump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598539 Summary: perl-Padre-0.62 bump Product: Fedora Version: rawhide

[Bug 598539] perl-Padre-0.62 bump

2010-06-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598539 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: status of some packages ??

2010-06-01 Thread Tom "spot" Callaway
On 05/29/2010 07:25 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > JBoss[1] is still a *big* deficit. Potential for f14/15 ? I'm pretty sure JBoss is still a no-go because of poor licensing, specifically: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479598 ~spot -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.

rpms/perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream/devel .cvsignore, 1.4, 1.5 perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream.spec, 1.8, 1.9 sources, 1.4, 1.5

2010-06-01 Thread Petr Pisar
Author: ppisar Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12085 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream.spec sources Log Message: 0.27 bump Index: .cvsignore

Re: tor-lsb -- hey, look, package script, don't complain to _me_. I'm just installing you.

2010-06-01 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 16:55:26 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > > Fixing init scripts and %post is now left in the state "maintainer is too > busy to fix". In the past I already offered co-maintainership or taking > over the package due to my close relationship with upstream. It's a lame > excuse

Re: libjpeg for F14

2010-06-01 Thread Adam Tkac
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 01:35:20PM +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: > Hi, Hello, > I'm still interested in seeing a linjpeg-turbo merger with ijg's own > code base. I'd say that the most performance boost brought in by > libjpeg-turbo is due to the specialized SIMD routines, which > theoretically can be

File Template-Tiny-0.11.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

2010-06-01 Thread Petr Pisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Template-Tiny: 5bb697dff7ff41f6894906233b205560 Template-Tiny-0.11.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m

Re: systemd (Was Re: tmpfs for strategic directories)

2010-06-01 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 01.06.10 05:53, Mike Fedyk (mfe...@mikefedyk.com) wrote: > On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Lennart Poettering > wrote: > > On Tue, 01.06.10 01:56, Mike Fedyk (mfe...@mikefedyk.com) wrote: > > > >> > KillMode=control-group → the entire cgroup is shot down > >> > KillMode=process-group → o

Re: systemd (Was Re: tmpfs for strategic directories)

2010-06-01 Thread Dhaval Giani
> What type of cgroup are you using?  Does it impede the use of lxc for > containers?  Ie, the cgroup type that systemd needs to be able to be > nested inside a container in a whole OS virtualization (think VPS / > Virtual Private Server where each VPS has root in its container). > systemd uses a

Re: systemd (Was Re: tmpfs for strategic directories)

2010-06-01 Thread Mike Fedyk
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Tue, 01.06.10 01:56, Mike Fedyk (mfe...@mikefedyk.com) wrote: > >> > KillMode=control-group → the entire cgroup is shot down >> > KillMode=process-group → only the process group of the process we forked >> > is shot down >> > KillMode

rebuild of packages dependent on perl

2010-06-01 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
Hello maintainers, I started rebuild of packages dependent on perl. At the moment are packages rebuilt in test buildroot dist-f14-perltest. It's quite possible that some will fail with new perl-5.12.0. If your package didn't pass rebuild, we (Perl-SIG) will be happy if you fix it by yourself. I

Re: libjpeg for F14

2010-06-01 Thread Ilyes Gouta
Hi, I'm still interested in seeing a linjpeg-turbo merger with ijg's own code base. I'd say that the most performance boost brought in by libjpeg-turbo is due to the specialized SIMD routines, which theoretically can be easily merged. libjpeg-turbo has also some weaknesses such as (as provided fro

rawhide report: 20100601 changes

2010-06-01 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Tue Jun 1 08:15:16 UTC 2010 Broken deps for i386 -- almanah-0.7.3-1.fc14.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.12 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libgladeui-1.so.9 banshee-1.6.1-1.fc14.i686 req

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-05-27 x86_64

2010-06-01 Thread Dan Horák
Matt Domsch píše v Po 31. 05. 2010 v 12:43 -0500: > Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64 > using rawhide from 2010-05-27 > > This is a full rebuild, the first for Fedora 14's rawhide. The > builders all have Fedora 13 installed. > > Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedor

Re: systemd (Was Re: tmpfs for strategic directories)

2010-06-01 Thread Nils Philippsen
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 04:13 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Wed, 26.05.10 22:06, Björn Persson (bj...@rombobjörn.se) wrote: > > > This suggests to me that environment variables isn't the right way to do > > this. > > Environment variables are good for parameters that should be available t

Re: systemd (Was Re: tmpfs for strategic directories)

2010-06-01 Thread Nils Philippsen
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 04:13 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Wed, 26.05.10 22:06, Björn Persson (bj...@rombobjörn.se) wrote: > > > This suggests to me that environment variables isn't the right way to do > > this. > > Environment variables are good for parameters that should be available to

Re: systemd (Was Re: tmpfs for strategic directories)

2010-06-01 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 01.06.10 01:56, Mike Fedyk (mfe...@mikefedyk.com) wrote: > > KillMode=control-group → the entire cgroup is shot down > > KillMode=process-group → only the process group of the process we forked is > > shot down > > KillMode=process → only the process we forked is shot down > > KillMode=no

Re: libjpeg for F14

2010-06-01 Thread Adam Tkac
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:51:56PM -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Adam Tkac wrote: > > On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 05:33:38PM +0200, Adam Tkac wrote: > >> > >> I'm going to create a Fedora feature for this task. > > > > Done. You can check > > http://fedoraproject.org/w

[Bug 597707] please update perl-Software-License to latest upstream release

2010-06-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597707 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Berrange 2010-06-01 05:48:36 EDT --- I'm fine with you updating Software::License to the newest upst

Re: systemd (Was Re: tmpfs for strategic directories)

2010-06-01 Thread Nils Philippsen
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 02:52 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Wed, 26.05.10 14:47, Simo Sorce (sso...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > > environment variables are normally inherited when forking/execing. We > > > want to make sure that only the process we actually start ourselves > > > parses and hand

Project packages.acl.org.ua - Find Linux Packages

2010-06-01 Thread Nikolay Ulyanitsky
Hi, friends! Let me introduce a project for finding and downloading Linux software and packages. The project provides next features: * Large, daily updated database with RPM and DEB packages for well-known repositories of the Fedora, CentOS, RHEL, Debian, Ubuntu and OpenSuse distributions. * Pac

Re: systemd (Was Re: tmpfs for strategic directories)

2010-06-01 Thread Mike Fedyk
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Wed, 26.05.10 09:01, Jeff Spaleta (jspal...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> >> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 5:55 AM, Lennart Poettering >> wrote: >> > Well, that depends on configuration. >> >> > In systemd you can choose individually for each uni

Re: libjpeg for F14

2010-06-01 Thread Adam Tkac
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 06:58:37PM +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: > Hi Adam, Hello Ilyes, > > it also contains bunch of > > pure algorithmic enhancements so even if target platform doesn't > > support MMX/SSE libjpeg-turbo is around 25% faster than original libjpeg. > > Can you please give some detai

Re: Missing deltarpms?

2010-06-01 Thread Kamil Paral
- "Jonathan Dieter" wrote: > It seems that deltarpms aren't being kept from one push to another > for > Fedora 13 (and, also it seems, Fedora 11). For example, there's an > openoffice update, but though there were deltarpms when it first came > out, they've gone now. Where should I report

[Test-Announce] Bugzappers Meeting Agenda for 2010-06-01

2010-06-01 Thread Adam Williamson
Event: Fedora Bug Triage Meeting Date: 2010-06-01 Time: 15:00 UTC Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net We haven't had a meeting for a while, so let's go for it today! Don't have anything particular on the agenda, though. If anyone has a topic they'd like to discuss, please reply to this e

rpms/perl-Archive-RPM/devel .cvsignore, 1.3, 1.4 perl-Archive-RPM.spec, 1.7, 1.8 sources, 1.3, 1.4

2010-06-01 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
Author: mmaslano Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Archive-RPM/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv15365 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-Archive-RPM.spec sources Log Message: * Thu Apr 29 2010 Marcela Maslanova - 0.05-2 - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 Index: .cvs

File Archive-RPM-0.06.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by mmaslano

2010-06-01 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Archive-RPM: 84713eba698fcb30992846dee77a4dc6 Archive-RPM-0.06.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm

Missing deltarpms?

2010-06-01 Thread Jonathan Dieter
It seems that deltarpms aren't being kept from one push to another for Fedora 13 (and, also it seems, Fedora 11). For example, there's an openoffice update, but though there were deltarpms when it first came out, they've gone now. Where should I report the bug? Jonathan signature.asc Descripti

Re: systemd (Was Re: tmpfs for strategic directories)

2010-06-01 Thread shmuel siegel
On 6/1/2010 5:45 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > Guys, nobody wants to take away configuration options. You can edit the > .service files too, and readjust things. You can even plug in shell > scripts here and there and wherever it suits you. > > There are not plans to make configuration of systemd